« Morning Briefs: Stuff You Probably Have Already Read Somewhere Else | Main | MSM Empathizes with Stressed Out Jihadist »

November 9, 2009

Back to the Future

Posted by Gregory of Yardale at November 9, 2009 5:38 AM

Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano provides the official Obamunist position on the Fort Hood terror attack; and that position is prostrate, with the head buried deeply in the sand.

Napolitano said her agency is working with state and local groups to try to deflect any anti-Muslim anger after the Thursday attacks by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The shootings left 13 people dead and 29 wounded.
“This was an individual who does not, obviously, represent the Muslim faith,” she said after meeting with a group of women university students.

The man was screaming Allahu-Akbar as he slaughtered our soldiers, including a pregnant woman. He attended the same radical mosque as the 9-11 hijackers whose imam has praised the attack. He described American soldiers as "infidels who should have their throats slit." How many dots to you need to connect, woman? The Obama Regime is more concerned with not hurting Muslim feelings than it is with protecting American lives. To Janet Napolitano, the real terror threat, as identified in her department memo, are tea-partiers, pro-lifers, and anti-tax activists.

This is a replay of Clinton Administration policies: Multiple terror attacks on the United States (in Kenya, Tanzania, the Khobar Towers, the USS Cole) were ignored. Reports that Muslim radicals were signing up for flight school but cutting class on the days when landings were covered were ignored. Instead, the Clinton administration ordered the FBI to focus on threats to abortion mills.

Ignore Islamic terrorism, and use the FBI to persecute political opponents. All of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again.

"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein


And those 300+ Japanese airmen also acted individually. . . in no way did they represent the Empire of Japan.

Posted by: JustAl at November 9, 2009 6:08 AM

It's incredible how the Obama administration goes to lenghts just to protect muslims. What's so great about them, anyway? They're citizens that demand a backward society with no civil rights, why do the left protect them? They are the antithesis of the liberal philosophy!

Posted by: Jay B at November 9, 2009 6:27 AM

It's a matter of resource allocation. If they devoted actual time and manpower to prevent Islamic terrorist threats, they wouldn't have time to track the Real Deal™:

Tea partiers, free-marketers, small-governmenters, Second Amendment bitterclingers, Bible-believers... "Racists," in short.

Posted by: Conservigilant at November 9, 2009 6:38 AM

What will the left do anyway once it got hold of America, in the very unlikely case of no uprising? They let the muslims do what they want and give them a muslim state? How do you think muslims feel about abortion? Women's rights?

Posted by: Jay B at November 9, 2009 6:43 AM

...why do the left protect them? They are the antithesis of the liberal philosophy!

Here's the code cracked, Jay B. (N.B.: only works if you use the word "liberal" in its classical sense.)

Or as Jamie Glazov put it: "United in Hate." (Great book, by the way, except for getting it wrong about Islamic anti-semitism, thinking it's an import from Europe rather than homegrown.)

Posted by: Conservigilant at November 9, 2009 6:43 AM

This tragedy is a perfect example of why gun bans only serve to disarm the good guys. Military base, Convenience Store, Shopping Mall, you name it. Someone intent upon mayhem has long passed consideration of any firearm restrictions.

Posted by: Jacob at November 9, 2009 6:51 AM

...why do the left protect them?

The Progressive Left hates America. Islamic jihadists hate America. The enemy of one's enemy is one's friend.

Posted by: V the K at November 9, 2009 6:53 AM

When the "Christian" guy shot the Tiller the Killer, were the Obamatrons out saying this guy didnt represent Christianity and they would seek to quell any possible violence against Christians?

Posted by: Bad Robot! at November 9, 2009 6:53 AM

Ugly horsey Janet can try and "deflect anti-muslim anger" all she wants. Not buying it.

Posted by: Karin at November 9, 2009 10:00 AM

This Hasan stoolsample was able to kill people due to the same underlying PC mentality that focuses on itself instead of reality.

PC policies infiltrate the Armed services, Academia, every Public and Private Corporation or company and of course the Government.

I believe a US Army General just came out and said that if someone had brought up a negative issue about a muslim, his Army career would be over.
Absolutely true. And the same consequences would and have been realized in Academia, Corporate America and Government.

PC needs to be crushed and we need to be able to call a muslim a terrorist.

PC has effectively squelched not only free speech, but our survival instinct.

Posted by: Fiberal at November 9, 2009 3:23 PM

Is that the big 0's face in the smoke from the tower?

More and more I see that we have been warned yet we let them continue to kill.

If we don't send them packing we are just asking for more.

Posted by: FREE at November 10, 2009 9:41 AM

Post a comment

Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)