moonbattery.gif


« Bette Midler's Village Is Missing Its Idiot | Main | Open Thread »


September 30, 2009

Folsom Street Kiddy Fashion

One more shot of last weekend's Folsom Street Fair in San Fransicko — work safe, yet still more disturbing than the others:

fetish-tots.jpg

Small children have been seen at events like this in the past, sometimes wearing S&M fetish accessories:

folsom_street_fair_children.jpg

Once homosexuality has been mainstreamed, sexualizing children could be the next frontier in the culture war.

On a tip from Andrew Cain.

Posted by Van Helsing at September 30, 2009 6:52 AM

Comments

The next front? Look at Roman Polanski and Victor Salva. It's already here.

Posted by: V the K at September 30, 2009 6:58 AM

They're not trying to indoctrinate the children.....ohhhh nooooo.

Posted by: TonyD95B at September 30, 2009 7:09 AM

V,

You beat me to the Polanski punchline!

Posted by: Fuzzlenutter at September 30, 2009 7:10 AM

Sexualization of children is already underway. The Liberals' next step is lowering the consent age to something akin to their views, probably 12...

Posted by: Jay B at September 30, 2009 7:21 AM

More like 9. Mooselims say marry her at 6, consumate by 9.

Posted by: Stephana at September 30, 2009 7:40 AM

You know what's funny?
The liberals used to laugh at us when we implied that the "Sexual Revolution" would inevitably result in this kind of filth being done to future children.
"Oh, you're just being paranoid," they'd say.
Now, their reactions would probably be more along the lines of, "So what? It's a good thing children are being encouraged to discover their sexual identities at such a young age. If you don't support it, then you're an evil bigot!"

Posted by: Adam at September 30, 2009 7:51 AM

Memo to the geyhs: Photos like the above are why so many of us have a problem with you marrying and raising children. Why give you access to something sacred, only for purposes of exploitation?

Granted, no one is saying that all gays are like Folsom Street, but the denizens of Folsom Street don't help their case either.

I don't know what's worse: sexualizing children, or selling their aborted body parts. Leftists suck.

Posted by: Nunya at September 30, 2009 8:08 AM

Just the way they laugh at us now when we talk about "Death Panels," Adam.

Posted by: V the K at September 30, 2009 8:08 AM

One of the worst shows on TV is that one where parents dress their kids up to look like Jonbenet Ramsey to compete in kiddie beauty pageants. Its creeeeeeeeeeeeeeepy.

Posted by: Ghost of Moo-HAM-mud at September 30, 2009 8:16 AM

Nunya,

It all comes down to exploitation (or sexploitation).

Exploit the children for the body parts or sexploit the children for their own pedophiliac fantasies.

They don't give a damn about children, besides for their own personal gain. It's sick, disturbing, and should be at least one ABSOLUTE reason to disown liberalism. Those who continue under this charade are hopeless and will never be un-brainwashed.

Posted by: AmericanToTheCore at September 30, 2009 8:18 AM

Where are Goatse, Meh, Fez, pansy90210, nutlicker and the other anonymous pansy trolls now?

I know, making a beeline to the Folsom Street Fair!

Posted by: Anonymous at September 30, 2009 8:21 AM

Given how paranoid Western adults have become about pedophilia and how they've been gradually restricting children's freedoms over the last 15 years, does it seem at all likely that any adult, regardless of their political views will allow children to become 'sexualised'?

Somehow, whoever submitted this article saw 2 pictures and read a description of this event, and managed to extrapolate the notion that a large section of society are demanding children should 'discover their sexual identities' as early as possible.
Clearly this was just a few people buying into a rather tasteless joke that involves dressing some children up in leather vests to give the impression that they're wearing S&M gear

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 8:30 AM

Surely everything that happens in San Francisco annoys Republicans.
How is this any different?

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 8:37 AM

No wonder that all support Roman Polansky

Posted by: JamesJ at September 30, 2009 9:00 AM

Umm aquasnot the prez wants to start sex ed for 5 year olds and the UN wants to start earlier. Hardly a small section of people.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at September 30, 2009 9:24 AM

Millstones are awaiting the perverts who do that to innocent children.

Aqua, what you are lacking is a historical perspective. Many of us who comment here remember a time when homosexuals were deep in the closet. Now they are on public streets doing things that would have been considered perverse even by past generations of homosexuals. How did we come to this point? A small group of homosexual activists demoralized the larger population by wearing down their defenses against such behavior. Only a babe in the woods would think this exploitation of children will not spread if there is not an active effort on the part of decent people to snuff it out.

Posted by: Judith M. at September 30, 2009 9:26 AM

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 8:37 AM

this should "annoy" any thinking person.

Posted by: nancz at September 30, 2009 9:28 AM

The first time I saw pictures of skanky women in the '80s like Cyndi Lauper and Madonna dressed up like "little girls" and being marketed to teens AND preteens (with a lot of help from their stupid young mothers), I thought that it was an early step in sexualizing kids. Very sadly, I, and other "narrow-minded hate-mongers", were right.

Posted by: Toa at September 30, 2009 9:32 AM

aquatookus,

I'm posting this again, purely for YOUR benefit:

Zombie's photo essay of the 2007 Folsom Street Fair

http://www.zombietime.com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/

Take a long, hard look at it. I'm interested to see if you're sick enough to defend it.

Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin at September 30, 2009 9:35 AM

re: Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 8:30 AM

In order to keep aquatarkus' comments in perspective, you need to remember that one of his closest associates is a 15 year old polysexual female (DON'T call her a Lesbian!!), a-tark is from (formerly) Great Britain, and he has a somewhat skewed view of who Americans are to begin with. The whole Right / Left and Conservative / Liberal thing just confuses our friend aquatarkus even more.

So, be gentle with the li'l varmint - the a-tark was brought up in a socialist culture with a lot of misinformation and is just tryin' to sort it all out....

Posted by: TonyD95B at September 30, 2009 9:41 AM

RE: Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin at September 30, 2009 9:35 AM

And, yes - you have a definite point here. Be interesting to see what aquatookus makes of all that....

Posted by: TonyD95B at September 30, 2009 9:43 AM

Tony I have a feeling that aquasnot won't be back for a while. I'm sure he's enjoying the folsom street fest pictures too much.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at September 30, 2009 9:48 AM

Well said, Judith. One need only extrapolate from where homosexuals were then to where they are now to be alarmed by where we're going with this. It must stop.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 30, 2009 9:59 AM

And another...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/galleryoftheabsurd14/3963341091/

Posted by: Andrew Cain at September 30, 2009 10:33 AM

I'm not clicking on that link.
It's probably where Refuter gets most of his child pornography...

And don't single out my friend for abuse.
She's 15, of course she's confused, everyone was at that age.
She's still more mature than most adults I know.

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 10:42 AM

The Folsom Street Fair, I believe, is not even an exclusively 'ghey' event. It is however the predominant form of sexual expression (or whatever ya wanna call it) in the fair however.

This fair is less a display of sexual liberty than it is of San Francisco's psychological open abscess; malignant narcissism.

These outfits for kids/toddlers just seem to turn them into mere accessories for the targeted customers' 'lifestyle' choices.

And boy is the traffic tie-up such a pain in the ass. (No play on words intended...) Traffic really does suuuuck because of this damned event!

Posted by: Nathaniel M at September 30, 2009 11:01 AM

"I'm not clicking on that link.
It's probably where Refuter gets most of his child pornography..."
Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 10:42 AM

In other words, you're too afraid to face reality and instead choose to bury your head firmly up your own rectum. That means you can stop lecturing us on what goes on within OUR cities, Kid. You pulled a similar head-in-the-sand routine in another thread, where I presented NUMEROUS examples of The Islamitization of (Once) Great Britain. You refused to look at any of the evidence and instead accused me of "Scaremongering". You are a classic Ignoramus. You probably consider Child pornography "Art",too.

As for your "Friend", she's a sexually confused idiot who has been brainwashed by Deviants into thinking perversion is proper. It seems you suffer from similar delusions. Both of you are CHILDREN, and breathtakingly ignorant ones at that. No longer will I address you or even acknowledge your existence on this website. BE GONE, both of you.

Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin at September 30, 2009 11:26 AM

Funny that you use the word malignant, Nathaniel, because I was just thinking how this perverse behavior began like a tumor (small and treatable), and because it was allowed to remain unchecked it metastized and is now rampant in every corner of our society and trying to turn it back now it going to be much, much harder.

Posted by: Judith M. at September 30, 2009 11:35 AM

where I presented NUMEROUS examples of The Islamitization of (Once) Great Britain
Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin

Oh fuck off, no you didn't.

How can you accuse me of 'burying my head in the sand' and the proceed to describe my friend as a "sexually confused idiot who has been brainwashed by Deviants"?

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 11:43 AM

From the following thread at moonbattery.com dated September 15th, 2009:

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/09/1m_americans_ch.html#comments


"Muslims and immigrants aren't the problem in the UK."
Posted by: aquatarkus at September 15, 2009 5:10 PM


"REALLY??

Is this a problem?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1197478/Sharia-law-UK--How-Islam-dispensing-justice-side-British-courts.html

How about this?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/11/muslim-group-anti-war-protests

Or this?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6730192.ece

Or this?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7884891.stm

Or this?
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/08/uk-bans-geert-wilders-michael-savage-but-welcomes-senior-muslim-cleric-racist-incitements-that-jews-.html

NONE of this bothers you eh?"
Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin at September 15, 2009 5:20 pm

I posted it AGAIN at 5:30 PM

The only response from Professor Limey Egghead was this:

"I'm not ignoring you, you're just asking scaremongering questions to try to piss me off and get an angry response."
Posted by: aquatarkus at September 15, 2009 6:03 PM

So I felt compelled to ask the following valid question:

"And another thing aquatookus,

Earlier, you expressed your solidarity with Faggery, Lesbianism, Bisexuality and Transgenderism. How tolerant do you think the UK Muslims are of those things? What chances do faggery, lesbianism, bisexuality and transgenderism have under the Sharia law you say is beautiful?"

Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin at September 15, 2009 5:51 PM

No response from Professor Limey Egghead after that. This CLEARLY shows that I did indeed provide evidence of the Islamitization of (Once) Great Britain, while this CHILD ignored all of it and accused me of "Scaremongering". YOU are a LIAR. I just proved it. CASE CLOSED. Now BE GONE.

Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin at September 30, 2009 12:07 PM

God. In 10 years when people will openly marry minors and it'll be normal for a little girl to have a child at 12, Liberals will praise this, saying how free they are from taboos.

Posted by: Jay B at September 30, 2009 12:48 PM

Wow Refuter, this is simply madness. I can't imagine how a country that was once so proud degenerated into this so quickly. Islam advertises itself to be a peaceful and noble thing, it is more like a cancer or a roach infestation.

Posted by: Jay B at September 30, 2009 12:53 PM

Only Nazis read the Daily Mail...

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 1:11 PM

Actually, I sometimes read the Daily Mail because it's fucking hysterical in the way it blows simple news items into massive events that have far-reaching consequences.

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 1:13 PM

Refuter of Liberal Vermin:

You know what your problem is?

You're a git

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 1:16 PM

A git that just gave you a COLOSSAL intellectual beatdown AND exposed you as a LIAR. I knew it was an impossibility that this CHILD could refute me.

Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin at September 30, 2009 1:27 PM

Intellectual beatdown? Bollocks.

Nitpicking douchebaggery is what it was.


You can't call me a 'CHILD' and call me stupid names at the same time, hypocrite.

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 1:38 PM

My work here is done. I'm moving on. There are plenty of ADULTS that need to be refuted, discredited and otherwise humiliated. From now on, the ignorant, delusional, dishonest babble of this CHILD will no longer register on my radar screen.

Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin at September 30, 2009 1:46 PM

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 1:38 PM

Back for more, socialist pig?

You are one fucking idiot, aqua asshole.

Go tell your mommy that she wants you.

Posted by: Dave at September 30, 2009 2:44 PM

Answer one simple question, AQUATARKUS:

Do you REALLY think that muslims are tolerant towards all this Liberal stuff?

Answer "YES" or "NO".

Posted by: KHarn at September 30, 2009 3:57 PM

KHarn,

I'm sure you won't get a serious answer. Probably no response at all. I already asked the same question and got nothing but leftist snobbery in response. That's why I'm done with the CHILD idiot.

Posted by: Refuter of Liberal Vermin at September 30, 2009 4:54 PM

Do you REALLY think that muslims are tolerant towards all this Liberal stuff?

Answer "YES" or "NO".

Posted by: KHarn at September 30, 2009 3:57 PM


Typical Liberal answer to that yes or no question: BUSH LIED YOU FOOLS!

Posted by: Jimbo at September 30, 2009 5:06 PM

Bollocks

Son, you Brits had better make nice, or we won't allow you to immigrate here when the Muzzies make Bradford the capital of the UK (United Khalifate?). It'll be just you and imam...

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 30, 2009 5:58 PM

Just because people like you try to prevent multiculturalism from really working in the USA doesn't mean we in the UK are going to do the same.

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 10:43 PM

Do you REALLY think that muslims are tolerant towards all this Liberal stuff?Answer "YES" or "NO".
Posted by: KHarn

I don't know, and neither do you.
None of us can claim to speak for every single Muslim, I don't represent the views of every Liberal and you don't represent the views of every Conservative.

You need to realise that can't just say every Muslim is evil based on what you may have seen of a few Muslims.
I don't assume every Conservative is a complete tool just because the few that use this site are.

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 10:52 PM

This is the biggest problem with you people, it always has to be YES or NO, it can't be in between.

Its always 'ARE ALL MUSLIMS EVIL? YES OR NO?'
Obviously some are and some aren't, don't generalise.

How did this become about Muslims anyway? this article was supposed to be about how you think gays are weird.

Posted by: aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 10:58 PM

"God. In 10 years when people will openly marry minors and it'll be normal for a little girl to have a child at 12, "

People these days, no sense of history...

This WAS normal for the bulk of human history. Check the Bible; more then once God suggested marrying girls who hadn't had periods yet. Insisting on a woman waiting until she was 18 before having sex would be considered madness by most people (including most Christians) throughout history.

Ah, the article; lots of faulty logic. A few people set up a booth at a major street fair in a major city. From this you draw that: 1) It was put up by gay people (probably not, there's a lot of freaks of various stripes there) 2) The gay community supports this (I know gay people. They wouldn't support anything like this.) 3) Gays are pedophiles (No; the vast majority of gay men are attracted to other gay /men/.) Really this is just a giant case of confirmation bias on the part of you guys.

Posted by: hey you guys at September 30, 2009 11:33 PM

hey you guys:

Bless you for being the voice of reason against a screaming mob of reactionary fools.

Posted by: aquatarkus at October 1, 2009 12:05 AM

Oh, in addition, there are several states in the US that permit parents to marry off their underage children to anyone they wish. I want you to guess which party routinely gets elected in those states.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 1, 2009 1:44 AM

Oh, in addition, there are several states in the US that permit parents to marry off their underage children to anyone they wish. I want you to guess which party routinely gets elected in those states.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 1, 2009 1:44 AM

What states are they? I would like to know.

Posted by: Anon at October 1, 2009 7:19 AM

"I'm not clicking on that link.
It's probably where Refuter gets most of his child pornography..."
Actually, no, Aqua, you brainwashed, closed- minded fool.
Zombietime is an ex- liberal (Though occasionally still siding with liberals somewhat on certain issues) activist, and currently an independent Internet photojournalist located in San Francisco whose reports tend to specialize on the various ultra- liberal protests in that area, often taking pictures of the individuals and signs that the liberal media tends to deliberately avoid capturing on film, so that viewers can see what repulsive, perverted, hate- filled lunatics most of those ultra- liberal activists are. Her work in that area is brilliant, and highly recommended for anyone who wishes to see what America's far left is really like. Even with that report on the disgusting Fulsom Street Fair, she gives the option I believe to see the images in question censored to avoid grossing out viewers. If you refuse to click on the link, it's only because your head is too deeply buried in the sand for you to acknowledge the truth.

Posted by: Adam at October 1, 2009 8:15 AM

"aquatarkus at September 30, 2009 10:52 PM"

The answer that you are too TERRIFIED to admit is "no".

Muslims STONE GAYS TO DEATH in accordance with their laws and "honor murder" their daughters for mearly DATING outside of their religion.

But you'll point out that this is not tolerated and treated as CRIMES. That is because we are CIVILIZED and TOLERANT.

You whine about "multiculturalism", but the MUSLIMS don't believe in that, they belive that islam should (and will) rule the world, crushing anyone who does not agree.

You're too cowardly to admit there is a problem.

Posted by: KHarn at October 1, 2009 1:16 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)