moonbattery.gif


« American Taliban Targets War Memorial | Main | Open Thread »


May 28, 2009

Vote if You Dare

In the end, everything adds up. Remember the story about the New Black Panthers endorsing Obama, and the one about armed Black Panther thugs intimidating voters? They add up to this:

This past Presidential Election, uniformed, baton swinging thugs were caught on video intimidating voters at a polling place in Philadelphia while hurling racial threats and insults at both black and white voters (see here, here). After investigating the incident, and before the change in Administrations, the Civil Rights Division of DOJ filed a complaint against the New Black Panther Party and several of its members for violations of Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act. That Section prohibits any "attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce" any voter and those aiding voters.
Neither the New Black Panther Party nor its members responded to the complaint. As a result, the federal district court ordered the Division to file a motion for a default judgment against the Party and its members. When a defendant doesn't respond to a lawsuit, this is what happens. By this time, however, the new Administration had taken charge. Instead of filing for a default judgment against the Party and its members, the Division VOLUNTARILY moved to dismiss the charges against the Black Panther Party and two of its members.
In other words, the Division voluntarily dismissed an uncontentested lawsuit against an individual who, by the terms of its own complaint, had "made statements containing racial threats and racial insults at both black and white individuals" and who "made menacing and intimidating gestures, statements, and movements directed at individuals who were present to aid voters." One member, Jerry Jackson, is an elected member of the Philadelphia Democratic Committee and was a credentialed poll watcher.

This video includes an interview with Jackson, which gives an excellent idea of the kind of guys Democrats want watching the polls:

No doubt the Black Panthers will have lots of help next election, with Obama's race-based and massive civilian national security force around to watch the polls.

Welcome to the Third World.

On a tip from Oiao.

Posted by Van Helsing at May 28, 2009 9:30 AM

Comments

Waaahhhh. Typical whining from you babies.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 28, 2009 10:15 AM

Typical salient and coherent argument put forth by Anonymouse.

Posted by: Karin at May 28, 2009 10:22 AM

Don't pay any attention to him, Karin - he's just looking for attention again. If "Anonymity" is what he wants, I say we give it to him.

Posted by: TonyD95B at May 28, 2009 10:49 AM

So a random jerk-off in a Black Panther uniform has a right to patrol the entrance to the building, but the press has no right to be there filming.

Brilliant, this one.

Posted by: cowlove at May 28, 2009 10:52 AM

Anonymous says don't "whine" about this sort of thug voter intimidation by the black panthers. Oh, noooo!!!

Be like Anonymous and just cower, give in and DO AS THE THUGS SAY!!!!

Posted by: Anonymous is a pervert at May 28, 2009 11:02 AM

RE: Posted by: cowlove at May 28, 2009 10:52 AM

Remember, the video is from Philadelphia. The Constitution may have been written there, but no one in the last few city administrations has bothered to read it.

As the previous Mayor of Philadelphia, John F. Street once said, "The brothers and sisters are running this city! We're in charge here"

The Loopy, Loony, Lying, Lemming-Like Liberal Lefties will call me a "Raaaacist!" for accurately quoting him, but he said it. That statement (and the scandals of his administration) speak for themselves.

He was succeeded by Mayor Michal Nutter. Nutter is a little better, but his last name says it all.

Posted by: TonyD95B at May 28, 2009 11:10 AM

Not only that, Tony, but just change one word in that quote

The brothers and sisters are running this city! We're They're in charge here!

and it looks like something that Wellstone racist would spew.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 28, 2009 11:14 AM

If a polling place isn't in a federal or municipal building, is it subject to the same ban on CC?

Posted by: cowlove at May 28, 2009 11:19 AM

No explaination for dropping the complaint?
So in other words, the BO DOJ rewards these creeps for ignoring a complaint filed by the Bush DOJ.
And for being black.

The DOJ/ACLU/FBI/CIA and ACORN-KGB and the vast left-wing media conspiracy would be on this like white on sheets if the Klan were out there intimidating people.



One positive thing: Since this leaves no doubt that we now have a clearly defined racist administration, there's no need for long, drawn-out debates designed to educate a couple of trolls.

Posted by: Fiberal at May 28, 2009 12:20 PM

"Waaahhhh. Typical whining from you babies."

You tell it, bro. Only a non-leftist would be whiny enough to have a problem with armed uniformed racist thugs standing outside voting booths on election day spewing racial insults and threats at people trying to vote and face no consequences whatever for their illegal actions.

You are such a blubbering fuckwit, buddy.

Posted by: Smorfia48 at May 28, 2009 1:00 PM

I just read the link to the civilian national security force where you once again call Obama a Nazi w/o evidence. Nice work.

Can Van Helsing or anyone else on this site perform any sort of policy analysis that doesn't boil down to the evidence-free assertion that Obama is planning a totalitarian takeover? Isn't that a little....crazy? Who are the moonbats here again?

When none of these claims come true, are you going to retract your assertions?

Posted by: brs at May 28, 2009 1:40 PM

A video I would love to see would be bikers like the Patriot Guard roar up to one of these precincts like in Philadelphia. These idiots wouldn't appear so menacing would they ?

Posted by: IOpian at May 28, 2009 1:58 PM

This is the new National Civilian Security Force under Obama...these thugs were there for the sole purpose of voter intimidation, wielding nightsticks (which the dummy lied about), using racial epithets, and so on. They will try this next election to keep Chairman Zero in charge.


And libs,..if you think this is racist, then you really are fools. What if the klan was in front of polling places intimidating voters. Same thing here. Different bigots.

Posted by: Atomic Lib Smasher at May 28, 2009 2:12 PM

"This is the new National Civilian Security Force under Obama.."

No, it isn't. These people have no affiliation with any federal group. You're simply making things up.

Posted by: brs at May 28, 2009 2:26 PM

"brs at May 28, 2009 1:40 PM"

Look at the video above, or as I call it, "People's Exibit A".

Posted by: KHarn at May 28, 2009 2:28 PM

You've got a couple of nutcases (not unlike yourselves who are open conspiracy theorists claiming that Obama's planning a totalitarian takeover of the US) that the gov't didn't prosecute. That's it. IF it all went down as above (and that's a big IF), I think they should have been prosecuted, and clearly what they did is ridiculous.

Saying they're part of Obama's National Civilian Security Force in an attempt to tie this in with your conspiracy theory is ridiculous w/o direct evidence.

Posted by: brs at May 28, 2009 2:34 PM

War on Terror" in areas populated by tribes from Afghanistan: real v official story

9 September 2001
Who is fighting who?
War between Taliban (backed by NATO) (1) and Northern Alliance (which was lead by Commander Massoud) (2).
Is the sharia the Law?
in Pakistan (Swat valley, etc): no.
in Afghanistan:
- controlled by Taliban: yes.
- controlled by Northern Alliance: no.

March 2009
Who is fighting who?
War between NATO (backed by neo-Taliban, i.e. NATO puppet Karzai) and resisters (mostly the former Northern Alliance).
Is the sharia the Law?
in Pakistan (Swat valley, etc), controlled by Taliban: yes.
in Afghanistan:
- controlled by neo-Taliban: yes.
- controlled by resisters: for almost all areas, no.

Notes
(1) Explanation how Taliban was controlled by NATO maximally reduced: Mullah Omar, the leader of the Taliban, ordered the destruction of the Buddha statues of Bamyan, March 2001, immediately after receiving the order from the CIA. The goal was to pave the way (using the acceptance by association technique) for the occupation ("attack to") of Afghanistan, which in the script was to follow shortly after 9/11.

(2) One of the three most successful tasks during operation 9/11 was to be able to murder Commander Ahmed Shad Massoud exactly the day it was planned (September 9, 2001).
To understand how important that was, it is enough to point out that 9/11 would have not take place on September 11, one of the most important symbols for "human cattle in the slaughterhouse".
Rather the illuminati would wait a little longer and try first a second murder attempt.

Related blogs:
-- 911 FULL STORY:
http://911-for-dummies.blogspot.com/
-- The Illuminati agents ruling muslim countries:
http://iran-hoax.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Matt at May 28, 2009 2:52 PM

Ya know Matt - you truthers are REALLY annoying.

Physics is complicated. Just because the buildings didn't fall in the way your common sense told you they would doesn't mean that there's something wrong with what happened - it means your common sense isn't a substitute for scientific analysis.

And you're no scientist. None of you truthers are.

Posted by: br at May 28, 2009 3:01 PM

brs


"These people have no affiliation with any federal group. You're simply making things up."


"Saying they're part of Obama's National Civilian Security Force in an attempt to tie this in with your conspiracy theory is ridiculous w/o direct evidence."


You're correct on these points.

Its usually the case that outrages like the story here gets people jumping around the room. The posts then generally settle into arguments with some lobotomized troll antagonizing everyone.

The actual issue gets buried in the process.
However, there is ample evidence that we have institutionalized racism designed to bring about social engineering through intimidation as well as tax-looting, nationalism and judicial activism.

Posted by: Fiberal at May 28, 2009 3:18 PM

"This is the new National Civilian Security Force under Obama.."

No, it isn't. These people have no affiliation with any federal group. You're simply making things up.

It could be. Why else would Obama request one that's "just as big and well funded" as the US military?

Oh, and also, brs... do you defend this sort of voter intimidation? Yes or no.

Posted by: Atomic Lib Smasher at May 28, 2009 5:25 PM

Anonymous says don't "whine" about this sort of thug voter intimidation by the black panthers. Oh, noooo!!!

Posted by: Anonymous is a pervert at May 28, 2009 11:02 AM

Yup, nothing to see here, move along, all in a day's work for the political left.

But try implementing measures to prevent non-citizens, in the country illegally, from voting Democrat, and listen to the cries of oppression and woe from the left.

Posted by: mandible claw at May 28, 2009 8:22 PM

Can Van Helsing or anyone else on this site perform any sort of policy analysis that doesn't boil down to the evidence-free assertion that Obama is planning a totalitarian takeover? Isn't that a little....crazy? Who are the moonbats here again?

Posted by: brs at May 28, 2009 1:40 PM

How 'bout this - you tell us why Obama thinks he needs a civilian security force that's as well-funded as the Army.

As for the takeover thingy, um, why don't you ask GM bondholders about whether or not they think it's already happened?

Posted by: mandible claw at May 28, 2009 8:36 PM

"It could be. Why else would Obama request one that's "just as big and well funded" as the US military?"

Ohhhhh - it COULD be. Sure. It could be anything.

I was assuming that this was an FBI level domestic anti terrorism force, as there's laws against the military acting domestically under most circumstances. But I really don't know - and that's why I would not start to pontificate what it is or what it isn't.

I guess it makes a lot more sense to posit that it will be a new Gestapo (literally) bent on a totalitarian takeover. Because, hey, it COULD be that.

Posted by: brs at May 28, 2009 9:01 PM

"Oh, and also, brs... do you defend this sort of voter intimidation? Yes or no."

No - I already covered this:
Posted by: brs at May 28, 2009 2:34 PM

Posted by: brs at May 28, 2009 9:04 PM

"How 'bout this - you tell us why Obama thinks he needs a civilian security force that's as well-funded as the Army."

answered:brs at May 28, 2009 9:01 PM

"As for the takeover thingy, um, why don't you ask GM bondholders about whether or not they think it's already happened?"

If you or the bondholders call that a totalitarian , Nazi-style takeover of the US and suspension of the constitution, then you simply don't know what any of these things mean, and have no historical sense at all.

We can debate whether the economic situation is dire enough to call for these kinds of measures, and where lines need to be drawn so that these are indeed temporary measures. But the notion that this somehow harkens to Nazi Germany is patently absurd, paranoid and quite simply - crazy conspiracy theory nonsense.

Posted by: brs at May 28, 2009 9:11 PM

From the "25-Points of the NSDAP":

13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts.

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries.

...

18. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers(my emphasis), etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race.

...

22. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (folk) army.

23. We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press. In order to make possible the creation of a German press, we demand:

(a) All editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens.

(b) Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State. They must not be published in the German language.

(c) All financial interests in or in any way affecting German newspapers shall be forbidden to non-Germans by law, and we demand that the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper and the expulsion of the non-Germans from the Reich.

Newspapers transgressing against the common welfare shall be suppressed. We demand legal action against those tendencies in art and literature that have a disruptive influence upon the life of our folk, and that any organizations that offend against the foregoing demands shall be dissolved.

...

25. In order to carry out this program we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the State, the unconditional authority by the political central parliament of the whole State and all its organizations

Oh, no, brs... you're absolutely right. NOTHING this administration is doing "harkens to Nazi Germany". We're paranoid and crazy, you betcha.

Posted by: hiram at May 29, 2009 12:33 AM

"Oh, no, brs... you're absolutely right. NOTHING this administration is doing "harkens to Nazi Germany". We're paranoid and crazy, you betcha."


You are no better than a truther. I could find W, CLinton, GW, Reagan, Carter, on and on policies that have SOMETHING in common with the Nazis. Almost all of those things could be said about FDR's reaction to the depression. Johah Goldberg did this in that absurd book where he said (e.g.) liberals advocate eating healthy, Nazis advocate eating healthy, ergo liberals are Nazis. Which is 2nd class thinking, to be nice.

Hiram, do you know what the Nazi's did? Do you understand the horror? Do you understand that you are a conspiracy theorist, party before country, nutcase for making statement like this?

Maybe if you had some historical context to fit these thoughts into, you'd realize that Obama is not sercretly plotting a totalitarian state, and that the evidence you have is patent nonsense from raving lunatics.

Go buy a history book - and read it.

Posted by: brs at May 29, 2009 5:55 AM

This is what the author Tom Wolfe calls "Mau Mauing The Flack Catchers".

Posted by: oldguy at May 29, 2009 8:16 AM

During the Reconstruction, African American attempting to vote were met by long lines of Klansmen with bullwhips. The object of this display was to discourage them from voting Republican. So, over a hundred and twenty years later, the uniforms have changed, but the tactics remain the same.

Posted by: James McEnanly at May 30, 2009 6:37 AM

brs, I have read history books. I've talked to people who lived through it, on both sides of the war. My Great Grandfather died after the Russians took over the town he was living in and he saw what they did. My stepfather was in Bastogne with the 101st. I've read Hitler's speeches, Goering's, Goebbels'.... yes, you f'in retard, I know what the Nazis did. Do you? You do realize that they were liberals, don't you? Or do you still believe the bullshit that your hippy professors lathered on you in college about them being "right wing"?

6 of 25 points, so far. If you can't see the parallels with totalitarianism, then you deserve your fate. Ask Ernst Roehm about it. He's in your (unread) history books.

Posted by: hiram at May 30, 2009 8:08 AM

"During the Reconstruction, African American attempting to vote were met by long lines of Klansmen with bullwhips. The object of this display was to discourage them from voting Republican. So, over a hundred and twenty years later, the uniforms have changed, but the tactics remain the same.
"Posted by: James McEnanly at May 30, 2009 6:37 AM"

True, but before then, WHITE SOUTHERN voters were blocked by Federal troops with RIFLES.
South Carolina had to turn it's Electorial College vote over to the REPUBLICANS in exchange for ending the occupation.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 30, 2009 8:52 AM

Chairman Hussein's "CCP".

"One of the basic conditions for the victory of socialism is the arming of the workers and the disarming of the bourgeoisie." - V.I.Lenin.

Posted by: chairman soetoro's oprichniki at May 30, 2009 9:41 PM