moonbattery.gif


« Global Warming Is Already Irreversible | Main | Coach Fired for Winning »


January 27, 2009

President Osama bin Obama's First Formal Interview

Imagine if, with WWII still raging, the liberal elite and the welfare class teamed up against normal Americans to elect someone named Adolf Hidler, who gave his first formal interview as president to a German television network. It might have gone something like Obama's interview with Al-Arabiya:

President Barack Obama presented a humble and conciliatory face of America to the Islamic world Monday in the first formal interview since he assumed office, stressing his own Muslim ties and hopes for a Palestinian state, and avoiding a belligerent tone — even when asked if America could "live with" an Iranian nuclear weapon.

The main topic of the interview was Obama sending George Mitchell to the Middle East to pander to Muslims and undercut Israel.

"What I told him is start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating — in the past on some of these issues — and we don't always know all the factors that are involved," Obama said. "What we want to do is to listen, set aside some of the preconceptions that have existed and have built up over the last several years."

When asked how he feels about Iran developing nuclear weapons, which the mullahs have made clear won't be gathering dust before they're used against the West, the heroic messiah equivocated, but did manage to assert that open plans to nuke us out of existence have not been "helpful."

It will take a miracle for America to survive the next four years.

osama-bin-obama.jpg

On tips from nancz and Cheetah.

Posted by Van Helsing at January 27, 2009 7:51 AM

Comments

Sad, but also funny in a way, to see the Man-Child on Arab TV.

Both the Israelis and the Palestinians know they can immediately bring a halt to this Obama foolishness in 10 seconds, any time they choose, with any number of tools at their disposal.

Their 1400 year war is not going to be solved, or even barely interrupted, by He Who Makes The Oceans Heal.

So I say, let him spew. The more of an infant he appears to the Arabs and the faster his grandiose plans of world peace through negotiation land in the garbage, the sooner they can get back to the real work of having a war to see who'll win.

Posted by: mega at January 27, 2009 8:01 AM

Right, war with Iran. Just what this country needs.

Invade 'em all, I say!

Posted by: Anonymous at January 27, 2009 8:24 AM

mega I always enjoy your comments. Well said.

Posted by: Air2air at January 27, 2009 8:25 AM

Anon @ 8:24 (jesus, trolls, pick a friggin' name so we can tell you apart, huh?)

Rest assured, if our only response is "negotiation", it will eventually be us who is invaded. Before you start in with the snickering and snide comments, may I remind you that in the winter of 1939-40 the French were laughing at Germany from behind their "impregnable" Maginot Line. They even made a 20-mile incursion, unopposed, into Germany itself. The French troops grabbed a few beers, hammed it up for the newsreel cameras, had a good laugh.

The frogs got their asses handed to them on a silver platter the following spring, mostly because of the "it'll never happen here" attitude.

Posted by: hiram at January 27, 2009 8:41 AM

BO said he favors a "contiguous" Palestinian State. That means giving handing over Israeli territory over an above everything that was "occupied" after the 6 day war and splitting Israel in half. Either this idiot has never looked at a map, or he is in favor of the destruction of Israel, or both.

He clearly didn't understand the significance of a divided vs undivided Jerusalem during the campaign, so I'm not surprised by this.

Posted by: forest at January 27, 2009 8:55 AM

hey dipshit,

you lost the election.

plus your dumb.

suck it.

Posted by: eat it at January 27, 2009 10:10 AM

I'm just here to gloat and laugh.

And I'm in firm agreement with the previous post -- you're just gonna have to suck it for the next 8 years. So git suckin'!

Posted by: NickSf at January 27, 2009 10:15 AM

thanks Air2, I jes calls it like I sees it.

If the fact of Obambi helps the Israelis clean the crud out of their eyes and see the situation clearly, then he could end up being a net positive for them.

They need a 10 year plan to get 100 % off US foreign aid, as in in year 11 they take $0 in gifts from the US.

They need to say eff you to the world and kick Arab ass until their enemy is humiliated, beaten, and decades from wanting to try again. The riots in the streets of Europe are part of a game of chicken being waged against Israel - how much international condemnation, violence, and threat are they able to handle? Israel needs to play out this game of chicken to a further, more dangerous point than they've been willing to so far.

They need to stop talking about the Iran nuke problem and actually stop it.

If they do all those things, there is a possibility of survival. Not a probability, just a possibility.

But the alternative is, if they continue on the current course of living off the US's largesse and bending their actions to US pressure, hoping the jihadis will get bored or tired, hoping the Iran nuke thing just goes away, or doing what they've been doing which is to start battles and then walk away before they're settled, i,e, "flinching" then I put their viability odds in the low single digits.

Maybe O-Messiah will help them wake up.

Posted by: mega at January 27, 2009 10:28 AM

What a shock to learn we have an actual intelligent adult in the Oval Office. It's such fun to read the childish whining of the losing side. The consequences of the insane Bush 43 "policies" are being lived by all of us now: endless war, highest job loss & unemployment in decades, world economy in the toilet, New Orleans still in ruins, 40 plus million citizens with no health insurance. Great job, W! Let's just wait and see what shakes out in the Obama administration. No way could he make things worse than Mr Bush did.

Posted by: Dave at January 27, 2009 10:33 AM

Your initial point comparing Obama to Hitler immediately takes away validity to any points you are trying to make. And even if you hadn't opened with such a ridiculous comment, the picture that follows this absurd and insanely asinine story speaks volumes as to the intelligence of the writer.

Posted by: Phil at January 27, 2009 10:47 AM

So, this site is called Moonbattery because its writers are a bunch of moonbats, right? "President Osama bin Obama." That's moonbattery par excellence.

Posted by: Frank at January 27, 2009 10:53 AM

"hey dipshit,

you lost the election.

plus your dumb.

suck it.

Posted by: eat it at January 27, 2009 10:10 AM"

You should learn the difference between "your" and "you're" before you go around calling people dumb.

Posted by: forest at January 27, 2009 10:57 AM

Obama is truly a naive and stupid man.

The Arabs aren't about to stop hating any time soon.

This interview stunt should satify his moonbat followers and the simpletons who voted for him as the USA is now loved by the rest of the world thanks to him. *rolls eyes*

Posted by: Cartman at January 27, 2009 11:08 AM

Wow. You don't get out much, do you? You're a world strategist on a par with George W. Bush, that's for sure. Which isn't good, in case you're not keeping track.

Photoshopping beards on people doesn't make whatever you're saying true - it just makes you look more and more ignorant. Whatever you're doing, though, keep it up. The crazier you guys get, the longer it will be before the Republican Party will resemble anything electable in this country.

The knuckle-dragging, grunting slobbering right-wing BS as represented on this site has (finally - thanks to the cheating on the elections and stuff) been called out for what it is - xenophobia, bullying and crass manipulation.

Try to learn something new today. Maybe watch some Mr. Rogers re-runs. He's smarter than you, and never taught anybody to be so afraid of anyone else that they sacrifice the entirety of American principles in service of a delusion.

Posted by: adb at January 27, 2009 11:11 AM

"Imagine if, with WWII still raging, the liberal elite and the welfare class teamed up against normal Americans to elect someone named Adolf Hidler, who gave his first formal interview as president to a German television network."

Hey, asshat, have you looked at the list of Americans supporting Hitler? There's a reason we didn't get into the war until the Japs bombed us in Hawaii, we liked Hitler and were uncomfortable with Jewish power.

Also, while we're on the topic of WWII history, do you remember from history class that it was the isolation, containment, and disgracing of Germany after WWI that created the nationalism movement in Germany? Leading to WWII? And do you remember that it was the reconciliation, bridge-building, and support which followed WWII that helped us break the cycle?

Oh! And one more thing -- that nationalism -- which means that you really over identify with your nation and get really arrogant about who belongs and who doesn't and you're willing to use military force on anyone internal or external who disagrees with you -- that nationalism that lead to really terrible things including dictators, mass murder and genocide -- that's what you're preaching.

Posted by: Anon at January 27, 2009 11:17 AM

Since the Libtards who voted for Osama (I mean Obama) want to exclude those who did not vote for Osbama from any political input, tax relief, or benefits during the reign of their messiah, I think it would only be fair if we could figure out a way that the next terror attack on the US which Osbama will undoubtedly enable, be on the community of Libtards that voted for him.

That's fair, right?

Posted by: Treeman at January 27, 2009 11:20 AM

Dave...

Clearly, reading comprehension is not a skill wasted on the left. Clearly, VH is not comparing BO to Hitler. He is comparing BO to someone who would have kissed Hitler's ass. In other words, The French.

But then, those that can't get the little details right shouldn't be expected to understand the larger picture. Therefore, I completely understand your succumbing to leftist idiocy. It's a childish world-view.

Posted by: hiram at January 27, 2009 11:30 AM

hiram:

Invasion? I really hope you mean "attack". There's a vague possibility they could lob a couple missles against us, which would be bad. However, I have to say that the extreme differences in military capability, extreme differences in population, and oh yeah, the Atlantic Ocean are enough to stop a conventional land invasion.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 27, 2009 11:55 AM

adb
You do realize that Mr. Rogers was a Navy Seal in Vietnam right? It looks like the kos kids got out of school early today.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at January 27, 2009 12:21 PM

'Osama bin Obama' ... oooh, clever! You people amaze me. But I do have a question: if this is World War III or whatever the hell, why are you sitting at a computer instead of signing up for the Marines? 'The 101st Chairborne,' saving us one keystroke at a time! LOOOOSERS! Sarah 2012!

Posted by: Nick at January 27, 2009 12:27 PM

Anon,
Ever heard of the Lend Lease Act? FDR wanted to fight WWII by proxy using the Britsh and Soviets. You see he wanted to work like this. The US supplies the weapons to win the war just not the men,that is until the Japanese got involved. I didn't know MIT had a History department,your parents must sure be proud of the money they spent on your indoctranation,oops I mean education.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at January 27, 2009 12:27 PM

Nick,
I'll be right next to you in line just tell me where you will be enlisting. See that's the difference between Conservatives and libacrits. Even us old conservatives will still fight for this country while you libacrits organize a kumbaya rally.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at January 27, 2009 12:30 PM

You should realy show him ugly and homely like emporer palpatine shooting lightning bolts from his finger tips

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at January 27, 2009 12:31 PM

Osama Bin Laden is not Hitler, and he is certainly not Stalin. He will never ride down Pennsylvania Avenue in a tank. Al Quada is not capable of destroying the United States. I don’t know why who surly tuff guy Republicans keep over reacting. Please stop clutching your pearls and fanning yourself while screaming that the world is going to end if we don’t invade another country. “I’ve got the vapors, lets invade Iran! And take away my God giving rights as a U.S. citizen just for good measure.”

Grow a pair, and then a brain.

You do not defeat Al Quada by invading countries around the Arab world. That only strengthens them. You defeat Al Quada through careful and deliberately focused counter terrorism, and the redress of the economic/political inequities that garner them the support of the larger Arab populace. JUST LIKE NORTH IRELAND!

Pouting, not negotiating, throwing countries against walls, and threatening absolute destruction all don’t work. The last eight years will demonstrate that.

Posted by: no use for a name at January 27, 2009 12:37 PM

I'm with you on that one, no name.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 27, 2009 12:42 PM

What an irrational tantrum this post is. I love to see the right-wingers convulse and froth at the mouth in delusional paranoia. It means they'll be unable to gain power anytime soon.

A good thing, too, because we adults have a lot of work to do to repair the damage done by the B*sh regime.

Posted by: jasperjava at January 27, 2009 12:52 PM

"that nationalism that lead to really terrible things including dictators, mass murder and genocide -- that's what you're preaching.

Posted by: Anon at January 27, 2009 11:17 AM"

I think you are confusing nationalism with collectivism such as Nazism and Communism. Many nations have been "nationalistic" without resorting to mass murder. Most of the countries in Europe had nationalistic populations in the 20s-30s - even France.

Soviet Russia made a big fuss of being internationalistic, and yet they were probably the biggest mass murderers ever, but it's a close call with other left wing regimes such as Khmer Rouge, Maoist China and Nazi Germany.

And your theory about the US resisted entry into the war in Europe due to a discomfort with "Jewish power" is just ridiculous and it kind or reeks. The US didn't want to get mixed up in a European war because people thought it best to just let them fight it out without us. In hindsight, it would have been far less costly to have intervened earlier. But people didn't take Hitler's promises to wipe out the Jews and Slavs seriously - just like some refuse to listen to Islamists saying similar things today.

Oh, and just a point of history here: The US didn't decide to go to war with Germany after Pearl Harbor, FDR still didn't have the votes. Hitler inexplicably declared war on us a few days after the attack.

Posted by: forest at January 27, 2009 12:53 PM

W. gave us Walter Read, unarmored hummers, and subpar body armor. Then the troop supporting Republicans sought to block the expansion of the G.I bill. McCain’s explanation sounded like he wanted or troops to live in debt peonage. And, yet you accuse Obama of being ant-American. You people are beyond comprehension.

I’m a Liberal and I’ve just started the enlistment process, (still waiting on the background check). I waited till we had a president that supports the troops in action as well as speech.

Posted by: no use for a name at January 27, 2009 12:54 PM

I tell you what anon libacrits why don't you go over to the middle east and just have a little pow wow with the mullahs who incite their followers to violence. You can tell them that the evil Bush is gone and we can all live together as one. By the way don't forget to tell them where to send your body parts when they're done with you because as hard as it may be for you kids to fathom thay hate you as much as they hate conservatives. You may as well deal with that fact libacrits.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at January 27, 2009 12:57 PM

LOL, come on Framer Ted. Do you really believe Libs are suggesting that we go over there and have a “pow wow” I mean as a farmer you should know what a stray man looks like.

Posted by: no use for a name at January 27, 2009 1:16 PM

"You do not defeat Al Quada by invading countries around the Arab world. That only strengthens them. You defeat Al Quada through careful and deliberately focused counter terrorism, and the redress of the economic/political inequities that garner them the support of the larger Arab populace. JUST LIKE NORTH IRELAND!" - no use for a name

Afghanistan is not in the "Arab world". Neither are, for example, Pakistan, and for the most part Iran. Your conflating of "Arab" and "Muslim" underscores the difference between "the Troubles" in Northern Ireland and the problem with Islamic terrorists today. Northern Ireland was a local political/ethnic beef over self-determination with a veneer of religious war. AQ and other Islamists have a supremacist appeal deeply rooted in Islamic teaching that spans national and ethnic differences. It is a "positive" rather than a "reactive" ideology that is fully backed-up in the religious texts.

Your whole argument is really based on an arrogant presupposition that everything Islamic terrorists do and believe is a reaction to what we do. They are quite capable of coming up with supremacist ideas on their own and/or gleaning them from the teachings of Muhammad.

You should really stop comparing AQ and the IRA because they don't match up well at all.

Posted by: forest at January 27, 2009 1:30 PM

"You defeat Al Quada through careful and deliberately focused counter terrorism, and the redress of the economic/political inequities that garner them the support of the larger Arab populace. JUST LIKE NORTH IRELAND!"
Big mistake to use Ireland as an example. The only way that Republican Ireland got its independence was by bullets. And after independence Britain atarted a trade war with the Republic. In Northern Ireland nobody redressed the 'economic/political' inequities. They just changed the buttons on the uniforms. Bless Blair and the US and Mitchell for forcing such change as was made but in the end it was the common market requirements that forced GB to allow the change.

Posted by: Jim at January 27, 2009 1:38 PM

"No way could he make things worse than Mr Bush did."
Coincidentally, that's what I keep hearing in Australia. It's a hell of a vote of confidence, don't you think?

Posted by: Anonymous at January 27, 2009 1:43 PM

From the words of the obaba yes it does sound like he wants to have a pow wow. I guess libacrits just can't understand that there are people that just want to kill for the sake of killing. They don't need a reason and islam sure seems to fit that mold. By the way we bombed the hell out of Germany and Japan and today they are our allies( for the most part). The crazy muslims only understand brute force trauma because that is the way they have led their lives for over 1000 years. I doubt they're going to have an epiphany any time soon and come into the 21st century so let's deal with them in a way they understand.By the way you don't know what I farm, could be servers. ;)

Posted by: Farmer Ted at January 27, 2009 1:59 PM

Yes, forest I understand the difference between Arab and Muslim. My point being invading Iraqi strengthened Al Quada, and Iraqi does fall within the rubric of an Arab nation. Invading Afghanistan was the correct thing to do, hence my impending enlistment. However, to be more precise we shouldn’t invade anymore Muslim countries, especial Iran a Persian Shea Theocracy (big fans of Ali, not some much the Umayyad Caliphate).

Moreover, the current war on terror does include/revolve around local and regional political, economic, ethnic concerns. Religion is a rallying point/justification/veneer. Solve many of the regions problems unrepresentative governments, systemic poverty, lingereing ethnic conflicts and you will begin to see an end to Al Quada. Bin Laden got his start in a politically inspired war against the Soviets over self determination in Afghanistan.

Posted by: no use for a name at January 27, 2009 1:59 PM

"and the redress of the economic/political inequities that garner them the support...."

Don't know much about Muslims, do you? Economic inequities are of little importance to them, as they are born into a station in life, and that's God's will. Reward is in the afterlife, including physical comforts and pleasures. They have no need to climb a ladder to get just like Jamal next door. This is American thinking and you are projecting or being spoon-fed BS. Look at the 9/11 terrorists. They were middle-class and comfortable. They kill in the name of Allah because Mohammed told them to, and to gain the rewards of paradise.

I know of what I speak, having been married to a Muslim.

Posted by: Karin at January 27, 2009 2:04 PM

Islamic terror revolves around Islam.

Posted by: forest at January 27, 2009 2:04 PM

NEWS FLASH, right-wing morons.

We're NOT at war with Dubai. It's most certainly not the same thing as if Roosevelt had kissed up to German media in 1938.

But then again, there was a certain Bush who kissed up to the Nazi's, but let's not go there.

Posted by: Junggai at January 27, 2009 2:20 PM

Declaring that they hate us for our freedom ids beyond sophomoric. Resolving the Israeli Palestinian conflict is the key to ending all Mideast terrorism, not just Al Quada. Ending Palestinian suffering will deprive Muslim militants of most of their recruiting and support across the globe. To do this the U.S. must take an even handed approach, like H.W. Bush. North Ireland serves as a valuable lesson. Negotiation, counter terrorism, and the recognition that all sides have blood on their hands are the keys to success. The bi-partisan Washington consensus that Israel is always correct, and must always be supported must be abandoned. Mr. Obama has not done this yet. However, he is taking an essential first step, by recognizing that the Palestinians are also victims of the cyclical violence.

The sooner you moonbats recognize this the better it will be for America.

Posted by: no use for a name at January 27, 2009 2:28 PM

What a bunch of MA-ROONS (as Bugs Bunny would say), as soon as George Mitchell can figure out who to pay off, that's when the violence will die down. Just like Egypt backed down, so will the Palestinians...

By the way, these types of blogs are really funny. If I didn't think they were satire, I'd think I stumbled onto a right-wing nutjobs' blog.

Posted by: mooshhhh at January 27, 2009 2:29 PM

Karin, "Don't know much about Muslims, do you?...I've been married to one"

And that make u an expert? Go to Jordan. Sit in a cafe'. Listen to the anger they express towards gulf state Muslims, and the sympathy they have for the destitution of the Palestinians.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 27, 2009 2:34 PM

We've been throwing hundreds of millions of dollars at palestine and it's still a crap hole because they use the money for guns and rockets not to help the people. Their hatred of the Jews is right there with Htler. Who by the way hosted many arab leaders during WWII because they wanted to see how he was getting rid of the Jews. Also palestinians are thought of as nothing but cannon fodder by other arabs if they were so beloved they wouldn't have been thrown out of every arab nation they went to. But if you really want to lay blame on the Isreali/palestinian problem you libacrits better blame your beloved UN. Think 1948.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at January 27, 2009 2:44 PM

It makes me more of an expert than you think. I have been to Jordan, but women aren't allowed to sit in the cafes.

You people think that if by some miracle of Obama, 1,400 year old violence ceases between the Jews and the Palestinians? Recognition of blood on both hands? Now you're talking sophomoric.
Terrorism ends with the dawn of the worldwide Islamic caliphate. Nothing less.

No use for a name, Muslims and/or Arabs DO NOT EQUAL Irishmen! They don't think alike, they don't worship alike, they don't even value life on this earth alike!

You may wish to visit Faithfreedom.org for more information and spirited discussions (on both sides).

Posted by: Karin at January 27, 2009 2:46 PM

I forgot to add this: There are plnty of muslims in Africa and Southeast Asia should we give them money too?

Posted by: Farmer Ted at January 27, 2009 2:46 PM

Karen
...But everyone is Irish on St. Patty's day. j/k

They're still human.

You all hve a good one.
-Peace

Posted by: no use for a name at January 27, 2009 2:50 PM

No no,
The terrorists are rabid animals and must be put down as such.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at January 27, 2009 6:03 PM

VH, I have a question...

Are the countless liberal trolls above all coming from the same IP address?

Posted by: hiram at January 27, 2009 6:12 PM

>>President Barack Obama presented a humble and conciliatory face of America to the Islamic world Monday in the first formal interview since he assumed office, stressing his own Muslim ties and hopes for a Palestinian state, and avoiding a belligerent tone — even when asked if America could "live with" an Iranian nuclear weapon.>>

We just lost the war and the civilized world will die with us.

Posted by: KHarn at January 27, 2009 6:13 PM

"EXTREMISM IN THE DEFENSE OF FREEDOM IS NOT A VICE"

BARRY GOLDWATER

Posted by: Pete at January 27, 2009 7:02 PM

Hiram, No, they're oozing in from Salon.com.

Posted by: Van Helsing at January 27, 2009 7:13 PM

W. gave us Walter Read, unarmored hummers, and subpar body armor.
Firstly Walter Reed. Secondly Humvees were a fast transport vehicle like the original army Jeep which also wasn't armored. It was never meant to be used in urban combat situations. Its actual role in the military was envisioned during the Soviet "Cold War" era.
This "subpar" body armor of which you speak: The Interceptor body armor was the best armor available at the time, it lacked side plates (underarm) which were the 'vulnerable' portions of the armor. Also some Soldiers removed plates to lighten the system. It has been replaced with versions that are superior in this regard. Only a complete, and utter moron would think you could replace a system like the Interceptor in a small period of time, with the ballistic tests that have to be performed, and manufacture time involved. Let me guess you watched the "Dragonskin" armor on History, and thought the U.S Military would rather the Soldiers get killed that pay out for that system. Jeez.

Posted by: xantl at January 27, 2009 11:00 PM

Resolving the Israeli Palestinian conflict is the key to ending all Mideast terrorism, not just Al Quada. Ending Palestinian suffering will deprive Muslim militants of most of their recruiting and support across the globe.

Right, so this will stop the Jihad taking place in Southern Thailand by Islamists? You've probably never heard of it so heres some pictures: http://zombietime.com/thai_jihad_photos/
Will it also stop the Islamic terrorists in Chechnya, Ingushetia and Dagestan? Did terrorists strike in India because of India's non-existent role in Palestine? how then were they recruited? How about the terrorists who detonated car bombs in Algeria were they recruited by "Palestinian suffering" ?
The Egyptians that attacked, and killed Copt Nuns, and Priests in Church were they killing them because of Palestine? What about the catholic schoolgirls beheaded in Indonesia? Do you think it'll stop with a "two state" solution too? How about the killings in Darfur; perpetrated by Islamic Janjaweed tribes, do you think they're killing because of Israel? How about the Islamists killing people in the Philippines? motivated by Palestine? How about Nigeria? do you think the terrorists there will simply become e-mail scammers if Palestine is created as a nation?

You have a very childlike view.

Posted by: xantl at January 27, 2009 11:15 PM

to moossshh

such sympathy theyy have for the palis...
if they have such sympathy for them they ought to have helped take some of their brothers in. truth be told , they dont anything to do with them.

after gaza was given AWAY waht difference did it make for these scumbag palis? none. becasue tehy are more interested in smoking their hookahs and having 4 wives they can not support and tons of kids theyoffer up as jihad martyrs.

they have ocean front property they could develop into some nice land but hey dont want to.
they would rather bomb and kill and fight amoungst themselves like savages. no community for them. no link to mankind or humanity for them.

www.mthysandfacts.com
get educated here

Posted by: birdy at January 28, 2009 2:46 AM

www.mythsandfacts.com
sorry for the spelling errors, dont have my glasses on.

Posted by: birdy at January 28, 2009 2:48 AM

Go to Jordan. Sit in a cafe'. Listen to the anger they express towards gulf state Muslims, and the sympathy they have for the destitution of the Palestinians.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 27, 2009 2:34 PM

Is that sympathy the reason why Jordan, the Muslim Arab state created on 80% of the Palestinian mandate, will not absorb the Muslim Arab Palestinians?

Israel, created on 20% of the mandate, absorbed more Jewish refugees from Arab countries, than there were Arab refugees that went to the refugee camps (and were locked in by Egyptian soldiers.)

Why the double standard?

Where's the "right of return" for the 800,000-odd Jewish refugees who fled Arab nations once those nations declared war on nascent Israel?

Surely you couldn't, in good conscience, support one and not the other, without admitting that Arabs are entirely responsible for the situation of the Palestinians..

Posted by: mandible claw at January 29, 2009 12:35 AM

The slobbering love fest continues. If you are going to try to sound like you have a clue about any of this, you may want to look up the spelling of Al Qaeda. Do you actually think someone is going to believe that they cannot destroy America because some person that does not even know how to spell says so? Obviously, you have done no research, and have no clue of what they are capable of. Keep your head stuck up you know whos butt that should keep you safe.

Posted by: LOL at January 29, 2009 1:38 PM