moonbattery.gif


« Moonbat Version of American History Coming to TV | Main | Cynthia McKinney Presidential Bid Bogs Down in California »


February 7, 2008

Archbishop of Canterbury Calls for Sharia in Britain

For once I have to agree with Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, the moonbat who has been using his position as head of the Church of England to help dismantle the remnants of British civilization. He now proclaims that Muslim sharia law in the UK "seems unavoidable."

The key word is seems. Technically, Britain could still save itself, if it rose up against a liberal establishment run by quislings like Williams, who actually likes the idea of instituting Islamic law in what was until recently a Christian country.

He feels that Britain's Muslim conquerors should not have to choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty." Therefore the British government must become Islamicized.

Did I mention that this treasonous jackass is head of the Church of England?

At least not all Britons will have to live under sharia — for the time being. Williams showcases his philosophical wisdom by proclaiming that the concept "there's one law for everybody" is "a bit of a danger."

Williams has sucked up to Muslims before. In stark contrast, Bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali has warned of the "no-go" areas Muslim colonists have been carving out in Britain. Unsurprisingly, Nazir-Ali has received death threats and has to live under police protection.

Maybe Williams thinks he will live a little longer by selling out his faith, his country and his culture. But who knows? When the Islamic conquest of Britain is complete, Williams might just lose his head anyway, despite his servile dhimmitude.

floating-head-of-canterbury.jpg
Looks like the Religion of Peaceniks chopped it off already

On a tip from Jacob.

Posted by Van Helsing at February 7, 2008 8:41 AM

Comments

Another brilliant example of a deeply religious man's ability to present an argumetnt using completely perverted logic.

Ironically, you take the opportunity to attack Muslims in your caption. A Christian came up with this numbskull idea! Why not attack the Church?

Islam is not the problem; Christianity is not the problem.

Religion is the problem, my friends. Relgion.

Posted by: hashfanaticFAN at February 7, 2008 2:09 PM

So, if one of your neighbors had a some pit bulls that had a consistent habit of mauling people to death, and others had dogs that were generally friendly and offered them great comfort, but occasionally annoyed you by barking or maybe crapping on your lawn, then I guess "dogs" would be the problem?

A religion that is also a totalitarian political system that specifically endorses violence to further its spread is a different kind of “problem” than those that might be associated with other mainstream religions.

This man is not espousing the views of his religion; he is a morally confused individual preaching to a choir of nihilist moonbats.

Posted by: Beef at February 7, 2008 4:23 PM

He is morally confused because his morality is based on a series of fairy tales.

Your dog analogy makes no sense.

Posted by: hashfanaticFAN at February 8, 2008 1:01 AM

teachers, religious leaders – even friends, or so called friends – take over where parents leave off. They demand that we feel only the feelings they want and expect from us. They demand all the time that we perform feelings for them. We're like actors – turned loose in this world to wander in search of a phantom…endlessly searching for a half-forgotten shadow of our lost reality. When others demand that we become the people they want us to be, they force us to destroy the person we really are. It's a subtle kind of murder….the most loving parents and relatives commit this murder with smiles on their faces.

Posted by: james d at February 8, 2008 6:00 AM

Posted by: V the K at February 8, 2008 7:15 AM