« Spanish Moonbat in Israel | Main | Rebels at the Beeb »

August 27, 2007

More Special Bathrooms For Perverts

Another step downward in the freakification of America:

Four "gender-neutral" bathrooms have been added to the University of Vermont's student center — at a cost of $2,500 apiece. Each has a sign on the wall identifying it as a "gender neutral restroom."

Squeaks Annie Stevens, assistant vice president for student and campus life:

It's about inclusivity and accessibility and the importance of meeting all people's needs, not just a few.

A "transgendered" student calling himself Kelly adds:

Just because there can be tense situations in gendered bathrooms, especially for trans-identified people, you need a space to use the restroom and feel safe and comfortable.

The point isn't just to flush $10,000 down the toilet. It's to put the official stamp of society's approval on the practice of men walking around in women's clothes, sometimes even having themselves surgically mutilated to enhance their morbidly narcissistic fantasies.

At least this might keep these freakazoids from barging into the ladies' room.

Vermont also offers "gender-neutral residential suites," making it more convenient for perverts to hook up with each other.

But it's still not enough, according to Dot Brauer, director of the university's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning and Ally Services, who is demanding more special bathrooms, as well as private showers in the gym in case there are any cross-dressing athletes.

When these demands are met, more will follow. Moonbats are transforming America into a John Waters movie.

If you see this on the restroom door, try to hold it.

On a tip from Nanc.

Posted by Van Helsing at August 27, 2007 6:51 AM


I've said this before, but, wouldn't gender-neutral bathrooms increase the danger for female students? All a guy would have to do is hide in a stall and wait until a woman came in alone and grab her.

Posted by: phil at August 27, 2007 7:33 AM

I don't know about y'all - but this could be good news. I'd just as soon have a "Men's room" free of perverts.

In San Francisco it's safer to pee in the bushes somewhere than to go into a "men's" room.

Posted by: Jimbo at August 27, 2007 8:40 AM

How about this: a bathroom for every person likely to need one at any public event or place? That is, let's build HUNDREDS, or Hell, THOUSANDS!, of individual bathrooms, so nobody will have a complaint. You'd get one with your name on it, a key so you and only you could unlock the door; special facilities therein depending on your sex (or lack thereof if you're "trans-gendered"), handicaps, religious persuasion (footbaths for all, Muslims or not!), etc.

Only cost every community across the country a few million more dollars to implement -- just raise taxes to pay for it! Wow! What a great idea; I'm sure I'll have thousands of people signing on and agreeing with me on this one in no time at all!

Posted by: jc14 at August 27, 2007 8:41 AM

precisolutely phil!

as i've stated before, public restrooms are nearly verboten for me - phobias...those nasty, nasty phobias about sitting where another butt has been...and no lobster bibs hanging on the wall...

Posted by: nanc at August 27, 2007 8:55 AM

jc14 - Fine, as long as the "special parts" groups have pay-facilities to pay for their 'special' needs. Kinda like a 'toll road', huh? :-)

I'll just keep using the bushes.

The world is my urinal.

Posted by: Jimbo at August 27, 2007 8:55 AM

It's about inclusivity and accessibility and the importance of meeting all people's needs, not just a few.

So the NON-transgendered community are now "just a few"? How dare they pander to the needs of 99.99% of the public.

Posted by: Anonymous at August 27, 2007 10:55 AM

In a public men's room, someone had written an invite for anonymous sex. Someone else wrote: "Son, you need some help." I'd say that sums up the issue.

Posted by: d at August 27, 2007 11:14 AM

"Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning and Ally Services"

This may be a stupid question, but just wtf is Ally???

Posted by: trace at August 27, 2007 12:15 PM

I propose a new title: CLUELESS

Posted by: phil at August 27, 2007 12:26 PM

Maybe Janeanne G would be the one to walk in and Phil would grab *her*.

Posted by: Still Grossed Out at August 27, 2007 12:34 PM

Jimbo grazed it: Isn't it the overwhelming majority of people who are "gendered" and "just a few" who are gender confused? Isn't the quoted statement completely backwards horsepucky?

Posted by: vonster at August 27, 2007 12:41 PM

Ooops. Anonymous grazed it.

Posted by: vonster at August 27, 2007 12:42 PM

Still Grossed Out-

There ain't enough beer in Vermont to make me do that!


Posted by: phil at August 27, 2007 12:56 PM

Ewww, I do not like walking into bathrooms that have been used by males (real or fake).

Posted by: Where is the tampon dispenser? at August 27, 2007 6:25 PM

Dang the bad luck, They missed!!!!!!!!!!11

Posted by: Glenn M. Cassel, AMH1(AW), USN, Retired at August 27, 2007 6:41 PM

How would Larry Craig and Bob Allen approach this issue?

Probably with some foot-nudging, swiping hand signals, and a $20 bill like they always do!

Posted by: Ronald Reagan at August 28, 2007 11:55 AM