« Helen Thomas Longs for a Judenrein Middle East | Main | Moonbat Restaurant Requires Eating Your Vegetables »

June 4, 2010

Disarming Israel

Posted by The MaryHunter at June 4, 2010 10:22 AM

During the entirety of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the principle aim of every international indictment of Israel has been to disarm Israel. This, despite the fact that every effort Israel has used to protect itself since its inception have been arguably the same things practiced by many other countries, including America, when their existence has been threatened by external powers. Krauthammer explains.

Israel has already twice intercepted ships laden with Iranian arms destined for Hezbollah and Gaza. What country would allow that?
But even more important, why did Israel even have to resort to blockade? Because, blockade is Israel's fallback as the world systematically de-legitimizes its traditional ways of defending itself -- forward and active defense.
(1) Forward defense: As a small, densely populated country surrounded by hostile states, Israel had, for its first half-century, adopted forward defense -- fighting wars on enemy territory (such as the Sinai and Golan Heights) rather than its own. [...] It is for the same reason America wages a grinding war in Afghanistan: You fight them there, so you don't have to fight them here.
But under overwhelming outside pressure, Israel gave it up. The Israelis were told the occupations were not just illegal but at the root of the anti-Israel insurgencies -- and therefore withdrawal, by removing the cause, would bring peace.

Some peace, that was. So what's next?

(2) Active defense: Israel then had to switch to active defense -- military action to disrupt, dismantle and defeat (to borrow President Obama's description of our campaign against the Taliban and al-Qaeda) the newly armed terrorist mini-states established in southern Lebanon and Gaza after Israel withdrew.
The result? The Lebanon war of 2006 and Gaza operation of 2008-09. They were met with yet another avalanche of opprobrium and calumny by the same international community that had demanded the land-for-peace Israeli withdrawals in the first place. Worse, the U.N. Goldstone report, which essentially criminalized Israel's defensive operation in Gaza while whitewashing the casus belli -- the preceding and unprovoked Hamas rocket war -- effectively de-legitimized any active Israeli defense against its self-declared terror enemies

Israel, the bad guys once again. So they fell back to this:

(3) Passive defense: Without forward or active defense, Israel is left with but the most passive and benign of all defenses -- a blockade to simply prevent enemy rearmament. Yet, as we speak, this too is headed for international de-legitimation. Even the United States is now moving toward having it abolished.
But, if none of these is permissible, what's left?

Deterrence? Not even nuclear deterrence is left, if B. Hussein Obama and the world's other Israel detractors have their way.

The whole point of this relentless international campaign is to deprive Israel of any legitimate form of self-defense. Why, just last week, the Obama administration joined the jackals, and reversed four decades of U.S. practice, by signing onto a consensus document that singles out Israel's possession of nuclear weapons -- thus de-legitimizing Israel's very last line of defense: deterrence.

The New and Improved Final Solution V. 3.0 (if you count Israel's wars collectively as V. 2) seems ever closer at hand.


Click image for full size.

Image hat tip: Current TV.
Palestinian-Israeli conflict history lesson on a tip from Bergbiker.