moonbattery.gif


« Cops Do Society a Favor in Seattle | Main | Moonbat WaPo Blogger: Nadal Hassan = General Patton = Sergeant York »


December 1, 2009

UN's Green Blueprint for World Domination

Posted by Van Helsing at December 1, 2009 9:47 AM

Like Dr. Evil in an Austin Powers movie, the authoritarian bureauweenies infesting the United Nations have an actual plan for world domination. It rests on the thoroughly discredited global warming hoax.

Environmentalism should be regarded on the same level with religion "as the only compelling, value-based narrative available to humanity," according to a paper written two years ago to influence the future strategy of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), the world's would-be environmental watchdog.
The purpose of the paper, put together after an unpublicized day-long session in Switzerland by some of the world's top environmental bureaucrats: to argue for a new and unprecedented effort to move environmental concerns to "the center of political and economic decision-making" around the world — and perhaps not coincidentally, expand the influence and reach of UNEP at the tables of world power, as a rule-maker and potential supervisor of the New Environmental Order.
The positions argued in that paper now appear to be much closer at hand; many of them are embedded in a four-year strategy document for UNEP taking effect next year, in the immediate wake of the much-touted, 11-day Copenhagen conference on "climate change," which starts on Dec. 7 [Pearl Harbor Day, how appropriate], and which is intended to push environmental concerns to a new crescendo.

A few examples of what our wannabe supranational rulers have in mind:

• Absolute preeminence for environmental extremist ideology. "The current environmental challenges and opportunities will cause the environment to move from often being considered as a marginal issue at the intergovernmental and national levels to the centre of political and economic decision-making."

• Hegemony for the sinister UNEP, which "will have to make itself relevant well beyond the world of those already concerned with the environment, including very prominently its own formal constituency."

• An "Environmental Bretton Woods for the 21st Century" — i.e., an entire monetary system based on delusional ecomoonbattery. After all, "the linkages between environmental sustainability and the economy will emerge as a key focus for public policymaking and a determinant of future markets opportunities."

• "Ambitious yet incremental adjustments" to envirofascist laws imposed by unelected international bureaucreeps.

• Brainwashing "children and youth" with antihuman envirokook propaganda.

• Transcending national sovereignty. UNEP plans to "pioneer a new style of work. This requires going beyond a narrow interpretation of UNEP's stakeholders as comprising its member states — or even the world's governments — and recruiting a far wider community of support…"

• Sucking in money as well as power. "Mobilizing sufficient finance to meet environmental challenges, including climate change, extends well beyond global mechanisms negotiated under conventions. It will require efforts at local, national and global levels to engage with Governments and the private sector to achieve the necessary additional investment and financial flows."

• Using environmental extremism as a Trojan horse for socialism. "We believe the environmental argument should be recast in terms of its importance for and potential contribution to prosperity, stability and equity." Equity means no matter how hard you work, you will live like a Third World peasant while bureaucrats plunder the wealth you create.

• Imposing a "Global Green New Deal" that will do to the world economy what FDR's New Deal did for America when it unnecessarily extended the Great Depression for a decade.

To sum up, they want totalitarian socialism imposed at a global level in the name of the polar bears.

It isn't easy to take the walking blobs of liberal suet that pass their kooky resolutions at Turtle Bay seriously. However, even if their hoax-based ideology is a joke, their designs on our liberty, our standard of living, and our national sovereignty are anything but. Our fifth-columnist president is firmly on their side, regardless of the catastrophic effects their plans would have on our economy.

As da Vinci said, it's easier to resist at the beginning than at the end. Why not play it safe and bulldoze that rotten domino into the East River immediately?

united-nations-building.jpg
One building the skyline would look better without.

On a tip from mega.


Comments

I've been out of the loop for the past couple of weeks, but wonder if y'all have seen this?

Posted by: nancz at December 1, 2009 10:00 AM


This must be the "anti-science, anti-government lunacy" or "conspiracy theory" that a certain little green moonbat was screeching about.

The plan for usurpation of national sovereignty and global wealth redistribution is already in place and openly published. Where is the "theory" part?

Posted by: Anonymous Countermoonbat at December 1, 2009 10:09 AM


Oh god, don't tell me you guys are part of that group of retard conspiracy theorists who think the UN is trying to take over the world...

Posted by: Chris Waddle at December 1, 2009 11:20 AM


Oh god, don't tell me you guys are part of that group of retard conspiracy theorists who think the UN is trying to take over the world...

The President of the EU might disagree.

Are you completely delusional, or did you just miss the countless calls for a "Global New Deal" (their words, not ours) or cross-border bureaucracies (what they say must be done), or hundreds of billions in international carbon taxes (their plan, not ours).

The IPCC and those who support it have repeatedly stated that international regulation of carbon is the only way to save the world from a fiery inferno.

We are opposed to their openly stated plans, unlike the left-wing truthers who opposed everything Bush did based on unproven conspiracy theories.

Posted by: Anonymous Countermoonbat at December 1, 2009 11:29 AM


The UN isn't nearly as organized as you think it is.

Posted by: Chris Waddle at December 1, 2009 11:34 AM


Actually, considering the sheer number of people/groups/organisations/countries/religions/ideas you guys are afraid of, it's not surprising that you'll ‘see’ a conspiracy theory behind anything.

Posted by: Chris Waddle at December 1, 2009 11:40 AM


The UN isn't nearly as organized as you think it is.

Right now, it isn't. Their openly stated goal is to change that, which is why conservative opposition is growing.

Conservatives disagree with the UN's desire to have a panel of UN bureaucrats regulating and taxing every carbon emitting activity, then redistributing that wealth in the name of "environmental justice."

UN bureaucrats are not accountable to anybody but the UN, which isn't accountable to Congress.

The opposition is to an openly stated plan to give unelected bureaucrats, not appointed by Congress, power over the American people.

So, please tell me where the "conspiracy theory" part comes in. Last time I checked, the conspiracy kooks were worried about UN troops rolling into town. Conservatives simply disagree with the Copenhagen agenda.

Posted by: Anonymous Countermoonbat at December 1, 2009 11:46 AM


Czech President Vaclav Klaus: Global Warming Is a Politician’s Myth (Video)

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/12/czech-president-vaclav-klaus-global-warming-is-a-politicians-myth-video/

Posted by: J at December 1, 2009 11:55 AM


Chris,
The Green Movement is simply the New Red. The USA wanted to implement a Global Government since at least WW1. More to the point Communism and the Green Movement are one in the same. Communism is not a "Government" but is a Population Control & Disposal system that is implemented by a government. What has happened is that the USA has been overrun by Communists and Communist Sympathizers who are beholden to this Global Government that has been in control as it says for two years now. Your mistake is to believe that this Word Government is WEAK. Once it starts collecting taxes we become its bitches. The dissolution of borders, redistribution of wealth and destruction of the family unit are in fact the primary goals of the Communist population control and disposal system that the world is going to face. On this note I will leave you with this quote....

"War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in thirty to forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist." -- Dimitri Manuilski

Posted by: AlphaOmega at December 1, 2009 11:55 AM


Show Me State Has Seen Enough… Obama’s Approval Rate Sinks to 33% in Missouri

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/11/show-me-state-has-seen-enough-obamas-approval-rate-sinks-to-33-in-missouri/

Posted by: J at December 1, 2009 11:55 AM


Climategate: Follow the Money

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703939404574566124250205490.html?mod=rss_opinion_main

Posted by: J at December 1, 2009 11:57 AM


Chris,

Would you have us believe raving hysterics such as Kevin Anderson, one of the UK's most senior climate scientists, who stated that only 10% of the global population is likely to survive climate change?

Would you have us believe businessmen like Al Gore, who would become the first carbon billionaire if his policy demands are met?

Would you have us believe UN bureaucrats, who have an obvious motive to expand their numbers, budget, and authority, just as every other bureaucracy tries to do?

Would you have us believe the grant-hungry and publicity-craving "scientists" whose academic dishonesty was recently exposed in the Climategate scandal?

Since, according to you, the conservative platform is universal distrust, who exactly should reasonable, rational people trust with regard to the climate change issue?

Posted by: Anonymous Countermoonbat at December 1, 2009 12:04 PM


If there were impending global climate warming DOOM, the solution would be STRICT RATIONING. Instead, the determined solution is HIGH TAXATION or put another way DEMAND DESTRUCTION.

In the end, the wealthy will have the roads to themselves along with the seas and air while the rest of the world starves... That is how any Communist/Socialist/ Fascist Oligarchy operates but why listen to me when you can hear it from one of the masters below…
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” - Hermann Goering

Posted by: AlphaOmega at December 1, 2009 12:16 PM


I hate to agree with Alpha (and I know we'll lock horns again soon) but in this case, that's pretty much the deal, esp. his take on rationing.

There is no actual crisis (obviously), but the threat of one is what's used to get everyone in line, impose economic "redistribution" and solidify their power.

The fact that those emails and docs about the faked science got out is one of the only things that is keeping me hopeful. They're already spinning like mad, but the fact is people are getting it.

If we bust the AGW myth AND keep Obama from shoving socialized medicine through, we may have a few more years of the Republic left.

Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at December 1, 2009 12:30 PM


Gregory of Yardale's previous posting was very telling: The NY Times has been printing "doom" headlines about global warming for over a century.

Environmentalism, and in particular global warming, is and has been in its essence a doctrine of liberal totalitarianism.

Now today, there's an all-out putsch to once and for all take this doctrine and ram it down the world's gullet ....come heaven or high water (ahem).

Posted by: Fiberal at December 1, 2009 12:33 PM


I have my doctrine in liberal totalitarianism.

Posted by: Al Gore at December 1, 2009 12:35 PM


If any building needed to have a wreckingball taken to it its that eye sore UN building it completly ruins the NYC skyline

Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at December 1, 2009 12:49 PM


Penn State Will Investigate 'Climategate'

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/paper-trail/2009/11/30/penn-state-will-investigate-climategate.html

Posted by: J at December 1, 2009 1:43 PM


UK climate scientist to temporarily step down

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CAM0VG0&show_article=1

Posted by: J at December 1, 2009 1:43 PM


Chris Waddle = drive-by, left wing douchebag.

Posted by: SK at December 1, 2009 1:45 PM


""What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is "no." The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about? This group of world leaders form a secret society to bring about an economic collapse." -- Maurice Strong, secretary general, 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development " -- Maurice Strong, Chinese agent and author of Kyoto

Global Warmingists

Posted by: DANEgerus at December 1, 2009 3:23 PM


The United Nations actually owns the United Nations building. Otherwise, it would be possible to paint a huge bullseye on it so it could easily be seen from the air. Somehow, a huge bullseye would kind of make a point. Of course, those nuts might just vote to do it themselves if they think of it.

Posted by: SnowSnake at December 1, 2009 3:28 PM


Van Helsing,
I often like the way you write but this piece is excellent. IMHO the scariest thing in the world is a more powerful UN. They're attempting to be the World Government.
"...Green Economy Initiative, a proposal to radically redesign the global economy and transfer trillions of dollars in investment to the world's poorest developing countries..." With the UN managing the money, like they did in Iraq.

Please keep up the good work rallying against the Commies.

Posted by: Joe Lender at December 1, 2009 3:48 PM


Is it me, or is it getting warmer in here?

Posted by: Phil Jones at December 1, 2009 4:55 PM


"The Pink Panther Strikes Again" is one of the greatest movies ever...money shot here starts at about 8:39

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rw7byc99goc

Posted by: Jonathan Eldridge at December 1, 2009 5:15 PM


I was wondering how the AntiChrist could manage to unite all religions into one and yet have it accepted by both fundamentalists and secularists. As this latest UN spewing shows, he might simply replace them all with a new one and get it ratified to boot.

Posted by: BURNING HOT at December 1, 2009 10:22 PM


This is a good piece, but the UNEP report itself is even creepier and more revealing than the news article about it. And it reveals why the UN doesn't care about global warming being a hoax -- they consider AGW to be only "the biggest, most magnificent political wave at present and in the immediate future" and one that "UNEP should not fail to ride." So if they weren't using AGW, they'd use something else to gain control of the world's economies. The report can be seen here: http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/113009_IISDreport.pdf

Posted by: Brenda at December 1, 2009 10:44 PM


Also the UNEP report indirectly explains Cap and Trade, which makes no sense from a purely environmental perspective since it doesn't reduce greenhouse gasses. They talk about the need to "harness" the private sector to their agenda, greatly increasing their power and support. Cap and Trade gives a lot of rich and powerful business interests a stake in the "green" agenda, thus meeting this need. Of course these ideas predate the report; UNEP just lays it all out. It's worth reading.

Posted by: Brenda at December 1, 2009 11:04 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)