« Wonderful, Wonderful, Copenwasten! | Main | Morning Briefs: Illegal Immigration Round Up Edition »
December 17, 2009
The Mother of ClimateGate?
Posted by The MaryHunter at December 17, 2009 4:16 AM
Via BigGovernment.com: an important key to uncovering the fraud regarding the growing fiction of anthropogenic global warming comes from Russia (with no love -- at least not for the COP15 crowd). UK climate scientists may have manipulated Russian data to exaggerate global warming trends:
[...] We have yet further evidence that the data is being cooked to make the long-running claim of an increase in global temperatures, and now to diminish the apparent cooling of said temps. As the gang at EU referendum tout, "it is in Soviet Union that the CRU, NOAA, NASA show the greatest warming."
Location is everything when ambient temperatures are recorded for climate data analysis. But certain locales apparently weren't good enough for those conniving climate-scamologists:
Around the world temperature stations have been widely decommissioned in rural and higher elevations, and we see an over-emphasis on increasingly urbanized (and therefore warmer) stations in the curious selection process as to what temperatures should count, and how much. The latter point references the fact that the data is then adjusted, and we are also seeing an increase in adjusting urbanized (that is, artificially warm) temperature records not down, but upward.
Meterologist Joe D'Aleo posted a brief report that details what appears to be plenty of tweaking of raw temperature data:
On Tuesday, the Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon, England) had probably tampered with Russian-climate data.
[...]The data of stations located in areas not listed in the Hadley Climate Research Unit Temperature UK (HadCRUT) survey often does not show any substantial warming in the late 20th century and the early 21st century.
The HadCRUT database includes specific stations providing incomplete data and highlighting the global-warming process, rather than stations facilitating uninterrupted observations.
IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations.
While it is unlikely that any of these allegations, if verified, will shake the eco-Marxists in Copenhagen from their efforts to subdue the international economy in the name of eco-utopia, maybe even the state-run media will finally come to report this hoax for what it is.
On a timely tip from J.
