« Pat Leahy Is an Idiot | Main | Open Thread »
November 19, 2009
Seen on the Streets of Philadelphia
Posted by Van Helsing at November 19, 2009 3:36 PM
Compliments of Conan:


Comments
I've seen this sort of thing in Tucson too.
Not as proffessional but the message was the same. Basically "Fed-up".
2010/2012/2013
Posted by: czuch at November 19, 2009 3:47 PM
Wont it be just grand when Andy and Lao show up to "dispell" the evidence provided by that sign. It must be really difficult to craft such fabulous communist lies when the proof is so overwelming.
Posted by: Michelle at November 19, 2009 4:14 PM
Well, those are pictures of a van that is about to be burned by the likes of the 'Purple Shirts'.
Owner of the van has balls. Especially in Philly.
Posted by: Oiao at November 19, 2009 4:23 PM
Oiao...25 minutes after those pictures were taken, the van was stolen and the driver tossed into the Schuylkill River chained to the spare tire.
That's Killadelphia.
Posted by: Sylvia at November 19, 2009 4:34 PM
Great looking van great message just keep the moonbats and ACORN away from it
Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at November 19, 2009 9:09 PM
Man, I hope his insurance company hasn't canceled his policy because that van isn't going to last three minutes before Obama sends out his SEIU and ACORN goons...
Posted by: Fuzzlenutter at November 20, 2009 2:47 AM
Posted by: Michelle at November 19, 2009 4:14 PM,
If they did it would be pure delusion they would be speaking.
Posted by: Moonbat Skullcracker at November 20, 2009 5:01 AM
I can't wait to see some dumb ass try to argue those points as "good for america".
Posted by: Had it up to here :/ < at November 20, 2009 6:28 AM
Just to humor Michelle at November 19, 2009 4:14 PM, I really don't know what you mean by "dispell". Is that a word that I misspelled? With 1 "l" it means to disperse.
Also, the van provides no "evidence" of anything but rather combines an opinion while questioning the contents of the bill's language.
But to comment on the van, I'm wondering if the driver/owner (that I assume to be associated with insurance, malpractice or health) is wanting everyone to have the same coverage as our government officials or he/she doesn't like the officials having excellent converge. Both open a new debate.
To respond to the driver's side, there are 2 reasons that Tort Reform isn't in the bill. 1) If it were, it would only alienate Democrats that are now on board to vote for it and 2) the money it would save is so minute (something like 2-5%), that it doesn't do anything to really help the cost. Why lose votes on the bill when that issue does nothing for the bill?
I really don't expect a reasonable response but as mentioned, just for the sake of humor.
Posted by: andy42302 at November 20, 2009 6:42 AM
Posted by: dandy andy42302 at November 20, 2009 6:42 AM- "Just to humor Michelle at November 19, 2009 4:14 PM, I really don't know what you mean by "dispell". Is that a word that I misspelled? With 1 "l" it means to disperse."
Gee andy, how very smarmy.
Posted by: dandy andy42302 at November 20, 2009 6:42 AM- "...he/she doesn't like the officials having excellent converge."
And, how very ironic...
Don't quit your day job andy. Bath house buggery is more "up your alley", that grammar teaching.
Posted by: chairman soetoro's oprichniki at November 20, 2009 8:18 AM
^than
Posted by: chairman soetoro's oprichniki at November 20, 2009 8:20 AM
Page 114 line 22:
"under this subsection shall be effective in such time"
Pretty sure the owner of the van is a liar, but that is not unexpected.
Posted by: athensguy at November 20, 2009 11:08 AM
why do you all want our commander-in-chief to fail during wartime? Don't you support our troops?
Posted by: zappy at November 20, 2009 11:29 AM
Wow, I wonder how much money the idiot who owned that van wasted on getting that done just to advertise his or her own stupidity. Well, at least he'll look like a hero to people who aren't smart enough to realize how incredibly weak those arguments are. So his cred in the moron/tea-bagging community will probably go way up.
Posted by: mark at November 20, 2009 11:35 AM
i think its mighty suspicious that all the dems that say the british nhs is a good thing have never been to england. im english and i have cancer (prostate) and i cant get the medicine i need, im also 21 years
Posted by: ALbi at November 20, 2009 12:13 PM
"zappy at November 20, 2009 11:29 AM"
Why did you Liberal idiots want AMERICA to fail durring Bush 2's term? Why do you idiots support FAILED SOCIALIST policies now, durring wartime?
Posted by: KHarn at November 20, 2009 2:13 PM
Have someone armed with a paintball gun if some hoods from SEIU or ACORN try to vandalise or burn it LET EM HAVE IT TILL THEIR CRYING LIKE BABIES
Posted by: Flu-Bird at November 20, 2009 3:04 PM
KHarn, Ive been asking a question lately on this hatefest site. Why is it that anyone, and I do mean anyone that so much as questions any of the hate spew here or as little as questions the rationale of that hate, has to automatically be a "liberal". That mindset defies logic. If you can possibly explain, please do. It's as if every single one of the lockstep contributors here must adhere to one and only one way of thinking, must not dare divert from some hate mission, and must be programmed to march lockstep to taking down our government (with the exception on the Bush years that required that they sacrifice a broken neck in the event that Bush made a sudden left turn).
That was the first post I've seen from zappy. I've been wondering for a while if you clone trolls also invent your own "trolls" to help you along. Either way, it's obvious.
Posted by: andy42302 at November 20, 2009 3:16 PM
Andy01210
Step away from the Meth. It's not good for you, son.
Posted by: FreeWillie at November 20, 2009 6:45 PM
...the Helsing van? :V
Posted by: FPST at November 20, 2009 7:29 PM
There is no tort reform in the bill because most of Congress were lawyers before running for office. And will be again once they resume their lives as private citizens.
Tort reform to a lawyer is like a wooden stake to a vampire. An apt comparison, actually.
Posted by: Cylar at November 21, 2009 4:14 AM
KHarn, Ive been asking a question lately on this hatefest site.
I've been asking a question of my own for some time now. Why do you keep coming back to this "hatefest site," you fucking retard?
Why is it that anyone, and I do mean anyone that so much as questions any of the hate spew here or as little as questions the rationale of that hate, has to automatically be a "liberal".
If it helps, I no longer use the word "liberal." It's too complimentary. I prefer "leftist" "socialist" or "statist." All three are more accurate.
That mindset defies logic. If you can possibly explain, please do.
What defies logic is a guy returning again and again to a site that has a philosophy diametrically opposed to his own, yet thinks he's going to win hearts and minds there. If you can possibly explain, please do.
It's as if every single one of the lockstep contributors here must adhere to one and only one way of thinking, must not dare divert from some hate mission, blah blah blah some other damn thing...
Because we see such an incredible diversity of viewpoint among the trolls here, don't we?
and must be programmed to march lockstep to taking down our government (with the exception on the Bush years...
Snnxxxxzzzzz....huh? What? Are you still talking? Sorry, I must have dozed off.
that required that they sacrifice a broken neck in the event that Bush made a sudden left turn).
What?
That was the first post I've seen from zappy. I've been wondering for a while if you clone trolls also invent your own "trolls" to help you along.
Oh, so Lao and Ghost and the other dimwits who show up here to throw mud are just "cloned trolls." Are we growing you left-wing retards in a science lab now? It would explain a few things, I guess.
One would have to be an artificial freak of nature to think Obamunism is going to rescue this nation from a deep recession.
Either way, it's obvious.
Posted by: andy42302 at November 20, 2009 3:16 PM
What is? That you don't belong here and should get the hell out? Duh.
Posted by: Cylar at November 21, 2009 4:22 AM
What's obvious Cylar and the multiple personalities that you portray, are the predictable distracting tactics that's prevalent here at Moonbattery. I totally debunked the message on the ban as it's no more than sheer extreme propaganda. Those taking points have no merit nor place in any rational debate on HCR (not that rationale is a factor here). You can't dispute that with any rhyme or reason so you do what you do best and that's to implement your rodeo clown maneuvers by stepping in for KHarn (who has predictably exited stage left) in order to create some ludicrous excuse to claim victory to you lost argument.
Posted by: andy42302 at November 21, 2009 7:42 AM


