moonbattery.gif


« Open Thread | Main | Science Czar John Holdren Involved in ClimateGate »


November 27, 2009

Progressives, Islam and the Universe of Lies

Posted by Gregory of Yardale at November 27, 2009 8:11 AM

Hey, Remember how in the wake of the Fort Hood massacre, American Christians --- a notorious volatile and violent group (according to the Mainstream Media) --- went on a rampage and began beating up every Muslim in sight?

Neither do I

But apparently, even though such violence never happened, the MSM still feels it necessary to hype the possibility of violence against Muslims, and give our Koran-kissing friends another opportunity to play the victim.

Ayyad, a charismatic 37-year-old with a sonorous voice, seems to be speaking for, not to, the congregation as he laments, "It's becoming harder and harder for us to raise our head and say, 'I am a Muslim.'" Many nod in agreement when he says, "There are very difficult times out there."

Poor baby. All of the anti-Muslim violence that didn't happen must really bum him out; but he doesn't seem too upset about the anti-Infidel violence his co-religionists perpetuate on a daily basis.

Rush Limbaugh has recently been describing the place where most progressives live as the "Universe of Lies." In this universe, climate change is caused primarily by people who drive SUVs, scientists never lie, the Government is swift and efficient and can fix any problem, insurance companies are greedy and enjoy killing people for profit, and Michelle Obama is the paragon of style and high fashion ... whereas we, who inhabit the Universe of Reality, know that none of this is true.

In the "Universe of Lies," it is Christians who are aggressive, violent, hateful, and want to kill everyone who doesn't believe as we do. All the evil in the world is committed by Christians, all the good is done by "progressives," and Muslims are innocent victims of hatred and prejudice.

First of all, here's a picture of someone who really is hateful, violent, aggressive, and would kill anyone who doesn't believe as he does.

behead_those_who_insult_islam_london.jpg
Note to the Progressive Left: This man is not a Christian

Second, no one has ever detonated a suicide bomb, hijacked an airplane, fired rockets at Jewish schoolchildren, or shot up a group of unarmed people while screaming "Jesus Loves You."

Third, no matter how fervently progressives want to believe it, peaceful and electoral opposition changing the definition of marriage to include same-sex couples is not worse than or equal to stoning teh gheys to death as is done in countries run by Islamic clerics.

Fourth, if Islam is a religion of peace, why is the only country on Earth run by Islamic clerics the world's largest state-sponsor of terrorism?

I could go on, but you get the picture.

It's easy to understand why the progressive left whitewashes Islam, it's because they share a mutual hatred of Christianity. And the progressive left hates Christianity because Christianity teaches things the progressive leftists who live in the Universe of Lies don't want to hear. Like, charity toward others is a personal responsibility; not something one can insist the Government do with other people's money and then claim personal virtue for it. Like, it's morally wrong to kill babies for the sake of having sexual gratification without consequences. Like, all of us are personally responsible for our actions and the consequences thereof.

You see, our Christian God is the one who sent His Son to die for us, not the one who demands we send our sons to die for him.


Comments

"It's becoming harder and harder for us to raise our head and say, 'I am a Muslim.'"
---------------------------------------------

Yeah, but it should be out of shame, you lame-assed puke. The bulk of your "religion" and culture has done very little if anything to counter the lastroughly 20 years of violent and deadly terrorist bullshit being done in YOUR name.

Were you Christian or even Jewish the world would be demanding the whole of your religion and cultural community and leaders be out loudly denouncing all that is being done in the name of YOUR religion and "god".

Yeah, hang your head in shame for your silence and inaction. As anti-social and uncivilized as the Muslim terrorists are, YOUR sin of appeasement and inaction is just as bad for the world.

Posted by: drillanwr at November 27, 2009 8:52 AM


Perfect, every sentence just perfect.

Posted by: JohnC. at November 27, 2009 8:53 AM


Absolutely agreed, drillanwr. Christians don't hesitate to speak up when people kill in God's name. Muslims just hide in their homes and whine "I hope no one hurt us" whenever a microphone comes close. The MSM must be really bummed out that the only violence coming out of the Fort Hood terrorist attack (no other way to call it) came from... muslims against christians. Religion of peace, right. Religion of hypocrisy and lies, rather. Just look at how these dogs protest and tell me these are decent people. They scream for any offense to be punished with beheading, they laud openly the terrorists killing people and they wear masks.

Posted by: Jay B at November 27, 2009 8:57 AM


Hard for them to raise their muslum heads, but not so hard for them to raze the heads of infidels.

Fuck them.

Posted by: Essaicheyetee-Bird at November 27, 2009 9:00 AM


I have to disagree a bit, Jay. It's not "... muslims against christians." It's muslims against America and everything we stand for. As they breed like rats, and as we have a VERY low fertility rate in our western cultures, they stand to take over most of the presently free world in the not-too-distant future. In the meantime it seems the more radical muslim sects are intent upon Jihad and murder. Gosh, I wonder why they'd expect to be threatened now and then?!

Posted by: Duke at November 27, 2009 9:04 AM


"YOUR sin of appeasement and inaction is just as bad for the world."

I couldn't agree more!! Well said.

How about y'all try policing your own for a change? Come out publicly and strongly opposed to the terrorists; About 99% of whom are members of YOUR religion.

You haven't done that; leaving the chore to those of us who actually DARE to defend our Nation and our Freedoms...AND WE WILL! Doing nothing - which you've now mastered - is equal to the acts of those very people. You are the same as the man who drives the get-away car in a bank robbery - JUST AS GUILTY.

Posted by: Anonymous at November 27, 2009 9:10 AM


The post at 9:10 was not intended to be from "anonymous". I don't hide behind my keyboard. I take 100% responsibility for that comment.

Posted by: Dell at November 27, 2009 9:14 AM


USA = Anti-White Third World Shit Hole.

Posted by: Anonymous at November 27, 2009 9:22 AM


The faux troll at 9:22 AM is from... not kidding... Rio Linda California. (71.137.109.78)

Posted by: V the K at November 27, 2009 9:41 AM


The faux troll at 9:22 AM is from... not kidding... Rio Linda California. (71.137.109.78)

Posted by: V the K
------------------------------------------------

Oh hell ... That means we now have to define and translate everything down to his/her understanding.

I ain't.

Posted by: drillanwr at November 27, 2009 9:53 AM


It's not a third-world shit-hole yet, Rio Linda. We still have a year or three to turn this thing around.

Posted by: forest at November 27, 2009 10:03 AM


"It's becoming harder and harder for us to raise our head and say, 'I am a Muslim.'"

And so you should. Those Americans that come from countries and ideologies that have attacked us in the past have always been right up front condemning the attackers.

A good example is the Nisei battalions of WWII. After we crapped on them as putative spies they still stood in line to volunteer to fight against America's enemies because they were Americans first, Japanese only by accident of birth.

Where's the great hordes of Muslim volunteers at the recruiters' offices today....?? How about all the Muslim Arabic, Pashtun, and Farsi speakers lined up at the doors of the CIA and Pentagon begging to help translate...? Waiting... waiting... [sound of crickets]

A pox on all these devil worshippers and the horse they rode in on [probably stolen at that].

Posted by: chuck in st paul at November 27, 2009 10:45 AM


"It's becoming harder and harder for us to raise our head and say, 'I am a Muslim.'"

Good. Muslims have much to be ashamed of, and precious little to be proud of. If I were one, I'd be ashamed too.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 27, 2009 11:18 AM


Is it so wrong of us to criticise SAVAGES when they destroy and murder?

Posted by: KHarn at November 27, 2009 12:16 PM


Some Muslims are assholes, some ain't.
Oh well.
ZOMG

Posted by: I'll get me coat at November 27, 2009 12:46 PM


Speaking of intolerance, note how that sign says “those who insult Islam”, not “those who don't follow Islam”.
And speaking of cowardice, perhaps it's safer to post snarky comments on a blog, than you guys telling a Muslim that they can go to hell to their face.

Posted by: Chris Waddle at November 27, 2009 12:54 PM


Eh Chris, do you really think I wouldn't give a muslim animal a solid piece of my mind if they began criticizing how my daughter and wife dress, how I wear a gold crucifix PROUDLY around my neck? Yeah, let's hear it from one, I just might punctuate my comment with a good left hook.

Posted by: Jay B at November 27, 2009 1:55 PM


Jay what chris doesn't understand is conservatives will back up their words where whiney liberal pussies haven't got the balls to do that.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at November 27, 2009 1:58 PM


I agree. I went to two tea parties this year. Was I wearing a mask? Nope. Was I holding a "kill Obama" sign? Nope, a Taxed Enough Already sign. Did we loot shops, break cars and attack people? Oh wait, nope, none of that happened. I remember seeing hundreds of decent folks, purple shirt thugs who YELLED constantly with their bullhorns, like the dogs they are, however.

Posted by: Jay B at November 27, 2009 2:01 PM


Just to be clear, in my last post, hundreds of decent american folks AND dozens of union thugs, I am in no way saying that unions are decent or even really american.

Posted by: Jay B at November 27, 2009 2:12 PM


Honestly, I wouldn't mind a modern day crusade and I think it's just about time.

Posted by: Rick Schroeder at November 27, 2009 3:16 PM


Ahh, the religion of peace, yes. Name me one armed conflict in the world in the last 10-15 years that hasn't had diaperheads right there causing it. There may be one or two, but I don't know any off the top of my head.

Posted by: Mr Evilwrench at November 27, 2009 5:18 PM


Maybe at some point, decades ago, America did something that really annoyed the Muslim world and then a few pissed off Muslims decided to retaliate earlier this decade.

I would research this line of inquiry, but right now I quite frankly could not give a fuck about the history of American-Islamic relations.

Posted by: Chris Waddle at November 27, 2009 5:39 PM


“Diaperheads”? That's a bit rude isn't it?
ZOMG

Posted by: I'll get me coat at November 27, 2009 5:41 PM


Hehe even a lefty can catch a hint when you trowel it on thick enough. Um, yeah, it's supposed to be rude. Did a good job, dint I?

Posted by: Mr Evilwrench at November 27, 2009 5:51 PM


Maybe at some point, decades ago, America did something that really annoyed the Muslim world and then a few pissed off Muslims decided to retaliate earlier this decade.

Since Muslims have done stuff that really annoyed us, so we've got the right to relatiate against them, don't we? And that's what we're doing, so everything's cool. Now it's just a matter of seeing which culture is more organized and technologically advanced at killing its enemies.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 27, 2009 6:05 PM


remember seeing hundreds of decent folks, purple shirt thugs who YELLED constantly with their bullhorns, like the dogs they are, however.

Hey, hey! Don't lay this off on dogs - I love dogs! Compare SEIU thugs to ...uh...Red thugs. Well, it's not a comparison, really, just a recognition of an intrinsic attribute.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 27, 2009 6:08 PM


Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 27, 2009 6:05 PM

Things happened before 2001 you know.
Or did you incinerate all the evidence of American aggression leading up to then?

Posted by: Chris Waddle at November 27, 2009 6:56 PM


Okay, Puddle... I'll bite. Since you wanna talk history pre-2001, how about the 1993 WTC bombings perpetrated by Muslim savages? Or the 1999 Cole bombing, again, perpetrated by Muslim savages? Not to mention (if you wanna go way back) the Barbary pirates, the Ottoman empire, and the Crusades.

I don't condemn individual Muslims here... just the whole nature of Islam, which I might add, subject women HORRIBLY (which I thought you libs were against), is morally and scientifically backwards, and puts its followers into utter submission. Now you may say Christianity does the same, but when have you heard of a group of devout Christians flying planes into skyscrapers full of people? Islam is NOT a religion of peace, and the Qu'ran fully shows it.

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. - Surah 9:29

Posted by: Atomic Lib Smasher at November 27, 2009 8:12 PM


Or did you incinerate all the evidence of American aggression leading up to then?

Twaddle, did you incinerate all the evidence of Muslim aggression from 700 A.D. on?

Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 27, 2009 9:03 PM


What's the difference between Islam and the Aztec religion? Liberals, is the latter defensible? Did it deserve to survive, and be respected? If not, why not?

Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 27, 2009 9:13 PM


Because I'm a Muslim, for one thing.

Bigot.

Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 1:08 AM


So you admit that Islam is as indefensible as the Aztec religion?

And no Muslim - none - can talk about anyone else being bigoted. Ever. Got it?

Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 28, 2009 10:25 AM


This is really stupid.
Are you seriously saying that every single Muslim is a terrorist?
Are you also saying that there are no Christian terrorists?

It is totally illogical to respond to what you perceive to be bigotry with your own bigotry.

Posted by: Chris Waddle at November 28, 2009 12:26 PM


You should also be aware of the endless crimes against humanity committed since 700 A.D by those who were acting in the name of the Christian God.

Posted by: Chris Waddle at November 28, 2009 12:29 PM


Waddle,
You talk more history than you have ever read.

Posted by: Jim at November 28, 2009 1:25 PM


Evidently I have read more than yourself, or you'd know better than to call bullshit on my perfectly valid observation.

Are you unaware of the Crusades? The Inquisition? The “White Man's Burden”?

Posted by: Chris Waddle at November 28, 2009 6:06 PM


Are you seriously saying that every single Muslim is a terrorist? Are you also saying that there are no Christian terrorists?

Straw man alert.

I'll respond in kind to your moronic post: are you saying that not a single Muslim is a terrorist? Are you saying that every single Christian is a terrorist?

Obviously none of these propositions are true, and no one said them. But one is clearly true: every single Twaddle is a twat. Presumably the etymology of the surname.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at November 28, 2009 8:32 PM


OMG-What are you, waddle, a college freshman? Do some reading -- Spencer's "PC Guide to the Crusades" for a start. Then stop off at the site called Religionofpeace.com and then Christianviolence.com (oooops -- there isn't one.) Then compare NUMBERS of Muslim terrorists vs. Christians -- never mind history, either -- just the last 10 years is enough.(If you must go into history, read Andrew Bostom's "Legacy of Jihad.") Stop w/ the PC stuff. It may get you an A in the course, but not on this site, where we know better.

Posted by: vladdy at November 28, 2009 8:40 PM


Do you own a single piece of literature that isn't ostensibly anti-Islam?

Posted by: Chris Waddle at November 28, 2009 10:57 PM


“Where we know better”

What? You don't see the point of treating everyone equally?
(Apart from windbag conservative trolls, of course)

Posted by: Chris Waddle at November 28, 2009 11:03 PM


Where's the great hordes of Muslim volunteers at the recruiters' offices today....?? How about all the Muslim Arabic, Pashtun, and Farsi speakers lined up at the doors of the CIA and Pentagon begging to help translate...?

I get your point, but I wouldn't trust any of those translators. I'd trust Jewish or Christian translators, but the CIA and DoD won't hire them.

I don't condemn individual Muslims here

Why not? Do they not read the Quran and proclaim its commands good? Do they not proclaim their pedophile rapist murderer prophet the Best of Men, the supreme Model of Conduct? In my book, that puts every Muslim who knows what the Quran says in the knowing service of evil. That would be most of them, in my opinion. That an individual Muslim is not, at the moment, doing evil doesn't matter. You can't be certain when they're going to start practicing a more strict adherence to the dictates of Islam. Not just murder and mayhem, but (for example) hiding Muslim criminals from infidel law-enforcement and sending money to Islamic "charities" (which are really fronts for terror groups).

Would you be so solicitous of persons who adhere to secular ideologies that are similarly evil?

Posted by: Bob Smith at November 29, 2009 1:18 AM


So basically Bob, your response to Muslim fear and prejudice is Christian fear and prejudice.

Who needs negotiation when we can hide behind our respective symbols and dogma, and have enormous yet utterly futile argument about how to property acknowledge the same fictional character.

Posted by: Chris Waddle at November 29, 2009 2:17 AM


Chris is right. We Muslims blow things up as part of our death cult. It's a Muslim thing. You wouldn't understand.

Posted by: Lao at November 29, 2009 1:54 PM


So basically Bob, your response to Muslim fear and prejudice is Christian fear and prejudice.

A) I'm not Christian
B) Prejudice is only bad when it has no rational basis. There is plenty of rational basis to be prejudiced against Islam.

Who needs negotiation when we can hide behind our respective symbols and dogma, and have enormous yet utterly futile argument about how to property acknowledge the same fictional character.

Negotiate what? My demands are non-negotiable: live in peace on an indefinite basis with your infidel neighbors. That means no bombs, no subverting of infidel governments and social institutions, and no looting/beating/raping/murdering infidels in Muslim countries.

Furthermore, negotiation implies all parties are doing so in good faith. Since Muslims do not negotiate in good faith, taking Muhammad's example in this area as normative, negotiating with them is futile.

Posted by: Bob Smith at November 29, 2009 5:13 PM