« Arsonist Targets Remains of 9/11 Dead | Main | How The Center-Left Gins Up Paranoia »

Making obvious just how sick they are, to everyone but the sicker.

You note this was reported by "Americans For Truth".

Interesting edit decision.

Their full name is "Americans For Truth About Homosexuality".

Hehe and conservatives are the one full of hate for not giving everything these little fairies want. Can you imagine if people hung gay activists, the kind of uproar we would get?

And the trolls are more concerned that the name of the source was incomplete than they are about the celebration of hate.

Because this can't be defended. The minority "victims" doing this is fine and will never be reported. This is one house I would seriously egg if I was twenty years younger. I bet they were hanging out Obama stickers.

I think Anonypussy has a point, they should consider changing their name to "Americans for Truth about Fascism."

Right, anony-homo-fascist? We a know that you all secretly admire Nazis, Commie secret police and banana republic dictators.

Here's an idea...let's stop giving them press coverage. Frankly, their petulant little displays have lost shock value. Yaawwwwwwn.

I'd pay more attention to a couple of mosquitos.

Of course, if some ticked off Mormon or Carrie Prejean fan torches their love shack, or breaks their little noses, (since they have been so accomodating as to post photos of themselves so their hate-targets can identify them), then it becomes news. Sooner or later they're gonna piss someone off who'll do something about it. Until then, they're a total waste of ink. Just another couple of young self-destructive idiots.

Since the black voters voted agansit the homosexual community, why arent these two "men" attacking black "leaders". Could it be they are concerned about retalation from them? Yep dont ask dont tell works here.

Jules;

My opinion is the exact opposite. Give these knuckleheads all the ink you can and more; the more press they get, the more shock value they lose *and* the more disgust value they generate. They're trying to woo the center, but when the center is being deluged with examples like this, day in and day out, of what sick, intolerant kooks they really are...

Well, it'll make it that much harder for them to state their case. And when they finally do piss of someone who'll do something about it, the center will be so sick of them, they really won't give a damn.

Those two homos will get theirs in due time. All in due time. They will regret their lifestyle CHOICE as well as their evil displays.

Eh Jules, if these two fairies get what they deserve, I already can see the movies and news plastered all over the place, with them holding one another in their classic victim poses, with images of holocause in the background and a sad music playing, as these "two freedom loving Americans face hate speech towards their freedom of expression".

Essaicheyetee-Bird, I'm glad you did point out that homosexuality is always a choice, let's not forget that. Remove those who are simply uneducated or uncomfortable around women, remove those who do it because all they want is the shock value and attracting attention like dressing like a peacock or a woman and demanding preferrencial treatment and you'll see you're not left with many real homosexuals.

Two homes i hope that parents avoided and left them without one single visitor

I was struck by the juxtaposition of this item to the one above.

The obnoxious behavior of a couple of gay flakes is used to indict the entire gay community, not to mention those on the left who support gays.

This is a tactic that Moonbattery employs regularly. If one person on the left does something ignorant, everyone on the left is blamed and held responsible.

How the extreme right gins up paranoia.

Hate crime laws evidently work one-way

This is a tactic that Moonbattery employs regularly. If one person on the left does something ignorant, everyone on the left is blamed and held responsible.

Pot, meet kettle.

The militant left has, for decades, accused every conservative of being a closeted racist, a crypto-fascist, a homophobe, etc.

Remember Bush, the guy you like to blame so much? Well, since about 2003, every prominent conservative who has supported strong national defense has been classified as an ideological carbon-copy of Bush, on every issue, from civil liberties to government spending to gay rights.

That is standard operating procedure for the far left, but it is not what happens at Moonbattery. VH did not accuse all gays of this level of hate and militancy. His post specifically identified "homosexual militants" advancing the "militant gay agenda" as being a source of hate, which it is. Nowhere in that post was a condemnation of otherwise balanced people who just so happen to be gay as being part of this militant homosexual movement.

This might be hard for you to grasp, but there are millions of people in this country who are gay or bisexual who lead normal, productive lives, and do not center their entire image and personality around one private aspect of their lives, and use it as an all-encompassing reason for militant moonbattery.

Thank God for AIDS.

These so called "men" are showing their true colors. Bitter haters who will stoop to low levels to degrade what is decent about our country.

You know Doug, just because we don't condone the gay lifestyle doesn't make us Nazi lovers, Commie lovers or banana republic dictators.

I'm a pro-life conservative woman. To me those mooonbats above are vile hateful men. They're not making a statement, they're showing what stupid lowlifes they really are.

Halloween is a holiday for children to dress up in funny costumes, get candy and have a good time.

These militant gays are mentally ill. Anyone who opposes their sick degenerate immoral lifestyle is a hater. Give me a break.

I would prefer to thank God for providing us the means to avoid AIDS... self-restraint, commitment, monogamy.

That's kinda my point, VtK. With AIDS, there's now a visible downside to acting like an alley cat.

Jesus would cry at the hatred you spew here.

Love thy fellow man, regardless of who they love.

What do you know about Jesus and what he would do. What would he think about the two fruits begging for attention? Would he cry about the hate THEY spew? Get lost.

Love thy fellow man...

Well, those guys are certainly taking that literally. If they're that literal, somebody better quickly clarify the phrase "animal husbandry" for them before it's too late.

These twinks need to meet their new neighbor:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWXkHp_1bT8

hiram and Jay B, I guess I'm already there. I just don't care what happens to these two morons.

I'm not against them being gay, I had a lot of gay friends in college, and my sister's best friend is a very classy gay fellow with more common sense than she has, I'm sad to say. People's personal choices are their own.

But these two are just idiots. What kind of morons create such hate-filled effigies and then post pictures of themselves for all of their enemies to see?

They're so proud of themselves for their "smarts", aren't they? Yet, one day they'll be wailing to every network reporter they can find, about how they just can't understand why these horrid people beat the crap out of them.

Darwin pointed out that some do not survive, and that nature has a way of correcting it's mistakes. These guys either get smart about pissing people off, or they'll cease to be a problem one day.

We can probably save their lives by completely ignoring them....Call it the humane thing to do.
(Besides, it's just about the worst thing you can do to glory-hounds. Drives 'em absolutely nuts.)

;)

Anonypussy: Jesus would not cry at militant homo-fascism, he would say 'Get thee behind me Satan' and like the money changers in the temple, he would whoop the hides of Obamunist crypto Marxist freaks like YOU.

Janet, you are obviously sarcasm impaired. Now re-read my post.

Some salient facts about vaginal sex v anal sex in terms of transmitting AIDS/HIV:

V: Elastic fibres present
R: NO elastic fibres

V: 25-40 cells thick wall
R: 1 cell

V: Ph low - inactivates the virus
R: Ph higher

V: No M cells
R: M cells present. Their function? To ATTRACT foreign particles for transmission to the immune system - the very target of the HIV virus.

The rectum is SETUP to absorb. It is part of the digestive system.

If someone wants to engage in this behaviour, then that is their business, but to try to shove it in front of decent folk and force them to celebrate it is reprehensible.

sorry, obviously HIV 'virus' is a tautology. you know what I mean...

Jesus did not condone homosexuality...

Then began he to upbraid the cities wherein most of his mighty works were done, because they repented not:

Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee, Bethsaida! for if the mighty works, which were done in you, had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.

22But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you.

And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.

But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee. - Matt 11:20-24 (KJV)

Not to mention:

"And He answered and said, 'Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE,' and said, 'FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH?'" - Matthew 19:4-5 (Also see Genesis 19: 1-29)

Jesus' ministry was primarily directed to the Jews, and in the first century, homosexuality was just not an issue for them. Sure, it occurred, but it was seen as evil perversion. It was not a part of Jewish contemporary debate.

But Jesus did discuss the many issues related to homosexuality, as He taught us our most basic Christian principals.

And Jesus was quite clear that marriage is only for a man and a woman. When we study the Biblical teachings concerning marriage, a man and a woman making a commitment for a lifetime, we also know that sex is a wonderful gift that God has created for a husband and wife to enjoy. But sex outside of marriage is always wrong in God's eyes, be it premarital sex, adultery, or homosexuality.

While Jesus never specifically spoke about homosexuality, His Word certainly does. And the Word is absolutely clear: sexual intimacy is God's gift for a man and woman in the context of marriage only.

The funny thing is that of America's recent leaders the most liberal with regard to gay marriage is Dick Cheney. Carrie Prejean and Sarah Palin's views on the subject are the same as Obama's.

Never was there a better illustration of the Pavlolivan conditioning of liberals.