« Open Thread | Main | Barack the Messiah - In His Own Words »
November 28, 2009
Grant Bosse Announces Candidacy for New Hampshire's 00 Congressional District
Posted by Van Helsing at November 28, 2009 12:17 PM
Hundreds of Congressional districts that exist only in the imagination of our incompetent moonbat rulers are showered with "stimulus" loot by the $billions, creating or saving thousands of make-believe jobs. Why should they be denied Congressional representation?
On a tip from TED.
Comments
Isn't it about time that we end this nightmare and restore the Constitution and the Republic?
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 28, 2009 12:44 PM
A nightmare alright. This is way beyond incompetence by the administration, it's open disdain of the legislation processes. They've crammed healthcare bills no one would bother reading, since apparently they prefer to use the "I didn't have time and was forced to vote for it" excuse to their constituents instead of taking responsibility for it. The lowest form of politic is the liberal way.
Posted by: Jay B. at November 28, 2009 1:08 PM
Oh, and just so you don't think this might have been a "one shot deal", read what Congresswoman Kay Granger of Texas has to say:
Dear Friend,
As news reports continue to break about the flawed job numbers coming out of President Obama’s Recovery.gov stimulus website, I thought it would be interesting to see for myself how the government’s $18 million website is reporting the number of jobs “created or saved” in Texas from the trillion dollar stimulus that I voted against.
What I found was surprising:
According to Recovery.gov, $191,727,818 in stimulus money has been spent in the 12th district to “create or save” 625.5 jobs at a cost of $306,764 per job. But that’s not all. Recovery.gov also reports 30 jobs were “saved or created” in Texas’ 91st congressional district. 45 jobs were saved for $3,659,964 in district 58, and 1 job was saved in the 68th district for $310,963.
The problem is there are only 32 congressional districts in Texas.
When asked to explain why the stimulus information listed congressional districts that don’t exist, Ed Pound, spokesman for Recovery.gov, said, “Who knows, man? Who really knows?”
How can we expect the administration to lead our economy into recovery when they take credit for spending $14,717,592 in congressional districts that don’t even exist?
Sincerely,
Kay Granger
Posted by: Dell at November 28, 2009 1:10 PM
That was pretty good, and the best parts are near the end. "If we fill all 440 seats in the Phantom Congress, we can take over"... "Even fake districts deserve real representation...like Chuck Norris."
Posted by: forest at November 28, 2009 1:10 PM
Damn straight, Alpha.
This is beyond comprehension. It's beyond criminal. I don't throw the word "tyranny" around a lot, but what else can one call this?
The current crop of corrupt thieves have overstepped the bounds so badly, that it's either going to end with the U.S. disintegrating into a shambles or the light being shined on these insects and a new beginning of honest government and civil culture will emerge.
God help us. 2010, baby.
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 28, 2009 1:11 PM
Where's the MSM? IF this had happened under Bush we would never hear the end of it. Democrats would call for investigations. All heck would break loose. And it deserves to. This is just out and out lying. The AP reported it by explained it by quoting someone who said" The people who report the jobs sometimes don't know which district they live in." And the MSM bought that without a hiccup???????
Posted by: TrickleUpPolitics at November 28, 2009 1:29 PM
Remember that YOU are going to PAY for all of this madness! Here is the list of available options to all of us...
1)Protest
2)Take up arms
3)Total tax strike
4)Blood
or
666)Slavery
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 28, 2009 3:40 PM
How exactly would the tax strike work? That's the one I'm interested in. If these cockroaches can't be responsible with our money, we have to stop letting them take it.
Posted by: Ed at November 28, 2009 4:07 PM
AlphaOmega has the right idea on restoring the Constitution and Republic but he's going a little over on "take up arms" and "blood". Wyatt's Torch is getting the idea. Vote these SOB's out and start legal action against them. Are they not taking money under false pretences. Two or three made to answer in this fashion should straighten the whole lot out until we can boot them out and put them back at the car wash where they belong, just don't leave change in your console when you send your car through.
Posted by: Rick Schroeder at November 28, 2009 4:07 PM
Posted by: Rick Schroeder at November 28, 2009 4:07 PM
The options I listed are the options PERIOD; to do something or do nothing; then if you choose to do something than WHAT... A tax strike would require everyone to stop paying taxes and will fail and you will lose your home since only a few might do it…
They are not going to simply give the Great Jewel of Liberty back to the bourgeoisie and they are fully funded by US so assuming all of their global government plans are in full operation I will leave you a quote and their basic plan of action(they say he didn't say it, but...)...
"War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in thirty to forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist." -- Dimitri Manuilsky
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 28, 2009 4:19 PM
"The only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.
- Edmund Burke
Posted by: TED at November 28, 2009 4:36 PM
Lookie! Alpha suddenly thinks he is a liberal and channeling Thoreau! And little Ricky has been watching too much Law and Order!
You guys can bitch and moan all you like but take no responsibility for the ones you did not vote out when you had the chance. For you it's ok when conservatives spend like whores at Nieman Marcus or drunken sailors overseas (while never including it in the budget), but if a liberal spends??? Oh fuck, the sky is falling! You guys make Perez Hilton look macho with all of your belly aching.
You don't want to pay taxes? fine, go to jail. You don't want to fight wars that your team started? fine join the peaceniks. At least have the humility to man up and admit "dear God...I fucked up over the last eight years! bloody hell!!!!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous at November 28, 2009 4:45 PM
"They are not going to simply give the Great Jewel of Liberty back to the bourgeoisie..."
Back to Indiana Jones dialogue I see.
How come "win elections" didn't even make your little list? Too much work to use democracy?
Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 4:46 PM
Posted by: Anonymous at November 28, 2009 4:45 PM
Foul language shows poor communication skills so good thing that you are Anonymous. You seem to have issues with reading too. Here is one for you to ponder while I get some rest...
"The bureaucracy is a circle from which no one can escape. Its hierarchy is a hierarchy of knowledge" -- Karl Marx
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 28, 2009 5:03 PM
AlphaOmega needs a rest. All that fantasizing about punching nazis and cracking his bullwhip wore the poor boy out.
Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 5:06 PM
"They are not going to simply give the Great Jewel of Liberty back to the bourgeoisie..."
Back to Indiana Jones dialogue I see.
How come "win elections" didn't even make your little list? Too much work to use democracy?
Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 4:46 PM
Is the USA a DEMOCRACY Lao? This is the problem by the way since it is NOT. Liberty is considered to be the Jewel of the USA and that is a fact!
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 28, 2009 5:07 PM
And when exactly did your "jewel" slip out of your fingers?
Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 5:15 PM
And when exactly did your "jewel" slip out of your fingers?
Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 5:15 PM
Clearly there is something wrong with you and so on that note good bye!
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 28, 2009 5:34 PM
It was such a simple question. Let me break it down for you.
You said: "They are not going to simply give the Great Jewel of Liberty back to the bourgeoisie..."
Obviously you believe the "bourgeoisie" had the jewel once but, you also believe, they don't anymore. So when exactly did they lose the Great Jewel of Liberty? Give me a date or occasion.
Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 6:02 PM
I'll be back. I have some illegals over to choke me while I am in the shower. You see they choke me and I...well, its too much to go into right now.
Its my way of giving back to these poor people.
I'll be thinking of you, A&O!
Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 6:17 PM
That was pretty good, and the best parts are near the end. "If we fill all 440 seats in the Phantom Congress, we can take over"... "Even fake districts deserve real representation...like Chuck Norris."
Posted by: forest at November 28, 2009 1:10 PM
Unfortunately ACORN is way ahead of us and already has the fake voter registrations completed. They even faked 2or3 three republican voters --They wouldn't want to get Holder and gang suspicious. Hell, if they could make this work they would try creating a phantom state, I am hearing they have a huge stimulus project just starting.
Posted by: Dan at November 28, 2009 6:55 PM
March 4, 1861
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 28, 2009 7:51 PM
The "Great Jewel of Liberty" has been lost to the "bourgeoisie" since Lincoln's inauguration?? Bwahahahahahaha!!
So, AlphaOmega, that means you have been advocating a violent American revolution for your entire adult life. How's it going so far? LOL!!
Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 10:49 PM
Lao and anon...NO one likes what the Repubs did for the last six (at least) years. When are you going to understand that conservatives don't follow a party line.
I'd rather have LESS evil (meaning Repubs) than what we've got now, but I REALLY want a total clean slate, with good conservatives who'll do the right thing.
To mock and sneer and be critical is your elitist way...and NO ONE respects you, since you don't respect yourselves.
As to what to do: Vote. If that doesn't work, resist...with taxes at first. If THAT doesn't work, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another..." And if that means blood, so be it.
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 28, 2009 11:52 PM
Posted by: Lao at November 28, 2009 10:49 PM
Actually, I simply listed the available options to SLAVERY. The fact that you want us to use "DEMOCRACY" as the method makes you the violent one since all democracy is are two wolves and a sheep deciding on what to eat for dinner.
For Lincoln all that can be said is that he killed nearly a million and that is simply one thing of many things that when studied show him to be not quite how the history books paint him.
I believe that when Thomas Jefferson said, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" he was warning Americans of the future that at some point they would be forced to face treason and folks like you and if need be dispatch you at the end of a rope or by whatever means is handy.
The issue you have is one of poor character since you choose to poke fun at my use of the phrase, Jewel of Liberty so pay attention you uneducated troll...
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel." -Patrick Henry-
You need to watch less Lucas and read more BOOKS so that way you can try to disguise your trollosity and general ignorance through intelligent discussion rather than ad hominem or non-words like, "Bwahahahahahaha!!" Grow up!
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 28, 2009 11:57 PM
Alpha, your Lincoln/conspiracy stuff is inappropriate. You believe what you want, but I'm real weary of the "no one understood history until I enlightened them" garbage.
This fetish with what a monster Lincoln was is bordering on "Oswald/CIA/Ruby/Castro/Mafia/Kennedy/Freemasons/Da Vinci Code" land ("back and to the left, back and to the left").
I get the feeling your intentions are in the right place, but seriously...you're sounding way too "Dale Gribble" for your own good.
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 12:22 AM
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 12:22 AM
I addressed this in the other thread. Let me ask you this...
How many people died in the Civil War?
How many people were injured in the Civil War?
How much land did the North take as a result of the Civil War?
Was Abe Lincoln a lawyer and if so what kind?
Did Abe Lincoln allow the Railroads to use Eminent Domain (government force de jure) to secure property rights from American Citizens to their respective corporations?
If the 13th Amendment frees the slaves from private holdings but permits slaves to the Government then how was SLAVERY, ABOLISHED?
What is the purpose of the 14th Amendment in the Bill of Rights and why are we considered "Subjects" and what happened to "State's Rights" if we are now all SUBJECTS of the Federal Government?
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 29, 2009 12:42 AM
I take back what I said about Alpha and "good intentions". He is a radical, agenda-driven conspiracy nut. Told me I was educated by Commies and to bury my head in the sand (another thread), etc.
He's using the "Abe was a moster/murderer" stuff to cover his real agenda...and it's got nothing to do with living in or restoring a free Republic. Oh no, trust me...that ain't the end game with ol' Alpha.
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 12:44 AM
Back and to the left, back and to the left.
It ain't playing pal. LOTS of people died in the Civil war. Lots of people die in ALL wars. Your Lincoln thing is a smoke-screen.
I get the feeling you're thinking there hasn't been a legitimate President since Jefferson Davis...am I right?
You can take all your "Abe was a lawyer, right?" stuff and shove it. ANY facts can be twisted to make it look as if there is a conspiracy. They can be manipulated (to those of weak mind) so that the conclusion supports the theory.
But you know damn well, your thing is NOT about Lincoln. That accusing finger you are pointing, those oh-so "obvious" facts that you lay out with a flourish and a "isn't it OBVIOUS?" are a smoke screen.
You may as well f-off now, 'cause you aren't going to get ANYwhere around here, bub.
Oh, and if you ever insinuate that I'm a commie dupe again, buster...
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 12:50 AM
Alpha, your Lincoln/conspiracy stuff is inappropriate.
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 12:22 AM
If you stated that you DISAGREED with me than that, I would understand. You decided to use the word in BOLD above and I must tell you that your intent is to hold yourself above me and that is not going to happen. You are no "expert" on what is or is not appropriate for another to say. Disagree with everything I say but never tell me what to say or what not to say. Clearly, you are attempting to act in judgment over me but I was not aware that I wandered into Wyatt's court. I trust you know where you can stick your judgment!
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 29, 2009 12:56 AM
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 12:50 AM
You must be a Communist sympathizer along with being foolish! Good luck with that.
Posted by: Anonymous at November 29, 2009 1:00 AM
By the way that was me above.
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 29, 2009 1:07 AM
Wyatt started out by saying "damn straight Alpha" and agreeing that violent revolution in the U.S.A. could be a reasonable choice. Now he's flipped into calling Alpha a conspiracy nut.
Is this the same Wyatt or a name highjacker?
Posted by: Burt at November 29, 2009 8:24 AM
I live near Wichita, KS. Better known as the 15th Congressional District of Arizona and I hereby announce my candidacy. (I just wish I had thought of it first.)
Do I have to smear Republicans now or can I wait till later to get GOP $$$ from Steele?
Posted by: Frank W. at November 29, 2009 9:15 AM
Posted by: Burt at November 29, 2009 8:24 AM
Good morning, Lao.
Posted by: SK at November 29, 2009 9:23 AM
"Keeping the equilibrium became harder as the country grew, and the conflict began. The North soon attained power over every department of Government. There were thirteen Northern states and twelve Southern (considering Delaware as neutral), making a difference of two senators in favor of the North. In the House of Representatives, the North had 135 members and the South 87. So, in all questions pertaining to the diversity of interests between the North and South, the South’s interests were sacrificed to those of the North. Through the adopted system of revenue and disbursements, an undue portion of the burden of taxation was imposed upon the South and an undue portion of its proceeds appropriated by the North. The North demanded a high tariff, “so as to monopolize the domestic markets, especially the Southern market, for the South, being Agragarian, must purchase all manufactured goods,” says southern historian Frank Owsley . The South fought the institution of the tariff, and almost seceded because of it. The resulting effect of the tariff was to transfer a vast amount of wealth from South to North. Under an equal system of revenue and disbursements, this would not have happened. Because there was so little restraint to prevent the Government from doing whatever it wanted, a small group of Northern abolitionists saw this as their chance to agitate for freeing the slaves." - Ria Living in St. Louis, MO
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 29, 2009 10:45 AM
Alpha, you are a punk. Wish you were here and tried to call me a commie. We'd have a little prayer session and I'd show the light.
You have NOTHING to say and you ARE inappropriate. Got a little touchy about that, didn't you? Sorry if the truth hurts.
Yeah, I agreed with what you said at first. Hell, I probably agree with one or two percent of what Obama says, too.
But you are a dangerous radical. You are a liar also, since you won't own up to the real agenda you have...and that's why you're mad at me. I've OUTED YOU! Anarchy is NOT liberty, pal.
So go ahead, keep it up. It won't get you anywhere here. Not anymore.
Oh, by the way...since you obviously have a LOT of time on your hands, not being employed or anything...the amount of words you post does not make you right. Keep it pithy. Or better yet, F-off.
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 12:10 PM
By the way, while you're waving your Confederate flag and ruing the day them Darkies were freed, I understand there is a "draft Jefferson Davis" rally scheduled for this week. You may want to attend.
(No offense to my friends in the South. I'm just giving ol' Alpha some jazz for being an idiot.)
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 12:13 PM
Alpha, you are a punk. Wish you were here and tried to call me a commie. We'd have a little prayer session and I'd show the light.
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 12:10 PM
Oh my! Look Wyatt the commie is calling me names and now makes terroristic threats to beat me up along with telling me what to post and how to post it. Wyatt, your commie ways are leaking out in your rage to be right. Clearly, you are an ignorant communist that at the same time pretends to know it all. Anyway, sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me.
"Keeping the equilibrium became harder as the country grew, and the conflict began. The North soon attained power over every department of Government. There were thirteen Northern states and twelve Southern (considering Delaware as neutral), making a difference of two senators in favor of the North. In the House of Representatives, the North had 135 members and the South 87. So, in all questions pertaining to the diversity of interests between the North and South, the South’s interests were sacrificed to those of the North. Through the adopted system of revenue and disbursements, an undue portion of the burden of taxation was imposed upon the South and an undue portion of its proceeds appropriated by the North. The North demanded a high tariff, “so as to monopolize the domestic markets, especially the Southern market, for the South, being Agragarian, must purchase all manufactured goods,” says southern historian Frank Owsley . The South fought the institution of the tariff, and almost seceded because of it. The resulting effect of the tariff was to transfer a vast amount of wealth from South to North. Under an equal system of revenue and disbursements, this would not have happened. Because there was so little restraint to prevent the Government from doing whatever it wanted, a small group of Northern abolitionists saw this as their chance to agitate for freeing the slaves." - Ria Living in St. Louis, MO
Posted by: AlphaOmega at November 29, 2009 1:18 PM
I think AlphaOmega's definition of "commie" is "anyone who challenges me on my conspiracy theories and rabid hatred of Lincoln."
Posted by: Evil Otto at November 29, 2009 2:02 PM
Gee, now I'm a commie AND a terrorist.
Yawn.
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 2:06 PM
Hey Otto, I appreciate you sticking up for me...but you realize Alpha will see this as another conspiracy.
I honestly can her him yelling Sic semper tyrannis.
Posted by: Wyatt's Torch at November 29, 2009 2:20 PM
Alpha, by any chance, ya didn't go by the name of Gator on a pretty big conservative message board a couple years ago, did ya?? Just wondering.
Posted by: Atomic Lib Smasher at November 29, 2009 11:19 PM
This would really be a funny clip if it weren't so sad. We Americans have been taken for a ride. Unfortunately, the fawning Obama media controls the uneducated and ill informed. We have no way of reaching those individuals, nor would they care to listen if we did. We are in deep trouble.
Posted by: bohica at November 29, 2009 11:32 PM


