moonbattery.gif


« The Strange Case of Mel Zelaya and David Romero Ellner | Main | Awarded $2.2 Million for Bed Sores »


October 5, 2009

Stunning New Proof 9-11 Was an Inside Job

Posted by Gregory of Yardale at October 5, 2009 4:00 AM

This latest evidence really puts a nail in the coffin of the few remaining people who still believe Al Qaeda hijacked airliners and flew them into the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9-11-2001. As with 99% all evidence supporting the truther version of events, it takes the form of a YouTube video put together by amateurs with no training in physics, engineering, or thermodynamics.

Remember, folks, the people who claim that Mossad/Bushitler/Halliburton/the Illuminati brought down the WTC are just "patriotic Americans asking questions."

The only dangerous lunatics are the ones who wonder why B. Hussein Obama has never released his college records or his Long Form Birth Certificate.

Source: Screw Loose Change

Note: The video may well be a joke, but the Troofers in the comments are dead serious about defending it.


Comments

That was HILARIOUS. What a great spoof on some of the looney YouTube videos about 9-11!

Posted by: Judith M. at October 5, 2009 4:35 AM


Well, that convinced me. Nothing like a foreign voice-over to make the case for a snow job.

Posted by: Son of Taz at October 5, 2009 4:45 AM


I recognize that voice...it's Apple's text-to-speech synthesizer. Oooo, clever.

Posted by: Sylvia at October 5, 2009 4:55 AM


10 seconds of hearing that voice sent me screaming for the volume control. If the makers want it to be believable they should have hired the gy who does the state farm insurance voice overs.

Posted by: puffdaddy at October 5, 2009 6:07 AM


To be more convincing they should've gotten the voice talent for Wing Fat from What's Up Tiger Lily.

Posted by: Corona at October 5, 2009 6:32 AM


BTW...
who was the technical advisor on this, Rosie "steel can't burn" O'Dildo?

Posted by: chuck in st paul at October 5, 2009 6:51 AM


Hilarious parody!

Posted by: Miscreant at October 5, 2009 6:51 AM


That is the most convincing science I've seen from those that believe it was an inside job.

Posted by: IOpian at October 5, 2009 6:52 AM


I allways thought it was really giants who made the final fall.
I hate giants. There allways busting up our stuff.
Lets wage war on giants!

Posted by: czuch at October 5, 2009 7:04 AM


The bigger conspiracy here is that the towers were made of snow! Imagine all of the greenhouse gases that were produced to keep them from melting in the heat of summer.

Posted by: LoneWolfArcher at October 5, 2009 7:08 AM


Illustrative of liberal gullibility as well as their ever-predictable reliance on comparative fallacies.

Posted by: Fiberal at October 5, 2009 7:23 AM


Fire has never melted snow! Google It!

Posted by: Rosie O'Donnell at October 5, 2009 7:33 AM


I know who did 9-11, while I dont know who they are or where they come from, I can tell you this much, Aliens are involved.

Posted by: Mr. Morden at October 5, 2009 7:40 AM


Just mock and deride. You know that there were right wing conservative elements behind the tragedy of 9-11 and the ensuing wars.

Posted by: Ghost of Wellstone at October 5, 2009 7:42 AM


"Just mock and deride. You know that there were right wing conservative elements behind the tragedy of 9-11 and the ensuing wars."

If you mean jihadis, then you're right. Otherwise, you're off your rocker.

Posted by: Arthur at October 5, 2009 7:50 AM


Food for thought: Although the science in this video is obviously 14 kinds of stupid, the thing that the lunatic fringe needs to be aware of is this: WE BELIEVE YOU CAPABLE OF THIS.

Would Karl Rove and his army of Machiavellian evildoers be 'morally above' letting 9/11 happen on purpose for selfish political gains? Of course not. Are there people out there who think that the Iraq war was a flimsy pretext to divert resources to Halliburton et al? Yep. Lots of them. And you will notice... that is exactly how it ended up happening. So even if it was not a grand conspiracy, the RESULTS seems awfully convenient for the neocon's army of shitweasels.

Before you get too far up your own asses mocking this, ask yourself WHY so many people are convinced that there was conspiracy involved. The trust the general public has for the monkeys on the right simply does not exist. If you told me there was a plan for Rove and W to feast on the still-beating hearts of human babies as an attempt to appease Chango, I might believe that too. Just seems like the sort of thing they might do.

Posted by: Food for thought at October 5, 2009 8:01 AM


Not even crackpots like Pelosi, Reid and Obama believe such conspiratorial nonsense. If they did, you can be sure they would be holding Congressional hearings to expose the socalled "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" now that they have complete control of the Federal Government. Unless...... they were in on it too!!!

Posted by: FDR bombed Pearl Harbor and I have PROOF !! at October 5, 2009 8:06 AM


WHY so many people are convinced that there was conspiracy involved.

South Park already answered this question. And guess what, you're the one in four.

Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at October 5, 2009 8:10 AM


Global warming hysteria made Al Gore rich to the tune of $100 million+. Maybe its not a grand conspiracy but its awfully convenient. Where did all that money come from exactly? I mean where did it REALLY come from? Other than the part that come from his families investments in Occidental Petroleum.

Posted by: T R Mathus at October 5, 2009 8:14 AM


Before you get too far up your own asses mocking this, ask yourself WHY so many people are convinced that there was conspiracy involved.

BEcause a certain segment of the society to which you apparently belong, are deranged. Whether they be Truthers, Birthers, Moon Landing Hoaxers, or whatever, they all belong in the same rubber room together.

Posted by: J at October 5, 2009 8:40 AM


"Before you get too far up your own asses mocking this, ask yourself WHY so many people are convinced that there was conspiracy involved."

Because there's no shortage of mouth-breathing retards in this country. One only has to look at one of the myriad of reality shows on television to see this. Or the last election.

Posted by: Panday at October 5, 2009 8:58 AM


Of course we all SAW the explosions at the BOTTOM of the twin towers that brought them down. Oh wait, no we didn't...um, um, right...the explosives were planted EXACTLY where the planes hit and not only that, they were not destroyed or scattered by the impact. There is no reasoning with the demolition nuts. Great video.


Posted by: Lao at October 5, 2009 8:58 AM


Who knew the Twin Towers were made of snow?
Was this video supposed to be funny?

I don't think it was an "inside" job. These snow towers were built "outside".

End of discussion!

Posted by: proof at October 5, 2009 9:28 AM


The birth certicate issue is the creation of Obama - he could clear the whole thing up by making it public. By keeping it secret it makes people wonder what on that certificate is there that he doesnt want people to know. Perhaps the name of his real father? REVEREND WRIGHT ???? Wright joined the Marines in early 1961 after Kennedys "ask not what your country can do for you" speech. Did he hook up with Obamas mommy?

Posted by: Vast Left Wing Conspiracy at October 5, 2009 9:39 AM


People, the towers are still there! The boys at area 51 obtained a number of Romulan cloaking devices from Ferengi traders back in the 1950s. It was all CGI effects shown on 9-11-2001. The people who didnt make it were sold as slaves to the Orion Syndicate to keep them selling Earths location to the Klingons.

Posted by: Anonymous at October 5, 2009 9:43 AM


Anonymous at October 5, 2009 9:43 AM

Makes more sense then anything posted by "Ghost of Wellstoned"

Posted by: metalgarth at October 5, 2009 9:45 AM


Van, you owe me the one minute and 42 seconds of my life back that it took to watch that!!!

That nice university in Philadelphia that issued my Engineering degrees owes me a few years of my life (and tuition) back as well.....OBVIOUSLY everything I ever learned about structural engineering was WRONG.

I knew I shouldn't have blown off that lecture on the high-temperature properties of steel alloys by Professor R. O'Donnell.

All kidding aside, anyone who cannot accept the obvious and understand that the events of 11 September 2001 were caused by murderous Muslim extremists (I know that's redundant) using a couple of airliners as flying IED / WMDs is not just a moron, but truly sick and delusional.

Posted by: TonyD95B at October 5, 2009 10:20 AM


"Before you get too far up your own asses mocking this, ask yourself WHY so many people are convinced that there was conspiracy involved."
1. The vast majority of the people who believe it was a conspiracy are what's known as the "Tinfoil hat crowd," the fringe minority of delusional, paranoid nutjobs who've never come across a conspiracy theory they didn't like and fully believe. Basically, people like Dale on 'King of the Hill.'
2. Many ultra- liberals were eagerly looking for ANY possible thing that they can blame on Bush/ Cheney/ Rove/ The evil corporate boogeymen, and felt claiming they were really behind 9/11 would be a good way to go about this. You yourself seem to fall into this category, based on the last two sentences of your ridiculous post.
btw, here's a point which the 9/11 Troofers never seem to be able to adequately answer/ rebuff:
When buildings are brought down by controlled demolition, they tend to collapse from the bottom up, so it looks kind of like the building is sinking in quicksand (As shown in how the second snow tower in the video fell).
In contrast, on 9/11, the towers collapsed from the top down, starting from where the planes hit!
Another question:
What about Flight 93, which crash landed in the field after Todd Beamer and the other passengers fought off the terrorists and prevented them from reaching their target? If it was all a big conspiracy by the brilliant supervillains Troofers have nightmares over or something, how could such a big problem in their plan have happened, which didn't happen on any of the other hijacked planes?
This video also fails to take into account that the plane didn't just hit the tower and that was it: After it hit the tower, its fuel supply exploded, weakening the tower's support.

Posted by: Adam at October 5, 2009 12:59 PM


What did the LUSITANIA carry what did FDR know about PEARL HARBOR what kind of secrets of history are kept from the public?

Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at October 5, 2009 2:03 PM


OK for the record, these tinfoil-hat type people are batshit crazy. Taken as read. BUT, (and there is always a BUT), if W/Rove/et al HAD known it was imminent, do we really think they are sufficiently moral to not consider letting it happen, and reaping the political rewards?

This is not conspiracy; it was made very, very clear that those people have no moral qualms about ANYTHING that might further their bent political ends. So I remain unconvinced that they did all that was possible to prevent 9/11. Seriously... if it really was a few dozen (ish?) uneducated, insane camel-folk... one might think it unlikely tha they were so stunningly able to get it all together without our various law enforcement types getting wise.

So which is it? Were the attackers superhumanly skillful? Or maybe, just maybe, was our old 'leadership' deliberately ignoring stuff until we were hit. And further, said 'leadership' used the outrage to foment (for example) a war in Iraq that had no basis in factual reality?

Come now. You can't tell me you think Karl Rove is above such things. He would clearly eat you, your grandmother, HIS grandmother... anything to try andd give the GOP the fear-and-control mantra they tried so desperately to instill.

You know I'm right...

Posted by: You know I'm right... at October 5, 2009 2:07 PM


Ghost of Wellstoned, why are you trying to use an argument that would really only work on people that are already on your side. Most people here don't believe Karl Rove is some kind of fucking super-vampire, or whatever you believe he is, so we don't have any reason to be swayed by your argument.

Posted by: Eric at October 5, 2009 2:37 PM


Ah, so Bush and Cheney are so Machiavellian and amoral that they permit a terrorist attack on US soil as a pretext for war.

But, they are not amoral and Machiavellian enough to manufacture evidence linking Iraq to the attack, or to make sure there are stashes of WMD in Iraq (place by Halliburton or Blackwater) for our troops to find?

Is that what you want us to believe?

Get out of here, retard.

Posted by: V the K at October 5, 2009 2:39 PM


It is so obvious that the idiot Bush and his minions brought this about to keep power. By eliminating a need for elections and instituting martial law they have maintained their evil grip on the government.

(except, that didn't happen either)

Posted by: Jeff Stone at October 5, 2009 4:09 PM


so silly. in order to make that a *real* test, they'd have had to given each snow tower an extremely strong, heavily-overengineered steel framework core designed *specifically* to resist failure due to an airline strike, among other things.

if they'd bother to do THAT, i feel certain the first "tower" would have collapsed. just like the real WTC towers did, the first (and still the only) total failure/collapses-neatly-into-its-own-footprint of a steel-framed skyscraper due to an airplane strike **anywhere in the world**. (except of course for WTC7, which was just the first and only total collapse of a steel-framed skyscraper due to fire [and a smallish fire at that] anywhere in the world.)

i have no use for moonbats. but i also have no use for those who - despite what their own eyes and research tells them - dutifully chant "truther", just as they're ordered to by their political faction, rather than take the risk of asking hard questions. much easier to just crank up a good ol' 2-minute hate. there are a good dozen things about that day that still defy rational explanation: the first-in-world-history collapse of the towers. the bbc reporting the collapse of wtc7 20 minutes before it happened. (google it: you can actually see wtc7 standing in the background as the bbc infobabe reports it "has collapsed".)(interestingly, the bbc claims it's "lost their tapes" of the most important news day of the last 50 years, and can't double-check them. pity.) the "crash site" of the flight in pennsylvania that's only the smallest and cleanest crash site in world history. (they told us that most of the debris, luggage, and bodies had "vaporized on impact". even though that's never happened before or since.) the high-speed corkscrew descent attack angle of the plane that hit the pentagon, which was a move so complex and difficult, that 'top gun' *instructors* have gone on record as saying they couldn't have done it. the fact that none - zero - of the hijacked planes got off a "hijacked" transponder signal. i know commercial pilots: all they'd have had to do was to push 1 button - and everyone on the flight deck has a button - or make a verbal "hijack" squawk code over the air. would've taken about half a second. didn't happen. not even once. the refusal of the government to release ANY footage of the pentagon strike from ANY of the DOZENS of nearby cameras that recorded it. (except the laughable 4 frames from the parking-lot camera. why that and no more? why?) and many many more.

the world teaches us as we get older and smarter that there are very few coincidences in life. but on that day, there were nothing BUT coincidences. and here you clowns are, allegedly conservatives, allegedly the seekers of truth .... and you shout down the questioners. exactly as the obamabots you love to whine about do to you. just so we're straight here: when the government tells obvious whoppers and makes vague, impossible-to-check assertions about *healthcare*, they're power-mad liars trying to usurp our freedom. but when they do the exact same thing about **9-11**, they wouldn't lie to us because they're the government and we should always trust what they say. that about it?

Posted by: beast of caerbannog at October 5, 2009 4:28 PM


Ummmmmm.... okay... so if Flight 93 didn't crash in Pennsylvania, and Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon, what happened to the passengers?

I know how a rational person would respond, but I'm curious to hear the perspective of someone who liked to taste the stuff under the sink when he was a kid.

Posted by: V the K at October 5, 2009 4:43 PM


there ya go, v. shout down/mock/ignore the heretic, just like you're told to. ANYthing's better than thinking the unthinkable, right? "where'd the passengers go?" beats me. your turn: why not release the multiple pentagon plane-strike videos? what national-security purpose is served by keeping them secret?

Posted by: beast of caerbannog at October 5, 2009 5:06 PM


oh, yeah: and since, in 'rational v' world anyone who dares disagree with the sacred truth gets mocked, you tell me, good buddy: have you quit eating your toejam yet?

saaay, this is FUN! (or does that rule not apply to you?)

Posted by: beast of caerbannog at October 5, 2009 5:08 PM


"beast of caerbannog at October 5, 2009 5:06 PM"

Why do you have a problem with us asking questions? You truthers defended your insanity by saying "we just want people to ask questions". Like hell. the last thing you want is for people to THINK and QUESTION YOU.

The 9-11 conspiracy has been debunked utterly by a blogger who put it this way (Paraphrased, I've forgotten the site):
"Let's put aside all facts about metalurgy, physics, camera footage, eyewitness accounts, police, paramedic, fire department, engineer reports and look at one simple fact:
"(Photo of #1 truther)
"This man is still alive!
"If our government is so ruthless and insane as to murder three thousand innocent people in one day, do you think that they would alow him to live to stir up trouble?"

Your turn, CAERBANNOG.

Posted by: KHarn at October 5, 2009 5:29 PM


(they told us that most of the debris, luggage, and bodies had "vaporized on impact". even though that's never happened before or since.)

*sigh*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--_RGM4Abv8

Posted by: J at October 5, 2009 5:35 PM


Thanks J, and the comment immediately below the video explains what happened to the passengers on the 9-11 flights. They never existed! They were all fake!

Of course, you might not want to tell that to any of the 9-11 widows. Some of them are pretty committed to the lie.

Posted by: V the K at October 5, 2009 6:11 PM


"Posted by: V the K at October 5, 2009 2:39 PM"
Brilliant rebuttal, V.

Oh, and for your comment on what the Troofers think happened to the passengers like Todd Beamer, one post I recall reading from the ultra- liberal, 9/11 Troofer, and genuinely insane blogger kayinmaine gave her own theory which is probably pretty close to what the majority of the Troofers believe happened to the passengers:
She claims that the passengers were in fact abducted by the government, and are currently imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay!
Okaaaaaay!
It's like they honestly don't realize what they're saying!
btw, I notice none of the Troofers who popped up after my last comment offered any sort of answer/ refutation to the part of my comment in which I contrasted the towers' collapse with how buildings which actually WERE brought down by controlled demolition collapse!

Posted by: Adam at October 5, 2009 6:38 PM


This video could equate for some of the Peer Reviewed Earth Science Studies coming out of NASA right now - Goddard for example..........

Posted by: Oiao at October 5, 2009 9:31 PM


Well, all that video proves is that Al Gore was absolutely right and the enire earth is just moments away from bursting into flames....

/end moronic interpretation of events
/end liberal propaganda
/end truther idiocy

Posted by: Michelle at October 5, 2009 10:08 PM


Why does the narrator sound like that 'liberator voice-synthesizer-thingy that Stephen Hawking uses to talk?

Posted by: Cylar at October 5, 2009 11:23 PM


10 seconds of hearing that voice sent me screaming for the volume control. If the makers want it to be believable they should have hired the gy who does the state farm insurance voice overs.

No. I vote for the female voice who says, "Getting you the most for your money. Now THAT's Progressive! Call or click today!"

Posted by: Cylar at October 5, 2009 11:25 PM


I've got one question for the "troofers."

Okay. So Bush planned/orchestrated/allowed for the demolition of the Twin Towers AND damage to the Pentagon, as a pretext for war.

War...with whom? Why, Afghanistan, of course! The US needed a pretext to go running in there and steal Afghanistan's oil & other natural resources. The country also lies at a very strategic location in the Middle East, has a highly-education population looking to be enslaved by the American Empire, and is a country successfully taken over and "used" by numerous other foreign powers in history.

What's that, you say? Wrong on ALL counts above?

Hmm. Maybe 19 Islamic crazies slipped past the US intelligence community's radar (which is A)concerned with not appearing racist and B)handcuffed by several Clinton-era policies), hijacked some planes, and slammed them into buildings in order to kill as many 'infidels' as possible, and try to undermine the financial & economic strength of the world's last superpower.

Nah. That's too simple of an explanation. We all know the REAL story - that 10,000 people ranging from the FAA to the FBI to the NYPD got together and arranged a massive coverup so that a democratically-elected government could slaughter 3,000 of its own citizens. And that not one of them has cracked and "told the truth" in the ensuing eight years of investigation and speculation.

Posted by: Cylar at October 5, 2009 11:35 PM


Cylar, all that fancy talk means is that you're one of THEM! ;)

Posted by: SK at October 5, 2009 11:40 PM


Attention all Truthers! The following exhibits are from the Moussauoi trial. You say you want us to look at your evidence? Only if you look at ours first...

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/


Posted by: Judith M. at October 6, 2009 3:57 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)