« Boycott CCHD | Main | Morning Briefs: Stuff You May Have Already Read Somewhere Else »
October 20, 2009
Ron Bloom: Another Mao Fan in the White House
Posted by Van Helsing at October 20, 2009 8:36 PM
Mao Tse Tung was the worst tyrant in human history, having brought about the death of 70,000,000 of his own subjects during peacetime. He was a totalitarian communist who reduced every soul in the most populous nation on earth to absolute slavery. This gives him a great deal of cachet among liberals. Obama's Communications Director Anita Dunn regards Mao as one of her "favorite political philosophers." She might not be alone. Here's Obama's Manufacturing Czar Ron Bloom:
"Power comes from the barrel of a gun." So much for the consent of the governed.
Mao's cult of personality foreshadowed the quasi-religious excesses of our Obamunist media. Via Cristy Li:

Normally people wouldn't want their idol compared with the worst butcher ever. But Obamunists don't mind. Look what's for sale at the Washington DC Souvenir Headquarters:

Hopey Change is pure evil draped with flowers, peace signs, and smiley faces.
On a tip from J. Hat tips: Hot Air, Ace of Spades HQ.
Comments
Funny how there are all these videos out of B.O.'s closest advisers praising Mao... but not one video of Rush Limbaugh actually speaking out in favor of slavery... yet which story does the MSM run with?
Where, for that matter, is the video of Limbaugh, Hannity, or Beck inciting people to kill the president? Where is the video of FoxNews promoting flat-out lies about Obama? That's what the leftards claim FoxNews does all the time, yet they have zero video to support that claim.
Posted by: V the K at October 20, 2009 8:54 PM
I heard from a reliable source that this dude Ron Bloom is yet another misguided-from-the-womb "Red Diaper Baby"
It was bad enough that the media and academia have been crawling with these sorts for decades, now they have become our President's appointed staff. Twould seem we are in fact obsequiously screwed.
Posted by: Contrarian_Libertarian at October 20, 2009 9:12 PM
The 70s peace symbol the chicken footprint is in reality a satanic symbol its the christian cross turned upside down with the cross arms bent its called the cross of nero
Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at October 20, 2009 9:16 PM
This is only the start the next wave of mao bitchs will not be so nice.
Soon obama will place real power in the hands of our enemies and our police and the political military will fall in line.
The system will use its power on the American people meaning 90 percent whites and down this road to black african AND ITS red ideals will come the camp system something like world war two and next will come the mass murder of the old and young and helpless by order of the new American ideals under obama or some bitch like him.
Its started to happen in front of you but like in 1933 no one will act out of fear of being called a nut job.
Evil is on the move what will you do to stop evil and all its pig shit ideals?
Posted by: Fred Dawes at October 20, 2009 9:21 PM
A union boss is a red? I'm shocked.
*snicker*
Posted by: Jimbo at October 20, 2009 9:42 PM
V the K,
And when asked why they don't move to China, or Venezuela, or Cuba where the policies they support are already in place, they say they don't want things to be like that here at all.
Yet every time one of these self stylized intellectual progressive leaders spontaneously pontificates, there they are praising Mao, Chavez, Castro.
Posted by: J at October 20, 2009 11:01 PM
Funny I thought that one 0of the t-shirts said "Oba Mao Ze Dong" for a second.
Posted by: Room Temp Wellstone at October 21, 2009 1:56 AM
The "Party of Compassion" with the covers off. They show their TRUE soul behind the rhetoric. This is good, they are exposed for the liars and animals they really are.
Posted by: TED at October 21, 2009 3:16 AM
Posted by: TED at October 21, 2009 4:01 AM
OBA IDI DA DA
Posted by: 3bus at October 21, 2009 4:11 AM
I'd like to seem more of this event, because I'm not a fan of heavily edited, short clips. We've seen how the left uses them to mislead, and we've seen some examples of that on the right, too. Truth is more important than a damning soundbite with the potential to go viral. Nothing is worse than spreading something that is a conscious attempt on the part of the creators to mislead people.
Posted by: Judith M. at October 21, 2009 4:18 AM
http://www.meetup.com/TriCity912/photos/739759/#11261139
Troy Michigan Operation Can You Hear Us Now
Next march November 2nd
http://www.operationcanyouhearusnow.com/
Posted by: 3bus at October 21, 2009 4:24 AM
man bites neighbors lip:
http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/dpp/news/local/clinton_township_lip_091020
will be at work before the open thread :/
Posted by: 3bus at October 21, 2009 4:26 AM
Obama was elected by a vast majority of the American people based on priniciples and beliefs he discussed during his campaign. No one used a gun to get anyone to vote for him. This is called democracy. If the people are not happy with his policies or his direction after 4 years, they can replace him. What is your problem?
If you don't like the results of the democratic process, I suggest you either 1. vote and ecourage others to vote differently in the next election, or 2. move to a country that does not employ democratic voting procedures or 3. shut the fuck up.
If your party and or candidates continue to lose in elections, as they most certainly will, you should take it as a sign that your poitical views are invalid and not appreciated in the country in which you live, and again, perhaps you should persue a new homeland or consider reformulating your views. (most of you are incapable of this.)
Instead of constantly whining and crying and stamping your feet accusing all of your opponents of fascism, communism and whatever other dirty word you think you now the meaning of, try to do something constructive to forward your views.
Unfortunately, your views are so unformulated and confused and contradictory that the more you put them forward, the more harm you do to them, and the more you reveal yourselves as idiots.
This is why you are left with crying and absurd name calling and accusations that you put out here every day. Frustration at having no idea at all of what you want.
Face it: You have nothing to offer the country. You are simply in the way.
Posted by: wingnutcracker at October 21, 2009 4:33 AM
Take your Alinsky tactics and shove them, Wingnut. They don't fly when people know what you're doing.
Posted by: Judith M. at October 21, 2009 4:40 AM
Posted by: TED at October 21, 2009 4:44 AM
I don't know what country you were in wingnut but Barry was NOT elected by ANY VAST Majority inthis country! He campaigned for 2 years, owned the media, had evenything handed to him on a gold platter and was ACORN'ED into office by fraud and intimidation. He won by single digit percentages - again you liberals are full of shit as usual. These are the REAL world statistics NOT your imagined liberal world.
Posted by: TED at October 21, 2009 4:50 AM
Posted by: TED at October 21, 2009 4:53 AM
ok TED, you prove my point. You hate democracy and you are a sore loser. Owned the media? Had everything handed to him? Fraud and Intimidation? Jeez, man you had a president for 8 years who didn't even actually win the majority of votes, yet I don't remember you complaining about that. Face it, you really don't care for or believe in democracy.
These are just wild abusrd unsubstantiated accusations that add up to nothing. All you are capable of is continued whining and foot stomping. Little baby children...every last one of you. My 5 year old deals with dissapointment better than the lot of you.
Posted by: wingnutcracker at October 21, 2009 5:05 AM
hey TED, here's an idea: Turn off Fox News and Rush for one week. Take a long walk and look at the real world. Sure, you probably won't have anything to bitch about for a bit, because no one will be feeding you what to think, but it might help you get over your anger and bitterness about living in a democracy.
Posted by: wingnutcracker at October 21, 2009 5:11 AM
Actually wingnutcracker, your boy Barry has a complicit press that refused to dig into his past. They refused to publish anything bad about Barry Soetoro. IN fact, it was ABC who refused to release the video on Obummer partying with Rashid Khalidi, a PLO terrorist turned leftist professor (go figure).
The American people were misinformed in a campaign of disinformation, bought and paid for by Soros.
Now go catch the short bus you triple-vested jackanape.
Posted by: GunnyG at October 21, 2009 5:13 AM
BTW wingnutcracker, we live in a REPUBLIC not a democracy, or we used to.
Amazing how misinformed and ignorant you libs are.
Posted by: GunnyG at October 21, 2009 5:14 AM
The Democrats own the Whitehouse, have a filibuster proof majority in Congress yet are having trouble ramming their programs thru Congress. That says alot. And then there is the constant whining from the Whitehouse about FOX News. If Obama and Rahm "Dead Fish" Emanuel were so sure of themselves they would ignore FOX. Trouble is they know the American people are waking up and they dont like what they see. Images of 1994 are flashing before their eyes. Now if only the RINOs could be sent out to pasture. Starting with Lindsey Graham. I would count Arlen Specter, but hopefully he is already on his way out, since even if he doesnt lose to Joe "Sleestak" from Land of the Lost in the primary, he will have to spend much of his money to win just the primary.
Posted by: Mousey Tongue at October 21, 2009 5:18 AM
my god, funny gunny, are you saying America is not a representitive democracy? Do you believe that being a republic and employing democratic ideals are somehow contradictoy?
My oh my....this is my point: You don't even know what you are arguing about.
Posted by: wingnutcracker at October 21, 2009 5:21 AM
"wingnutcracker", you are absolutely correct in that Obama was elected, with 2% of the majority. However, he was elected based on false promises and contrary to his opponents, whose pasts were combed, his was largely brushed away, keeping only the best parts. Take his "useful" muslim roots, they were denied during his campaign, yet boasted openly when needed. Muslim roots is not a bad thing but he knows he would not have gotten elected by touting it.
Posted by: Jay B at October 21, 2009 5:25 AM
"Do you believe that being a republic and employing democratic ideals are somehow contradictoy?"
No, slow boy, I believe Gunny is pointing out that presidents in this country are not elected by majority vote, but through the electoral college, which is a function of our country being a republic, not a pure democracy.
Posted by: Judith M. at October 21, 2009 5:28 AM
So, wingnutlicker believes that once the election is over, everybody is supposed to shut up and support the president whether they voted for him or not. Dissent is un-American.
I bet he espoused a different viewpoint prior to 1.20.2009.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2009 5:34 AM
"wild abusrd unsubstantiated accusations..." blah blah blah. Nutlicker, you just keep saying the same thing over and over and over again without support. This is bad essay-writing, and would earn you an F in 8th grade English. Shove it, we're not listening to you and your bullshit.
Posted by: Karin at October 21, 2009 5:35 AM
so now you are against the electoral system? You don't seem to whine so much about it when your candidates emerge victorious from such a system.
So America does or does not employ democratic principles....what is it? and why do you hate democracy so much?
Posted by: wingnutcracker at October 21, 2009 5:35 AM
Has anyone here called for a coup, wingnut? We're suffering through this Obamanation, that's what you have to do when a large segment of the population is duped into voting for someone who is all bluff and no substance. However, nothing says we have to suffer through this sentence silently. In fact, suffering in silence might give the wrong impression (i.e., that nothing is wrong). Obviously, there's a lot wrong when you have a president who breaks promise after promise and who doesn't seem to have the faintest clue what he's doing.
Posted by: Judith M. at October 21, 2009 5:48 AM
v, i am challenging you to do something other than cast absurd hysterical insults at those you disagree with and try instead to promote your views in a constuctive convincing way in order to win the next election.
The fact is, however, your views are ungrounded, not thought out, poorly articulated and/or antiquated.
It's much easier to jump up and down, cry, point fingers and cast mud at your oppnonets than to argue any real substance.
When there is a lack of substance within the people who profess a certain view, those views will inevitably lack substance. V, you are a walking testament to lack of substance.
Karin- I'm repeating myself? What the hell do you think is going on here everyday, and are you people capable of making a point without getting all spittle spraying angry? Little babies.
Posted by: wingnutcracker at October 21, 2009 5:50 AM
"Has anyone here called for a coup, wingnut?"
Umm, I'd say yes.
But again I challange you, instead of attacking your opponents views unfairly and ignorantly, try promoting your views.
Again, I don't believe you can do this because your views are so convuluted. This is why you realize your only chance of winning an election is through attack.
Posted by: wingnutcracker at October 21, 2009 6:05 AM
"But again I challange you, instead of attacking your opponents views unfairly and ignorantly, try promoting your views."
That's rich coming from someone who ALWAYS attacks people with whom he disagrees.
I have no problem expressing my views. I want small government and the freedoms due all human beings to make my own decisions as long as those decisions do not harm others in a criminal way. I don't want Big Brother looking over my shoulder and telling me how to live my life. I don't want big government turning me into a wage slave through punitive taxation. I want the right to criticize acts I believe are contrary to the common good in the public square and not be marginalized simply because I believe in God. I want for the media to be able to operate without fear of government coercion. I want to be able to own a gun, as our constitution allows. I want government decisions to be made at the lowest level possible, and for government to limit its role in commerce to enforcing laws against criminal behavior such as fraud, and collusion.
Now why don't you tell us what motivates you other than hatred of conservatives.
Posted by: Judith M. at October 21, 2009 6:20 AM
I've been perusing comments at other blogs. Invariably, all the lefties are required by law to insert the following in all comments:
"But but but......FOX NEWS!!!!!!"
Proving that they don't have an original thought rattling around their "collective" empty gourds. They take their talking points, robotically, from Rahm and fire up their interwebz machines.
Posted by: Karin at October 21, 2009 6:22 AM
as you take your talking points from Fox News.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2009 6:55 AM
Posted by: TED at October 21, 2009 7:02 AM
See? But but but....FOX NEWS!!!!!!!
No I don't, Anon. I take it from my own thought processes and research from a wide variety of sources. Including history.
Posted by: Karin at October 21, 2009 7:39 AM
God forbid that someone in this administration would mention or quote George Washington or any of dozens of other founding fathers. That an official can say that about the free-market is overwhelming cause for his immediate dismissal. This guy isn't qualified to run the fryer, make him mop the floor! I'm sick, literally sick to my stomach with these fools!
Posted by: Bob at October 21, 2009 8:22 AM
"Obama was elected by a vast majority of the American people based on priniciples and beliefs he discussed during his campaign."
No, Obama was elected based on the fact that he has more charisma than McCain, and was able to use that and his buddies in the liberal media to build up a nice cult of personality that got him elected.
Posted by: Adam at October 21, 2009 8:43 AM
Wingbutcracker, it's very important for you to understand the depth of your own blatant idiocy.
Obama was elected by a vast majority of the American people based on priniciples and beliefs he discussed during his campaign. No one used a gun to get anyone to vote for him.
This is incorrect on many levels. First, 52% of the popular vote does not represent a "vast majority."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27531033
Second, Obama was elected on inspirational rhetoric, and presented himself as a pragmatic moderate. We have seen however, partly through his policies but also partly through the bizarre nature of the people he has chosen to surround himself with, that he is not the moderate character he plays on television. The electorate was duped, which is one of the primary reasons for his falling approval numbers across the board.
This is called democracy.
Right. Except for that we live in a Republic. In fact, the Founders purposely created a representative republic to prevent the nation from becoming a democracy, so that our nation's government would be led by rule of law as opposed to mob rule.
If you don't like the results of the democratic process, I suggest you either 1. vote and ecourage others to vote differently in the next election, or 2. move to a country that does not employ democratic voting procedures or 3. shut the fuck up.
1. Is an excellent suggestion.
2. Ignoring the incorrect use of the term democracy, I turn the question back on you. Why not move to China, Venezuela, or Cuba where the policies you support are already in place? Remember, conservatives founded this nation, it belongs to them, not to the interference of progressive ignorance.
3. Spoken like a true despot. Why do you have a problem with dissent? Isn't that the finest form of patriotism? Don't we have a right to "disagree with any administration?"
Regardless, since we live in a representative Republic, winning an election does not in any way give Presidents carte blanche to transform America into some quasi socialist/marxist nightmare.
If your party and or candidates continue to lose in elections, as they most certainly will, you should take it as a sign that your poitical views are invalid and not appreciated in the country in which you live, and again, perhaps you should persue a new homeland or consider reformulating your views. (most of you are incapable of this.)
Please elaborate on this comment in the context of the following articles:
Republicans gets big bump of donors; Outraise Dems
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-09-24-party-money_N.htm
Generic House Polling Suggests the Republicans Could Regain the House in 2010
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/09/generic-house-polling-suggests.html
Democrats running away from Obama
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204488304574431080139159704.html?mod=rss_opinion_main
Democrats Are Jarred by Drop In Fundraising
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/24/AR2009092404906.html?wprss=rss_politics
NYT/CBS poll shows Obama losing ground on health care, Afghanistan
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/09/25/nytcbs-poll-shows-obama-losing-ground-on-health-care-afghanistan/
RNC Beats DNC in September Money Race
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/10/20/rnc-beats-dnc-in-september-money-race/
Instead of constantly whining and crying and stamping your feet accusing all of your opponents of fascism, communism and whatever other dirty word you think you now the meaning of, try to do something constructive to forward your views.
Unfortunately, your views are so unformulated and confused and contradictory that the more you put them forward, the more harm you do to them, and the more you reveal yourselves as idiots.
This is why you are left with crying and absurd name calling and accusations that you put out here every day. Frustration at having no idea at all of what you want.
Please explain why it is simply name calling, to call someone a communist who extols communist values or who praises communist philosophers?
Also explain, why it is merely name calling to call someone a communist who employs officials who exhibit the above behavior?
Face it: You have nothing to offer the country. You are simply in the way.
This of course is incorrect. Aside from founding the nation, conservatives offer much in the way of preserving the nation and its Liberty.
It's a matter of historical fact, that leftist ideology always leaves behind it a trail of nightmarish misery wherever it's allowed to fester. Unlike your words, this is more than merely insulting rhetoric, and is an easily provable fact.
The socialist Nazi Germany stands as the ultimate destination to which the leftist road leads. Cuba, Venezuela, China, are all places where political dissidents disappear into internment camps, if you don't believe the romanticized nonsense they now teach in schools. In fact, generations of immigrants from all over the world came here to escape the very kinds of policies you leftists now want to inflict America with.
Here in America, we can look to the abandoned wasteland of Detroit, as the American Crown Jewel of Leftist Socio-Economic policy. Physical evidence that their philosophy simply does not work, and only offers false promises of the snake oil known as social justice.
In fact, when we compare the founders of both our
ideologies:
http://tinypic.com/r/2n0ss2s/4
What we find is that the founders on the conservative side are intellectual giants, statesmen, and champions of Liberty.
What we find in the founders on the leftist side, is a collection of emotional train wrecks, drug addicts, and despotic mad men; hardly the folks you would look to, to found a legitimate political philosophy grounded in reason.
If you leftists would focus on the reason America became great, it's Liberty and conservative founding, then perhaps you would teach your kind embrace independence and self reliance. Instead, all you do is sound like uneducated drones incapable of any kind of independent thought, and capable only of parroting "collective" approved soundbites.
So go back to your collective hive and report what you've read here, so they can instruct you on how to respond.
Or do the right thing instead, and return to a grammar school of your choice that does not include an entirely incorrect curriculum of progressive indoctrination.
Posted by: J at October 21, 2009 9:50 AM
Annon must read the NEW YORK SLIMES,SLIME,NEWSREEK,USSR TODAY,WASHINGTON COMPOST,ATLANTA URINAL/CONSTIPATION and watch all the talking heads on TV
Posted by: Flu-Bird at October 21, 2009 1:06 PM


