« Moonbat Messiah–Inspired T-Shirts | Main | Bwahahahahaha »

A tangent, I know, but why do conservatives have a problem with teaching masturbation? One would think it would go hand-in... hand with abstinence education. Seven is too young, obviously, but why not for older kids?

Let me perfectly clear, you twisted sick fu cks who will try to defend this man who gave advice to a child to "wear a condom" instead of reporting that he was having sex with an older "person".
I and MANY others on this site will not give you God's mercy after you espouse your views to defend child rape. If/ WHEN we find you you will experience a quick end. That is NOT a threat it is a PROMISE. Please report this to an authority so I/we can find out who you are....and we will end you. Period. Play time is over, you twisted fucks who play upon children's indecision/innocence no longer will be able to hide behind ideology. Each one of you that posts ANYTHING to run contrary to the rape of a child, will be hunted down. We will find you. And then...end you.
Furthermore, please report me for hate speech so I'll know who you are, we'll go to trial, and you'll leave this mortal realm.

Please Van Helsing post where the hell we find "hey you guys". Make your EXACT views known on this matter, "hey you guys", or God will have to stay out of this and Father's will take care of you.

What role is it of the government to "teach" masturbation? A sufficiently clever child will discover this phenomenon on its own. I know I did. Anyone that thinks it's their role to teach this to my son will find himself in some serious trouble. Keep your sick little perversions away from my kid.

Hehe....NAMBLA. Try and rape me...you'll get something shoved up you're ass, and it wont be good.

w, but why do conservatives have a problem with teaching masturbation?

A. We don't think it's the government's business.

B. Given the public schools' complete incompetence at teaching math, science, and English, 70% of the kids they taught would injure themselves and require reconstructive surgery.

My views? Nuanced! I know you guys prefer brute simplicity, but try to follow me.

I work with children.

Pre-pubescent children are not sexual creatures and I deplore any effort to make them so.

Pubescent children are sexual creatures. They require education to know what safe practices are. Parents claim they want the responsibility to do this, but most people are hypocrites in this regard who simply want to deny their children are growing up. I favor sex ed at about 11-12, mostly because of parental failure to do so. Most people are not virgins by time they are 14; this is unfortunate but I prefer to do something besides wringing my hands and wailing that it's someone else's fault.

I feel teenagers are unsuited to raising children and the teen pregnancy rate should be held down by any means except force.

I favor laws against sex between adults and children. I don't agree with the sex offender registry for several reasons. Such registries are often inaccurate, out of date, feature people who shouldn't be on them (17 year olds having consensual sex with 16 year olds and such), and are too often used vindictively to punish people who commit relatively minor crimes. If such registries were strictly limited to crimes of violence and coercion, I would change my opinion.

hey you - Because it's very creepy for an adult to teach children to pleasure themselves. Everyone finds out how to do it on their own, even animals know how. It's not exactly kung fu. The schools can't even manage to teach math and grammar anymore.

dear hey you guys:

since you work with children so much, could you ever consider the old-fashioned idea of chaperones for a date between pubescent children? and i didn't have roman polanski or jack nicholson in mind.

B. Given the public schools' complete incompetence at teaching math, science, and English, 70% of the kids they taught would injure themselves and require reconstructive surgery.

Hahahahahahahaha.

Given their abysmal failure rate in schooling nowadays, they most certainly would hurt themselves.

Parents claim they want the responsibility to do this... I favor sex ed at about 11-12, mostly because of parental failure to do so.

So you're lumping all parents into the fray, even though only SOME are failures?

I think that means that this calls for better parenting, not a need for MORE government intervention.

Some parents are up to the task so there is no need to take away from them that ability just to cover the bad apples who shouldn't be parents to begin with. You're punishing the majority for the minority. I thought you believed in "for the good of society?"

if you dont think history is repeating look up berber weimar... compare her to our stars today, and note who she had in her stable... lets say jennings really looks up..

Also, masturbation is something most kids pretty much figure out on their own. Putting an adult into the mix is just plain creepy, in addition to unnecessary.

Posted by: starkness at October 2, 2009 5:21 PM

Chaperons? I don't mind. In fact, when me and my wife were dating we had chaperons at first (long story). That's a thing that most society has moved past, but if you think you can pull it off.

Posted by: fozzy at October 2, 2009 5:11 PM

Well, not getting into details, just generally as an alternative.

Posted by: AmericanToTheCore at October 2, 2009 5:43 PM

I can't make people better parents; I can only influence indirectly. Also, I'm not punishing anyone. I want to help everyone by presenting factual, correct, and unbiased information. That I can do, and it is for the good of society.

A bit more on topic; I also advocate teaching respect for everyone. Not in any quota based PC "everyone is special" way, but by preventing bullying and promoting common humanity. My kids are too young to teach about homosexuality except by me coming down on them if they happen to act like hateful idiots.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:59 PM- "...I work with children."

"Work", huh? Are you a dull boy, Jack?

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:07 PM- "...why do conservatives have a problem with teaching masturbation?"

Sounds like you're a real workaholic.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:07 PM- "...Seven is too young, obviously, but why not for older kids?"

Jackie boy's got principles, dammit. No 7 year olds for Jack. They're not his thing. They gotta be 8.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:59 PM- "...Pre-pubescent children are not sexual creatures and I deplore any effort to make them so."

Jack likes them innocent, man. If he offers them a "lollypop", he wants them to BELIEVE it's a lollypop.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:59 PM- "...Pubescent children are sexual creatures. They require education to know what safe practices are."

And you're just the guy for the job, right Jack?

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:59 PM- "...Parents claim they want the responsibility to do this, but most people are hypocrites in this regard who simply want to deny their children are growing up."

Parents are boring bourgeois prudes, comrade. Those hot little tots are too horny for your man meat to let waste, right Jack? To hell with reactionary parents. Herd those groovy kiddies into the Bela Kuhn school of getting jiggy with Jack.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:59 PM- "...I favor sex ed at about 11-12"

No doubt.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:59 PM- "...Most people are not virgins by time they are 14"

Not the ones were Jack "works", anyway.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:59 PM- "...I prefer to do something besides wringing my hands"

Whoa. Not touching that one.

Posted by: hey you guys at October 2, 2009 3:59 PM- "...I don't agree with the sex offender registry for several reasons."

What are their names, Jack? Are they cute?

I don't know why people on this blog hate homosexuals so much. You're all touched in the head and once we're really in charge, we'll make sure you so called human beings are dealt with.

"I don't know why people on this blog hate homosexuals so much. You're all touched in the head and once we're really in charge, we'll make sure you so called human beings are dealt with." (Ghost of Wellstone)

WHOA!! DID EVERYONE CATCH THAT? Is this THE gay/lesbian agenda, to be "really in charge"? You mean, To take over straight society? EXCUSE ME???? WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? And EXACTLY WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU'RE GOING TO "DEAL WITH" US STRAIGHT PEOPLE? WHAT ARE YOU THREATENING US WITH? I think this is a really sick attitude you have there.

Look at it this way... if they're going to "deal with" us, then that will be self-defeating as, without the straight population, human life ceases.

This fits well with the liberal mantra of equal misery.

I don't know why people on this blog hate homosexuals so much. You're all touched in the head and once we're really in charge, we'll make sure you so called human beings are dealt with.

If you left-wingers don't get the hell out of the way and let the rest of us win the War on Terror, it is the homos who will be "dealt with" by the victorious Islamo-fascist terrorist scum.

You perverts don't know the definition of "hate" until you've tangled with those murderous, barbaric thugs. All these groups who hate conservatives so much will be the first up against the wall (and the first with their heads on the chopping block) when the enemy wins.

I hope you run your mouth like that in public some time, douchebag. You WILL get your comeuppance.

And for the record, it's the moonbats who seem to be seriously disturbed. I haven't met one yet who seemed to be playing with a full deck.

"teach masturbation.." As Bill Cosby said when he went to child birth classes, "we're intellectuals, you know, the people that go to school to learn what other people do naturally."

"I don't know why people on this blog hate homosexuals so much. You're all touched in the head and once we're really in charge, we'll make sure you so called human beings are dealt with."
Why do you hate heterosexuals so much?

"...once we're really in charge, we'll make sure you so called human beings are dealt with."

I can only assume that means the Clockwork Orange treatment, except being forced to watch the Logo channel for hours on end.

"...once we're really in charge, we'll make sure you so called human beings are dealt with."

Um, you guys are really in charge now. Or did you need all 535 members of Congress to be Democrats before you can start doing anything?

One good way to start cutting back on teen pregnancy and disease-inducing promiscuity would be to cut all "sex education" from the schools. Somehow, our species managed to reproduce itself before we had the sordid situation of adults instructing 10 year olds in oral sex and 6 year olds what gay sex is. If you just plotted a graph of sex ed in schools mapped against teenage pregnancy, it would simply and factually say everything that needed to be said on the topic. More chit-chat about sex = more sex.

Does anyone else find it disturbing that "hey you guys" is allowed around small children?

Somehow, our species managed to reproduce itself before we had the sordid situation of adults instructing 10 year olds in oral sex and 6 year olds what gay sex is.

Didn't you hear? Democrats created the human race and it wasn't until their inception that the human race propagated.

The Scottish SPCA is appealing also in behalf of intelligence after it responded to a elicit from a unending at the community's Hawkhill Cottages who spotted the set impious and unsullied female cat in the avenue, dragging her behindhand leg.
Our sweet Monday passed away, during the Rainbow Tie and into the Summerlands, on December 28, 2001 and on May 11, 2002 we unchaste our adored Princess Honeybear. I've built two memento pages, both to honor their homage and to serve others who have cursed furbabies of their own. Click on the beating centre to pop in the memorial pages or barely continue down this send for to turn towards the rear the clock and bear some fun with Monday and Honeybear and their family and friends in happier times.
Scottish SPCA Chief Inspector Paul Anderson said, "Bromide of our ambulance drivers rescued the cat and took it to a loutish vets where she was x-rayed and cat grin wallpaper an air gun pellet was bring about more lodged in her second section, causing a harsh demoralize to her femur.

pOBdik4888

http://www.psinews.ru/novosti/sochuvstvie-i-zloradstvo.html#comment-9366
http://www.timenetsule.com/create.php
http://bacarus.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=76666
http://www.skytone.net.cn/en/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=1216
http://www.argentinisima.us/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=19348
http://reue.eu/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=182029#182029
http://www.whoosh.danisbell.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=133000
http://strunts.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Talk:Main_Page#relative_to_cats_and_beam_91
http://www.whatwouldyouliketochange.com/discuss.php?issue=41
http://www.telecharger-logiciels.net/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=122