« Skin Cream Uses Cells Developed From a Life Terminated for Convenience | Main | Public Option: Is Red Reid Running Yellow from Blue Dogs? »
October 28, 2009
Newt and the Deaniac Take On Healthcare, but Hitler and Moses Confront Climate Change
Posted by The MaryHunter at October 28, 2009 2:19 PM
Hearing that Howard Dean and Newt Gingrich squared off over healthcare today in the Show Me State is worrisome, in that it is reminiscent of a certain silly thing that the Newtster did not too long ago with another notorious liberal twit:
…which, in turn, is akin to this:
…which all leads one to conclude (yet again) that many conservatives (out to "just get along" with moderates and loonbats) are, indeed, pure unadulterated idiots.
One only hopes that Dr. Newt swept the floor with Dr. Demented on healthcare, rather than hold hands and agree to disagree with him.
Comments
Newt can go f*ck himself now for all I care.
Posted by: Moonbat Skullcracker at October 28, 2009 2:35 PM
The thing that infuriates me more than anything in this video (more so than Newt's fawning to the Globullsh1t Warmening mythology) is when he says something about demanding 'action from our leaders.'
Excuse me? LEADERS? Uhm.. I don't think so, Newtster. I don't have a leader. I have elected representatives, people who are chosen and hired by ME to represent MY interests. These people are not my leaders. As soon as elected rep's begin to refer to themselves as 'leaders,' its time to feed the tree of liberty.
Posted by: baboy at October 28, 2009 3:08 PM
Fools. Newt's playing republicans for fools so he can stay alive in politics.
What happened to Drill here Drill now, Pay Less? He's abandoned that absolutely essential cause in order play footsies with Dean the Scream on health care? He's lurching from one topic to the next to stay relevant.
The man can't be trusted...he's gone limp in his twilight years and has liberal disease all over himself like a rash...picked up sitting too close to Pelousy.
Posted by: Fiberal at October 28, 2009 3:09 PM
This merits nothing more than a singular: Egad.
Posted by: MoogieP at October 28, 2009 3:55 PM
Newt reminds me why I'm a confirmed mugwump. But as long as he's in bed with Nancy, I want video. I want to watch them do to one another what they're collectively doing to the rest of the country.
Posted by: ~Argus at October 28, 2009 5:41 PM
I'll take a piece of that action.
Posted by: Al Gore at October 28, 2009 6:05 PM
I sent Newt a scathing email last night letting him know what I thought of his traitorous positions! What the hell happened to the architect of the contract with America? He's thinking of running for Pres. I let him know...in no uncertain terms...that (to be nice) he was delusional if he thought conservatives would support him after the crap he's been pulling. Go let him know. Google Newt email, you'll find it. Blast his stupid ass!!
Posted by: Mongrul at October 28, 2009 7:08 PM
So, you conservatives on this forum, can you offer some suggested names for people you think would make an electable leader who you feel confident would represent your interests?
Posted by: Anonymous at October 28, 2009 7:33 PM
This asshole has passed to the other side. Do not support him, do not listen to anything he says...he's an Obambi believer and traitor! If your a real American..ie conservative, reject Newt...if your a lib America hater...FUCK YOU!! Move to Cuba you piece of shit! Penn is there, join him! I dare you, put your bullshit comments where your mouth is! Go, enjoy, your nirvana awaits you in Cuba you fucking Hippocrates!!
Posted by: Mongrul at October 28, 2009 8:40 PM
@Mongrul
While your argument that "real Americans" are conservative is weak and overused to say the least, using proper grammar would certainly make it easier to get through your incoherent rants.
Please note that "your" is possessive, while "you're" is a contraction of the words "you" and "are". Additionally, I believe you meant to call all of the "lib America hater[s]" hypocrites and not Hippocrates. Hippocrates is regarded as the "father of medicine" and most associated with the Hippocratic Oath.
Posted by: grammar/history nerd at October 28, 2009 9:06 PM
Green moonbats 10 Commandments THOU SHALT NOT DRIVE A SUV, THOU SHALT NOT EAT MEAT, THOU SHALT NOT HAVE ELECTRICITY,THOU SHALT NOT USE WOOD,THOU SHLAT HONOR GAIA,THOU SHALT NOT GIVE BIRTH,THOU SHALT NOT CELEBRATE ANYTHING BUT EARTHDAY,THOU SHALT NOW WEAR ANIMAL SKINS,THOU SHALT LIVE IN A CAVE,THOU SHALT NOT HAVE FIRE
Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at October 28, 2009 9:13 PM
Hey, none of the above apply...I guess I'm not a green moonbat...hooray!
Posted by: Anonymous at October 28, 2009 9:17 PM
Posted by: Anonymous at October 28, 2009 7:33 PM
I usually don't reply to "the nameless", however I'll make a exception.
There are several out there who may work - hopefully, unlike the last election which was a damned if you do, damned if you don't choice, hopefully the cream will rise to the top.
I've not ruled out the following (in no particular order):
Jindal
Romney
Huckabee
Giuliani
Palin
Sanford
Pawlenty
Hunter
My personal preference would be Duncan Hunter, who exists under the dark cloud of California's failed socialist experiment, so knows what a successful government should avoid - but no one takes him seriously.
The others must show me something. For instance, when you see headlines from the socialist MSM networks like this: Romney picked as 2012 GOP front-runner - CNN.com, I immediately become skeptical and suspicious. CNN knows as much about conservatism as I do about the mud at the bottom of the Mariana Trench. Palin makes me nervous because she's becoming strangely ambitious to an end I've not been able to determine - but as a former long-time Alaskan she interests me.
However, as I said, the cream will hopefully rise to the top. The mistake we can't make (again) is letting the socialist MSM dictate the 'cream'. Other names will undoubtedly appear in the next couple of years. So I'm keeping my options open.
Posted by: Jimbo at October 28, 2009 10:07 PM
Oh - And Santorum is another possible... But I have a hard time getting behind a damned yankee.
Posted by: Jimbo at October 28, 2009 10:10 PM
Green moonbats listen the recorded calls of loons,wolves and whales and wonder what their saying AND THEIR TELLING YOU GREEN MOONBATS YOUR STUPID FOR BELIEVING THIS GLOBAL WARMING POPPYCOCK IS CUASED BY SUVs AND BBQS SQUAWK SQUAWK SQUAWK HYUK,HYUK,HYUK
Posted by: Flu-Bird at October 28, 2009 11:27 PM
There is a difference between a moral conservative and a conservative for being a conservative just for conservative sake. I have never heard Newt mention moral absolutes as part of his thinking. I trust no one whose base does not include some understanding and fear of the Holy God. Newt is not the answer or even part of the answer.
Posted by: apostle53 at October 29, 2009 2:37 AM
Is anyone else reminded of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" when they watch that first clip?
Posted by: Judith M. at October 29, 2009 3:34 AM
As for Newt, keep the books on the WBTS coming, other than that shove a petty coat hoop up arse.
Posted by: So What at October 29, 2009 4:26 AM
When the commie/socialists have no argument they resort to the old YOU cant spell BS, anyone ever notice that?
Posted by: FREE at October 29, 2009 8:00 AM
Thanks for offering a list Jimbo. I'm inclined to agree with you that someone else out of right field could easily emerge.
Jindal? He got flogged by that speech response, but he has time to mend that.
Romney? I'm actually surprised you mentioned him. He strikes me as too see-saw to really appeal to conservatives.
Huckabee? He's personable in an aw-shucks way, similar to Bush. The Dems would have a field day with his views though.
Giuliani? Again I'm surprised. He went nowhere last time he tried.
Palin? A recent poll says 70% don't have confidence in the thought of her as president, but she certainly has visibility and charisma and that counts for a lot.
Sanford? You really want to go hike on the Appalachian Trail?
Pawlenty? A dark horse but possible.
Hunter? Nothing for me to go on yet.
Santorum? Ew! But I'm sure the Democrats would love it.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 29, 2009 8:24 AM
@FREE
I'm neither a commie nor a socialist. I just think a strong argument is one that is clearly and concisely written - that includes proper grammar and spelling. Making simple grammar mistakes repeatedly does make one look foolish and/or uneducated. I don't see how adhering to the rules of the English language is a bad thing.
Posted by: grammar/history nerd at October 29, 2009 9:09 AM
grammar/history nerd at October 29, 2009 9:09 AM
Good posts, both.
I agree with you.
A poorly-written piece is usually a sign of nonsense or irrelevancy.
More importantly, the deterioration of a language, written or spoken, portends a dying culture.
Posted by: Fiberal at October 29, 2009 9:37 AM
I culd give a crap
Posted by: Al Gore at October 29, 2009 9:38 AM
@grammar/history nerd
Go FuCk YourSelF SCCHOle! OH crep, did I net spall that rigte! HMMMMUB, meyby teh poent is mor inpotent then teh spellbling....YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!!
Posted by: E@tDouSH at October 29, 2009 9:40 PM


