« Open Thread | Main | Spoiled Progressive Crybabies Call the Wahmbulance »

Are you suggesting that we should just tell the environment to go [intercourse] itself? How dare you mock Gaia!

Think very carefully before answering that question. There is no room for humor on the environmental left. Call me a wahmbulance!

“When there is only one network alternative, and only one newspaper alternative, that's where people who don't want to hear unfiltered, one-sided Democrat propaganda will go”

Well that's a bit a bit [bleeping] rich, website dedicated to hysterical right-wing table-thumping rhetoric (which I am too stupid to distinguish from major networks claiming to be news organizations)

Posted by: Anonymous Whinerbat at October 15, 2009 1:16 AM- "Are you suggesting that we should just tell the environment to go fuck itself?"

No. Just you.

Posted by: Anonymous Whinerbat at October 15, 2009 1:16 AM- "Think very carefully before answering that question."

Ok....... No. Go f*** yourself.

Whinerbat, what don't you get about the essential nature of having competing voices in the marketplace of ideas? Gad! This is how totalitarianism starts, with people that have such thin skins and such weak positions that they can't even tolerate an opinion different from the "official line"TM, being voiced (which if you're too stupid to figure it out does not include the people at Moonbattery, since they indulge nitwits like yourself regularly).

Did anyone besides whinerbat think my remarks about polar bears and Hazelwood were in any way serious?

Meanwhile, when leftists try to be funny, it's either through death fantasies like Chris Matthews wanting to blow up Rush Limbaugh's head, or Keith Olbermann calling Michelle Malkin, "big mashed up bag of meat with lipstick?" or David Letterman making rape jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters?

Isn't it funny how right-wingers make fun of leftists by mocking their silly beliefs? While the leftist idea of "humor" is rooted in violence and crude insults?

Leftists really are degraded, aren't they, Gregory? I attribute a large part of their lack of wit to their emotionalism. I don't think they ever pause between the stimulus that evokes a reaction in their gut and the expression of that reaction to ask themselves "Does this sound reasonable?" I mean, calling Michelle Malkin a "big mashed up bag of meat with lipstick" is just plain stream-of-consciousness weirdness.

Again, that's a bit [EXPLETIVE] rich to describe leftists as being ‘humourless’.
I can't remember seeing Bill O'Reilly smile over something that wasn't quite twatty, though I can't cite any examples and that Glenn Beck, he's just insane, isn't he? He doesn't even believe Obama is the greatest man ever to walk the Earth. How crazy is that?

People at either end of the political spectrum are generally humourless, it's their nature.
They only think in cold facts and rhetoric, which don't allow for them to show their sense of enjoyment, unless of course they're attacking the other side by calling Michelle Malkin a “big mashed up bag of meat with lipstick” and making rape jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters.

By the way, my first comment was supposed to be sarcastic, I was joking, so don't lecture me about being humourless, asswipe, because I am as incapable of accepting criticism as I am at expressing myself without potty language.

"Also stop retroactively altering my comments" said the witless Brit wanker from Somerset who posts anonymous insults.

If you want to believe this site is fair and balanced, which no one has claimed, you have to accept that not everyone is going to agree with you and those who don't are going post profane anonymous comments because they're pussies like that.

If you want to believe this site is fair and balanced, you have to accept that not everyone is going to agree with you.

What makes you think this site is fair and balanced?

Aqua, why do you bother posting under anonymous when you use words like twatty that give you away? It's not like Aquatarkus is even your real name...or is it?

Umm, isn't Anonymous Whinerbat being sarcastic, like doing a parody of a moonbat? Read carefully. Look at how he named himself.

Anyway, to quote from above: "uncritical repetition of Democrat talking points..." Can you think of anything more boring? And Greg is right. There's the pie, it's undifferentiated in any way. Divide that pie up, and it's small wedges all around. Even the DUmp was discussing one day why Air America is a failure. "It's boring" is what even those moonbats said.

Actually, Karin, it was originally just "Anonymous." I changed it to "Anonymous Whinerbat" after reading chairman soetero's reply. And the italicized portions of his comments are my edits.

I just don't think those who post anonymously deserve any sort of respect.

What makes you think this site is fair and balanced?
Posted by: Evil Otto

Good point.
Fuck this site.

What's bother making jokes about Gaia?
Nobody thinks they're funny. Make jokes about raping Sarah Palin instead.

Item 3:
This has some actual great side effects. For one, in international waters the eco-nuts can't get at them with endless lawsuits. The International Court has no navy to enforce anything, and you could hire your own private navy to blow 'em out of the water if they did show up. (Hey Spain, want to see a few dozen more of your ships on the bottom of the Carribean?)

In the case of hurricanes, they just up anchor and sail to safe haven.

Seems reasonable. [and... screw the Polar Bears]

I just don't think those who post anonymously deserve any sort of respect.

From one of the conservatives posting anonymously: Get over yourself, because a screen name is fundamentally no different than posting as "anonymous." Also, I wonder what is really served by such frequent editing (four in this thread alone) of posts. The raving moonbats on this site don't need any help looking stupid.

Back on topic, I will proudly vote for Pat Toomey when the primaries come around. We have not had anything even resembling conservative representation since Santorum was outsed.

I mean, for crying out loud, we traded Rick Santorum, who had the President's ear from time to time, for job-hopping Bob lets-keep-funding-ACORN Casey...

because a screen name is fundamentally no different than posting as "anonymous."

Not true. Any number of people can post anonymously. And when there are four or five people posting anonymously, only someone with the ability to check IP addresses can distinguish them. Taking a screen name is taking ownership of your remarks, even if the name is not your own.

Taking a screen name is taking ownership of your remarks
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale

How this for a remark?

I'm a cockmuncher.

If you edit this, that just amplifies my level of cockmunching.

Stop being a lying bastard and trying to make yourself look like you aren't just a loser getting revenge on other losers.

I think aquaboy just soiled his underroos.

Stop being a lying bastard and trying to make yourself look like you aren't just a loser getting revenge on other losers.

Physician, heal thy self.

Where did the name Farmer Ted come from?
Are you really a farmer named Ted, or what?

You motherfucker....

Taking a screen name is taking ownership of your remarks, even if the name is not your own.

This has to be ripped right from a politico speechbook. Let's build a bridge to the challenges of the 21st century too. Your blog's about page was not very informative, so you may as well post as Captain Picard or Wheeljack.

Look, I understand not putting the personal information out there. I work for a limousine liberal who's looking for excuses to cut more jobs. That's why anonymity is important, despite its abuse.

Sorry for dragging this off topic though.

Back on topic, I've been toying around with subscribing the the WSJ since my local newspaper's gone even further in the tank for Obama and big government. They're in so much trouble that they were offering me half off to renew. Does anyone here just get the print edition or is online a must-have?

Aquaboy I could tell you where the name comes from but then I'd have to kill you.

Fuck this site.

Posted by: Aquatarkus at October 15, 2009 6:00 AM

Then why are you here? Srsly?

Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Don't let the door hit you were the good lord split you......Aquatard.

As an Atheist, I find that statement offensive.

Posted by: Anonymous at October 15, 2009 7:53 AM

Back on topic, I've been toying around with subscribing the the WSJ since my local newspaper's gone even further in the tank for Obama and big government. They're in so much trouble that they were offering me half off to renew. Does anyone here just get the print edition or is online a must-have?

I prefer the print edition as I tend to get lost following links on the online one. But I'm a bit retarded when it comes to news web sites so that might not be a representative view. I believe wsj.com is generally thought to be among the best newspaper web sites.

l1QwG9 kowbyyshuoij, [url=http://pfbxucknievk.com/]pfbxucknievk[/url], [link=http://rnhnjegeghju.com/]rnhnjegeghju[/link], http://nboxfgybeexp.com/