This clip should be viewed by every man, woman, and child over the age of ten in the entire United States of America...

Hi, great Blog you have here. I have had you on my Blogroll for a few months now and enjoy all your posts. We have a mutual friend, James over at Reaganite Republican got me into this wonderful world of Blogosphere and I am now hooked..lol. Keep up the great work and I will chat at you later, Phil

http://governmentmess.blogspot.com/

Sad really, how a great place can be destroyed by a minority of Fools, and basic idiots

I disagree. It was not a minority of fools, it was a majority of voters who were so angry and deranged at G.W. Bush that they voted for an inexperienced socialist to be their President. The door to this travesty was not opened from the outside, but rather from within.

Now, in return for 'hope and change,' we will see chains and slavery.

This is what Limbaugh was talking about when he said that Obama will sell our sovereignty to the U.N. Rush speculates that O's ultimate goal is to be President of the world and Lord Monckton's statements are compelling evidence in my eyes.

We call them WATERMELLONS becuase their green on the outside red on the inside and OBAMAS green pals

No wonder that spineless jellyfish Al Gore will not debate Lord Monckton. His Lordship would wipe the floor with Al's colossal ignorance.

I wouldn't worry too much about this. There is no way that Congress will ratify this. Even the most leftwing Senators care more about their jobs than their principles.

"It was not a minority of fools, it was a majority of voters...."

Not at all; it was a majority of fools.
Stupid beyond all rationality.

BO in the office of the presidency is clear evidence that we desperately need a competency test to disqualify massive parts of the voting public.

"spineless jellyfish Al Gore"

Palanos at October 24, 2009 5:49 PM

Al Gore wouldn't debate Lord Monckton or anyone else for that matter.

He would absolutely never, ever debate a scientist.

In fact, Waxman's committee protected him from the lethal exposure of opposition by not allowing Lord Monckton, or any qualified scientist to testify about global warming. Yet they listened to Al Gore give his self-interested propaganda in isolation.

The absence of public debate to determine policy is a violation of ethical conduct. (The ethics of debate in the context of a scientific theory or political policy, form the foundation to depress disinformation and grand deception.) The GW "debate" is practically nonexistent, while the data supporting GW "science" is government owned.

The lawmakers are fully aware of this.

Regardless of his massive girth, enormous influence on the advocacy of climate change and ginormous ego and income, Al Gore is now, and will remain in history, a very small man.

Now why did Monckton have to go and drag chewing tobacco into this debate?

Al Gore is afraid to debate becuase he dont want to be proven to be a liar and hypotcrit

... What?

We sign a treaty, and suddenly we're eternal slaves because "oh, we have a treaty, we have to follow it"?

Do you have ANY IDEA how many treaties the US has pulled out of, rewritten, disassembled, or simply ignored in its existence? Even if it's a terrible deal now, at some point we'll just be able to ignore it and it will go away.

Pointless alarmism.

To HEY YOU the russians violated every treaty so we should pull out of the UN and hvae the UN building raized

"It was not a minority of fools, it was a majority of voters."

Posted by: Duke at October 24, 2009 11:56 AM

Not at all; it was a corrupt system. He didn't win anything the SEIU and ACORN made it a win with dead people and mickey mouse voting, over and over again.

BO in the office of the presidency is clear evidence that we have been conned out of an honest election.

DONT let them get away with it. Replace everyone who counts the votes!!!

Everyone should listen to Lord Moncton when he talks about who started this mess. M Strong the slimiest commie on the planet. He hides in China because there seems to be a few people that want to talk to him about the "oil for food" scandal from a few years back. Expose Maurice and all the rest will be in the spotlight as well.

To view more information on Lord Monckton, including his proof that Al Gore's film is
full of lies and his two presentations on how
the Copenhagen treaty would bring about a new
world order, follow these links:

1. http://www.hootervillegazette.com/LordMonckton.html

2. http://www.hootervillegazette.com/monckton2.html

3. http://www.hootervillegazette.com/moncktonav.html

4. http://www.hootervillegazette.com/moncktontheater.html

5. http://www.hootervillegazette.com/moncktonletter.html

The last link is a warning to the United States, not to copy the the UK National Health Service.

Posted by: Rockin Robin at October 25, 2009 7:33 AM

I've heard conservatives propose exactly this, so I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious here.

Do you have any links to support that Robin? I'd be interested if you would be so generous as to post a few

Al Gore wouldn't debate Lord Monckton or anyone else for that matter.

He would absolutely never, ever debate a scientist.

Lord Monckton isn't a scientist, he has a degree in classics and a journalism diploma. He has as much science education as Sarah Palin. Although calling him a 'climate change expert' makes as much sense as calling her a 'presidential candidate'

Since Obama is not really a US citizen, whatever he signs will be null and void, and non-applicable to the US.

He is a US citizen, you idiot. Even the birthers only contend that he wasn't "natural-born" as per the constitutional requirement, but he is a citizen.

Lord Monckton interviewed by an Australian radio presenter.

http://2gb.com.au/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=4998

"Al Gore wouldn't debate Lord Monckton or anyone else for that matter.


He would absolutely never, ever debate a scientist. ---Fiberal."

Lord Monckton isn't a scientist, he has a degree in classics and a journalism diploma. He has as much science education as Sarah Palin. Although calling him a 'climate change expert' makes as much sense as calling her a 'presidential candidate' "Posted by Duncan Idaho at October 25, 2009 11:12 AM

Read what you quoted from me carefully...I do not call Monckton a scientist. Moreover, his education in science is not the point.

You criticism of Monckton is the liberal party-line critique of Monckton that is trotted out every time as an automatic means to discredit his views; i.e., your critique is common and a pure run of ad hominem drivel.
Secondly, having credentials in another field of education besides climate or earth science, does not necessarily invalidate his right to debate any scientist whatsoever and certainly in no way should invalidate his right to debate an opportunist like Al Gore.

BTW I would assume that if you had more familiarity with science and scientists, you may be a little less confused about this.
Further, if in bringing Palin for a double ad hominem is all you have to contribute, you may want to troll on over to the KOS site or somewhere where your dull insights can be appreciated.
They rightly fall flat here.

I don't debate because I don't have to.