moonbattery.gif


« The Definition of Vanity | Main | Moonbats Screech That Penn State Shirt Design Resembles a Cross »


October 27, 2009

Labour Party Admits: Objective Is to Displace Native British Population

Posted by Van Helsing at October 27, 2009 8:14 AM

Progressives don't just want to change our civilization; they want to obliterate it. Thus the opposition to securing borders against aggressive waves of Third World colonization. From what remains of once-great Britain:

The Labour government has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural sabotage.
This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. …
Neather wrote that until 'at least February last year', when a new points-based system was introduced to limit foreign workers in response to increasing uproar, the purpose of the policy [immigration minister Barbara] Roche ushered in was to open up the UK to mass immigration.
This has been achieved. Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since 2001. Since 1997, the number of work permits has quadrupled to 120,000 a year.
Unless policies change, over the next 25 years some seven million more will be added to Britain's population, a rate of growth three times as fast as took place in the Eighties.
Such an increase is simply unsustainable. Britain is already one of the most overcrowded countries in Europe. But now look at the real reason why this policy was introduced, and in secret. The Government's 'driving political purpose', wrote Neather, was 'to make the UK truly multicultural'.
It was therefore a politically motivated attempt by ministers to transform the fundamental make-up and identity of this country. It was done to destroy the right of the British people to live in a society defined by a common history, religion, law, language and traditions.
It was done to destroy for ever what it means to be culturally British and to put another 'multicultural' identity in its place. And it was done without telling or asking the British people whether they wanted their country and their culture to be transformed in this way.
Spitefully, one motivation by Labour ministers was 'to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date'.

An insufferable elitist like the rest of our liberal rulers, Neather boasts that this policy has provided an inexhaustible supply of the "foreign nannies, cleaners, and gardeners" without whom upper class twits like himself would be unable to function.

But the most shattering revelation was that this policy of mass immigration was not introduced to produce nannies or cleaners for the likes of Neather. It was to destroy Britain's identity and transform it into a multicultural society where British attributes would have no greater status than any other country's.
A measure of immigration is indeed good for a country. But this policy was not to enhance British culture and society by broadening the mix. It was to destroy its defining character altogether.
It also conveniently guaranteed an increasingly Labour-voting electorate since, as a recent survey by the Electoral Commission has revealed, some 90 per cent of black people and three-quarters of Asians vote Labour.

For sheer treachery, Labour has managed to outdo Nazi collaborators. They don't want Britain ruled by foreigners, but replaced by them, so that the Britain that produced Winston Churchill will be gone forever — as will be the America that produced the Founding Fathers, once Third World hordes have been allowed to swamp the USA, converting it to an extension of Latin America.

But of course, if you don't want your country to be erased, you're a racist, so shut up.

Meanwhile, the same liberal elite that promotes our extinction by colonization screeches that we must stop having children for the sake of the polar bears.

The objective couldn't be more plain. They want us to stop existing. Never in our history have we as a civilization faced a more profoundly hostile enemy than today's liberal ruling class.

On tips from Rob Banks and EvilResident.


Comments

int the upcoming remake of Gilligan's Island-
the Skipper is an illegal alien
the Professor is Asian
Ginger is a man who had a sex change operation
Mary Ann is a 'Ho from Detroit
Mr Howell is a rich Russian pimp
Mrs Howell is his bottom bitch
and Gilligan is the normal American


Posted by: blue at October 27, 2009 9:33 AM


Lol, blue

Treachery is right. The sheer arrogance of these social engineers is astonishing.
The Brits once had a quaint custom of placing traitors' heads on pikes on London Bridge.
They need to seriously consider bringing it back into vogue.

Posted by: Mike_W at October 27, 2009 9:48 AM


Looks like the BNP was right all along. God save the Queen. *shakes head slowly*

Posted by: SK at October 27, 2009 9:56 AM


We aren't far behind.
The stupidity of liberals and the arrogance of the ruling class is driving the US into the same sewage as Britain is now wallowing in.

Imagine that BO was a white guy from Kansas--would he become president with a resume as thin as BO's? Not even Eisenhower with a speech-writer and teleprompter could have done that.

BO was heralded as the Messiah in America and across the globe because of his skin color. There's no better evidence of the stupidity of American liberals and they will follow their privileged pigmented, bobble-headed leader right to Mecca, dragging everyone else with them.

Posted by: Fiberal at October 27, 2009 10:08 AM


When I tipped VH to this story, I commented on how absolutely refreshing it is to read the comments left by ordinary Brits about all this! Makes me feel like we're not alone in the struggle.

From what I can gather, New Labor is the equivalent of our Democrats, Tories that let it happen our RINOs, and the BNP would be Libertarians and/or Constitution Party?

I might be wrong, but that's how it sounds.

And notice that for simply giving a darn, they're called racists and fascists.

At least traitorous scum worldwide are nothing if not consistent.

Posted by: EvilResident at October 27, 2009 10:28 AM


Incredible, how far the left will go to destroy a culture and country for no good gain besides obviously flawed ideology.

Posted by: Jay B at October 27, 2009 10:50 AM


Is there not a single sane party in Britain?

The major parties have all been irredeemably corrupted by extreme moonbattery, and the only alternative, the BNP, is rather nutty and racist itself.

Is there not a single Brit who believes in freedom, individual liberty, and sane immigration policies?

You know, the US is starting to look like Britain, in that we have no sane major political parties either. What is it about politics that forces voters to choose between different forms of stupidity?

Posted by: Anonymous Countermoonbat at October 27, 2009 11:10 AM


the BNP would be Libertarians and/or Constitution Party?
Not quite. The BNP is xenophobic to the point of attacking immigrants personally, rather than simply advocating a need for a controlled policy which favors those already in Britain.

What they fail to grasp is that sane immigration policy is based on allowing a reasonable number of talented, law-abiding workers to enter through legal and controlled channels, not an outright attack on the immigrant class and a complete vilification of immigrants until such point that they completely assimilate. Immigration itself is not the problem; the problem is uncontrolled immigration involving many people who aren't self sufficient, or come to commit crimes and tear down existing society.

The BNP has a history of anti-Semitism, racism, and neo-Fascist leanings. They promote ethnocentrism as an answer to almost every problem. The party leadership is also infested with criminals.

The BNP is simply a different breed of political insanity.

Posted by: Anonymous Countermoonbat at October 27, 2009 11:16 AM


Where's our little buddie aquaboy defending his utopia aka Englanistan?

Posted by: Farmer Ted at October 27, 2009 12:10 PM


Ah, thanks for the info, Anonymous Countermoonbat. I figured I may have had it wrong.

Either way, looks like politicians are pretty much the same world 'round...

Posted by: EvilResident at October 27, 2009 12:14 PM


I support the BNP wholeheartedly now. 100%. There is a war brewing in the UK. And I don't care what anyone says now. It's time to run people out of OUR LAND. Peacefully if possible, by brute force if necessary. These hoards of 3rd world filth have no right to be here.

Posted by: MM at October 27, 2009 1:45 PM


That's nice, MM. So let's see... Britain has a choice between socialists, Islamofascists, or garden-variety fascists like you.

Britain is screwed.

Posted by: Evil Otto at October 27, 2009 1:59 PM


Actually, the BNP would be a left-wing party, if you considered anything but their position on immigration. On economics they're probably to the left of the Democrats. Still, if I lived in Britain, I'd probably be voting for them. You can always argue about your country's economic policies - but first you have to have a country to argue about.

Posted by: Rob Banks at October 27, 2009 4:11 PM


You miss the point Evil...Britain does not have a choice. It's either Socialism supporting the influx of an Islamofascist take-over or nothing. Nothing being Britain under Islamofascist/sharia rule.

You call MM a fascist? At this point, just what do you expect real Brits to do? Lie down and quiver? Like the French under Muslim violence. And if you take a walk through Londonistan these days that's what you see.

I have to say however, its somewhat a measure of poetic justice that the Brits who as a rule, have supported Palistinian aggression over the defensive posture of Israel, to now see themselves being pushed to oblivion by Muslims.

Posted by: Anonymous at October 27, 2009 4:25 PM


You miss the point Evil...Britain does not have a choice.

Bullshit. You always have choices in life. Saying there's no choice is to make excuses for morally wrong behavior.

It's either Socialism supporting the influx of an Islamofascist take-over or nothing. Nothing being Britain under Islamofascist/sharia rule.

No, it isn't. There's another way: support candidates who are in favor of immigration control and the dismantling of the social welfare state. Work to build another party. These political parties don't spring fully-formed out of nothing... they're built by people, supported by people, and there's no reason that can't be done again.

It's EASIER for people to vote BNP, but that doesn't mean they have no other options.

You call MM a fascist?

Yes, I believe I did.

At this point, just what do you expect real Brits to do? Lie down and quiver?

You act as if that's their only other choice... vote for a fascist party or lie down and quiver.

The BNP is no more a friend of individual liberty than the islamofascists or socialists are, and to me, that makes them just as much the enemy.

Like the French under Muslim violence. And if you take a walk through Londonistan these days that's what you see.

There are ways to limit immigration without voting for nutcases. This isn't an either/or situation.

Posted by: Evil Otto at October 27, 2009 4:56 PM


What a shame that apparently even the Brits commenting here have never heard of the UKIP. This party supports free market economic policy, a flat tax, greater decentralization and local control of schools and, most importantly for the UK, rejection of the bureaucratic tyranny of the EU. An earlier commenter correctly observed that, except for immigration, the BNP might as well be Labor. I have no special knowledge of how capable the UKIP is at marketing itself. But, if one supports these kind of at least nominally conservative positions and is a British citizen, a bit of research is called for.

Posted by: boqueronman at October 27, 2009 5:28 PM


Evil:


Britain has gone past critical mass of Muslims in their country to the point where they can't absorb them, can't civilize them and certainly can't get rid of them.
And the Brits aren't going to out reproduce them (although the youth seem to be trying).
Slowing immigration, even if the Brits have the political power to do so (-questionable), isn't going to do any good under these circs anyway. Besides, a huge % of Muslims are there illegally and they're there for good.

Britain may have once had the political will, but it doesn't now and even if it did, what's it going to do? Throw out all the Muslims? Kick the parasites off the dole so they leave? Ask them to behave?
Give it break Evil. You haven't said anything.

The British reality of Muslim domination is past any simple solution.
Saying that it isn't "an either/or situation" is not BTW a solution.

Neither you or anyone else has a "solution" bc the problem has gone way past a solution. As it will here in the US.

The best that Britain can do now, and this will eventually happen, is to set up a 2-state system. Which will probably take the form of Palistinian-Israli set up.

Posted by: Fiberal at October 27, 2009 7:19 PM


I've said it before, and I'll say it again. At this point, the West only has two options. Barbarianism or fascism. If you can realistically produce anything better, go ahead and show us what you've got. But you haven't yet, and my money says you never will.

Posted by: Rob Banks at October 27, 2009 11:52 PM


The Lefties in the UK must have been following the directions from Kennedy, Mc Cain, Graham, and all the rest of the pro-third world immigration supporters and their shamnesty project!

Posted by: old man at October 28, 2009 1:09 AM


"Britain has gone past critical mass of Muslims in their country to the point where they can't absorb them, can't civilize them and certainly can't get rid of them."

- posted by fiberal

Britain certainly can't get rid of them peacefully, although there is a recent precedent for forced mass emigration in the Benes decree.
From Wiki:
"The Beneš decrees are most often associated with the forcible "population transfer" (deportation) in 1945-47 of about 2.6 million former Czechoslovak citizens of German ethnicity to Germany and Austria following WW2".

It would be great if such a peaceful solution was possible.
Of course, the Muslims are too strong now and would never submit to similar treatment peacefully, so war is inevitable.
I pity the poor Muslims and the treasonous vermin who created this mess when the Brits do finally wake up.

Posted by: Mike_W at October 28, 2009 3:13 AM


evil otto...

Like I said, call me what you want. Say what you will about the BNP. But at this time, they're the only party that stands up for true Brits. They don't piss on our culture, our heritage, our values. The others, that seems to be their m.o., And all to get power. I almost welcome the inevitable chaos. Sometimes, you need violence and unrest to solve a problem. In this case, the problem is unwanted immigrants being used to rot OUR COUNTRY from within.

And I'll wear your allegation of being a FASCIST like a badge of honor.

Posted by: MM at October 28, 2009 5:02 AM


MM,


I agree. We have been so whipped in this country a lot of conservatives can't see the writing on the wall.

The Constitution is the cornerstone of freedom not just for the USA but for the western world.
Yet we have given up a lot of Constitutional rights- including the right to carry guns, allowed illegal immigration to escalate from all fronts, invested billions into minority entitlement programs, elected a communist for president and have allowed leaders to progressively rob us of our money for decades.
And for what? Mainly racial appeasement.

Now the best most republicans can do is whine about compromise, or like some posters here, fantasize about "solutions".
(Oh you get the occassional guy with the post bragging about what he's going to do with his gun, but its all just a pathetic "bunker" mentality.)

We are following in your footsteps; although the US is big enough to still turn things around before we get to a point of no return, I doubt we ultimately will survive as a culture.

Posted by: Fiberal at October 28, 2009 5:44 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)