« Krauthammer on the Campaign Against FNC | Main | Communist Truther Van Jones' Green Graft Legacy Lives On »

The foreign pig who calls himself Obama has done a little robbery and burglary and theft of the USA And appear to have gotten away with mass murder.
obama is not just one more monkey in government but he is that evil monkey inside the white house who is planning the mass death of millions of Americans for race and political reason.

The Raid on this nation appears to have worked and without people who are willing to fight back in the old way obama and his evil little occult pigs will win.

You got to love the fact this evil little african Obama made the big time, how sad for this nation that so many are fools.

Man, Fred's gone off the deep end. I miss Bush.

White House Commits To War Effort (scooters report)

WASHINGTON (SR) - After weeks of what some have called foot-dragging, President Obama has pledged to commit whatever resources are needed to defeat the enemy.

In a statement read by White House Press Secretary Robert GIbbs to reporters Monday, President Obama said he "could no longer sit idly by as an emboldened and savage foe attempts to erode our hard-fought gains." Gibbs said the President is "prepared to invest whatever manpower and money is needed to decisively win this war."

While Democrats cheered the President's move, most Republicans were outraged. Congressman Joe Wilson called Obama's declaration of war against Fox News "mind-numbingly idiotic" and implored the President to commit the same energy and resources to defeating our real enemies overseas, saying, "Even an ex-crackhead community organizer from Chicago should identify the Taliban as a more serious threat than Megyn Kelly."

My comments: It's nice to see the President finally ready to fight an enemy - too bad it's a TV station. Maybe the Taliban should start covering Barry's health care proposal.

ObamaCare™ Trading Cards: Collect 'em all!

Just because you guys are devoid of any sense of charity and can only see opportunism in helping the less fortunate, that doesn't mean everyone is that way.

The Left Wingers 10 Great Unanswered Questions

1. If all the world hated America because of George W Bush’s 2003 invasion of Iraq….then why was America attacked on Sept 11, 2001; 2yrs before that invasion?

2. Why has Al Queda been trying to exterminate every American for the past 17yrs?

3. Did you want Bush to fail in Iraq, or did you want America to succeed?

4. Given that Osama left Afghanistan in 2001, and Al Queda was largely destroyed in Afghanistan in 2002, how did the Bush Administration “take its eye off the ball [Afghanistan] by invading Iraq” in 2003?

5. What caused the great recession of 2007?

6. How have Democrats ensured that we don’t have another $13 TRILLION dollar Great Recession?

7. If FOX, Hannity, Glenn Beck, Limbaugh, etc are examples of right wing propaganda…then what is an example of left wing propaganda?

8. If Republicans lie, and all politicians are liars, then what are some lies told by Democrats?

9. Since President Obama’s Israel/Palestine talks have failed, and he’s been unable to stop Iran’s nuclear program, and since he’s completely clueless on what to do in Afghanistan…what is PLAN B for keeping Israel from bombing Iran and starting a regional-possibly a world war?

10. Obama’s a quarter of the way done with his presidency. What will history record as his greatest accomplishment?

Story

TED, the correct answers are:

1 & 2 Bin Laden can see the future via flash forwards given to him by his CIA handlers.
3- Detroit and Havanna
4- Square root of -1
5- Shape shifting aliens from Zeta Reticuli
6- Jupiter
7- Thats easy. John McCain
8- Tomatoes are vegetables not fruits
9- There is no PLAN B, but there is PLAN 10 from Outer Space
10- Obama remained alive

Posted by: hey you guys at October 23, 2009 12:20 PM

Conservatives More Liberal Givers
By George Will

If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data.

They include these findings:

-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).

-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.

-- Residents of the states that voted for John Kerry in 2004 gave smaller percentages of their incomes to charity than did residents of states that voted for George Bush.

-- Bush carried 24 of the 25 states where charitable giving was above average.

-- In the 10 reddest states, in which Bush got more than 60 percent majorities, the average percentage of personal income donated to charity was 3.5. Residents of the bluest states, which gave Bush less than 40 percent, donated just 1.9 percent.

===

Do some research before you make an ass of yourself again, fool.

Conservatives help their fellow man. Liberals want to make the government help their fellow man.

Also...

People who identify themselves as conservatives donate money to charity more often than people who identify themselves as liberals. They donate more money and a higher percentage of their incomes.

It is not that conservatives have more money. Liberal families average 6 percent higher incomes than conservative families.

You may recall a flap during the 2000 election campaign when the fact came out that Al Gore donated a smaller percentage of his income to charity than the national average. That was perfectly consistent with his liberalism.

LINK

===

From the horse's (ass) own mouth:

Op-Ed Columnist
Bleeding Heart Tightwads
Article Tools Sponsored By
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: December 20, 2008
The New York Times

This holiday season is a time to examine who’s been naughty and who’s been nice, but I’m unhappy with my findings. The problem is this: We liberals are personally stingy.

1 and 2. They hated us before, for similar reasons. There's a distinction between being a great world power and being imperialist jerks. In our history, we've been both.

Absolutist thinking again. It's not that everyone hates us or everyone loves us all at once. We're liked or disliked by degrees, and Bush upped our "dislike" factor.

3. I wanted America to realize that it already had a bad history of military intervention and propping up unpopular leaders/dictators. Just look at what happened in Iran.

If America somehow succeeds in Iraq, I'll be surprised but quite pleased.

4. Just look at what's happening in the region now. The Taliban are resurgent and we're having trouble finding fresh bodies to send in. Consequences often take some time to manifest.

5 and 6. Points conceded. We need fiscal conservatives back in power.

7. Michael Moore, certainly. Prince... William, is it? Al Gore. If propaganda includes things that aren't mostly false, then most major news networks.

8. That government programs won't cost money. Like how the Repubs tried to claim that invading a country wouldn't cost much.

9. Like you don't want that to happen. Hmmm... with the current administration I'd say the plan would be to lean hard on Israel and retaliate with smart missiles if Iran acts first.

10. No telling what will happen in the next three years. At this moment I'd say the Nobel Peace Prize with a lot of obfuscation on how he actually earned it.

You lose one issue, throw in a different one. Heyyouguys started by claiming conservatives have no compassion. Hammered into the ground, he hasn't the guts to admit he got it wrong. Instead he jumps to another set of lunacies.
Stupid and gutless.

Sorry, jumped ahead without reading.

Seems you have me on this one. Wouldn't have called it, but yep, conservatives generally are more charitable. Got me with facts, I can't disagree.

Admission after the fact? Called on the carpet and then repenting?

You are just a useless piece of human excrement like ghost of wellstone and just as phony and insincere.

LOL!

The guy on the left agrees that the guy on the right has a good point.

The guy on the right responds with petulant namecalling.

Even if they win an argument they stay bitter. Very un-classy SK.

Anonymous has a point, SK. HYG, to his credit, admits you have a point. Work with that. Few liberals will ever make such an admission. Anyone who can make such an admission has generated some intellectual honesty, and that's the first step to outgrowing liberalism. So don't excoriate him - help to convert him.

In that spirit,

The Taliban are resurgent and we're having trouble finding fresh bodies to send in.

That's in Afghanistan, not Iraq. Iraq is fine. Afghanistan was what candidate Obama called the "necessary war." We have the troops; we just need the will. Over to you, Barry.

with the current administration I'd say the plan would be to lean hard on Israel and retaliate with smart missiles if Iran acts first

This probably is their plan, but it hopelessly flawed: leaning on Israel won't stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Retaliating won't do much good if Israel – or New York – is a lump of radioactive glass.

OBAMA looks like THE JOKER when he is totaly going nuts

Posted by: SK at October 23, 2009 3:58 PM

Another lesson in relativism!

SK, conservatives generally are charitable. YOU are a jerk.

> That's in Afghanistan, not Iraq.

The question was about Afghanistan.

READ

Ok, I know you guys are going to yell at me, but what's wrong with applying the doctrine of MAD to Iran? It's worked well so far. I'll admit the leadership is crazy, but they're not suicidal. Also, if they really want nuclear weapons they're going to get them eventually; we couldn't stop them without provoking a war (probably including limited engagement with Russia) anyway.

I'm going to uselessly ask that you can the knee-jerk religious mudslinging and give me a straight answer.

Posted by: SK at October 23, 2009 3:58 PM

Another lesson in relativism!

SK, conservatives generally are charitable. YOU are a jerk.

> That's in Afghanistan, not Iraq.

The question was about Afghanistan.

READ

Ok, I know you guys are going to yell at me, but what's wrong with applying the doctrine of MAD to Iran? It's worked well so far. I'll admit the leadership is crazy, but they're not suicidal. Also, if they really want nuclear weapons they're going to get them eventually; we couldn't stop them without provoking a war (probably including limited engagement with Russia) anyway.

I'm going to uselessly ask that you can the knee-jerk religious mudslinging and give me a straight answer.

My apologies. I took out my frustration with GoW on you. That was inexcusable. Mea culpa.

HYG, your #9 isn't workable. I doubt the Israeli's have much regard for 0's words, or promises. They, after all, are under the gun(missiles) and we aren't yet, if the government is to be believed. As Golda Meir said, they fight because they have no where to go. So, if the world won't do anything to head off a nuclear armed Iran, I'm sure they will. They've been told what the Iranian's plans are for them, what choice do they have? Holocaust redux?
I agree with your point on MAD, I hope the Israelis make it perfectly clear to the madman in Tehran that that is what will happen.