« Soros, Newsweek, Chip Away at Economic Liberty | Main | Open Thread »
October 28, 2009
Airstrip One Bans Parents From Watching Over Their Own Children
Posted by Gregory of Yardale at October 28, 2009 11:42 AM
This is one from the "WTF You Have To Be Effing Essing Me" File, but it's apparently true. Big Brother's Government is now banning parents from supervising their own children in public parks unless they undergo a state background check.
A council has banned parents from supervising their children in public playgrounds until they have undergone criminal record checks.
Adults have been excluded from two adventure play areas in Watford, apart from a handful of council-vetted 'play rangers' who will assist youngsters, it emerged today.
Parents will be forced to watch their children from outside the perimeter fence.
Supposedly, the objective of this is to protect children from pedophiles. Because, using classic moonbat logic, they have concluded that parents are more likely to assault children in a public park than in their homes. (Perhaps, continuous home monitoring is Phase II.) Ironically, this is the same country that placed a young boy in the foster care of two homosexuals who repeatedly sexually assaulted him, and the child protection agency refused to investigate the initial allegations because the gay couple were considered "trophy care-providers." (Note, the preceding is an indictment of political correctness, not gaiety.)

Comments
Just shows to go ya: No ends left un-gone to undermine, obfuscate, and obliterate societal norms by these criminals we call The Nanny State.
Posted by: pomalom at October 28, 2009 12:10 PM
Um yeah, ok, um, nothing to see here, move along, its all double plus good! The war with East Asia continues to go well. It should be over soon.
Posted by: First Name WARREN - Last Name PEACE !! at October 28, 2009 12:39 PM
Yup, the parents might think or educate their kids. Let the Liberals, with their own agendas, take care of telling your children what is right and what is wrong.
Posted by: Jay B at October 28, 2009 12:42 PM
So now parents cant watch over their own kids now? I bet HITLER and STALIN did the same thing to
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at October 28, 2009 12:48 PM
I've been calling it Formerly Great Britain for a long time now.
This is just one more facet of the long-range plan to take kids away from their parents.
It's just a short step from the playground to the home. How can we trust mere parents to care for their children?
Posted by: ZZMike at October 28, 2009 1:04 PM
This is partly why my wife and I decided not to have children.
May I ask, do we really surround them? Everywhere I look, the moonbats are flanking and advancing.
I feel we are but a few shepherds, surrounded by sheep and wolves. What is going on?
Posted by: RICH at October 28, 2009 1:20 PM
I'd keep my kids at home before I'd comply with such an asinine rule, but I surely wouldn't send them to watched by people with the creepy title, "play ranger".
Posted by: Judith M. at October 28, 2009 1:34 PM
Not to mention that these fools are from the same ilk as the liberal dullards who turned Elian Gonzolas over to a communist government.
Its always "for the children" with these asphalt-heads.
Posted by: Fiberal at October 28, 2009 1:47 PM
Have any Brits read Brave New World, or has the nanny state banned that too?
Posted by: Anonymous Countermoonbat at October 28, 2009 2:01 PM
This is actually refreshing to hear, since most of the whack job pedophile paranoia I hear comes from the right. Glad to see some sanity from our conservative friends.
Posted by: hey you guys at October 28, 2009 3:30 PM
"hey you guys at October 28, 2009 3:30 PM"
Fuck off, it's ignorant shits like you that made this possible!
Posted by: KHarn at October 28, 2009 3:49 PM
most of the whack job pedophile paranoia I hear comes from the right.
Yeah, because we on the right are so retrograde we actually think it was wrong for Roman Polanski to drug and rape a 13 year old girl, and for a 13 year old boy to be raped and murdered by two homosexuals.
Too bad we're not enlightened like you.
Posted by: V the K at October 28, 2009 3:55 PM
WTF is wrong with the white woman pictured in the article? Her kids are named Aliyah, Tameena and Kareem.
WTF IS WRONG WITH WHITE WOMEN THESE DAYS?
They are all anti-white, leftist/feminist, and pro-miscegenation. Talk about being brainwashed by liberalism.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 28, 2009 4:00 PM
(Note, the preceding is an indictment of political correctness, not gaiety.)
Gay and gaiety: two once beautiful words ruined forever.
Posted by: Mike_W at October 28, 2009 4:10 PM
Posted by: First Name WARREN - Last Name PEACE !! at October 28, 2009 12:39 PM
We're at war with Eurasia, you frigging Thought Criminal!
Room 101 for you, pal.
Posted by: SK at October 28, 2009 4:10 PM
They do need to have KING RICHARD THE LIONHEART to return from the dead and send all those islamic radicals to a one way meeting with the hooded headsman
Posted by: Flu-Bird at October 28, 2009 9:17 PM
Flu-Bird -
In the End, they WILL meet the "headsman" and their choices WILL haunt them for all eternity. That's a damned long time to suffer. I've been taught my entire life not to wish that end on any soul. It's really hard to pray for them - but I give it my best shot.
Posted by: Jimbo at October 28, 2009 10:46 PM
Some say that KING ARTHUR didnt die but was turned into a raven
Posted by: Rockin Robin at October 29, 2009 11:57 AM
Posted by: V the K at October 28, 2009 3:55 PM
What...goes on in that head of yours?
Not talking about the story of the day. Talking about conservative parents who go all shock horror and lock up their kids to protect them from pedophiles in the bushes. Despite, you know, the extremely low risk of such things occurring.
Action, reaction. Crazy conservatives cause crazy liberal reactions. No one wins unless both sides learn to be more reasonable. Drop the gays=pedophiles thing and we'll get the gays to act more mature. Ok?
Posted by: hey you guys at October 29, 2009 9:04 PM


