moonbattery.gif


« New York Waste of Times: "We Covered Up ACORN's Lies Because We Didn't Want to Make Them Look Like Liars" | Main | Open Thread »


September 28, 2009

Here's One for Dr. Laura

Posted by Gregory of Yardale at September 28, 2009 12:08 PM

Really, there's not much I can add to this, but this does seem to be the kind of dilemma you are not likely to have if you lead a normal, healthy lifestyle.

Dear Professor Foxy,
I am a queer feminist cis woman in my early twenties, in a long-term cohabiting relationship with a male queer partner in his early twenties. Thanks to the recession, we have had a lot of financial trouble over the past two years. Due to the criminally low hours at his day job, my partner applied to be a male escort at a small local agency.
...
His clients are all male and mostly in the closet. He is very popular, mainly because of his boyish looks, his youth, and he's a bottom. He's been an escort for a couple weeks now. We are both all about sex workers' rights and are very sex-positive, so it has nothing to do with that. I am trying my best to be supportive
...
These are his first same-sex experiences. He doesn't enjoy them. ... I don't want him to feel negatively about himself because of the social stigmas surrounding bisexual men and/or sex workers. But whenever I open up about my anxieties regarding his job, it really upsets him. How can I help support him but also be honest about my fear? And how can I open up a dialogue about his feelings regarding his sexuality
Please help, -- Anxious Partner

Y'know... normal people, when they have financial challenges, reach out to their families, their churches, their communities. It's just not healthy for commercialized sex to be an option. And dressing it up in politically correct psychobabble ("queer feminist cis" "sex-positve") doesn't change the fact that whoring yourself is not a physically, emotionally, or spiritually healthy pursuit.

H/T: NRO

ho-tel.jpg
Real prostitution may be less glamorous than the Hollywood version.

Comments

I've read that "queer" is supposedly different than "gay" but I don't understand what the difference is supposed to be.
This queer feminist(WTF?) has a queer boyfriend (queer queer?) that has never had sex with a man before he started turning tricks and he doesn't like homo sex. So how is he queer? He just sounds confused.

Posted by: single stack at September 28, 2009 12:31 PM


Single stack,

Welcome to liberal education. Confusing children from birth to death.

Posted by: AmericanToTheCore at September 28, 2009 12:32 PM


Check out what Professor Foxy has to say: http://www.feministing.com/archives/017975.html

Posted by: toreydawn at September 28, 2009 12:41 PM


Glamoring prostitution, typically Liberal. How these women are "Empowered" with their sex life and how they meet charming, rich guys who'll give them whatever they want. This article is just messed up. When you need to use such slang to define yourself, you know you went too far in the margin.

Posted by: Jay B at September 28, 2009 12:45 PM


I'm with single stack - totally confused.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 12:59 PM


I think we need ACORN to help us sort this one out.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 1:00 PM


Another classic example of action/reaction. When you stigmatize gay people and forbid them from having formal relationships, do they stop being gay?

Did the sexual repression of the Victorian era mean that men were more faithful to their wives?

Nope! In both cases, the men turn to prostitutes.

Posted by: hey you guys at September 28, 2009 1:00 PM


Maybe we could get ACORN to help us sort out HYG's post too, while they're at it, because it doesn't make any sense either.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 1:02 PM


Oh, and by the way, we will not have you disparaging prostitutes. Some of the posters here are prostitutes. Right, Ghost of Wellstone?

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 1:03 PM


Let them go.... hell encourage them! We know where they will end up. The "Anxious Partner" will be found in a bath tub dead of an over dose. The "male queer partner" will hang himself in a shower with a dildo shoved up his butt OR be admitted to ER with a preferated colon and "bleeding shit into his abdomen". Two less problems in the world. The first one is a "no cost" well unless mommy and daddy refuse to pay for the funeral. The second we pay for the ER visit and then the funeral. Small price to pay to get ride of these idiots.

Posted by: FreeWillie at September 28, 2009 1:05 PM


Oh boy, FreeWillie, you really stepped in it now! The freak show folks from feministing.com (is that supposed to be short for feminist fisting or something?) will want your willie on a platter for your "insensitive and cruel" words against these two "fine and utterly normal, upstanding citizens"...

Posted by: Dave M at September 28, 2009 1:20 PM


Van where did you come up with a picture of so-stoned, pandy and meth?

Posted by: Farmer Ted at September 28, 2009 1:23 PM


If two people consent to having sex and an exchange of something of value is involved, who cares.

If it does not involve forced actions, pimp beatdowns, etc., no big deal. What's the difference when a guy buys a girl a gift, dinner, wines & dines etc. in order to get laid? It's the same principle only some women choose to generate an income from it....And anyone who says that men and women never use objects of value (money, gifts, favors) as a medium of exchange for consensual sex are lying. Happens everyday...Whoopdeedoo...

Posted by: Trollmenot at September 28, 2009 1:25 PM


If two people consent to having sex and an exchange of something of value is involved, who cares.

Is HIV something of value? Because that's probably one of the things being exchanged.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 1:26 PM


What a fine example of moral relativism and how it erodes someone's ability to make informed decisions concerning their emotional, mental, & physical well being.

Posted by: son of a preacher man at September 28, 2009 1:34 PM


Jeez I try to keep up with these people, just so I know what they're talking about. So a "queer" isn't a homo now? When did this start? What exactly is it now? Was calling themselves queer just a way to deny they were having (gasp) a heterosexual realtionship? I'm pretty sure they're confused, and they're trying to take the rest of us with them.

Posted by: Mr Evilwrench at September 28, 2009 1:39 PM


In that case, they've certainly succeeded.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 1:40 PM


Just what have you got against goats now?

Posted by: Anonymous at September 28, 2009 1:52 PM


Goats: The preferred sex partner for islamic imams everywhere...

Posted by: Dave M at September 28, 2009 1:54 PM


@Dave M

Bring it on! The gloves are off and they are MY bitches!

Posted by: FreeWillie at September 28, 2009 2:09 PM


And I have hip boots so bring it on!

Posted by: FreeWillie at September 28, 2009 2:12 PM


Liberal logic is so confusing. I'm still trying to figure out the relationship between gay tea-bagging and excessive taxation.

Posted by: IOpian at September 28, 2009 2:17 PM


I'm still trying to figure out why they call us teabaggers. No one I know had ever heard the term before the tea parties began.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 2:20 PM


Is it any wonder they are trying to eliminate Christians? Could you imagine the guilt their depravity give them every day? With people like this trying to make this lifestyle the norm is it any wonder our culture gets sicker every day?

Posted by: TED at September 28, 2009 2:24 PM


I am with single stack - what does queer mean in this context - an idiot?

Posted by: puffdaddy at September 28, 2009 2:26 PM


When we stand up the "weenie's" always back down. They bully and posture as long as they can get away with it. And they have because we let them. No more. Now the bullies are the hunted. There is no more safe haven for them. Watch them slip back under the rocks they came from. How did we allow this? No more. Hide! run for your lives. The GIANT is awake! I want their heads on a pike! I am what they fear! I will not rest until I taste their blood.

Posted by: FreeWillie at September 28, 2009 2:29 PM


TED,

You would think they would think twice before eliminating all the Christians. Falwell and friends aside, the Christians aren't what they should be worried about.

If they get their way and the Christians are gone, they will then have to submit to their new Muslim rulers. Islamofacism has zero tolerance for that level of depravity, and will proceed to eliminate them quickly.

Honestly, can you imagine these San Francisco militant homosexual liberals finally receiving the natural result of their anti-Christian dhimmitude?

Liberal - noun - A person who praises Iran and its government, but would never travel their for fear of their own life.

Posted by: Anonymous Countermoonbat at September 28, 2009 2:39 PM


I know this idea is terribly old fashioned, but maybe anxious partner's discomfort with his new profession has something to do with the fact that he's being treated like sex toy instead of a human being. Just a thought...

Posted by: Judith M. at September 28, 2009 2:57 PM


Never mind that. He ought to be worried about showing up in some future public health worker's report.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 3:04 PM


I knew a troll would come out and say "What's the big deal?" Once again, we see how twisted the leftist mind is. Those of us who are concerned about the physical and mental well-being of people who sell their bodies for sex are the freaks. Those who don't care about people suffering for the gratification of others are the enlightened ones.

Posted by: V the K at September 28, 2009 3:31 PM


I think we need ACORN to help us sort this one out.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 1:00 PM


Stole my thunder, Jay. When I was reading that freak's story, I knew someone had already beaten me to it. Damn you.

Posted by: Right0fReagan at September 28, 2009 3:41 PM


Christ! You guys are like Beavis and Butthead when it comes to the gay community, I can hear it now "You said fag!"

V the Kitten, why do you care? You guys spend nearly as many comments as you do any bashing the gay community, sometimes more than shit that actually matters.

That said, this story is as about as true as Saddam's WMD or the log cabin Republicans are just secret liberals. Not sure if you noticed, but you are still the minority.

Posted by: Ghost of Wellstone at September 28, 2009 4:37 PM


This story is more confusing than Father's Day in Harlem. It still doesn't make the slightest bit of sense, so you know liberals are involved. It is reminiscent of the late, great Andrea Dworking, who bore a striking resemblance to a manatee, was a dyke, and lived with a fruit for some reason.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 28, 2009 4:47 PM


Once upon a time I owned lovebirds. They are an african parrot. What is somewhat unique about them is the fact that they'll bond male/male female/female if they have no other option. Which tells me the bonding is due to lack of choices and a conscious decision on the part of the parrot. If anything can be learned from this and reading the article is that today's "gays" are making a choice for themselves and it isn't biological. After all, if there was a "gay" gene there would be no passing it on since that would be an evolutionary dead end.

Just my two cents.

Posted by: Moonbat SkullCracker at September 28, 2009 4:51 PM


"This story is more confusing than Father's Day in Harlem."

I don't care who you are, that's funny!

Posted by: Judith M. at September 28, 2009 5:10 PM


I gotta say, making Goatse go nutzoid is my new guilty pleasure.

Posted by: V the K at September 28, 2009 5:22 PM


"This story is more confusing than Father's Day in Harlem."

Like Judith said... that certainly is a Larry the Cable Guy moment...

Posted by: AmericanToTheCore at September 28, 2009 5:24 PM


The recent ACORN debacle, along with hollyweird liberals defending Roman Polanski's perverse behavior only proves that most liberals are fine with child molestation as long as it's one of their own doing it. Truly sick individuals Democrats are.

Posted by: Right0fReagan at September 28, 2009 5:29 PM


Posted by: Goatse O'Wellstoned at September 28, 2009 4:37 PM- "Christ! You guys are like Beavis and Butthead when it comes to the gay community..."

I understand your rage. As a community organizer, it must be infuriating.


Posted by: Ghost of Wellstone at September 28, 2009 4:37 PM- "...You guys spend nearly as many comments as you do any bashing the gay community, sometimes more than shit that actually matters."

Sh*t actually matters? To a coprophiliac, perhaps.


Uh huh huh huh... Goatse said "gay".

Posted by: chairman soetoro's oprichniki at September 29, 2009 1:18 AM


If they get their way and the Christians are gone, they will then have to submit to their new Muslim rulers. Islamofacism has zero tolerance for that level of depravity, and will proceed to eliminate them quickly.

I've thought the same thing for some time now. If the terrorists win - by force or by demographics -and succeed in their goal of a worldwide Islamic state, these homos, atheists, and radical feminists will be the first ones up against the wall.

All of a sudden, they'll be crying out for that those "horrible" Christians they spent years lampooning and railing against. You know, the ones with all the guns, some of whom are actually serving in the US military?

Posted by: Cylar at September 29, 2009 2:42 AM


I'm still trying to figure out why they call us teabaggers.

When the leftards started calling us "teabaggers" I got a good laugh out of it because they're too stupid to realize that the joke is on them.
If we're teabaggers that means we're "teabagging" someone. Guess who's on the receiving end of the teabagging.

Posted by: single stack at September 29, 2009 7:52 AM


So .. she's a homosexual woman, who lives with a man, who is also homosexual, but has never had gay sex until he started working as an escort.

What?

Posted by: mandible claw at September 29, 2009 7:08 PM


Thank God for AIDS.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at September 29, 2009 8:52 PM