« Obama FCC Diversity Czar: "We're in a position where you have to say who is going to step down so someone else can have power." | Main | Moonbat Tech: Energy-Producing Speed Bump »

The congressional version of "Fair & Balanced" involves expending tax dollars on chasing down whistle blowers. How sensible.

If these two are charged, there will be a revolution.

I foresee an O'Keefe-Giles Legal Defense Fund - you just watch Glenn Beck go with this. (I haven't listened to Beck today yet on radio, maybe he already has?)

That fat, stupid, ignorant butt-ranger, Bonnie Faggot turns my stomach. Are the people of Mass. that stupid and corrupt to keep this abominable pee-pot in elective office, or what?!

Two criminals investigating ACORN... this is sickening. The two whistle blowers will be torn apart by the liberal media and the real criminals will be left to go free. Look at your new justice America!

If two thugs videotaped in paramilitary garb wielding batons in front of a voting place can be let off free by BO's racist DOJ, I don't see how much will be done to incarcerate ACORN thugs.

Exactly Fiberal. Two thugs intimidating voters in a blatantly racist gesture? Sure, you're free to go. Investigative journalists exposing the horrors of an organisation that casually helps people setup brothels and child prostitution? Watch the Liberal media spin this full tilt. I still can't shake off the shivers I got watching those videos. These black criminal girls, so CASUALLY explaining how to dodge tax and setup these things, they don't even blink when they are told it's for child prostitution, it's just daily business for them.

What are the odds that i could go 'undercover' as a neo-nazi lunatic asshole, visit a redneck 'gun show', and expose all sorts of wrongdoing there, too?

If I asked a "like-minded" retard to sell me illegal assault weapons, we could blow it all out of proportion and finally get rid of the anachronism that is the 2nd amendment.

OR - Even better - get a guy to pretend to be an underage male hooker and solicit repub congresspeople. How many you think would bite? (It would be a large number, I think we are all aware...)

Both would be entrapment, just like this instance (would not have happened iff those kids had not forced it to happen), but that would be a logical counterthrust to these kids... you guys are welcome to open that can of worms if you want to.

rteducto ad absurdum: nobody can do anything because everyone, everywhere is trying to trap or catch everyone else.

Big brother, here we come.

Let is give thanks. Because I hope that Barney Frank & John Conyers holds FULL Congressionals PIMP Hearings!

These overstuffed SOCIALIST TURKEYS just love gobbling up any tasty young treat that drops on the congressionals proving ground.

But I'm betting that the President calls these hearings off when he gets back into town! Because as the TOP Chef knows that making the bread & sausage dressing requires more than just big bucks and a few chopped nuts.

Anonymous at September 23, 2009 8

The logical fallacy here obviates any need to address the poorly-considered topic.
But for the sake of argument, I think it's reasonable to ask you this question: are there any other cheap tiresome rhetorical fallacies that liberals know besides "parallelism"?

Guys, its just no challenge.

Do they really want to make this story more public? I'm sure Barry Obama would like to keep it out of the news since he trained ACORN workers.

RE: Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2009 8:46 AM

Anonymous (IF that's his REAL name.....you can't be too sure these days) jumps out with: "What are the odds that i could go 'undercover' as a neo-nazi lunatic asshole, visit a redneck 'gun show', and expose all sorts of wrongdoing there, too?

If I asked a "like-minded" retard to sell me illegal assault weapons, we could blow it all out of proportion and finally get rid of the anachronism that is the 2nd amendment."

It's being done every day, Anony-dude. How many 20/20, Dateline, and other "Investigative Reports" do you need to see? The problem (for them) is that they can never find the pattern or epidemic of bad behavior they say is there, so (as you say) they can 'blow it all out of proportion' and claim the exception makes the rule. They try, though.

Using your logic, we should all be anti law-enforcement because every now and then we find a police officer that has "gone bad". Never mind that this is the exception.

In the case of ACORN, we have a huge amount of evidence (not just the O'Keefe and Giles tapes) that suggest that it is being run as a criminal organization.

Get your head out of the sand and get a cloe, 'nonymoose.

Clue......

"O'Keefe and Giles are among the greatest patriots this country has seen since the Revolution. "

*Boggle*

That's the kind of thing I'd expect to read on Jesus General. Congratulations, moonbattery, you are now indistinguishable from parody...

Maybe we ought to have an "investigation" of the liberal trolls that come out here and post racist / offensive things pretending to be "right wingers".....

Oh, but that never happens, does it?

She can investigate my acorn any day.

It's not entrapment. Aruging entrapment (in the legal sense) is practically impossible to do, because you have to shown that you would not have otherwise done this were it not for the coercion of a law enforcement official. ("Coercion" usually means that the undercover guy asks you to sell him drugs, and he pesters you so often that you go acquire drugs to sell to him just to shut him up.) The folks who made these undercover videos aren't guilty of entrapment if for no other reason than they're not part of law enforcement. Also, from the reaction of the ACORN employees, it doesn't seem that they had been constantly bothered by this pair in the past.

RE: Posted by: ptet at September 23, 2009 9:08 AM

Congrats, ptet - I just visited your worthless blog.

The Hit Counter is now "3" - who were the other two? Relatives?

Grrrrr. Congress has lost it's mind.

I guess ptet and anonymous are disappointed that they won't be getting any from underaged Salvadoran prostitutes any time soon.

Why are conservative chicks the hottest?

Anonymous, you wear your ignorance on your sleeve.

What are the odds that i could go 'undercover' as a neo-nazi lunatic asshole, visit a redneck 'gun show', and expose all sorts of wrongdoing there, too?

Explain to me how this would excuse ACORN's criminal activities?

If I asked a "like-minded" retard to sell me illegal assault weapons, we could blow it all out of proportion and finally get rid of the anachronism that is the 2nd amendment.

That fact that you use the word anachronism to describe the 2ndAmendment, illustrates your deep ignorance on the topic. The 2nd Amendment was purposely written into the constitution, not to bestow the rights of duck hunting on the public, not to allow folks living in isolated rural communities to defend themselves, but to give the people the tools that are necessary to retake their government by force if necessary, should that government turn tyrannical. It is in essence, an insurance policy against domestic tyranny. But maybe that's what really bothers you about it...

OR - Even better - get a guy to pretend to be an underage male hooker and solicit repub congresspeople. How many you think would bite? (It would be a large number, I think we are all aware...)

Again, explain to me how this would excuse the criminal activity of ACORN.

Both would be entrapment, just like this instance

Would you describe MSNBC's To Catch A Predator with Chris Hansen as entrapment?

I hope not, because entrapment only involves law enforcement, not investigative reporters. Again, you're ignorant.

You seem intent on using the bad behavior of your political opposition to excuse the bad behavior of those working on your side. That's pretty childish. "Well, they did it!" Grow up.

"She can investigate my acorn any day."

"Why are conservative chicks the hottest?"

the 2 of you read my mind...

Can somebody please explain to me why the so-called conservative woman in the photo is so inappropriately dressed?

She's wearing as little as possible, exposing her hips, and just about everything else. If I saw her on the street I'd think she's just another "slut feminist". You can see the top of her panties and her tan lines from her bathing suit. She stands there like she's actually accustomed to wearing much less.

Just goes to show you HOW FAR GONE AMERICAN WOMEN ARE. THIS IS CONSIDERED NORMAL!???

Seriously, PUT ON SOME CLOTHES.

The guy looks decent, respectable, and professional. The girl looks like a trashy whore. Did her parents not raise her properly? Ever hear of modesty?

WTF is wrong with women these days?

Thank you Anne. You beat me to it.

Anne and Nunya, Hannah was undercover as a prostitute. I don't believe she dresses that way in her day to day life. You should have seen the hilarious fur coat her partner wore when he was dressed as a pimp (on loan from her grandma, apparently).

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2009 8:46 AM

Easy, do it. You don't want to get shown up by a couple of conservative kids, do you?

Do it.

"...among thegreatest patriots this country has seen since the Revolution"

think for a second of all of the people who've given their lives in all of the wars since the Revolution, or risked their lives or well being for this country.

Then think about how fucking stupid it is to say that.

bras considering how much those two young people are going to be harrassed and intimidated by the press and law enforcement they have made a great sacrifice to shine the light on what acorn really is.Of course such sacrifice is unknown to losers such as yourself.
Anne,
relax everyone can't look as hot as the young lady.

"Why are conservative chicks the hottest?"

2 Reasons:

1) Conservative chicks practice personal hygiene.

2) Nasty chicks generally gravitate towards moonbattery, because government coercion is the only way they can get power.

Can somebody please explain to me why the so-called conservative woman in the photo is so inappropriately dressed?

Because though you pretend to, you don't understand conservatives.

I dunno what you guys see in her. She looks completely average, doesn't have a single physical characteristic to differentiate her from millions of other girls.

I'm A Lasagna Hog

She doesn't have hairy legs or braided arm pits!

I'll investigate. . . what's in her PANTS!!!

*bada-bing*

Wow, brs used the f-word. The only way a leftist knows for expressing emphasis.

Anyone like Anonymous who includes such gems in their posts as "neo-nazi lunatic azzhole", that the 2nd amendment is anachronistic and suggests that what ACORN was up is to is acceptable because people could also go undercover to "entrap" people fron the right is simply a troll and should probably be ignored.

brs and ptet trawl through a post, wait for someone to exaggerate approval, make a spelling mistake, get a date wrong, then hit the divert button.
But these two are very useful indicators that the post is unarguable, that it hurts, and through their wincing pain, help me to realise the bullet got home.
As to Anne, with her pretense at writing like an uptight conservative, she gave herself badly away with "WTF is wrong with women these days?" Nice conservative women don't use WTF, Anne. Big mistake.

Great patriots? If she were a liberal, you'd be calling her a hussy! You are going to equate these two with the early labor movement who gave their lives so you could have a weekend off, a paid holiday, etc? equate them with those he lost their lives for the civil rights movement? How about MLK? How about those men and women who performed rescue duties on 9/11 and Katrina? Or better yet, you would equate them to the men and women serving in the military? Give me a Goddamned break! You are leaderless aren't you?

BRAVO O'Keefe and Giles!

thankyouthankyouthankyouthankyouthankyou

There's that annoying whine again. Where's that coming from?

Can somebody please explain to me why the so-called conservative woman in the photo is so inappropriately dressed?

She's wearing as little as possible, exposing her hips, and just about everything else. If I saw her on the street I'd think she's just another "slut feminist". You can see the top of her panties and her tan lines from her bathing suit. She stands there like she's actually accustomed to wearing much less.

Just goes to show you HOW FAR GONE AMERICAN WOMEN ARE. THIS IS CONSIDERED NORMAL!???

Rosie... is that you?!?! No seriously, I bet you're a joy in the sack.

Yes, they are patriots. Considering the violent nature that ACORN and SEIU goons are known for, they did in fact place their lives in jeopardy.

Leaderless? Who cares about that?

Conservatives think as independent individuals, they don't some weird desperate codependency with their leaders like those in the "collective" hive of the left.

Posted by: Anonymous Coprophiliac at September 23, 2009 8:46 AM-
"What are the odds that i could go 'undercover' as a neo-nazi lunatic asshole, visit a redneck 'gun show', and expose all sorts of wrongdoing there, too?"

Extremely long odds, I'd say. You wouldn't last 30 seconds, you pansy. They'd bounce you for the squishy, fey, girly man that you are. I can just imagine a poof like you, swanning in and announcing that you're interested in a MP40. What a joke. You suck. It would be as obvious as your assless leatherette pants that you suck.

Posted by: Anonymous at September 23, 2009 2:54 PM

Funny...when there is some 'investigative scoop' that "blows the lid off" some outfit perceived as right-wing, the liberals are hoisting the kids onto their shoulders and demanding another paid holiday in their honor.

Dumbasses. Why can't you just be happy that the corruption of a taxpayer-funded organization has been exposed? Are you upset because it's going to wind up tarnishing Dear Reader?

Grow up.