« Open Thread | Main | Little Girl at Obama's Latest Staged Spectacle Was a Plant »

So who can ever trust these lying scumsnakes for the MSNBC lying peacock vulture i mean nonw trusts these liberal left-wing journalists anymore

Get some Cash For Geezers at www.TheNothingStore.com

Tweety Matthews says protesters are upset because the president is a black. No, tweety, it's because he's a red.

Yeah, THIS is fucking hilarious seeing as how those in strong opposition to the ObamaCare Bill are pointing out "Zeke" Emanuels's and other scientists/doctors who are on record for their euthanasia beliefs and views, and how they are huge influences in this bill's crafting.

Glenn Beck went over the historical facts of euthanasia in Germany and in this country. But when he does it, using facts and history ... Beck's some sort of idiot clown fearmonger.

http://tinyurl.com/mtxfbg

These MSNBC wonk-shits are not only out of gas, but the fumes have long left them. Their septic tanks are so empty they are rusting under their own failed weight. Look at the damn numbers. NBC/MSNBC is one of the most idioticly run companies/businesses ever.

http://drudgereport.com/

CABLE NEWS RACE
NITE OF AUG 10, 2009

FOXNEWS O'REILLY 3,814,000
FOXNEWS HANNITY 3,118,000
FOXNEWS BECK 2,417,000
FOXNEWS GRETA 2,388,000
FOXNEWS BAIER 1,988,000
FOXNEWS SHEP SMITH 1,833,000
MSNBC OLBERMANN 1,243,000
MSNBC MADDOW 1,082,000
CNNHN GRACE 875,000
CNN KATHY GRIFFIN 810,000
MSNBC HARDBALL 710,000

Where is that in the bill again?

Counseling session to set up living will (which everyone should have) = killing invalids and the elderly like Nazis, only it doesn't.

If you guys have to lie like this, what are you hiding? Why keep lying? Why not argue about the bill and what's in it?

The problem with sarcasm, satire, and vicious cutting wit is that it depends on finding something lower than the object and to make surprising and clever remarks that make the comparison so that the audience is drawn to make the leap intellectually and thus the comparison and find a grain of truth. But what happens when the object is already lower than fermented cat shit and road kill combined with the ethics that would make a vulture puke so that no decent cannibal or child molester would want to be associated with the object? What then should one use for the comparison? That is what is wrong with these people. They have gone down about a hundred levels beyond funny.

Van, I have to say if it wasn't for you, MSNBC would have only THREE viewers instead of FOUR

Goatse, Anonypussy and andy.

Let me get this straight. I am un-American according to Pelosi and Hoyer. I am a Nazi according to Pelosi. I am a KKK member according to John Dingell. I am now a holocaust-denier according to this Obama sychophant. Boy am I busy, no wonder I cannot find a job under this wonderful Obama economy.

Arthur Caplan doesn't even make a half-way cogent argument. It's worthy of a D in a high-school essay class. Saved from an F only by spelling the words right.

The comments following the article basically trashed him, sprinkled in with a few Obamabot non-sequitors. "Everything that's wrong with this country is Bush and his father's fault."

"Arthur Caplan doesn't even make a half-way cogent argument. It's worthy of a D in a high-school essay class. Saved from an F only by spelling the words right."

But seriousuly comparing Obama to Hitler is a cogent argument?

Good thing no one can really be bothered to pay any attention to MSNBC, and this is why.

But seriousuly comparing Obama to Hitler is a cogent argument?

Absolutely. The parallels are many for any student of history to see.

Firstly both Hitler and Obama are leftist socialists, who speak of things such as fairness and the snake oil of social justice, while being worshiped by masses of adoring zombies.

Second, both advocated having citizens turn on one another to turn in "fishy" opponents.

Third, Hitler had his own "National Civilian Security Force" just as Obama promises to create.

Fourth, we must not forget the Hitler Youth, which Obama will have his parallel of if his "mandatory volunteerism" program gets started.

Fifth, the Nazi's had their concept of useless eaters, and the current health bill has bizarre Orwellian provisions giving bureaucrats the power to decide who merits care, what kind and how much. The elderly and infirm are mostly left out of this criteria.

Sixth, the Nazi's characterized their political opposition as either terrorists or mentally ill, as Obama's administration did with the DOHS report on "right wing extremists."

Seventh, The Nazis interned people from their enemies list into indoctrination or reeducation camps, in H.R. 1388 (The GIVE Act) there are provisions for the creation of indoctrination camps. In fact the writers understood the similarities of the language so well, that they canged the word camps to campus.

Eight, the leftists, whether Nazi or Democrat, is always zealously concerned with controlling the lives of those around them. The Democrats, like the Nazi's, love regulation and "oversight." I've never heard Nazi's be accused of "deregulation," which is why it's always been so bizarre for the Democrats to have called the Republicans Nazi's for decades, and illustrates the left's general lack of education and understanding of reality.

The parallels are endless really, and I could go on.

But seriousuly comparing Obama to Hitler is a cogent argument?
Posted by: brs at August 12, 2009 9:10 AM

it seemed to be before jan 21, 2009, something must have changed?

Tell you what, if Obama backs off the goon squads, fires the eugenicists from his advisers, stops talking about killing the unproductive, and stops all the cult of personality crap ... we'll stop comparing him to Hitler.

Sound fair?

But seriousuly comparing Obama to Hitler is a cogent argument?

Posted by: brs at August 12, 2009 9:10 AM

No, Hitler was "Hitler" ...

Obama will establish his own notoriousness in his own name. He's (and his 'czars') just decided he likes a lot of Hitler's style and plan.

It's like anything with the left/libs in this country. Tell them Communism has failed wherever tried around the world and they reply, "Well, enough of it wasn't used ... not enough money poured into it ... and WE can do it better."

Same with Hitler's fascist socialism ... Our current PTB in our government think THEY can do more of it ... and better.

Nothing ... NOTHING this man or his Congressional minions can say from this moment on can save the American public's perception of this obamanation of a bill. No amount of tweeking, amending, or rewriting will either.

BTW, THIS bill is NOT the only one we need to stop. Do NOT forget Cap and Trade is sitting on deck.

Who's the eugenicist advisor?

Posted by: brs at August 12, 2009 12:39 PM

Science Czar John Holdren's Eugenicist Idol Harrison Brown

So his "idol" is a eugenicist so he must be? This is like saying Einstein believed you could go faster than light because he "idolized" Newton. Science is always changing, and one generation learns from the the last. Eugenics was a dark period in science, and a lot of that generation belived in eugenics- not just Nazis (though that's the whole point of this blog, I know...). Mismeasure of Man by Gould chronicles it pretty well.

Does this mean if a TOE is found I have to distance myself from Feynman for QED?

Find me something that says HOLDREN is a eugenecist. Then we'll talk.

BRS,

Read John Holdren's, ECOSCIENCE

Ignoring the "interpretation" and forming my own thoughts (on the above link)... sure is scary, scary radical thinking.

... and now he's in a position where he can exercise his ideas and put them into motion.

Not saying he will but the possibility is still there.

I don't like to judge from quotes out of context, but it's hard to find context for some of those things. It's nuts. And, if all of that is correct, he did subscribe to at least one eugenics idea: sterilization of undesirables (which doesn't even 'work', but that's just bad science).

I hope to Christ he's reversed himself, but that is cookery.

The idea that he could implement any of it is absurd -his legal reaoning is crazy, assuming he still belives any of htis.

"But seriousuly comparing Obama to Hitler is a cogent argument?
"Posted by: brs at August 12, 2009 9:10 AM"

Are you suggestig that the Liberals are full of shit for calling President Bush "Hitler" and conservatives "nazis"?

You better say "yes" you little piece of scum, or your whole argument falls apart.

The idea that he could implement any of it is absurd -his legal reasoning is crazy, assuming he still belives any of this.

Legal reasoning... you make it sound as though liberals actually act within the law. And that, in itself, is a horribly horribly ignorant statement. Apparently you ignore the fact that liberals repeatedly deem themselves "above the law" and act as they see fit, regardless of laws that restrict their blatantly retarded actions.

Liberals hold the 1st amendment sacred, but only for themselves. At the sight of opposition, liberals are the first group to condemn the "outdated" Constitution and say that it isn't relevant in today's society.

It's incredible that they use OUR sacred documents for themselves but get in a tizzy when WE exercise OUR freedoms in opposition to their abuses.

Posted by: Boston Red at August 12, 2009 8:32 AM- "Where is that in the bill again? Counseling session to set up living will (which everyone should have) = killing invalids and the elderly like Nazis, only it doesn't."

3 words- Leading. Beyond. Authority.