« Next After ObamaCare | Main | Denver Vandal Was Paid by SEIU »

Please, I just ate eggs.

What is actually in that issue of TIME for Kids?

Did TIME do a similar one for Bush 8 years ago? If so, how was he depicted? Did he have Devil horns and glowing red eyes?

Its child abuse to allow kids to even glance through that SLIME FOR KIDS i mean its not enough TIME is lying to adults now its lying to the kids Its not worth even linning a birds cage with

Well, here it is! Bush! in TIME for Kids.

Wow, no horns or glowing eyes but they made him look like a cross between Richard Nixon and Ted Kennedy.

http://www.timeforkids.com/TFK/kids/news/story/0,28277,96031,00.html

Yep, the mag is real ---> http://www.amazon.com/TIME-Kids-President-Obama-Americas/dp/1603208291

There's a lot of reasons why I don't post here every day--why, indeed, I take a break off the 'Nets for all but a weekday or two. One of the major reasons is I'm just fed up of seeing that mugshot all the time.

The perpetual stare of the Head of State is a salient feature of certain countries. I sometimes check myself, asking, like the three-letter troll did here a week or so ago, whether I'm not being alarmist. But then I see something like this thing right now, the indoctrination of kids--not just adults, but kids--with the same saturated mugshottery, and I become totally convinced: No, it's not alarmist of me to assume the worst about this anti-American president and his czar-infested shadow administration. On the contrary, it is the continuing heartbeat of consciousness, awareness of the evidence, reason and logic.

It's those who don't think that way that are in deep, deep trouble.

The liberals have had control of our schools for decades. Proof of that is the low test scores on real world subjects. However, Ask them about the global warming hoax or any other PC subject. The NEA does not exist to help your child!

"Time for Kids" is just an honest label for the bulk of it's readership and their corresponding grasp of the world. You can't say "Time for Liberals", as that is not only redundant but untrue, as there should never be time for liberals.

Time for Kids may be a strategy to concentrate its resources to a more appropriate demographic. It already dominates the tabloid market.

The current issue of Time For Kids has a eulogy for Ted Kennedy. Says Obama:

"There are very few people who have touched the life of this nation in the same order of magnitude."

Yep.

"No, it's not alarmist of me to assume the worst about this anti-American president and his czar-infested shadow administration"

Ouch. Are you really unaware that the simple declarative statement "this anti-American president" is, itself, alarmist nonsense? And to further talk about a "shadow administration" (and after all those years of W actually having a shadow administration, chock full of comic-book supervillians like Cheney) is, again, alarmist claptrap.

Seriously... even if you don't agree with his politics, he is clearly working his ass off to get things done. Which (as I understand the term) would mean he is in fact loving America. If he were actually anti-American, things would be progressing far differently.

(He might, for example, spend half the year at Camp David or in Texas clearing brush, while the greatest economic crisis in the postwar era grows under his feet... )

Are you really unaware that the simple declarative statement "this anti-American president" is, itself, alarmist nonsense?

It would be if it weren't backed up by evidence. It's backed up by mountains of evidence, starting from Obama's background (black supremacist pastor, anyone?), through his disastrous economic policies, up to his foreign policies of appeasing enemies of America (Iran, for instance) and cracking down on her friends (Honduras, Israel).

And to further talk about a "shadow administration" (and after all those years of W actually having a shadow administration, chock full of comic-book supervillians like Cheney) is, again, alarmist claptrap.

So what do you make of all those czars? All those functionaries outside of the domain of Congress, accountable to no one but the one who appointed them--Obama? The "You Too" accusation is no evasion--I for one never claimed Bush was perfect. But since your candidate has won (keeps saying "I won" to remind us of that fact), then he should own his policies. You can only keep talking about Bush so long.

Seriously... even if you don't agree with his politics, he is clearly working his ass off to get things done.

Yep, he's working to get things done. "Things," however, means turning America into a Socialist state, where everyone is dependent on the government.

Which (as I understand the term) would mean he is in fact loving America.

Marxists love the vision of America they strive for, the vision of America as a Socialist state. They do not love the core American values of exceptionalism, self-reliance, market freedom and religious belief. (Take a clue from Obama's pre-election "Bitter Clingers" comment.)

If he were actually anti-American, things would be progressing far differently.

Definitely not. He's doing exactly what would be expected of an anti-American at the helm.

(He might, for example, spend half the year at Camp David or in Texas clearing brush, while the greatest economic crisis in the postwar era grows under his feet... )

I happen to remember Ronald Reagan's non-reaction to the stock market crash in 1987, in spite of all the pressure on him for government intervention. Not even a year later, the stock market got back to what it was pre-crash. In contrast, Obama's policies are guaranteed to turn the recession into a full-blown depression, 1930s-style.

"Ouch. Are you really unaware that the simple declarative statement "this anti-American president" is, itself, alarmist nonsense?"

Are you aware you have to come up with more sophisticated propaganda to convince people that a guy who, just one example, spent 20 years listening to and later praising a preacher who preach sermons like "God damn America!" holds America in highest regard?

"He might, for example, spend half the year at Camp David or in Texas clearing brush"

Trillions dollars to socialist programs after America can only dream he take such a course.

Seriously... even if you don't agree with his politics, he is clearly working his ass off to get things done. Which (as I understand the term) would mean he is in fact loving America. If he were actually anti-American, things would be progressing far differently.

Probably one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Just because he is "getting things done" does not (by magical definition that you elude to) and I repeat, DOES NOT, mean that the things getting done are GOOD for America. You seem to define your own good in a way that involves de-development of America into a third-world shithole that resembles that of Cuba.

Thank you for being mentally challenged and attempting to project your garbage onto those who have a solid grasp on reality.

Just because he is "getting things done" does not (by magical definition that you elude to) and I repeat, DOES NOT, mean that the things getting done are GOOD for America.

It's a wonder he didn't say he made the trains run on time.

How many tree were chopped down to print this crap?

Wow... all of you really believe that hard work on America's future is BAAAAD. Which is somewhere between tragic and hilarious.

Did the advent of Social Security end the world as we know it? (People like you said it would... you were wrong. We're still here, and we have less poverty among the elderly).

Did Medicare create a facist state? (People like you said it would... you were wrong. We're still here, and the elderly/incapacitated have healthier lives).

Are any of you capable of learning from the past? Every time anyone tries to get something done for the betterment of society ('society' guys... we are ALL a part of it), the lunatic fringe says it will be the end of the world. And it never is.

This time next year, when we have heathcare reform on the books and America is still here, and none of you have been forced to eat your grandsmothers or been sent to work in the abortion mines... what will your complaint-du-jour be then? Is there some web board where they tell you what to be pointlessly incensed about next?

(My favorite part? The people who will benefit the most form this are the penniless hillfolk like that jackass the other day who hurt himself at an anti-healthcare rally... and then complained that he didn't have insurance! If you can't recognize your own self-interest, you really don't get an opinion...)

"Surreal at August 27, 2009 1:56 PM"

You sure are.

This time next year, when we have heathcare reform on the books and America is still here

You do realize that it won't go into effect until 2013, right? Therefore, demonRATs will go around gloating that they got super-awesome-crazy-special-perfect-free healthcare... without actually witnessing the outcome.

Short-sighted much?

KHarn, as usual in the face of a good argument you have nothing to say except a pathetic one line delivery. "No, you are!"

I agree that its sad that your failure to see your own self interest is a gross distortion of reality on your part. Do you not realize that one third of the insurance premiums we pay are used to pay people who sit around denying claims and denying coverage to people?

Are you really so deluded that you think the Insurance industry has your interests at heart?

Both of these guys are quoting the Jesuits, a branch of the Catholic Church, who used to say:

"Give me the child, and I care not who has the man."

A saying which, given scandals of the past decade, is perhaps equally as chilling.

And, really, are you criticizing a news magazine for featuring the President? Really? I've seen magazines for kids like this for the last several presidents. Even when they were explaining the Clinton impeachment scandal they were at least vaguely positive.

He is being paraded around, much like a celebrity. We don't need celebrities in political offices. We need leaders whose intentions are to promote American exceptionalism and strength, not be on TV and magazines, which paints him to be "superior" to all the rest.

His arrogance and ego (driven primarily by the msm) are fed day in and day out by those whose only goal is indoctrination by the repetitive, in-your-face appearance of the exalted one.

He is their messiah and as such, they are seeing to it that he become a household name, as a way to extend his popularity outside of the political realm, but to an elitist realm of royalty and superiority.

They WORSHIP him as a God... which is something that no political figure should be a part of.

Uncontested Absurdities

"Anonymous at August 27, 2009 5:09 PM"

One absurdity is that you idiots couldn't stay on topic to save your lives.

TIME FOR KIDS no difference just more left-wing propeganda aimed at kids