« Found: Beneficiary of "Stimulus" Package | Main | Village Idiot »

This is the message that matters.

Are we going to be allowed to vote in 2010?

There will be a White House manufactured "crisis" to keep the people from voting in 2010...watch what happens THEN!

Praying for the asteroid.

as IF! The Republicans have anything better to offer!

As a Lifelong Conservative, the Republican party of today is no less repugnant than the Democract party!

Stop the partisan bull! NO party is going to save this country only citizens who realize that government is supposed to be by the people and for the people!

NO party today stands for that Ideology!

Its time to throw ALL parties out and start from scratch!

Yeah, it's nice to think about throwing both parties out, but gosh darn it to heck, it's just not going to happen. Now, there are plenty of good people in the Republican party. Heck, there are probably some good 'rats too, just too blind to see what they're doing is wrong. The thing is, there's a better chance for the good people to take back the R's, but even if we don't take back the whole party, having a good showing in 2010 for the R's will leave us with a government that will do us far less damage than what we have. It will give us time to reform the party into something with the guts to actually undo some of the damage. Just think, when was the last time one of the two dominant parties was replaced? Before the civil war. 150 years ago. Third parties have been spoilers ever since, and what we DON'T need right now is someone spoiling the vote against the rats.

Al Franken's Former Talk Radio Colleagues Vocalize Disapproval

http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2009/07/al-frankens-former-talk-radio.html

"No on else to blame." Yeah - like silly liberals are ever going to really take responsibility for anything - much less complete failure.

Actually that goes for all politicians - not just the silly liberal ones.

All politicians suck like leaches. Career politicians are a scourge.

Mr Evilwrench, I wouldn't be surprised at a take over of both parties in the near future, or perhaps a major changeover of what we now have. The political winds aren't at the backs of the party of "no" and Democrats will eventually hang themselves on too much rope. But mark my words and take a little note, Republicans will do very well to lose minimum seats in 2010 if not take another "thumping" as they have in 06 and 08. This may not be such a bad thing if they can , let me use the dirty word, DIVERSE, and restructure for 2012. If not and unless Dem's fail miserably, they're dead. But it's going to be hard for Dems to outdo the ass raping America took during the 8 years of Bush.

I actually THOUGHT for just a second that I would trounce you again Andy.

Then I thought why bother?

Your just to clueless to comprehend anything you are told.

Michelle, perhaps you'd consider sharing your vision of the political outcome of 2010, 12, & 16 and why? Perhaps not?

ANDY, Bush is out of office. GET OVER IT!

And your solution for conservatives is to "be like Liberals". Go to hell.

KHarn, it's not an issue of being over Bush or not. It's that elementary adage that states if you keep doing what you've been doing, you'll keep getting what you've been getting.

Andy, have you read a poll lately?

Karin, Andy's problem is not reading, its comprehension.

He was Socialized too well to understand facts and common sense.

Throw him a dog bisket and let him slink away wagging his tail. That is the equivilent of his intellectual training.

Oiao, what's a dog bisket?

The polls Karin, are still in the Dem's favor, much, much higher than they were a year ago.

Point me the way to which polls you are reading Andy. Can you do that or are you scared?

Galluppoll.com has the #s on their homepage. A year ago congressional approval was somewhere in the 9%-14% area and Bush was between 19%-26%. If you seriously dispute that, incapable of googling, and have no understanding of navigating any credible poll, I suppose I can do that for you.

By the way, if you want to use the polling of Republican voters only, that's no consistent with the overall statistics.

I'm bored so I'm going to toy around with your lack of knowledge some more Andy.... Just for "fun" mind you

I wouldn't be surprised at a take over of both parties in the near future, or perhaps a major changeover of what we now have.

Considering that the socialists like you and Odumbo are going to control the Census and use it to increase your congressional seats with the help of the voter fraud actions that ACORN contributes that's a foregone conclusion. The "changeover" has already begun from the succesful American Capitalism model to the historically PROVEN failure of socialism.

The political winds aren't at the backs of the party of "no" and Democrats will eventually hang themselves on too much rope.

Oh but THEY are my clueless friend! Granted the Rebublicans have made some egregious errors in judgement which led them to their current status. The Socialists are sowing the seeds of MASSIVE discontent and weather they believe it or not way more than just "rope" will be used to deal with them.

But mark my words and take a little note, Republicans will do very well to lose minimum seats in 2010 if not take another "thumping" as they have in 06 and 08.

Considering how badly and obviously the socialist cheat, lie, and steal, It pains me to agree the the Republicans may not make any great gains. Sadly the ONLY reason they may be "thumped" is because you socialist can't win without cheating. Hence your partiy of criminals took over the Census.

This may not be such a bad thing if they can, let me use the dirty word, DIVERSIFY, and restructure for 2012.

Therin lies the problem. WE don't need to "diverisfy" WE have solid principles. ALL we need to do is rid ourselves of the socialists in our party and return to the ORIGINAL message which is rather difficult for a large number of the traitors in our parties midst.

If not and unless Dem's fail miserably, they're dead.

"IF" they fail?? Honey there IS no IF! Socialism has FAILED everywhere it's been tried for thousands of years.

But it's going to be hard for Dems to outdo the ass raping America took during the 8 years of Bush.

Gee, what a colorful term. Considering Unemplyment was 4.5% then and it's 9.5% NOW, TOTAL public debt was 5802.851 Trillion in 2008 and Obama has increased it to 19623.418 Trillion currently Which are the CBO numbers, and we gained about 200k jobs per month compared to the 430K a month we are currently losing under Odumbo I would REALLY love for you to cite some examples of "ass raping" Bush commited in comparison to what the Idiot in chief is doing NOW!

Michelle, perhaps you'd consider sharing your vision of the political outcome of 2010, 12, & 16 and why?

The outcome could only be determined or speculated about IF I knew for certain that elections would even be held. Currently I'm not very convinced they even will be.

In the event they are held, the VAST majority of incumbants on BOTH sides would suffer heavy losses unless ACORN is involved. Primarily the socialists but there are quite a few turncoats that our side neads to deal with. Assuming the socialists keep pushing their monarchy agenda which the evedence highly suggests, their losses won't be as significant.

By 2012 the ecomony will have collapsed under the weight of the current administration and martial law will probably have been imposed already. This would negate any need for an election to root out the current band of turncoats so an armed revolt will be almost immenent.

Depending on the outcome of the revolt, will affect ANY possibility of a 2016 election.

Perhaps not?

Oh Andy, I'm NOT like you... I actually have the knowledge and inteligence to match you point for point and shred you like the insuferable fool you are. Rather than ignore your posts and avoid answering them as you always do to mine, I'll just keep thrashing you about like the ball of string you are.

Don't worry Andy, I know you WON'T respond, and you CAN'T provide the statistical data I can so It's probably best if you just stay out of range of my claws!

Rawr!!!

A year ago congressional approval was somewhere in the 9%-14% area and Bush was between 19%-26%.

That really say's it ALL right there. Living in the past is not an effective example of brilliance Andy.

Feel free to cite TODAY'S NUMBERS since Bush is no longer the president or were you not aware of that?

If you seriously dispute that, incapable of googling, and have no understanding of navigating any credible poll, I suppose I can do that for you.

Considering YOU have proven consistantly that you are incapable of doing so perhaps you might learn how to do some research before you tell us how to.

By the way, if you want to use the polling of Republican voters only, that's not consistent with the overall statistics.

Actually it is. Depending on the polling and the SUBJECT of the poll it may be issue specific or looking for a statistical consensus of opinion rather that a broad issue. YOU do know haw poll's work don't you?

Oh nevermind, you really don't know how anything works....

Well Michelle beat me to it Andy. Polls can be skewed in any which way therefore some are not credible. Better indicators are what and how the mainstream media reports stories like the tea parties, they don't out of fear. Just by keeping up with them on the Internet it's not hard to see more and more Americans fed up with what's going on. I don't think your boy Obama is as popular as you think, Andy. Why is that liberals, such as yourself Andy, keep referring to the past?

Voting is dead? No more elections? The census will give more congressional seats (well, that did work for Tom delay but since he's a Republican it's ok, right?), and all of our financial woes are a result of Obama? Yep, hard to argue with that mindset.

Your mindset Andy?

Hey Dave, according to the Washington Times, Palin says she plans to write a book, campaign for political candidates, even Democrats and build a right-of-center coalition. She said "People are so tired of the partisan stuff — even my own son is not a Republican," How ya like them apples? Have a big slice of diversity pie!!!

Also, McCain said today of Palin on Meet The Press- ""Oh, I don't think she quit,". I was waiting

And these are Republican's finest?

Posted by: Michelle at July 12, 2009 4:15 PM

You were responding to my answer to Dave's question.
You've already demonstrated a disturbing thought process but if it's therapeutic for you to stalk me, I hope it helps you deal with whatever infatuation you have with me.

That's old news Andy. Good for her, she will be stumping for those Dems against Obama and his socialist plans.

Be careful before you cream your pants Andy, this could play in my favor.

Bares watching for sure.

Why do you hate her? What triggered this hatred? What did she do to deserve this? Remember it started during the campaign.

The this saying mean anything to you Andy?

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend"

Think about it.

Oh yea....I'm not a republican if that's what you are implying. I am an independent. Both parties piss me off. I vote common sense not socialist tax and spend ass wipes.

I don't hate Palin. Never have. I just think she has no place in the White House. She's inarticulate and is out of her league on any serious political stage. She just fell into the Governors office and was only VP candidate because she fit the suit. I don't see how she could possibly survive in any run for the White House when she would actually have to answer to town halls, face the media, and could no longer hide behind a pretty smile and impeccable voice inflections. She was introduced late in the season as a Carol Brady/success story/Governor/ pro gun hunter/golly-you-bethca Supermom. She delivered the same canned speech while hiding from the media. What few interviews she was forced to do (real interviews, not Hannity pampering), she failed miserably. I honestly believe her own family was intentionally and strategically used to provide a shield for her from any scrutiny.
But what amazes me is the Republican party knew she was incompetent yet fell for her head over heels. It was as if she ever dropped in the polls, a slight hike of the skirt along with a wink would bring her approval ratings up. Nothing against Palin.

Thanks for answering my question after twenty four hours. Better late than never, Andy.

Funny how your answer is a complete parallel on Obama.

You might think Palin is incompetent, but Obama is showing his incompetency.

I think you have mother issues, Andy.

Voting is dead?

With as many completely uninformed people like you Andy in the population it sure looks that way.

No more elections?

Considering the socialist agenda that is being FORCED upon the public and the typical pattern ALL despots follow it sure looks like a possible reality in the not to distant future.

The census will give more congressional seats well, that did work for Tom delay but since he's a Republican it's ok, right?

THAT was a STATE leval redristricing NOT a national one you moron! Incedentally the Democrats DID it beforee Delay took office. IT happens ALL the time at the state leval, NEVER at the national leval.

It's rather subjective weather it's "wrong" or "right" at the state leval and there are a lot of good and bad effects from doing it. Personally I don't have a huge issue with state redistricing due to poplulation influx or loss. Apparently this is just one MORE thing you know nothing about.

all of our financial woes are a result of Obama? Yep, hard to argue with that mindset.

With ACORN getting billions of TAXPAYER dollars, and "assisting" with the Census.... uh yes. Quadrupleing of debt ....Well DUH! Apeasing our enimies and insulting allies... FOR SURE!! Bailing out and THEN taking over failed companies to pay off political supporters... OBVIOUSLY!

Increasing taxes and lying about it, trying to take over health care and EVERY other facet of the economy IS one of the many causes of the current situation and ALL of them rest on the socialists like you.

You were responding to my answer to Dave's question.

And your point is?

Michelle You've already demonstrated a disturbing thought process but if it's therapeutic for you to stalk me, I hope it helps you deal with whatever infatuation you have with me.

Excuse me while I pee my pant's laughing and how obcenely moronic that statement is!

TO QUOTE THE RESIDENT DUMMY :

Michelle, perhaps you'd consider sharing your vision of the political outcome of 2010, 12, & 16 and why? Perhaps not?

Posted by: andy42302 at July 11, 2009 6:57 PM

To which you replied :

you to stalk me,

whatever infatuation you have with me

Posted by: andy42302 at July 12, 2009 5:28 PM

Answering your question and joining in an OPEN discussion

Is stalking?

It's Infatuation?

WOW !!

UNBELIEVABLE!!

You REALLY are a moron, and excell in fantastic ways of proving it to all who are penalized by your ineptnes.

Michelle: "I actually have the knowledge and inteligence to match you point for point and shred you like the insuferable fool you are."
_______________________________________

Andy: A year ago congressional approval was somewhere in the 9%-14% area and Bush was between 19%-26%.

Michelle: That really say's it ALL right there. Living in the past is not an effective example of brilliance Andy.

Andy: If you seriously dispute that, incapable of googling, and have no understanding of navigating any credible poll, I suppose I can do that for you.

Michelle: Considering YOU have proven consistantly that you are incapable of doing so perhaps you might learn how to do some research before you tell us how to.

Andy: Voting is dead?

Michelle: With as many completely uninformed people like you Andy in the population it sure looks that way.

Andy: No more elections?

Michelle: Considering the socialist agenda that is being FORCED upon the public and the typical pattern ALL despots follow it sure looks like a possible reality in the not to distant future.

Andy: You were responding to my answer to Dave's question.

Michelle: And your point is?

Andy: By the way, if you want to use the polling of Republican voters only, that's not consistent with the overall statistics.

Michelle: Actually it is.
____________________
Amuse yourself all you like. Your knowledge and intelligence of matching me "point for point and shred like the insuferable fool" that I supposedly am is no more than some sophomoric attack mode of rhetoric. It has no substance and only allows you to wonder off into your hate fest haven. You're a fraud Jeff, and boring.

Yawn!

I don't hate Palin. Never have. I just think she has no place in the White House. She's inarticulate and is out of her league on any serious political stage. She just fell into the Governors office and was only VP candidate because she fit the suit. I don't see how she could possibly survive in any run for the White House when she would actually have to answer to town halls, face the media, and could no longer hide behind a pretty smile and impeccable voice inflections. She was introduced late in the season as a Carol Brady/success story/Governor/ pro gun hunter/golly-you-bethca Supermom. She delivered the same canned speech while hiding from the media. What few interviews she was forced to do (real interviews, not Hannity pampering), she failed miserably. I honestly believe her own family was intentionally and strategically used to provide a shield for her from any scrutiny. But what amazes me is the Republican party knew she was incompetent yet fell for her head over heels. It was as if she ever dropped in the polls, a slight hike of the skirt along with a wink would bring her approval ratings up. Nothing against Palin.

A slight correction and rewrite Andy:

I don't hate Obama. Never have. I just think he has no place in the White House. He's inarticulate and way out of his league on any serious political stage. He just fell into the Presidential office and was only A candidate because he fit the affirmative action, diversity, racial quota suit. I don't see how he possibly survived in any run for the White House when he would actually astroturf every one of his town halls, and be given cover by the media, and could always hide behind a pretty smile and impeccable voice inflections as long as his telepromter didn't fail. He was introduced far to early in the season as a Karl Marx/success story/unacomplished senator/ anti gun proponent /hope & change Supermam. He delivered the same canned speech while always hiding from any kind of media investigation. What few interviews he was forced to do (real interviews, not CNN,MSNBC,ABC, DAily Kos, Media Matters, PBS, leg tingling, pampering), he always failed miserably. I honestly believe his own family was intentionally and strategically used to provide a shield for him to hide from any scrutiny.
But what amazes me is the Democrat party knew he was totally incompetent yet fell for him head over leg tingling heel. It was as if he ever dropped in the polls, a slight hike by the fawning media campaign distortion section along with a new lie would bring his approval ratings up regardless of his policy positions. Nothing against.Obama

There you go, all corected for you. I'm sure THAT'S what you meant to say huh?

Well.....I see that Michelle sees the parallel in your answer Andy.

Nice work Michelle. You saved me the trouble...I don't type as well as you.

andy, you tool, give up.

Thank's Dave!! ;)

Andy know's that he is not very good at debating the issues so he keeps calling me "Jeff" I guess to make me mad or something but that's fine.

He's clueless and can't point to anything that supports his claims so he just does the typical liberal dance. Deny, ignore, distort, etc.

If he were a real man he would show a little more conviction for his beliefs, I might even respect that weather I agreed or not. That's not the liberal way though so I'll just keep "stalking" him and see where that goes....ROTFL

No No No Mr Evilwrench. The more he tries to defend his position the more of an idiot he is. He is like a dog chasing his tail.

Andy has a predictable pattern.

I must say this about Andy.....He is a persistent troll yet a typical one at that.

Andy tell me why Obama is qualified to be POTUS?
No excuses now, just the answer.

C'mon Evil, you know liberals NEVER give up on failure. Just look at the idiot's they have leading them.

Failure is just another way of saying Democrat.

Andy who is Jeff?

Amuse yourself all you like.

Gee thank's I will!!

Your knowledge and intelligence of matching me "point for point and shred like the insuferable fool" that I supposedly am is no more than some sophomoric attack mode of rhetoric.

Such eloquence for someone who NEVER can assmble a rebuttal to anything I've said. Considering your age and lack of any meaningful knowledge I felt is was better to communicate in a range you may understand. Aparently "sophmoric" is even to much... would you prefer pre-school instead?

I can do baby talk if you prefer that......

It has no substance and only allows you to wonder off into your hate fest haven. You're a fraud Jeff, and boring.

Ponting out your ignorance of global economics, history, federal and state economics, finacial law, juris prudence, sentance structure, gender confusion and such is not "a hate fest" Andy.

It's a genuine effort to help you learn, sadly you seem woefully equiped to do so.

Yawn!

I make your little brain hurt huh?

Ahhh.... Rowr~~ Hiss~~~

Andy who is Jeff?

Posted by: Dave at July 12, 2009 7:40 PM

I've asked that a lot but he never answers. I sure would like to know though, he seems to have a real personal issue with that guy.

Michelle, if there's anything obvious in your writings, it's that you have no interest in debating or if there's conviction in my beliefs or not. Your objective, and you do it well, is to create a diversion by dissecting a post and spewing some irrelevant diatribe to each sentence. This creates a distraction of anything I've said in order for you to display your own real message, your hatred of liberals. By my understanding of the definition of a "troll", that fits you perfectly.
It's also interesting that the only times I've seen the name "Michelle" on here is when you're following me with your attacks.
You've you told me in your rants what I think, what I believe, and how I feel about certain issues although you have no knowledge. You've defended this by dissecting, spewing non sequitur gibberish, and take victory for being correct. You've even combined my statements in order to present them with a different meanings in order to inject your hate.
So if you, tag-a-long-dave, et al (assuming you are indeed different people)want to sit back and
enjoy your irrelevant kibitzing, I'm at least glad I brought some thrill to your mundane and admittedly boring lives.

Jeff had a blog and did the same as you are doing; dissect, distract, and attack. He also had his/her own group of followers that became obvious was one person. It's the same exact pattern.

Michelle, if there's anything obvious in your writings, it's that you have no interest in debating or if there's conviction in my beliefs or not.

I would anwser or respond to this charge & accusation but THAT would be "dissect, distract, and attack" so I won't say anything.

Your objective, and you do it well, is to create a diversion by dissecting a post and spewing some irrelevant diatribe to each sentence.

I would anwser or respond to this charge & accusation but THAT would be "dissect, distract, and attack" so I won't say anything.

This creates a distraction of anything I've said in order for you to display your own real message, your hatred of liberals

I would anwser or respond to this charge & accusation but THAT would be "dissect, distract, and attack" so I won't say anything.

By my understanding of the definition of a "troll", that fits you perfectly.

I would REALLY like to anwser or respond to this charge & accusation but THAT would be "dissect, distract, and attack" so I won't say anything.

It's also interesting that the only times I've seen the name "Michelle" on here is when you're following me with your attacks.

I would REALLY REALLY love to anwser or respond to this charge & accusation but THAT would be "dissect, distract, and attack" so I won't say anything.

You've you told me in your rants what I think, what I believe, and how I feel about certain issues although you have no knowledge.

Oh lord do I REALLY REALLY want to anwser or respond to this OBVIOUS charge & accusation but THAT would be also be "dissect, distract, and attack" so I won't say anything.

OH to hell with that you mental infant!!

THIS WAS TAKEN FROM YOU WEBSITE YOU PATHETIC LITTLE TWIT. YOU ARE A LYING COWARD WHO IS SO IGNORANT IT AMAZES ME YOU CAN SURVIVE WITHOUT DROWNING IN YOUR OWN DROLL!!

Written by Andy the COMMUNIST sypathiser himself:

Across this nation, as the lies and smears come forth from the forces of McCain, the heart and soul of America fights back from the good and decent people who say of Bush and Cheney and McCain and Rove: enough, no more, it ends here.

When John McCain lied about Barack Obama and said he would lose a war to win an election, the single mom and her teenage daughter fought back. Mom canceled Sunday dinner. Her daughter returned the CD. They gave another $20 to Obama. In their America, the big truth must defeat the big lie.

McCain, like Bush, is too intellectually incompetent to be a U.S. President. It should be obvious to almost everyone that George W. Bush is an abject failure and totally incompetent to lead our country. We saw this incompetence in his first year and his polls were heading down the toilet. His “C” average mentality was showing his true abilities.

THAT is what you believe MORON!!!

YOU are so stupid!! Anyone on here can go LOOK and figure out what you believe but you are such an insevure COWARD you won't even own up to it like a man. You are just and idiotic child who is to dumb to ever figure out how stupid you really are!!!

You've defended this by dissecting, spewing non sequitur gibberish, and take victory for being correct.

I would REALLY REALLY ABSOLUTELY love to anwser or respond to this charge & accusation but THAT would be "dissect, distract, and attack" so I won't say anything.

You've even combined my statements in order to present them with a different meanings in order to inject your hate.

Do the acusations ever end with you....

I sure wish I were allowed to participate in the discussion. I might just be able to answer you or even explain my position AND why I hold it but NOOOOO not me. I just have to sit here and let little Andy acuse me repeatedly, and make baseless assumtions without EVER pointing to anything I have said.

You've even combined my statements in order to present them with a different meanings in order to inject your hate.

As always more charge & accusation but NO real point.

So if your, tag-a-long-dave, et al (assuming you are indeed different people)want to sit back and enjoy your irrelevant kibitzing, I'm at least glad I brought some thrill to your mundane and admittedly boring lives.

Oh PLEASE Andy can I comment on this charge & accusation or do I have to keep quiet and stay still?

Jeff had a blog and did the same as you are doing; dissect, distract, and attack. He also had his/her own group of followers that became obvious was one person. It's the same exact pattern.

So this Jeff guy has some blog and since I just happen to follow a normal text style debate common on THOUSANDS of boards around the world I'm suddenly HIM?

You really are dumb!!

Scraping through your froth, I'm wondering how you deduce that my feelings toward the Bush Admin equates to me being a communist sympathizer. There's no connection.

Ge Andy...

I would REALLY REALLY ABSOLUTELY love to anwser or respond to this charge & accusation but THAT would be "dissect, distract, and attack" so I won't say anything.

That works too. No answer is better than a diatribe of irrelevant rambling gibberish.

I would simply love to anwser or respond to yet another one of your many CHARGES & ACUSATIONS but as usual that would be just "dissect, distract, and attack" in your opinion so I'm not alowed to respond to anything you say.