moonbattery.gif


« At Least They're Consistent | Main | Lodgers at San Quentin Recreation Center Don't Want to Leave »


June 8, 2009

Obama Picks Militant Pervert Kevin Jennings for Key Education Post

Vladimir Lenin said,

Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.

Four years is how long Comrade Obama has, and he isn't going to waste a single day — as made clear by his appointment of militant pervert Kevin Jennings as Assistant Deputy Secretary, Office of Safe & Drug Free Schools:

Kevin Jennings is the founder and former executive director of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), an organization that works to make schools safe for all students, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Translated from bureaucratese, the above reads:

Jennings founded a fanatical cult devoted to imposing homosexual depravity on small children.

"Safe" schools are schools in which homosexuality is aggressively promoted, as by GLSEN's "Day of Silence" celebrations.

In bold on Jennings' resume is his organization's role in the Fistgate Incident:

On March 25, 2000, GLSEN put on a conference called "TeachOut" for kids across and public school teachers across Massachusetts. This conference was co-sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Education.
At this conference children as young as 12 years old were taught by state employees how to engage in various extremely dangerous (and disgusting) homosexual sex acts.

Here's an example of what the kids were taught by bureaucrats on your dime, thanks to Jennings and his fellow activists:

Fisting [forcing one's entire hand into another person's rectum or vagina] often gets a bad rap.… [It's] an experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate with… [and] to put you into an exploratory mode.

Comrade Obama has said that sexual indoctrination should start in kindergarten — and GLSEN agrees:

GLSEN activist and New York kindergarten teacher Jaki Williams said starting in kindergarten is a must, since children at that age are still developing their ideas about the world around them. Even at that age, she said, is "the saturation process needs to begin."
Williams, in fact, is a model teacher when it comes to this "saturation" process. She regularly initiates conversations with her children by reading to them such controversial books as Heather Has Two Mommies, Daddy's Roommate, and One Dad, Two Dads, Browns Dads, Blue Dads. She also hosts a viewing of the video Both of My Moms' Names Are Judy: Children of Lesbians and Gays Speak Out, produced by a San Francisco pro-homosexual advocacy group.
According to one writer for The Lambda Report, who infiltrated a 1997 GLSEN workshop, one former teacher admitted that changing the mind of a child required more than a one-time effort. She said she had to expose her children to a constant stream of homosexual words and images, because "It's really a conditioning process."

Here's what Jennings has to say about those of us who respect traditional values:

We have to quit being afraid of the religious right. We also have to quit — I'm trying to find a way to say this. I'm trying not to say, '[F—] 'em!' which is what I want to say, because I don't care what they think! [audience laughter] Drop dead!

Brainwashing small children into accepting this freak's viewpoint is what Obamunists had in mind when they promised their two-bit messiah would unite us.

Hat tips: The Conservative Dominion, PC Free Zone, Atlas Shrugs, Cao's Blog.

Posted by Van Helsing at June 8, 2009 12:08 PM

Comments

Did Joe Biden tell Sotomayor to "Break a leg" during her confirmation hearings?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090608/ap_on_go_su_co/us_sotomayor_injury

"WASHINGTON – Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor broke her ankle Monday morning in an airport stumble, then boarded her flight as scheduled and made the roughly hourlong trip to Washington to meet with senators who will vote on her confirmation."

Posted by: Justin Case at June 8, 2009 12:25 PM

Obama selects only the most feindish diabolical memebrs of the LEGION OF DOOM for his cabnet of scoundrels

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at June 8, 2009 12:26 PM

Look how far we've fallen. Remember Jocylen Elders and her masturbation-gate? Seems kind of tame, now. My God. I'm never setting foot in Massachusetts. Or SF or Provincetown, for that matter. Or Vermont.

Posted by: Karin at June 8, 2009 12:31 PM

My God. I'm never setting foot in Massachusetts. Or SF or Provincetown, for that matter. Or Vermont.

Posted by: Karin at June 8, 2009 12:31 PM

Don't fool yourself...

This stuff gets exported from the areas you've mentioned above pretty quickly. The ripple effect is astounding.

Posted by: Nathaniel M at June 8, 2009 12:52 PM

Oh my Ever Loving Christ. You should follow the link and read the article. What does it take to enrage this country???

Posted by: Karin at June 8, 2009 12:52 PM

Karin,


Want to know how far we've fallen?
There was a time when discussion of homosexuality was considered to be impolite.

Now apparently, some psychopaths enjoy open discussion with kids about perversions of unimaginable decadence.
Why isn't this considered to be a sex crime?

Posted by: Fiberal at June 8, 2009 12:53 PM

Political patronage at its finest. (Spit!)

Posted by: Nathaniel M at June 8, 2009 12:54 PM

Joe Biden's wife is heavily involved with this organization (GLSEN). It starts at the top. Wawn't Goering a pedophile? (Just to see which buttons get pushed)

Posted by: codekeyguy at June 8, 2009 12:59 PM

Of course this post is disgusting, biased and full of lies.

The document that discussed "fisting" was a document aimed for adult to promote what is safe and what is unsafe safe.

Based on any google search many more heterosexual fisting sites come up. So not a homosexual only act...and of course not all heterosexuals or homosexuals engage in that act.

But this writer wants to spread misinformation.

There was never any intent for children to see the publication. It was brought in error to a school by an organization that also does outreach to adults.

An anti-civil equality activist found the pamphlet in a box - never given out to children and spread the lie repeated here.

I say repeating lies and spreading hate is far worse than civil equality and healthy discussion of sex acts.

Sex is not evil.
Gay or straight.

Posted by: RJP3 at June 8, 2009 1:01 PM

>> She said she had to expose her children to a constant stream of homosexual words and images, because "It's really a conditioning process.

"Conditioning" is another word for "behavior modification".

Liberals can't let people decide things for themselves, RJP3; thay have to "encourage" them to THEIR way of thinking. Let the kids GROW UP and let them decide "how they swing". Let adults who have experienced life decide their sexual orientation.

If you have a problem with that, GO TO HELL.

Posted by: KHarn at June 8, 2009 1:23 PM

Gay activists are treating children like human bonsais by forcing weird and unnatural beliefs on them. It's despicable and must be stopped.

Posted by: Judith M. at June 8, 2009 1:28 PM

"If anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a large millstone were hung around his neck and he were drowned at the bottom of the sea."

Matthew 88:6 (NIV)

Posted by: Anonymous at June 8, 2009 1:41 PM

"If anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a large millstone were hung around his neck and he were drowned at the bottom of the sea."

Matthew 88:6 (NIV)

Posted by: ZMarshall at June 8, 2009 1:42 PM

Correction: Matthew 18:6 (NIV)

Posted by: ZMarshall at June 8, 2009 1:43 PM

RIP
Why do you think that public discussion of sex is healthy?

In fact, why do you think that deviate sexual practices should be given any kind of public attention, let alone by a sitting president?

In fact, just what is in the general civic interest to promote homosexual lifestyles through legislative action?

Posted by: Fiberal at June 8, 2009 1:44 PM

OMG! This is DISGUSTING!!! What the hell is wrong with these people???? How is this helping any of these kids succeed in life??? Fisting???? What the fuck!!!

Posted by: MM at June 8, 2009 2:02 PM

Of course this post is disgusting, biased and full of lies.


^^ Liberal degenerate drone.

We're not talking about how you spend your weekends, troll.. we're talking about your depraved, perverted kind taking over actual curriculum. Gotta get those kids to have massive diseases and unwed pregnancies real quick, don't ya?

From Massnews:

"A lesson in fisting?"
There was a five minute pause so that all of the teenagers could write down questions for the homosexual presenters. The first question was read by Julie Netherland, "What’s fisting?"

A student answered this question by informing the class that "fisting" is when you put your "whole hand into the ass or pussy" of another. When a few of the students winced, the Department of Public Health employee offered, "A little known fact about fisting: you don’t make a fist like this. It’s like this." He formed his hand into the shape of a tear drop rather than a balled fist. He informed the children that it was much easier.


This is how libs wanna teach our kids. I don't give a damn, this is hardly fit for Cinemax, let along junior high or high school.

Posted by: Atomic Lib Smasher at June 8, 2009 2:06 PM

RE: Posted by: RJP3 at June 8, 2009 1:01 PM

"An anti-civil equality activist found the pamphlet in a box - never given out to children and spread the lie repeated here."

What, exactly is your idea of an "anti-civil equality activist"? Sounded more like a concerned parent to me.

Posted by: TonyD95B at June 8, 2009 2:09 PM

"Sounded more like a concerned parent to me."
TonyD95B, that probably IS RJP3's definition of an "Anti- civil equality activist"!

"It was brought in error to a school by an organization that also does outreach to adults."
If that is true (And I'm definitely calling that into question, since you're not exactly an unbiased source, offer no proof, and something like that would have to be a pretty colossal mistake for the group to make purely in error), then was the person or persons responsible for it punished accordingly, or given a pat on the head for his/ her superiors or the school officials for "Encouraging diversity" or some crap like that?

Posted by: Adam at June 8, 2009 2:27 PM

Sex is not evil. Gay or straight.

So is there any perversion at which you draw the line, or it all good? Necrophilia A-OK? Coprophilia good for you? What?

Anyone teaching this to kids - or even allowing children to see it - should be flogged.

And pardon me, but "fisting" is perverted. No normal person does anything of the kind.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 2:28 PM

There was never any intent for children to see the publication. It was brought in error to a school by an organization that also does outreach to adults.

You know, excuses are like assholes, everybody has one and they all stink. And the worst stink always comes from left-wing hippies.

There was absolutely no reason for the publication to be made in the first place, except that some leftist radical wanted to put information about a particular sexual fetish out into the mainstream.

Posted by: V the K at June 8, 2009 2:32 PM

"Gay" sex IS evil. It spreads killer diseases.

AIDS could be virually wiped out in one generation if homosexuals could keep their pants pulled up - but they are too self-centered and selfish to even consider it. Their "right to sodomize" is more important to them than saving millions of lives.

Perverted bastards are sick.

Posted by: Anonymous at June 8, 2009 2:58 PM

In addition to which, Anon, homosexuals are apparently the major reservoirs of STDs, including syphilis, gonorrhea, and hepatitis B, all thanks to their delightful habits and practices.

While I'm not religious, I suspect that the Biblical prohibitions against homosexuality - much like the dietary ones - stemmed from public health oonsiderations. Thanks to refrigeration, the dietary restrictions are now obsolete, but as we've seen, the adverse public health impact of homosexuality is still with us.

And before any liberal bleats that homosexuals are not a public health problem, let me ask this (rhetorical) question: would you perform CPR on an obvious homosexual, or expose yourself to his blood, without a second thought?

Of course not. No one in his right mind would. And why not? Because you know they do pose a significant public health problem.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 3:12 PM

It's almost like one of those SAT questions.

Culture A promotes gay sex, abortion, and fisting lessons for children, and 50 % of children are born to single women.

Culture B promotes maximum procreation within a traditional extended family structure which has been proven strong and durable over 7,000 years.

At which year will Culture B completely overwhelm Culture A such that Culture A will cease to exist?

Posted by: mega at June 8, 2009 3:20 PM

Wouldn't it be nice if we could adopt some "real radical" education like.. I dunno....

Reading, Writing, and Arithmatic?

Mr. Smith descibed liberals perfectly in the Matrix. They are a virus that consumes everything and then they move on to infect something else.

Posted by: Michelle at June 8, 2009 3:20 PM

Twice now I have had a "private" conversation with my sons so called teachers. For some reason he says they don't bring up there sick fag BS anymore. Go figure. There is an answer but a liberal would find it so very unPC.

Posted by: FREE at June 8, 2009 3:53 PM

Hey FREE,
Don't you just LOVE those "private" conversations? No witnesses, just factual statements, and promises, from parent to teacher!!!!

Posted by: codekeyguy at June 8, 2009 4:00 PM

"AIDS could be virually wiped out in one generation if homosexuals could keep their pants pulled up."
Well, there would be a pretty big dent put in it, certainly, but it would most likely still be raging in Africa, which suffers from a badass AIDS epidemic which is generally spread through other ways (i.e. contaminated blood transfusions, drinking contaminated well water).
"Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 3:12 PM,"
That is a pretty good point on the possible reasoning behind the dietary restrictions in the Old Testament.

Posted by: Adam at June 8, 2009 4:17 PM

Can we just have the three "R's" in our schools? Getting off base with all this bs does our children no good

Posted by: D mockracy at June 8, 2009 5:20 PM

Adam, I've read conjecture that heterosexual AIDS in Africa is more prominent because Africans use anal sex as a birth control measure. I don't know the merit of this point, but it would explain a lot.

It's certainly not spread in Africa through transfusions, which very few people ever get (even here), and I'm unaware of any reports that AIDS can be spread by drinking water.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 5:25 PM

Adam, Jay is correct. You need to recognize that it is no longer the 80's and that phobia that HIV/Aids is a "gay disease".

Posted by: Ghost of Wellstone at June 8, 2009 5:42 PM

Having said that, AIDS is a disease of homosexuals and drug addicts in the developed world. And it's not a phobia to be concerned about catching a potentially fatal disease; it's just good sense.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 6:12 PM

GHOST
Tell us how aids spread to straights since it's a SEXUALLY transmitted disease.

Here's a hint: WHORES.

Posted by: Anonymous at June 8, 2009 6:13 PM

This is another reason why liberals hate school vouchers...they have a pathological need to indoctrinate others to their social diseases.
Rest assured that BO's children will not be exposed to the filth to which he's willing to expose other children.

Posted by: Fiberal at June 8, 2009 6:18 PM

I have pretty much the same perspective on homosexuals that I do on junkies: I know they exist, and don't think they should be picked on, but also think that they've adopted unhealthy and socially destructive behaviors that should be discouraged, most particularly among the impressionable.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 6:24 PM

Great point, Fiberal -- you can bet that Sidwell Friends has no such program introducing their students, like Barry's two girls, to "Gay, Lesbian and Trans-sexual Lifestyles."

Back to the three R's? That'll be the day! Like you, I share your enthusiasm for teaching things that kids can use in later life, like how to read and write English properly, how to add, subtract, multiply and divide, etc. But obviously our Dear Leader, the "Screw 'em all, I'm goin' to NYC for dinner and a show!" President (for a little while longer) has other ideas -- I say "for a little while longer," since a revolution is coming -- keep it up, Barry, because everything you're doing enlists another soldier for the cause, that is, a return to the Founding Principles and Conservatism. 2010 can't get here soon enough, though, I fear . . .

Posted by: jc14 at June 8, 2009 6:35 PM

However, AIDS is by far most common among the homosexual population in the United States, primarily because the type and frequency of sexual contact, combined with STDs, is the perfect method of spreading a body-fluid borne virus.

Public health records demonstrate that homosexuals, representing 2 percent of America's population, suffer vastly disproportionate percentages of several of America's most serious STDs, with incidences among homosexuals of diseases like gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis A and B, cytomegalovirus, shigellosis, giardiasis, amoebic bowel disease and herpes far exceeding their presence in the general population. These are due to common homosexual practices that include fellatio, anilingus, digital stimulation of the rectum and ingestion of urine and feces.

An exhaustive study in The New England Journal of Medicine, medical literature's only study reporting on homosexuals who kept sexual "diaries," indicated the average homosexual ingests the fecal material of 23 different men each year. The same study indicated the number of annual sexual partners averaged nearly 100. Homosexuals averaged, per year, fellating 106 different men and swallowing 50 of their seminal ejaculations, and 72 penile penetrations of the anus. (Corey, L, and Holmes, K.K., "Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men," New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, vol 302: 435-438; as quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).

A study by McKusick, et al., of 655 San Francisco homosexuals reported that only 24 percent of the sample claimed to have been "monogamous" during the past year, and of this 24 percent, 5 percent drank urine, 7 percent engag-ed in sex involving insertion of a fist in their rectums, 33 percent ingested feces, 53 percent swallowed semen and 59 percent received semen in their rectums in the month just previous to the survey ("AIDS and Sexual Behavior Reported by Homosexual Men in San Francisco," American Journal of Public Health, December 1985, 75: 493-496; quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).

Lesbians show similar patterns of high venereal disease incidence relative to the general population. They are 19 times more likely to have had syphilis, twice as likely to have had genital warts, four times as likely to have had scabies, seven times more likely to have had infection from vaginal contact, 29 times more likely to have had oral infection from vaginal contact and 12 times more likely to have had an oral infection from penile contact ("Medical Aspects of Homosexuality," Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality, 1985, Jaffe and Keewhan, et al.; quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).

AIDS research by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control reported that the typical homosexual interviewed claimed to have had more than 500 different sexual partners in a lifetime. Considered by themselves, the AIDS victims in this study averaged more than 1,100 lifetime sexual partners. Some reported as many as 20,000. Studies reported by A-P. Bell, M.S. Weinberg and S.K. Hammersmith in the book "Sexual Preference" (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1981) indicated that only 3 percent of homosexuals had fewer than 10 lifetime sexual partners. Only about 2 percent could be classified as either monogamous or semi-monogamous (from "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).

LINK

Posted by: Anonymous at June 8, 2009 6:40 PM

Sorry. Above post was mine.

Posted by: SK at June 8, 2009 6:43 PM

Anon, you twit, it is not an STD. HIV was initially transmitted through SIV (simian immune virus), and it began with animal to human transmission. In South Asian countries where eating monkey brains or meats is not uncommon, Harvard studies along with physicians declared it's orgin. It later went viral in both gays and straight men and women because of the exchange of bodily fluids, hence why needle drug users and transfusion patients have also been at risk. The myth that it is a gay disease is a lie, and certainly shows your ignorance on science and your discriminatory mentality. Jay, I almost applaud your last statement. Both straight and gay people engage in unhealthy behavior at times. What you think you witness at flamboyant Gay Pride parades or such, is just that...a Parade! Gay friends of mine have wonderful and healthy lives, but have been pretty glamorous at the clubs. What you need to understand, and I do from a family member, friends, and my best friends brother, nobody chooses to face the discrimination the LBGT community does. Preferring the same sex was not an issue they had much of a choice in. As a straight man, I will say, I have enough confidence in my own sexuality that I can go to a bar with my gay friends and not worry. You might try it sometime.

Posted by: Ghost of Wellstone at June 8, 2009 6:51 PM

Great post, SK. Why male homosexuals would be walking disease vectors is obvious, but I can't understand the incidence of disease among lesbians. Maybe it's allergy to flannel. /g

Posted by: Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 6:52 PM

"Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 6:24 PM"

I agree. I don't hate either, but I have a firm dislike of junkies.

Posted by: KHarn at June 8, 2009 6:55 PM

Anon, you twit, it is not an STD.

On this planet, it sure as hell is. You seem to be arguing that it’s not an STD based on conjecture regarding its origin. That’s not the point. It’s an STD because it’s largely transmitted sexually. That’s what the “T” stands for! How and where it originated is irrelevant. Who knows how syphilis or gonorrhea originated? They’re transmitted sexually, which makes them STDs.

Both straight and gay people engage in unhealthy behavior at times.

The point is not existence, but likelihood. Homosexuals engage in unhealthy behavior at a vastly higher rate than normal people, as demonstrated by the studies SK has linked. That’s why AIDS – and before them, syphilis, gonorrhea, and hepatitis B – spread like wildfire through the homosexual community. In fact, epidemiologists initially modeled HIV transmission with data from hepatitis B.

Preferring the same sex was not an issue they had much of a choice in.

What choice did Jeffrey Dahmer have? Or John Wayne Gacy? The extent of their volition is not the issue, but rather the desirability of their behavior. Should we condone it, or discourage it? That’s the issue.

You might try it sometime.

As a matter of fact, I have. Still doesn’t change the point. I consider homosexuality the same way I consider, say, wife-swapping. I know some people do it, but I think it’s unhealthy physically (for the reasons discussed above) and morally, and should be discouraged, not lauded.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 7:05 PM

"The myth that it is a gay disease is a lie ..."

REALLY, Ghost ... care to provide us some proof???

Try again, you're up a creek without a paddle once more:

This, from none other than the land of fruits and nuts itself:

California Homosexual Organization Admits HIV/AIDS is "Gay Disease"

LOS ANGELES, California, October 4, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center has abandoned a long-held homosexual activist contention by declaring on billboards posted throughout Southern California that HIV/AIDS is a “gay disease.”

According to a report by the Los Angeles Times, the Center is trying to address rapidly increasing HIV infection rates among the homosexual population by rallying the gay community to increasing vigilance against exposure to the disease. Activists for the homosexual lifestyle have, until this current development, strongly, and sometimes vehemently refused to admit that the disease is predominantly generated among homosexual men.

The ad campaign, which is also running in magazines, is in part a response to the findings of public health officials, who have noted that three out of four cases of HIV infections are found in men who engage in homosexual activity, the United Press International reported.

In 2005 US health officials reported an alarming eight percent increase in HIV infection rates in one year alone among homosexual and bisexual men. The Center for Disease Control also warned that a survey of 15-29 year old men who engaged in homosexual activity “reported that the proportion of unrecognized HIV infection was as high as 77 %.”

A report by the Public Health Agency of Canada, released in August 2006, revealed a sharp increase in HIV/AIDS infections, with 51 percent of infections found in men engaging in homosexual activity.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2006/oct/06100404.html

Posted by: ZMarshall at June 8, 2009 7:08 PM

Wellstone, do you really deny that if gay males all pulled up their pants, AIDS in the developed world would drop to a piddling semblance of its former self? In America, if every gay person stopped having sex or paired off with exactly one person in a monogamous arrangement, AIDS would disappear in 10 years, end of story.

Also, to say the "LGBT community" faces discrimination is, in 2009, ridiculous. Christ, they are a whole "LGBT community" now - when did that happen? This isn't 1975. You can go to college and major in GLBT studies. Kids today can barely be considered cool without having some kind of same-sex encounter. You have to face the facts that the GLBT crowd had a 100 % success and then doubled it in terms of first gaining acceptance and then commandeering the public agenda. I would ask you WHO, exactly, is discriminating against gays today? Is it some Obama boogey-man straw man, like "conservative haters" or "Christianists"? Most people are scared out of their effing minds to even use the word "gay", for fear it could cost them their job or something. Out culture is saturated and root-rotted in gay-sex talk, imagery, and perversion, and we are probably not even in the 2nd inning yet of the GLBT onslaught. It is, actually, monogamous heterosexual married couples who are most discriminated against, today, in policy, politics, and popular culture.

I say all that as a person, by the way, who has no problem with people doing whatever turns them on in the privacy of their own homes, with the shades pulled down. I'm just sick of them being in our faces all the friekin' time.

Posted by: mega at June 8, 2009 7:09 PM

From what I understand, it is from the sharing of sex toys.

And despite however GoW wants to spin it, HIV is an STD.

That is how it is classed vis-a-vis the CDC and WHO.

So much for GoW's staunch support of science. Like most liberals, science is only convenient when it allegedly supports their perverted or ridiculous views. The article cited uses CDC reports as their sources.

HIV may affect heterosexuals but it STILL does not affect them to the degree that it does homosexuals.

Wonder why that is?

That is because homosexuality is a disease that spreads disease.

Posted by: SK at June 8, 2009 7:10 PM

I'm with mega. Go queer off if you must, but keep it to yourself, and try not to spread any delightful maladies to the normal population.

Oh, and keep that stuff away from kids.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at June 8, 2009 7:21 PM

Evil walks the earth everyday in the form of deviant sexual practices. This is a portion of its arsenal against sane, moral peoples. The sheer grotesque-ness of all this gay/lesbian crap makes me vomit. Children are being taught this nasty "fisting" garbage in pubic schools from my tax dollars? Unbelievable. Calling these freaks moonbats is WAY too kind. Children are so innocent; liberal playbook: make deviant behavior acceptable and mainstream and begin with the children. May these sick twisted unloved self hating kooks burn.

Posted by: Elise at June 8, 2009 7:27 PM

if only all the gays boys would practice safe sex like kung fu, David Carridine did.....

Posted by: blue at June 8, 2009 8:32 PM

What the silly liberals argue, including the TWITS who infest this blog, is that a male inserting his penis into the anal, feces-filled cavity of another man is absolutely normal, clean, mainstream, and acceptable behaviour; and anyone who disagrees that it is normal, clean, mainstream, and acceptable behaviour must be either shut up or re-educated.

My GOD liberals are sick!

Posted by: Jimbo at June 8, 2009 8:37 PM

Elise, you've correctly identified their admitted weakness to their "openly gay" political agenda. As Obama's cretin appointee Jennings has noted “If the Radical Right can succeed in portraying us as preying on children, we will lose.”

As for Jennings immoral agenda, even beyond its manifest moral abomination, and the natural repulsion any sane person would have to allowing his radical and militant homosexual ilk to come within 1000 yards a child, empirical evidence underscores further the dangers of the nation’s children being exposed to pro-homosexual groups as directly leading to teen suicide: “the factors most likely to contribute to a suicide attempt are: gender nonconformity [acting like the opposite sex] and precocious psychosexual development [early sexual experiences] were predictive of self-harm. For each year’s delay in bisexual or homosexual self-labeling, the odds of a suicide attempt diminished by 80%.” “Homosexual Identity Promotion is What Causes Suicides” TVC SHAPE report, p. 4, at http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Sodomy/homosexuals_recruit_children.pdf

Posted by: ZMarshall at June 8, 2009 8:42 PM

Jay Guevaraaa, if only you were president. that was an excellent debate on your part

Posted by: Joe Nen at June 8, 2009 9:35 PM

GoW- "It later went viral in both gays and straight men and women because of the exchange of bodily fluids, hence why needle drug users and transfusion patients have also been at risk..."

No, it went viral in fags. Human beings became affected after the mass outreak spread amongst dung enthusiasts. Throwing the "and" between the two groups is a despicable, but typical attempt to obscure the issue.

GoW- "The myth that it is a gay disease is a lie, and certainly shows your ignorance on science and your discriminatory mentality."

The homos should not have spread the disease, if they don't like being associated with it.

GoW- "What you think you witness at flamboyant Gay Pride parades or such, is just that...a Parade!"

It's always "just", or "merely" something. Sexual fecophilia has an organized political and social predatory disease. The ongoing process as outlined in the "Gay Agenda' involves- 1)Desensitization. 2)"Jamming". 3)Conversion. First they wanted buggery legalized, because it's a "privacy" thing. Then they want public displays of their sickness, to "express themselves". Then comes demands for everyone to "celebrate" their "lifestyle". Followed by demands to accept it all as "normal", even "biological". Then comes the outlawing of criticism, and the inevitable move into schools and the curriculum. They don't want mere "acceptance". They expect recruits, from the ranks of children. After all, they cannot reproduce.

Gow- "Gay friends of mine have wonderful and healthy lives, but have been pretty glamorous at the clubs..."

Oh yeah. You're straight. No ambiguity there.

Gow- "What you need to understand, and I do from a family member, friends, and my best friends brother..."

Sure. Due to the experience of your "best friends brother".

GoW- "...nobody chooses to face the discrimination the LBGT community does. Preferring the same sex was not an issue they had much of a choice in."

Nobody is born a pervert. One has to choose to become a Feco-worshipper.

Gow- "As a straight man, I will say..."

Say what you want. I'm not buying it.

GoW- "I have enough confidence in my own sexuality that I can go to a bar with my gay friends and not worry."

Of course. What would "worry" you at a gay bar anyway?

GoW- "You might try it sometime."

Is that a come on?

Posted by: chairman soetoro's oprichniki at June 8, 2009 10:10 PM

Even Mr Garrison would be a less perverted choice!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_Condom_Use

Posted by: BURNING HOT at June 9, 2009 12:11 AM

GoW is probably unaware of websites like Barebackcity and Bugshare which offer personals ad services to gays looking to deliberately spread the HIV virus through "Bug chasing" and "Gift giving," and if he were aware... as a Progressive leftist... he'd have to support it as a valid lifestyle choice; one that perhaps should be taught to young children in school.

And if he doesn't support that lifestyle choice, I guess that makes him a hypocrite who hates people with HIV and would deny them the free expression of their sexuality.

Posted by: V the K at June 9, 2009 4:35 AM

Homosexuality has gone from "the love that dare not speak its name" to "the love that doesn't know when to shut the f$ck up."

Posted by: Mr Evilwrench at June 9, 2009 5:07 AM

Probably RJP3 has not returned, but he said:

"The document that discussed "fisting" was a document aimed for adult to promote what is safe and what is unsafe safe." Uhhh, what?

Then he goes on with a pure lie spin to say that this was never meant for children, and it was only a stray pamphlet. RJP3, why do you assume we cannot read here? If you go to the article and read it, it is a transcript of an actual workshop with 13-16 year old kids, being extremely explicit about fisting and other homo acts. IT'S ON FRIGGING TAPE!! Why did you even bother with your dopey post? You don't think we don't look into these things? We just take you at your word? We are not sheeple here, make no mistake.

Posted by: Karin at June 9, 2009 6:27 AM

These days every sort of perversion is labeled as freedom. Look at that freak David Carradine. TMZ has all the gory details about the weird shit he was into. This is typical of the self indulgent "lifestyles" that hard core lefties are into. And they want to spread the perversion so that it become socially acceptable. The commies are famous for saying that once you control the children you control the future. 10 years from now performing sex acts in public in front of elementary schools will likely become common place under the guise of "Freedom of Expression". Gays will go into churches and start packing each others fudge during services. What will the congregation be able to do? Nothing. Touch them and you will be convicted of gay bashing. Think this is an exaggeration? Just wait.

Perhaps its a good thing that all the wackos are coming out of the woodwork - eventually there will be a backlash and these freaks and perverts will be driven back underground where they belong. Maybe we can stop this craziness before its too late.

Posted by: Liberal Cancer at June 9, 2009 6:59 AM

Interesting post today on repubx.com -
There was an interesting e-mail from someone the other day that gives a plausible reason why Michelle didn't go to Saudi Arabia or Turkey.

“I was at a [video store] on Saturday renting videos, and as I was going along the wall, there was a video called ‘Obama’. I told the two men next to me that I wouldn’t waste my time. We talked about Obama. These guys were Arabs and I asked them why they thought Michele Obama headed home following her visit in France instead of traveling on to Saudi Arabia and Turkey with her husband.

They told me she couldn’t go to Saudi Arabia, Turkey or Iraq. I said ‘Laura Bush went to Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Dubai.’ They said that Obama is a Muslim, and by Muslim law he would not be allowed to bring his wife into countries that accept Sharia Law. Just thought it was interesting that two Arabs at [the video store] accept the idea that we’re being ‘led’ by a Muslim who follows the Islamic creed. They also said that’s the reason he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia. It was a signal to the Muslim world.”

But for some good news, the tide may just be starting to turn...but notice the MSM reaction!

From http://www.800poundgorillamedia.com/News.html

June 8, 2009, 3:50 pm
Republicans Seize Control of State Senate
By Jeremy W. Peters AND Danny Hakim. NYT

State Senate revoltRob Bennett for The New York Times; Suzanne DeChillo/The New York Times Two state senators — Pedro Espada Jr. of the Bronx and Hiram Monserrate of Queens — moved to defect to the Republican side, which would end Democratic control of the chamber.

Updated, 5:14 p.m. | ALBANY – Republicans seized control of the New York State Senate on Monday, in a stunning and sudden reversal of fortunes for the Democratic Party, which controlled the chamber for barely five months.

A raucous leadership fight erupted on the floor of the Senate around 3 p.m., with two Democrats, Pedro Espada Jr. of the Bronx and Hiram Monserrate of Queens, joining the 30 Senate Republicans in a motion that would displace Democrats as the party in control.

It was a noisy and acrimonious scene on the floor of the Senate as Senator Thomas W. Libous, a Republican from Binghamton and the party’s deputy leader, shouted for a roll-call vote, while Democrats attempted to stall the vote by asking to adjourn the session.

All 30 Republicans stood with their hands raised, signaling a vote for a change in leadership. Mr. Espada and Mr. Monserrate joined them, each raising his hand. Republicans won the vote by a 32-to-30 margin. The Senate will now be governed under a new joint leadership structure, with Mr. Espada serving as the president pro tempore, and Senator Dean G. Skelos, of Long Island, as the new majority leader.

After the results of the vote were read aloud, the in-house television station that carries Senate proceedings live in the Capitol went dark. All that appeared on the screen was a still photo of the Senate chamber and the words “Please stand by.”

Posted by: rrobin at June 9, 2009 7:14 AM

Vladimir Lenin? Do you guys have ANY history chops at all?

This is a group that tries to keep these poor gay teenage kids from getting their asses kicked or offing themselves. Lenin indeed. I know you hate with a white hot hate these people, but come on. Is it REALLY so important to you that they be so tortured at a tough time? Put your political hat and apocryphal historical comparisons down for a second and be a human being about it.

And if you think sexuality is so malleable that a few question and answer sessions turns you, you are gay or at least bi. I mean, if you are a regular red-blooded male, you know that drive comes from a deep-seeded place, and no speech is gonna make you want man-ass. Come on now.

I live in Boston (BRS: Boston Red Sox), and this whole fistgate thing was a crock as well. They had kids in an environment where they could ask Qs about sex (i.e., sex ed), and some of the Qs went where young kids will take them - to crude places. Maybe there should have been better ground rules or age restrictions, but there's no data that sex ed harms kids. But again - if hearing a description of guys fisting makes you want bang dudes, you're already there. Run with it.

The fistgate thing was popularized by some ass hole who staged a lie about not being able to stop his kid from being there. Him and Massresistance orchestrated/popularized the whole thing. All BS.


Posted by: brs at June 9, 2009 11:22 AM

But again - if hearing a description of guys fisting makes you want bang dudes, you're already there. Run with it.

You really think that's the problem with this whole story? Turning kids gay?

Pathetic.

Adults should not be describing the act of fisting to teenagers. Period. End of story. If an adult has a problem with focusing a discussion in a sex ed class on actual sexual education, as opposed to the "crude places" you alluded to, then said adult has no place in a classroom setting, much less fulfilling a role in the Department of Education.

Posted by: cowlove at June 9, 2009 11:52 AM

"Adults should not be describing the act of fisting to teenagers. Period. End of story. If an adult has a problem with focusing a discussion in a sex ed class on actual sexual education, as opposed to the "crude places" you alluded to, then said adult has no place in a classroom setting, much less fulfilling a role in the Department of Education."

OK - I don't think it's the most harmful thing ever, but it shouldn't have happened. Mind you that many of your compadres claim that is gay recruiting, and is responsible for turning kids gay (which is why I wrote it). But if you're smart enough to see through that, good for you.

But did Kevin Jennings answer the question? No. He wasn't even there. And the good work this group has done cannot be undone by some dumbass who took the ed session too far.

Gay high school kids lead miserable lives, and anyone helping them is doing a good deed in my mind.

Posted by: brs at June 9, 2009 6:15 PM

Boston Red- "This is a group that tries to keep these poor gay teenage kids from getting their asses kicked or offing themselves."

Really? So this nice group is giving them boxing lessons? Martial arts? Providing real guidance, based on actual morals? Maybe these kids wouldn't be so inclined to suicide, if they weren't associating with perverts and adopting sick habits.

Boston Red- "Lenin indeed. I know you hate with a white hot hate these people, but come on. Is it REALLY so important to you that they be so tortured at a tough time?"

Tortured? I suspect you mean "tormented". If they weren't encouraged to be sissies there wouldn't be the problem in the first place.

Boston Red- "...if you think sexuality is so malleable that a few question and answer sessions turns you, you are gay or at least bi. I mean, if you are a regular red-blooded male, you know that drive comes from a deep-seeded place, and no speech is gonna make you want man-ass. Come on now."

Oh, I see. Children and teenagers are not so impressionable, that what is being taught will not affect them. How about some military training then? What's the standard liberal response to that sort of "guidance"?

Posted by: chairman soetoro's oprichniki at June 9, 2009 7:17 PM

You're calling me a Red - how clever....

"Tortured? I suspect you mean "tormented". If they weren't encouraged to be sissies there wouldn't be the problem in the first place."
"Oh, I see. Children and teenagers are not so impressionable, that what is being taught will not affect them."

OK, you are a homos. No worries - I'm fine with it. But any man (I can't speak for chicks) who thinks their sex drive at that age was that impressionable is bi or gay. They are VERY impressionable in amny, many ways. But not in that.

These poor bastards are born this way. How much evidence do we need? There's more convergent evidence from biology alone that these kids are born this way.

But ass holes like you would prefer to see them tormented or whatever you'd like to call it becasue you put your stupid political BS before your humanity.

Then again, you think you could have been turned by a really slick talker, so you must be a little light in the laofers yourself.

Why don't you just live and let live, and let people help these kids stop killing themselves.

Posted by: brs at June 9, 2009 8:01 PM

Boston Red- "OK, you are a homos."

What is a "homos"? Chick pea dip?

Boston Red- "No worries - I'm fine with it."

Fine with what? On second thought, don't reveal it. No doubt it would be disgusting.

Boston Red- "But any man (I can't speak for chicks) who thinks their sex drive at that age was that impressionable is bi or gay. They are VERY impressionable in amny, many ways. But not in that."

This isn't about just teenagers. Which is bad enough. The Religion of Poop doesn't stop at the age of consent. If you pay attention, you will find that this queer-gramscian push is going all the way down to pre-school. But that doesn't bother your kind does it? You claim feco-fetishism is "biological"- therefore the communist buggery boys cannot pass their disease to little kids, because one is either "born straight", or not.

Boston Red- "These poor bastards are born this way."

No. No they're not.

Boston Red- "How much evidence do we need?"

Any evidence at all would be a start.

Boston Red- "There's more convergent evidence from biology alone that these kids are born this way."

No, there is the typical socialist drive to fudge-pack the facts, combined with intentional obsfucation of genetics. Genes or "biology" can no more make one a dung lover, than it can a preacher. It is nonsense pushed for ideological gain for some, and financial for others.

Boston Red- "But ass holes like you would prefer to see them tormented or whatever you'd like to call it becasue you put your stupid political BS before your humanity."

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Boston Red- "Then again, you think you could have been turned by a really slick talker, so you must be a little light in the laofers yourself."

What's a "laofer"? Is that like a loofah?

Boston Red- "Why don't you just live and let live, and let people help these kids stop killing themselves."

Agreed. Some normal guidance towards curing the disease would be a good start. Removing predatory queer agendas from schools would be better. Replace it military instruction- after all, what you teach kids cannot possibly affect them, right?

Posted by: chairman soetoro's oprichniki at June 9, 2009 9:10 PM

Most of what you're saying is all over the map BS about fecal matter and communism (always got work that in, no matter how non-sequiter) and "my kind" (good Americans always marginalize), blah, blah, blah. You're so all over the map and unable to hold a line of thought that it's pointless to reply. And the Boston Red - just so friggin' clever guy. Nice work. YOu must be a Yankee fan....

But this I will engage you with:
"No, there is the typical socialist drive to fudge-pack the facts, combined with intentional obsfucation of genetics. Genes or "biology" can no more make one a dung lover, than it can a preacher. It is nonsense pushed for ideological gain for some, and financial for others."

I'm actually a biologist, and there's no need to looks at genetics to show these people are born this way - and remember: inborn differences need not be genetic. There are phenotype differences that are impossible to explain, especially when taken in total, by some sort of environmental factors alone. And there is a LOT of evidence, including digitial differnces in lesbian women, different hair swirling patterns in gay men, and menstral-like hormone induced positive feedback reactions in gay men that resemble women more than men. And I wil even spot you LeVay's work, becasue there were problems with the gay group, and replication has been mixed.

How do you refute these? With more politics? This is science. No more BS.

Posted by: brs at June 10, 2009 8:53 AM

To quote Mad Comics (the first issues of Mad Magazine were comic books)"Hoo-Hah! I get this strange feeling I'm living in one of Dantes circles.

Posted by: oldguy at June 10, 2009 8:56 AM

"These poor bastards are born this way. How much evidence do we need? There's more convergent evidence from biology alone that these kids are born this way."

"How do you refute these? With more politics? This is science. No more B[R]S."

Your gibberish is very easily refuted with scientific evidence -- your supposed sources of a biological link to homosexuality are not credible ... and you damn well know you're fabricating.

Humans CHOOSE to follow sex drives; animals have no choice about it.

Your bluff is called. See, e.g., the following:

"There is no evidence that shows that homosexuality is genetic--and none of the research itself claims there is. Only the press and certain researchers do, when speaking in sound bites to the public."

--Jeffrey Satinover, M.D., The Journal of Human Sexuality, 1996, p.8.

Even the national organization P-FLAG ("Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays") offers a booklet prepared with the assistance of Dr. Clinton Anderson of the American Psychological Association. Entitled, "Why Ask Why? Addressing the Research on Homosexuality and Biology," the pamphlet states:

"To date, no researcher has claimed that genes can determine sexual orientation. At best, researchers believe that there may be a genetic component. No human behavior, let alone sexual behavior, has been connected to genetic markers to date...

"Despite recent neurobiological findings suggesting homosexuality is genetically-biologically determined, credible evidence is lacking for a biological model of homosexuality."

--R. Friedman, M.D. and J. Downey, M.D., Journal of Neuropsychiatry, vol. 5, No. 2, Spring l993.

"Gay criticism has not addressed the classic family configuration"; it has merely "asserted away the considerable evidence" for the existence of family factors. Studies which attempt to disprove the existence of the classic family pattern in homosexuality are "convincing only to those with a need to believe."

--S. Goldberg (1994) When Wish Replaces Thought: Why So Much of What You Believe is False. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books.

..... and on, and on and on. See http://www.narth.com/docs/bornway.html

Posted by: ZMarshall at June 10, 2009 10:36 AM

These are not pieces of data with interpretation, they're opinions about the GENETIC basis of homosexuality. But you did not read my post very carefully: Inborn does not equal genetic. I don't actually think it is genetic. I think something happens gestationally, but I can't be sure of that.

And scientists should not say they know one why or the other, becasue it's not well understood. That it's inborn, however, is almost irrefutable at this point because of specific and replicated biological findings that cannot be explained by learned behavior. How do you account for these physical differences? You can argue that the studies - all of them - are methodologically flawed, but random quotes about genetics addresses nothing AND misses the point.


Posted by: brs at June 10, 2009 11:14 AM

Oh yeah, and just for the humor:

"Your gibberish is very easily refuted with scientific evidence..."

But then there's not even reference to data or studies (i.e., evidence)

" -- your supposed sources of a biological link to homosexuality are not credible..."

and then there's no refutation of any sort

Posted by: brs at June 10, 2009 11:46 AM

Boston Red- "I think something happens gestationally, but I can't be sure of that."

Of course you're not sure. It's magic!

Boston Red- "And scientists should not say they know one why or the other, becasue it's not well understood."

I hear you. The mysteries of Astrology still elude most scientists.

Boston Red- "And there is a LOT of evidence, including digitial differnces in lesbian women, different hair swirling patterns in gay men, and menstral-like hormone induced positive feedback reactions in gay men that resemble women more than men."

Oh yeah, that's some kick-ass scientificky type evidence. How about the Phrenology results? You're wasting your brilliance as a biolotician- Uncle Al Gore needs your talents.

Posted by: chairman soetoro's oprichniki at June 10, 2009 3:59 PM

"And scientists should not say they know one why or the other, becasue it's not well understood."

Nope. He couldn't get a job with the Goracle. Such a statement is apostacy in man-made global warming circles.

"But then there's not even reference to data or studies (i.e., evidence)" ... "and there's no refutation of any sort"

Hello out there Boston Red. Are you imbibing the same bong water as Brandon. I not only cited and quoted several on-point examples from reputable scientists who studied the issue, but also directed you to a website that is a repository of even more scientific scholarly work and citations to studies in the area. Read it man.

"You can argue that the studies - all of them - are methodologically flawed, ..."

No, you can argue that, albeit you do so without one iota of factual proof. I prefer to rely on factual support and biblical doctrine, not your non-peer reviewed theory that you, to your credit, candidly admit you can't even be sure of, to explain the reason why homosexual deviancy exists.


"

Posted by: ZMarshall at June 10, 2009 9:54 PM

"And scientists should not say they know one why or the other, becasue it's not well understood."

Nope. He couldn't get a job with the Goracle. Such a statement is apostacy in man-made global warming circles.

"But then there's not even reference to data or studies (i.e., evidence)" ... "and there's no refutation of any sort"

Hello out there Boston Red. Are you imbibing the same bong water as Brandon. I not only cited and quoted several on-point examples from reputable scientists who studied the issue, but also directed you to a website that is a repository of even more scientific scholarly work and citations to studies in the area. Read it man.

"You can argue that the studies - all of them - are methodologically flawed, ..."

No, you can argue that, albeit you do so without one iota of factual proof. I prefer to rely on factual support and biblical doctrine, not your non-peer reviewed theory that you, to your credit, candidly admit you can't even be sure of, to explain the reason why homosexual deviancy exists.


"

Posted by: ZMarshall at June 10, 2009 9:54 PM