« Climate Police Denounce Lamb, Tomatoes, and Alcohol | Main | Maryland's Missing Millionaires »
May 26, 2009
Rowan Williams Defends Corrupt MPs
As head of the Church of England, Archmoonbat of Canterbury Rowan Williams is a champion of the downtrodden: not just Britain's put-upon Islamic conquerors (as noted here, here, and here), but also politicians oppressed by those who object to their corruption:
The spiritual head of the British Anglican church, Archbishop Rowan Williams, has warned what he calls the "systematic humiliation" of British politicians could damage democracy.
The revelations of extravagant expense claims have infuriated Britons and fuelled pressure for an early parliamentary election.
Claims made by more than 200 of Parliament's 646 MPs have now been exposed in a series of reports by the Daily Telegraph newspaper, based on information passed on by a former British army officer from an unnamed source.
"Many will now be wondering whether the point has not been adequately made," Archbishop Williams wrote in The Times newspaper.
"The continuing systematic humiliation of politicians itself threatens to carry a heavy price in terms of our ability to salvage some confidence in our democracy."
It's getting a little late to salvage any confidence in the moonbattery-addled Church of England, thanks to Pigswilliams. But it's inspiring to see him go to bat for his fellow bureaucratic overseers of England's self-induced decline.
On a tip from Burning Hot.
Posted by Van Helsing at May 26, 2009 8:08 AM
Comments
2 thessalonians 2:11 - "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:"
if we aren't there as a world, i don't know where we are - all the lying and delusions are enough to make a person go nutz!
Posted by: nancz at May 26, 2009 8:33 AM
"The continuing systematic humiliation of politicians itself threatens to carry a heavy price in terms of our ability to salvage some confidence in our democracy."
So, apparently, the public is supposed to have faith in corrupt politicians?
This clergyman is a real piece of... um... work.
Posted by: V the K at May 26, 2009 8:36 AM
This guy is the Anglican Pope?
Posted by: Shooter1001 at May 26, 2009 8:44 AM
Anglicans have two options. Orthodox or Catholic. Anglicanism is screwed.
Posted by: General at May 26, 2009 10:18 AM
That guy looks like a evil wizard practicing black magic or DARK LORD DOKUU
Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at May 26, 2009 11:36 AM
Archbishops of Canterbury have been moonbats since...forever. In a vain attempt to breathe life into the Church of England by appearing relevant, Archbishops of Canterbury have been staking out progressively more extreme positions for decades now.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 26, 2009 11:54 AM
First, public officials have always been the targets of jokes. Maybe even as far back as when the pyramids were new.
Second, if they don't want to be subject to ridicule, they should stop acting like dumbasses!
Posted by: KHarn at May 26, 2009 2:58 PM
Rowan Williams is an educated idiot who has presided over the disintegration of the Anglican Church, which has been ruined by liberalism and the strident Anglo-Catholic invasion. Anglicanism is one big stinking mess, complete with ordained clergy who are open homosexuals. And to the previous poster who stated that Anglicans have two choices, Roman Catholicism or Eastern Orthodoxy, I contend that would only amount to jumping from the frying pan into the fire.
Posted by: Used to be one at May 26, 2009 5:14 PM
A 'Troublesome Priest'
Posted by: Viking04 at May 26, 2009 6:37 PM
Substitute this Rowan for Rowan Atkinson and you'd barely notice the difference... Except that Atkinson is smarter.
Posted by: mandible claw at May 27, 2009 1:15 AM
This guy is campaigning against the British National Party after his campaign in favor of the Islamic take over of Britain.
I'm suspicious that he isn't what he says. If he were truly dedicating his life to spreading the gospel and leading flock, how could he be using his pulpit to promote the downfall of the West?
Posted by: mandy at May 27, 2009 7:00 AM
[i]I contend that would only amount to jumping from the frying pan into the fire.[/i]
Would you like to explain that instead of making statements and scurrying back into the shadows? Oh, please do explain!
Posted by: General at May 27, 2009 10:10 AM
