« Open Thread | Main | Moonbats Dream of Taking Our Cars »

is that baby black or white?

That's especially funny since all I ever hear on this site is a bunch of crying and whining.

Oh, and don't forget irrelevant racial comments.

Anonymous, I think the point is clear although you may be too boneheaded to ever get it. Liberal whining, crying, and victimhood is the only thing being discussed here. The push for the nanny-mommy state is the complaint, and its one worth "whining" about if that's what you want to call it.

This "perfectly secure state of childhood" is an accurate description, for example, of what liberals wanted to make of the Katrina Hurricane. A state were everyone gets taken care of, instead of everyone taking care of themselves. Where the huge big federal government solves the problem for everyone, instead of the individual, the neighborhood, and the city address the problem. Where food, shelter and housing come from the big government, and who cares where big government gets it from...

If the liberal cries for handouts, the victimization, and the whining about being wronged stopped, I don't think this site would exist, would it?

That's probably why they hate Cheney.. a stern adult father figure unlike mother who is willing to give into their every whim and tantrum.

That's especially funny since all I ever hear on this site is a bunch of crying and whining.
Oh, and don't forget irrelevant racial comments.
Anon

This is rich. A post on the infantile mentality of Moonbats and what is the response from this Moonbat? "That's what you are, but what am I? Naa, Naa!"

I think you probably could've found a better example than Hurricane Katrina, "were everyone gets taken care of," huh ... something you clearly know nothing about. I won't rip you to shreds for it though. I'll just say: government got it from us in the first place, P. Spending some of it on disaster relief is no crime in my book.

Again Kevin, keeping it on the level, man.

Your "post" as you refer to this juvenile "official seal" certainly is grown up in contrast to my response, yes?

@ IOpian: Yeah, Cheney. He's the kind of father who beats his kid to "make a man out of him." He's like the father who terrorizes the kids out of malice, then says "it's for their own good." Great counter example. A father in a homewhere the kids all have nightmares.

Your "post" as you refer to this juvenile "official seal" certainly is grown up in contrast to my response, yes?
Posted by: Anonymous at May 13, 2009 10:45 AM

Now it responds: "You guys are so immature!"

Sounds an awful lot like The Liberal Mind.

Get it. Read it.

I'm saying if you're trying to call someone immature, you might try and take the high road and not get dirty in in the same thing you're accusing another of doing.

Calling someone "it" -- showing your maturity yet again.

but I still want to know - is that a black or white baby?

Hitler beleived in taking away children from their parents and brainwashing them at specialy run schools

The answer, blue, cannot be determined at this point in it's life. That baby has no color at this point. It will have to be educated by it's parents, friends, school, and television before it is aware of what color it is.
As to what our perception of it's color is, well the picture is black and white, so I would say both, or neither, apparently it is up to each of us to determine for ourselves what the color of that child is.
Personally, I don't care as long as it grows up to be a hard working productive member of a free society. and not some teet sucking maggot living off other peoples' work.

I'm saying if you're trying to call someone immature, you might try and take the high road and not get dirty in in the same thing you're accusing another of doing.
Calling someone "it" -- showing your maturity yet again.
Posted by: Anonymous at May 13, 2009 11:20 AM

Notice how it uses the intellectual tactics of the pre-adolescent mind. Anything said becomes reduced to the child's level of cognition and argumentative technique, mature and immature, high road low road, as opposed to adult concepts of true and false and of right and wrong. An interesting specimen.

Fat Stanley: Sorry I didn't consider fringe thinking.

Yes, there is a high road and a low road, Kevin. Ends don't justify means ... at least not for me.

While one by no means guarantees the other, high road and truth can coexist, just as you've proven that low road and wrong definitely go hand-in-hand.

If all you want is a tit for tat, let me know and I'll stop. I'm happy to let you have the last word.

Why are liberals such killjoys? Who was it that said the first thing to go when socialists take over is satire? Man, were they right.

Hurricane Katrina is the perfect example of the nanny state run amok. New Oreleans should have been the safest place to be when that storm hit. It was a Democrat run city in a Democrat run state for 75 years. Big Daddy taking care of everyone. It received BILLIONS of Federal money to protect itself from storm surge. But the money was stolen by corrupt politicians or diverted to other programs, mainly quality of life programs. Although warned that if the levies broke the death toll would be between 10 and 20 thousand the idiot Mayor Nagin refused to evacute when Bush urged him repeatedly until it was to late to get organized. Remember hundreds of school buses under water The idiot Governor refused to sent in the National Guard right away and refused Federal help for days. Bush sent the Coast Guard who rescued 10 thousand trapped citizens, the largest rescue in US history (no credit for Bush or the Coasties of course), and the death toll was less than 1 thousand. Meanwhile the remaining citizens trained over a lifetime to wait for their Government hand-out suffered or rioted. The deaths in New Orleans and all the hype it was Bush's fault overshadowed the real story of Katrina. It was and continues to be a tragedy due to the failures of decades of Liberal rule and policies. Local newspapers wrote scathing series of articles condemning the local and state's leadership (Bush got very little blame in these liberal papers but that story got no national attention). Nagin won reelection by allowing (politically connected cronies-hello ACORN) absentee voters and his current approval rating is 14%. The citizens of the state
voted in their first Republican governor, Bobby Jingal, in decades. If Louisianna voters felt Bush was responsible for Katrina that NEVER would have happened, but they knew the truth. Billions of dollars to rebuild remain unspent because Nagin still can't get his act together. The myth of Katrina is and always will be the product of the corrupt MSM.

all I ever hear on this site is a bunch of crying and whining.

I only see that in comments posted anonymously.