moonbattery.gif


« Police Arrest Goat | Main | Google Founder Wipes Out Neighborhood to Build Eco-Mansion »


April 1, 2009

Washington Housewives Reduced to Smuggling Detergent

The main purpose of our federal system is that it creates a free market for liberty. If one state goes off the rails into authoritarianism, people can cross the border to another. For example, Washington residents who want clean dishes can go to Idaho to buy effective detergent, which is forbidden by the petty tyrant environazis who run their own state.

The quest for squeaky-clean dishes has turned some law-abiding people in Spokane into dishwater-detergent smugglers. They are bringing Cascade or Electrasol in from out of state because the eco-friendly varieties required under Washington state law don't work as well. Spokane County became the launch pad last July for the nation's strictest ban on dishwasher detergent made with phosphates, a measure aimed at reducing water pollution. The ban will be expanded statewide in July 2010, the same time similar laws take effect in several other states.
But it's not easy to get sparkling dishes when you go green.
Many people were shocked to find that products like Seventh Generation, Ecover and Trader Joe's left their dishes encrusted with food, smeared with grease and too gross to use without rewashing them by hand. … As a result, there has been a quiet rush of Spokane-area shoppers heading east on Interstate 90 into Idaho in search of old-school suds.

This should surprise no one:

Among other states that have banned or are banning phosphates in dishwasher detergent are Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Michigan, Vermont, Minnesota, Illinois, Massachusetts and New York. A bill on Capitol Hill would impose a nationwide ban.

At least when this sort of envirofascism is imposed at the federal level, the government will become motivated to guard the border. Bureaucrats won't want Americans sneaking off to a relatively free country like Mexico to bring in dishwashing detergent that actually works.

On tips from Murff, V the K, nancz, hiram, and the MaryHunter.

Posted by Van Helsing at April 1, 2009 9:39 AM

Comments

I'll take a healthy Chesapeake Bay over water spots on my dishes thank you. But then again, I have a conscience...

Posted by: Environazi at April 1, 2009 9:51 AM

How can governments destroy a business? By requiring them to produce products no one wants to buy. But this is good. Anybody want to buy a Prius?

Morons.
.

Posted by: OregonGuy at April 1, 2009 10:09 AM

The businesses in southern BC will enjoy the extra cash

Posted by: FREE at April 1, 2009 10:20 AM

Here's the ban on phosphates that went into effect on Dec. 1 1985:

COMAR 26.08.06.03 Phosphate Ban.http://home.ncifcrf.gov/ehs/ehs.asp?id=119

A. After December 1, 1985, a person may not use, sell, manufacture, or distribute for use or sale any cleaning agent that contains phosphorous, except as provided below:

1) Products that may be used, sold, manufactured, or distributed for use or sale regardless of phosphorous content include:

(i) Used in dairy, beverage, or food processing cleaning equipment,
(ii) Used in hospitals, veterinary hospitals, clinics, health care facilities, or in agricultural production
(iii) Used by industry for metal cleaning or conditioning,
(iv) Manufactured, stored, or distributed for use or sale outside the State,
(v) Used in any laboratory, including a biological laboratory, research facility, chemical laboratory, and engineering laboratory,
(vi) Used in a commercial laundry that provides laundry services for a hospital, health care facility, or veterinary hospital, or
(vii) Used for surface cleaning, appliance cleaning, or specialty home cleaning, and not for dishwashing or laundry;

I have to wonder what now the dairy industry, food processing industries, hospitals, agricultural production etc, etc, are going to do if they must use inferior cleaning products that work so poorly that people complain they leave "their dishes encrusted with food, smeared with grease and too gross to use..."

There are a lot of bad unintended consequences that this kind of legislation is going to produce.


Posted by: Kevin R at April 1, 2009 10:49 AM

Environazi meant "I'll accept spots on my dishes if it means a healthy Chesapeake Bay"...
didn't you, environazi?

Anyhow, enviro', I have a *right to choose* to use the bad detergent. Don't impose your morality on me!

Posted by: slim at April 1, 2009 10:52 AM

I'll take a healthy Chesapeake Bay over water spots on my dishes thank you. But then again, I have a conscience...

So, your "conscience" empowers you to enforce your will over other people's choices. Does that "logic" also apply to abortion?

Posted by: V the K at April 1, 2009 10:54 AM

My St. Bernards have much bigger tongues and can get an entire meals worth of dishes squeaky clean in no time at all.

Posted by: Choey at April 1, 2009 11:19 AM

Liberals are such a bunch of sissied sissiepates with their minds working over time on stupid ideas

Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at April 1, 2009 11:24 AM

Can't the Electrasol et.al. people then just label the bottle "for use for surface and appliance cleaning only." (wink nudge). Isn't a plate a surface? Isn't a fork kind of an appliance?
Anyway, I had no idea NY was doing this. They have such STRINGENT commercial food handling laws, you can barely make dinner for the family without a PhD in chemistry, a semiconductor cleanroom, and a $5000 license. How can standards of cleanliness be maintained with gunk all over the food prep/serving stuff?

FREE--so will Southern Ontario, that's a lot of border mileage.
Environazi--there's a difference between disease-breeding filth and water spots.

Posted by: Karin at April 1, 2009 11:59 AM

"A bill on Capitol Hill would impose a nationwide ban.'

Waste of time, these States constitute a big enough part of the market that, like California/cars and Texas/textbooks the manufacturers are already phasing out the "non-compliant" products nationwide - it will take a couple of years though.

Posted by: teqjack at April 1, 2009 1:01 PM

They're going to have to comply with the Department of Health, though. Anytime anybody tries to do something environmental, it damages some other part of the enviro. In this case, we need to kill some microorganisms. But yet, we don't want to.

Wind farms: clean eco-energy. Hideous for visual environment and hazardous to wildlife.

Wildlife mgmt: Favoring one species upends the predator/prey relationship. Everything goes off kilter. Some starvation may ensue.

Environazis hate animals!

Posted by: Karin at April 1, 2009 1:57 PM

"Environazi at April 1, 2009 9:51 AM"

How do you feel about greasy dishes?

Phosphates are also used in fertlizers, so please expand the ban, moonbats; that way you can protest the FOOD SHORTAGE!

Posted by: KHarn at April 1, 2009 3:15 PM

this kind of reminds me of the ol' "low flow" toilets of California.

Yeah, right! Those toilets (required in all new toilets sold from about 1990 on) flush so badly (unless you can afford a super-delux model), getting the brown stuff down usually takes 2-3 flushes, thereby totally wasting the concept of "saving" water by using the low flow.

And a shower? Don't get me started on those (I used to call them the "no flow" shower)...

Posted by: Ex-Bat at April 1, 2009 5:04 PM

Anything that makes life easier or more pleasant MUST be done away with to assuage the horrible guilt of self-hating moonbats for having been born.

Posted by: Kathleen at April 1, 2009 6:52 PM

If you want to get around the ban, just go to your local hardware store and buy a package of trisodium phosphate (aka TSP). Most often you'll find it with other products for outdoors cleaning, like decks. Just add it to your phosphate-free eco crap to make it clean like the old days. You'll have to do a little research to find out the right amount to add per load. Also works in the clothes washing machine.

Posted by: Steve at April 2, 2009 6:53 AM

better start buying up the incandescent lightbulbs as they'll soon be outlawed - just purchased 10 four-packs of varying wattage this week.

Posted by: nancz at April 2, 2009 8:44 AM

Big choice up here.......do we go to Coeur D' Alene for "good soap" ....oooorrrr....use the styrofoam plates? hmmmmm

Posted by: metprof at April 2, 2009 9:35 AM

First of all, I don't think we are supposed to call the "housewives" anymore!! Isn't that politically incorrect??? heehee

Second, to follow up what the guy said about low-flow shower heads: years ago, I lived in an apartment complex. The management came around and replaced our shower heads with low-flow heads (we had NO choice!!)

I tried to convince myself "maybe it won't be so bad." I couldn't even shower or get clean. I was freezing cold because by the time the warm water trickle got past my shoulder area, it had already cooled off. It took me twice the time to shower. I had to use a plastic cup to fill up with water to even finish my shower. Then, when I got out, I realized, I still had soap on my legs and feet. The tiny trickle of water evaporated by the time it got that low!! I took the shower head off, drilled a bigger hole in it, and replaced it. Problem solved.

Posted by: Andrea at April 2, 2009 9:58 AM

Hey environazi, your false dilemma is showing...

Posted by: texas at April 2, 2009 12:17 PM

BIRDS AND PEOPLE HAVE DIED BECUASE RACHEAL CARSON LIED

Posted by: Flu-Bird at April 4, 2009 10:40 PM