« To Each According to His Greed | Main | Believe Obama Regime, Not Your Lying Eyes »
April 8, 2009
Porn Yes, Prayer No at U of Maryland
The University of Maryland took a heroic stand for the First Amendment Monday night by showing students 30 minutes of the XXX porno movie Pirates II in a campus classroom, in spite of angry state representatives who know of more appropriate uses for public funds.
Atop the ramparts, sophomore Xenia Strunnikova beat her breast and boldly proclaimed:
Just because it's a state school, state legislators shouldn't be telling us what we can and cannot watch.
In other University of Maryland news:
There will be no more prayer at the campus-wide commencement ceremony after the University Senate voted to eliminate the practice yesterday.
The senate approved a proposal that eliminates a prayer invocation at the university's annual commencement ceremony in a 32-14 vote after a lengthy debate that touched on the controversial issue of the separation of church and state.
"Separation of church and state" is a reference to the same First Amendment that evidently requires state taxpayers to fund porno movies. As always with progressives, principles are merely tools to accomplish whatever political correctness dictates. Our "Living Constitution" is amazingly flexible in liberal hands.

On a tip from Burning Hot. Hat tips: NewsBusters, theblogprof, Inside Charm City, Jawa Report.
Posted by Van Helsing at April 8, 2009 10:11 AM
Comments
Yawn.
U. Maryland is so far behind...
Posted by: Henry at April 8, 2009 10:48 AM
Strangely enough, yes, the First Amendment does cover both of these things.
There are a lot of avenues to exclude material from a course, such as letter writing, publicity campaigns, internal processes, etc. The one that can't be used is coercion by the government. If they can control content for good reasons, they can also do it for bad reasons.
School prayer is a little fuzzier. If I recall my Supreme Court rulings correctly, prayer in public primary schools is disallowed since there is too heavy a coercive element to it. However, it is acceptable at assemblies in colleges since by that time no one would feel compelled to actively participate.
However, there is certainly nothing that prevents people from praying, and internal procedures were followed, so I don't see a problem here.
Posted by: Anonymous at April 8, 2009 11:08 AM
^- moonbat doesn't see the problem here.
Posted by: xantl at April 8, 2009 11:32 AM
I'm sick of universities...they piss me off so much with their outrageous PC, their stupid "womyn's" and other identity "studies," their communists/marxists indoctrinating still-impressionable people. I will not donate to one, and I will not remember any in my will.
My stepdaughter had to drop out (financial) and I secretly cheered.
Posted by: Karin at April 8, 2009 12:05 PM
"My stepdaughter had to drop out (financial) and I secretly cheered."
Ah yes, I'm sure she'll have a fiiiine future without dat kollege edukashen! I'm sure you guys think all people do in University is sit around and watch porn and talk about liberal ideology, right?
Posted by: Joe the Plumber at April 8, 2009 12:35 PM
No, sometimes they like to get drunk and walk around campus shouting at and denigrating anyone they perceive in the slightest as not thinking like them. (I speak from personal experiance).
Posted by: son of a preacher man at April 8, 2009 1:02 PM
She can go back later, Joe, when she's grown up enough to resist the Koolaid the professors pour down everyone's throat. Meantime, she can do some well-rounded reading, and gain perspectives other than those on the hard hard left. I have a whole bunch of bookshelves for her.
Thank you for your very kind post, though.
Posted by: Karin at April 8, 2009 1:40 PM
After reading the stupidity posted by allegedly college-educated trolls, I question the value of a university education as well. My undergraduate education *was* a waste of time and money, but I made up for it in grad school by studying something practical.
My older son is taking a year off to work before he starts college, and I think it's great because he's getting an understanding of the real world, and that will help him make the most of his education when he's ready for it.
Posted by: V the K at April 8, 2009 2:00 PM
HOOOOOBOY, here we go. Educated beyond their intelligence. (One of my personal favorites.) After the Navy I went to college. The little, just out of high school, pukes that gave me so many stumbles in the enrollment process really pissed me off. Then its time for classes. I wanted to be in special needs psychology. Indroctination to the maximum allowed level.
after I decided to let these assholeslive i got a real good job and never went back. Now I work with highly "educated" people and laugh all the time. Some are wonderful of course but for the most part should not be left alone.
I have contempt and ,frankly resentment for some of these clowns. I've done more in and with my life than these folks can ever imagine. I tell milder stories of what I've done and they stop the conversation as they cant fathom stepping out of an airplane at 22,000 feet and landing in the water. I could sooooo go on...
Posted by: czuch at April 8, 2009 2:46 PM
V the K, you're "allegedly" wrong, I'm far past my college years.
As for these types of events, they have been around for a long time. I remember there was something like this when I was in college (viewing of an adult film in a class), and it was viewed as a joke. This is most certainly the minority though, and to discredit an entire university because of one publicized ridiculous class/event is rather ignorant.
As with anything in life, an experience is what you make of it. If parents have done their job, a young adult will be mature enough to have a positive and educational experience. I have many friends who are republican that have gone through the state university system and speak highly of it. Your broad generalizations are ill informed, and expose your ignorance.
But, I apologize... I keep "trolling" your moonbat bashing party. I discovered this site after a friend sent me a link. I was intrigued by the venom and broad generalizations toward a group of people (that probably includes your coworkers, neighbors, family members). The display of hatred and blind generalization never fails to disappoint/entertain/terrify.
Posted by: Joe the Plumber at April 8, 2009 2:48 PM
It's not a matter of this being pornography," said Scott Whalen, 20, a junior from Queen Anne's County. "It's a matter of them taking away our right to do something."
Perhaps you can explain this "right" to watch Pornographic materials in University right to me, Joe - I must be a little slow? Can any of these "scholars" watch this movie in the privacy of their home? Yes, so there is no censorship. Can you explain what merit pornography viewing in class brings into academia? "shocking the squares" was a defense used in the `60's perhaps the Liberals have a new one?
"We're starting to sound more like China or Cuba as opposed to the Free State," said Sen. Richard S. Madaleno, a Montgomery County Democrat.
Amazing, no porn in University and we're suddenly Communists, hyperbolic Democrat ALERT.
Posted by: xantl at April 8, 2009 3:56 PM
I especially like the moonbat that complains that the state legislature can't tell them how to spend state money.
Posted by: Scaramouche at April 8, 2009 4:31 PM
I'd hate to say this, but its college. 99.99% of the time the people that would be attending this class are of legal age to view such stuff. So its not like they're breaking a law. Now as a use of taxpayer funding, they could find a more appropriate use for it. OR, have a rather large fee to have THAT particular class. Maybe enough to purchase the DVD itself. Everyone gets a copy!
Now, as COURSE material, what can you REALLY learn from porn? Bad acting? How 'plot' is used loosely when describing the 'story' of a porn? There is really nothing to study other than naked bodies and banging.
Posted by: Cheesecake at April 8, 2009 5:47 PM
All bibles replace with ORIGION OF THE SPECIES
Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at April 8, 2009 7:17 PM
Joe, it's telling that your typical response to the oh-so-frightening hatred you claim to see here is...well...hateful rhetoric.
When you do take the time to type out anything other than a brainless one-liner, it's nothing but a load of condescension sprinkled with disdain and the odd insult for flavor.
Do yourself a favor and clean up your own house instead of projecting onto others the very qualities you claim to reject.
Posted by: cowlove at April 8, 2009 8:06 PM
You guys are bad losers. You lost the “make other people pray” battle; just live with it! I don't dwell on fights I lose 3 for 3 decades.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 8, 2009 11:15 PM
Stalin was right.
RIP, USA.
Posted by: David Waldman at April 8, 2009 11:18 PM
>Gimme Money
>Gimme Money
>Gimme Money
Obama's welfare class.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 1:16 AM
We sure don't sit around getting drunk and watch porn at college today. No sir, besides reading Marx we get really wasted on our parents money and think up reasons why capitalism is evil.
Power to the Peoples.
Posted by: Comrade President Zero at April 9, 2009 1:49 AM
Gimme money: congrats on your side winning the 'watching comedy porn is an effective use of state funds' battle. You must be proud.
VtheK: taking a 'gap year' to work before college is an excellent idea and one that i wish i'd taken to get some real world perspective before entering academia.
Posted by: Mandible claw at April 9, 2009 1:54 AM
“Gimme money: congrats on your side winning the 'watching comedy porn is an effective use of state funds' battle. You must be proud.”
When did I say anything about me winning? I never heard about this trivial non-issue until I entered your juvenile website. I'm just saying that touchy-feely Christians who always bring up the issue of prayers being "banned" in school, that is not being allowed to force others to pray if they don't want to (because prayers of course are NOT banned anywhere), proves you are bad losers. You can't shut up about losing three decades later!
And I'm not an expert on this but aren't US colleges privately funded? Don't the students pay for their education?
>Gimme Money
>Gimme Money
>Gimme Money
Obama's welfare class.
Oooooooo-kay.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 2:11 AM
Notice the juxtaposition of the swords.
The left hate the woman, or at least, in this case, their bosoms.
Posted by: Mike_W at April 9, 2009 3:08 AM
My major was something practical, but one of my other courses was Japanese lit. We didn't watch porno films, but we were assigned a book that was EXTREMELY pornographic. I didn't bring the book home with me on a weekend visit to my parents, lest my Mom pick it up. I think the prof just got off on it. We even had to write a thoughtful paper on it.
I was very fortunate to not have a lot of moonbat marxists for profs. Of course, my major was accounting, and I suppose one could politicize "profit and loss" but they didn't. The biz school was built by a very successful capitalist pig dog. :)
Posted by: Karin at April 9, 2009 5:40 AM
I had an economics prof that was open, out-and-out Marxist. He used to make us listen to turn of the century labor songs during his lectures.
Also, his economics class had three expensive textbooks that were required reading. He was the author of all three.
Posted by: V the K at April 9, 2009 6:11 AM
C'mon V, even hippie marxist professors out-of-touch with reality gotta eat, ya know?
Posted by: cowlove at April 9, 2009 6:42 AM
VtheK, did anyone call him out on it, ala the kid at Harvard with Bawney Fwank?
I got into an arguement with someone about how Rage Against the Machine were money-grubbing anti-capitalists. The rapid fan's compelling argument was: Stick fingers in ears and go LALALALALALALA.
Posted by: Karin at April 9, 2009 6:55 AM
"The rapid fan's compelling argument was: Stick fingers in ears and go LALALALALALALA."
He didn't call him a troll then?
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 6:57 AM
>Gimme Money
Losers? Who is scouring the Internet looking for a place to spill their off-topic bile? If I wanted to read some vapid morons babblings I'd go over to a fever swamp like DailyKos.
How about you ask your mom for another ham hot-pocket, pull on your stained Y-fronts while avoiding tipping from your pizza box towers in your basement dwelling and eat a whole bag of dicks.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 7:46 AM
Who is scouring the Internet looking for a place to spill their off-topic bile?...
How about you ask your mom for another ham hot-pocket, pull on your stained Y-fronts while avoiding tipping from your pizza box towers in your basement dwelling and eat a whole bag of dicks.
I love ironic humour from people who don't even realize they're comedians.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 8:02 AM
And if you pay attention enough so that reality is not bended to fit your pathetic paranoid delusions of victimhood you'll notice I didn't call you (“you” as in all those who bring up misrepresentations about prayers being “banned” in American schools every other day) losers, but bad losers. A bad loser is somebody who can't take a defeat and will dwell on it and whine about for years to come.
You can't force others to pray. You tried. You failed. Get over it. And get over yourself.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 8:06 AM
VtheK, did anyone call him out on it, ala the kid at Harvard with Bawney Fwank?
No, we just called him "Comrade Fusfeld" behind his back.
I don't dwell on fights I lose 3 for 3 decades.
If it takes 3 decades or 3 centuries, a fight to restore Christianity to its rightful place at the center of our culture is a noble one. You guys never stop fighting for socialism and Marx, so why should we ever stop fighting for freedom and Christ?
Posted by: V the K at April 9, 2009 8:23 AM
Surprise: the only person actively talking about forcing prayer, is some lefttard moron. How's it feel to be such a complete dullard that you argue a point no one but yourself raised? Isn't it time to have your drool tray changed, perhaps have mommy bring you some chunky crayons for drawing time?
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 8:25 AM
Maryland's football team is never a threat to win a significant game. Everything relating to them is irrelevant.
Posted by: I'm A Lasagna Hog at April 9, 2009 8:52 AM
You guys never stop fighting for socialism and Marx.
LOL. You're beloved stereotype that you vent your insecure rage through never stops fighting for socialism and Marx. I'm an objectivist and not a touchy feely dweeb who feels its his place to dictate other people's actions. People can pray to god or pray to a lamppost for all I care. It's not of my damn business. If you tell me I have to pray to god or a lamppost then it does become my business. You leave me alone and I'll leave you alone. It seems that philosophy is incompatible with religion though. You can never leave other people alone.
Why should we ever stop fighting for freedom and Christ?
Because in America you don't have to fight for freedom: you've already got it. If all you want is the freedom to pray or preach about Christ whenever you want then you don't have to fight. You're clearly fighting against freedom. You feel that the whole world should dance to your tune because you know what's good for other people better than they do. Has it ever occurred to you that some people don't want to pray? Or that some people don't like having their actions dictated by someone who simultaneously preaches his love of freedom?
How's it feel to be such a complete dullard that you argue a point no one but yourself raised? Isn't it time to have your drool tray changed, perhaps have mommy bring you some chunky crayons for drawing time?
Do you have any idea how pathetic you're making yourself look?
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 8:52 AM
Surprise: the only person actively talking about forcing prayer, is some lefttard moron.
If the left didn't keep creating imaginary right-ring boogeymen, their mindless followers might start to learn the truth.
Posted by: V the K at April 9, 2009 8:54 AM
A point no one but yourself raised
Yeah that's right, nobody raised the point about prayers being banned in school. I'm sorry to argue so off topic on a post called “Porn Yes, Prayer No at U of Maryland”. The word prayer or references to praying at educational institutions never comes up once in that title.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 8:56 AM
Go and fuck a dog dickless, because nobody said anything about prayying.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 8:58 AM
I never posted that.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 9:01 AM
How can I fuck a dog if I'm... oh never mind. Get a life kid.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 9:06 AM
So explain how proximity of the subjects in a header somehow translates endorsing forced prayer ? Clue: It doesn't. Firstly it can be framed as a public morality issue (I'm sure you believe "godbags" made up morals so they'd have something to feel guilty about!) Secondly it can be framed as a freedom of speech issue, like the Porn movie showing was argued on. So now the issue has been cleared up, that no one is endorsing prayer at gunpoint kindly make a real point, or shut the fuck up.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 9:10 AM
Because in America you don't have to fight for freedom: you've already got it.
No, there are people on the left fighting every day to take away my freedom. The freedom to lead a prayer in schools has been lost, but the schools indoctrinate children in secularism, socialism, and environmentalism every day and confiscate my taxes to do it.
Every tax dollar the Federal government takes away reduces my freedom to choose how to spend it.
The freedom to choose how children are educated is severely limited by punitive taxation and the lack of a voucher system.
The left seeks to limit my freedom to choose what I listen to on the radio through the government censorship of talk radio.
The left seeks to take away utterly my freedom to purchase and use a firearm in self-defense. In some large cities, this freedom is already gone.
My freedom to participate in the electoral process is undermined by groups like ACORN, canceling my vote out with those of illegal or non-existent voters.
My freedom to make my own heath care decisions is under assault by those who want a bureaucratized national health care system.
My freedom to eat the food I choose has been limited because the state I live in has banned trans-fats.
My freedom to choose what kind of automobile to drive is under assault in the name of the almighty Gaia and her mortal enemy Manbearpig.
So, yes, I will fight in any way that I can to push back against the left-wing assault on my religious and personal freedoms.
Posted by: V the K at April 9, 2009 9:15 AM
My point? One thing that I said that you picked up and dragged out over the remaining comments? That touchy-feely American Christians always whinge about prayer being “banned” (ie being non-coercive) at American educational institutions. You want to talk about how bad it is that some college kids can have a laugh by watching porn in class then fine, but you can't do it: you have to conflate that non-issue with prayer banning: hence my pointing out the title.
BTW on this thread did you mean 3 decades ago? 30 decades = 300 years.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 9:17 AM
oh were you searching for a comment of me endorsing some Christian belief ? You sure are desperate, desperate and stupid.
The fact that you believe that peoples money should be spent pushing pornography to college students for a 'laugh' speaks volumes about you, you insipid moron.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 9:23 AM
“The freedom to lead a prayer in schools has been lost.”
A contradiction in terms my friend. What you mean is you've lost your right to force others to do what you want them to. That's a victory of freedom; just not for you. Now you're free to pray and those who don't want to are (sometimes) free not to.
“But the schools indoctrinate children in secularism, socialism, and environmentalism every day”
First define secularism (a word that seems to have lost all meaning today) and then tell me how your schools indoctrinate children. Real life examples rather than stereotypes and platitudes would be much appreciated.
And there's no need to go on about the left, the left, the left. I'm not on the left. I'm just not on the same wavelength as you. I respect your right to pray, you should respect my right not to pray. Is that so much to ask?
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 9:25 AM
“The fact that you believe that peoples [sic] money should be spent pushing pornography to college students for a 'laugh' speaks volumes about you, you insipid moron.”
Sure, we objectives have always supported looters! And I asked this question earlier: aren't American universities funded by students? Isn't it the students (or rather, their parents) who are paying to watch porn?
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 9:28 AM
you should respect my right not to pray. Is that so much to ask?
Since a prayer is read by a preacher, and does not require you to recite it (Saying Amen, is not even required) your rights are respected. In actuality what you are saying is that you not wanting to hear the word 'God' invoked, or hear any discussion of religion and therefore everyone should "respect" your views by removing it. A very puerile world view.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 9:32 AM
It just shows how stupid you are, Universities receive numerous sources of Federal Government funding from pell-grants to research funding. This excludes State funding which may also be paid to certain Universities.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 9:35 AM
In actuality what you are saying is that you not wanting to hear the word 'God' invoked, or hear any discussion of religion and therefore everyone should "respect" your views by removing it. A very puerile world view.
No pal, that is what I'm saying in your paranoid world in which even choosing to say holiday instead of Christmas is considered an act of war. I don't want you to respect my views. I like finding people like you who grind their teeth when I tell them how I feel (why do you think I keep responding to your insults, to check if my keyboard is still working?). I would rather die than live in a world in which everybody respects my views. I couldn't imagine a more boring world if I tried.
Universities receive numerous sources of Federal Government funding from pell-grants to research funding...
Governments and private corporations around the world hire university departments that provide expertise that cannot be found elsewhere, but does the government pay for classes in which kids laugh at porn videos?
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 9:45 AM
The government doesn't have to pay for the class where pornography is shown; if a University receives taxpayer money, it puts it under public scrutiny -- a concept that I'm sure is lost upon you.
I like finding people like you who grind their teeth when I tell them how I feel
I somehow think your little man-marbles retract when your boss, or anyone else with the authority to terminate your livelihood says anything you disagree with - if he said "Christmas" or "Jesus" I doubt you'd be "telling" him how you "feel" then. Which is why you idiots feel safe and secure to talk smack in your little echo chambers, but back in the real world say nothing.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 9:54 AM
I define secularism as the denial of the value of religious faith, and its substitution with political correctness. And one need look no further than the agenda items passed at the most recent NEA convention to see this agenda of indoctrination:
- Oppositional to parental school choice
- Promotion of the multicultural diversity agenda
- Promotion of acceptance sexual deviance
- Support for illegal immigration
- Promotion of "self-esteem" based education
- Support for global trans-nationalism
- "Education on Peace and International Understanding"
- Opposition to competency [sic] testing of teachers
- Opposition to market-based salaries because "it too frequently reflects the race and sex bias in our society"
- Promotion of Nationalized Health Care
- Promotion of Statehood for DC
- Opposition to any expression of religious faith in school (Item I-30)
- Support for the International Criminal Court
- Promotion of the Global Warming Hoax
These are the secular values the NEA seeks to take into the public schools.
Posted by: V the K at April 9, 2009 9:58 AM
In actuality what you are saying is that you not wanting to hear the word 'God' invoked, or hear any discussion of religion and therefore everyone should "respect" your views by removing it. A very puerile world view.
Exactly. When you ban religious expression from the public square, by default, you promote atheistic humanism by stigmatizing religious expression.
Posted by: V the K at April 9, 2009 10:00 AM
“I define secularism as the denial of the value of religious faith”
So do you believe anybody is allowed to have a philosophy instead of a religion? A set of values based on reason rather than dogma: ie don't drink alcohol because it's toxic, intoxicating and addictive vs. don't drink alcohol coz god sez so.
Just out of interest how is privatized health care a religious value? (Promotion of nationalized health care = secular value ergo promotion of privatized health care is a religious one) I myself don't support a government monopoly on health care (like in Canada) but I'm English and the big bad NHS has cured me of things a Roman Emperor would have died from.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 10:08 AM
When you ban religious expression from the public square, by default, you promote atheistic humanism by stigmatizing religious expression.
Taking away the right of private citizens to force their will upon others is not the same as removing expression from the public square. Go to the centre of your local town/city and preach the evils of atheists and the virtues of Christians. You know as well as I do that the soldiers of the Evil Atheist Conspiracy will be nowhere to be seen.
And atheistic humanism really defines the American zeitgeist doesn't it? No wonder atheists get kicked out of school, are not allowed into the boy scouts and are told they're not patriots by the head of state. Do really believe what you're saying here?
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 10:14 AM
That "reason is greater than or equal to dogma" thing sounds reasonable in theory, but in the real world, it doesn't work very well. Those who claim, "I can create my own morality" turn out to be the biggest a-holes in the world: Bill Maher, Richard Dawkins, Chris Hitchens.
These are the people who fall for the Global Warming hoax hook, line and sinker. These are the people who champion sticking their wang into any convenient hole, and murdering any preborn children that might inconvenience their lifestyle. These are the Hollywood and media left, endlessly congratulating each other at their sanctimonious award shows... nothing more than a pageant that celebrates themselves instead of their Creator.
Then, there are the Randian Objectivists, with their pervasively selfish "f--k the poor" attitude, obvious in the comments to reason.org or any libertarian weblog.
And you miss the point. The point is that teachers have no business politically indoctrinating anyone in the public schools. And banning religious expression is a form of political indoctrination.
Posted by: V the K at April 9, 2009 10:20 AM
No wonder atheists get kicked out of school, are not allowed into the boy scouts and are told they're not patriots by the head of state.
HURR DURR I BELIEVE EVERYTHING I SEE ON TV DERP DERP.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 10:21 AM
Atheists... are not allowed into the boy scouts
So, the state should compel a private organization to accept members who oppose its fundamental beliefs?
Scratch a liberal, find a fascist.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at April 9, 2009 10:27 AM
For you Hitch is an arsehole by default just because he's an atheist. Hitch is a man who speaks more sense when he's drunk than 99.9% of people when they're sober. But you shun him simply for being an atheist. I don't want to sound like a whiney lefty here but that's one of the negative outcomes of group generalization and discrimination. Man = atheist, man = bad. Period.
And I love your cute objectivist stereotype: fuck the poor! Weren't you guys championing Ayn Rand here a few months ago?
And banning religious expression is a form of political indoctrination.
Of course it is. But in the real world Americans are freer to express their opinions than any other people (under the law at least). Go out on your street and praise Christians and damn atheists. Nothing will happen to you! nobody from the big bad in-cahoots-with-the-atheist-conspiracy government is going to take you away to their secret re-education camps.
So, the state should compel a private organization to accept members who oppose its fundamental beliefs?
If it didn't receive government subsidies, yes.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 10:43 AM
I don't want to sound like a whiney lefty here
Looks like George Bush isn't the only candidate for the term "Miserable failure"
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 10:47 AM
xantl break time is over, get back to class or you'll be getting detention again!
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 10:49 AM
Why not put your feet up and ask your mom to fetch you a soda pop, after your hard day of slinging fries?
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 10:50 AM
Anyway I don't care if I get detention again. I like Mr. Thomson's soft touch. He does it better than my dad.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 10:53 AM
I figured that was you that did the original comment about "sucking a dog dick" you whacky liberals and your projections.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 10:56 AM
What you and your partner(s) get up to is none of my business.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 11:01 AM
Van Helsing: Please ban our dentally challenged retard, for impersonation - thanks.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 11:07 AM
Thanks for your time Mr. Xantl. Contact me again before you pass puberty, I always enjoy hearing insecure ranting from insecure juvenile dweebs like you. I have to leave now though or I'll die laughing. May you and Mr. Thompson live long and prosper and...
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 11:17 AM
Xantl sounds:
Losers? Who is scouring the Internet looking for a place to spill their off-topic bile? If I wanted to read some vapid morons babblings I'd go over to a fever swamp like DailyKos.
How about you ask your mom for another ham hot-pocket, pull on your stained Y-fronts while avoiding tipping from your pizza box towers in your basement dwelling and eat a whole bag of dicks.
Surprise: the only person actively talking about forcing prayer, is some lefttard moron. How's it feel to be such a complete dullard that you argue a point no one but yourself raised? Isn't it time to have your drool tray changed, perhaps have mommy bring you some chunky crayons for drawing time?
Go and fuck a dog dickless, because nobody said anything about prayying.
So explain how proximity of the subjects in a header somehow translates endorsing forced prayer ? Clue: It doesn't. Firstly it can be framed as a public morality issue (I'm sure you believe "godbags" made up morals so they'd have something to feel guilty about!) Secondly it can be framed as a freedom of speech issue, like the Porn movie showing was argued on. So now the issue has been cleared up, that no one is endorsing prayer at gunpoint kindly make a real point, or shut the fuck up.
The fact that you believe that peoples money should be spent pushing pornography to college students for a 'laugh' speaks volumes about you, you insipid moron.
I somehow think your little man-marbles retract when your boss, or anyone else with the authority to terminate your livelihood says anything you disagree with - if he said "Christmas" or "Jesus" I doubt you'd be "telling" him how you "feel" then. Which is why you idiots feel safe and secure to talk smack in your little echo chambers, but back in the real world say nothing.
HURR DURR I BELIEVE EVERYTHING I SEE ON TV DERP DERP.
Looks like George Bush isn't the only candidate for the term "Miserable failure"
Why not put your feet up and ask your mom to fetch you a soda pop, after your hard day of slinging fries?
Anyway I don't care if I get detention again. I like Mr. Thomson's soft touch. He does it better than my dad.
I figured that was you that did the original comment about "sucking a dog dick" you whacky liberals and your projections.
I'll make sure I put this classic material to good use!
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 11:23 AM
HURR DURR I DONT KNOW HOW TO QUOTE ON THE INTERWEB DERP.
Posted by: xantl at April 9, 2009 11:37 AM
HURR DURR I DONT KNOW HOW TO QUOTE ON THE INTERWEB DERP.
Keep 'em coming. Hows about a voice-synthesized rap video of your cute ranting? I'll get back to you as soon as its made.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 11:40 AM
The xantl song:
HURR DURR I DONT KNOW HOW TO QUOTE ON THE INTERWEB DERP.
HURR DURR I DONT KNOW HOW TO QUOTE ON THE INTERWEB .
How about you ask your mom for another ham hot-pocket, pull on your stained Y-fronts while avoiding tipping from your pizza box towers in your basement dwelling and eat a whole bag of dicks. Isn't it time to have your drool tray changed, perhaps have mommy bring you some chunky crayons for drawing time? Go and fuck a dog dickless, because nobody said anything about prayying.
HURR DURR I DONT KNOW HOW TO QUOTE ON THE INTERWEB DERP.
HURR DURR I DONT KNOW HOW TO QUOTE ON THE INTERWEB
HURR DURR I BELIEVE EVERYTHING I SEE ON TV DERP DERP. Why not put your feet up and ask your mom to fetch you a soda pop, after your hard day of slinging fries? Anyway I don't care if I get detention again. I like Mr. Thomson's soft touch. He does it better than my dad.
HURR DURR I DONT KNOW HOW TO QUOTE ON THE INTERWEB DERP.
HURR DURR I DONT KNOW HOW TO QUOTE ON THE INTERWEB
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 11:43 AM
Gimmie what did you get cured from? It sure wasn't a case of limey dumbass syndrome.
Posted by: Farmer Ted at April 9, 2009 12:22 PM
Don’t respond to Gimme money it’s a waste of time. He is the typical diversionist blogger. Misrepresents arguments, is superior and smug, mostly affects to be amused by the arguments, likes to use “lol”, dominates entries in the blog, claims impartiality, simplifies others comments, argues by analogy, loves to claim to pick holes in arguments using techniques like alleged lack of logic, uses ’strawman’ accusations, giggles, goes off topic….
Just forget him. He has nothing to contribute.
Posted by: Jim at April 9, 2009 2:25 PM
Jim he could contribute something useful. Like don't let this happen to your teeth.
Posted by: Farmer Ted at April 9, 2009 5:26 PM
The imposter xantl's IP has been banned. Bad news for Gimme Money.
Posted by: Van Helsing at April 9, 2009 5:26 PM
Bad news for Gimme Money.
Somehow I'm sure he's used to it.
Posted by: cowlove at April 9, 2009 5:51 PM
If you beat 'em, ban 'em.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 10:03 PM
And it's nice to see Mr. Helsing running to aid people who've had people add comments in their name. Check out my IP address from previous posts and a person who pretended to be me not in the name of annoying an idiot, but for genuinely misrepresenting my views. You really came running to my aid then! Clown.
Posted by: Gimme Money at April 9, 2009 10:20 PM
funny how gimme the money and that asshole who bastardized joe the plumber's name has no problem with this but if you force islamists not to pay these filthy cunts are outraged and angered
Posted by: Q7toENY at April 13, 2009 12:33 PM

