« New York Times Has Made $2 Million Selling Obama Merchandise | Main | Bank of America Gets a New Chairman »

they have a city named after Roseanne?

"stop spending" I like that one. Concise.

Plugs Biden needs to borrow Big O's teleprompter - he seems a bit -------- confused. And wants us all to fly on planes and die, Die, DIE!!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/21925

"“I would tell members of my family — and I have — I wouldn’t go anywhere in confined places now,” Biden said on NBC’s “Today” show.. “It’s not that it’s going to Mexico. It’s [that] you’re in a confined aircraft. When one person sneezes, it goes all the way through the aircraft. That’s me. …

“So, from my perspective, what it relates to is mitigation. If you’re out in the middle of a field when someone sneezes, that’s one thing. If you’re in a closed aircraft or closed container or closed car or closed classroom, it’s a different thing.”

That contradicted more restrained advice from President Barack Obama and the federal government — and the last thing the White House wants to do right now is shut down the airline industry and big-city subways out of mass panic.

The White House quickly arranged for Biden to make this statement through a spokesperson."

"Host Matt Lauer had asked the vice president: “This is by no means a ‘gotcha’ type of question. … But if a member of your family came to you … and said, ‘Look, I want to go on a commercial airliner to Mexico, and back within the next week,’ would you think it’s a good idea?” Biden made it unmistakably clear he would not want his family to make any trips on planes or subways.

These sorts of comments are what the Obama administration fears from Biden, who after more than three decades in Washington is known for making gaffes."

In other words Joe wouldnt want his family on planes but its ok for everyone else.

It's all a conspiracy propagated by certain news channel on which El Presidente is not very popular. Really.

The megality of his mania becomes more apparent with each passing day.

*channels*

Big mistake, zero's snarky comment about people waving teabags around. The best way to make an enemy is to tell a man he doesn't count.

His index today is 2, BTW.
Generic R vs. D has R's 41 vs. D's 38. Go to Rasmussenreports.com to see the trend. I have it graphed, it looks like this: >

Are we supposed to be expecting pressers and media fawning specials every 100 days from this idiot during the next four years, or is the end of it?

Todd: Are you kidding? There's going to be something like this at least once a year, even after he leaves office, to mark this "historic" occasion. It is historic, all right, but probably not for the reasons the media thinks.

You're absolutely right, Karin. His smirky little tea bag waving gesture removed all doubt - the man doesn't consider himself to be "our" president. I suspect his words will come back to bite him by motivating and mobilizing even more of us redneck yokel nobodies to become rightwing extremists and "wave our little teabags" in front of Fox News cameras.

Another orderly peaceful protest with no rioting no looting no vandalism no attacks on the police or pedestrians by unruly mobs of dirty maggot infested hippy freaks that why it dont interest the NEW YORK SLIMES,WASHINGTON COMPOST,ATALANTA URINAL CONSTIPATION,L.A. SLIMES,SLIME,NEWSREEK or any of the talking heads on DECAY,GOOF MORONS AMERIKA,BS MORONS NEWS,

What a collection of idiotic responses... yes, that's right... government spending started in the last 100 days. The "fiscal conservative" party under Reagan had a $200 billion dollar deficit. Under the first Bush? $300 billion. Clinton? $200 billion SURPLUS. And our boy W? $482 billion deficit. The tab on Iraq? $830 BILLION. And counting... wake the hell up. If you're going to market yourselves as the "Christian" party, maybe we can start HELPING our own before KILLING others with all this money? Crazy huh? Ha ha ha ha.

Yes, you folks aren't indoctrinated at all! What place do children have at a protest? What real opinion can a five year-old have on politics except what's handed to them painted on a sign?

Yes, you folks aren't indoctrinated at all! What place do children have at a protest? What real opinion can a five year-old have on politics except what's handed to them painted on a sign?

What's wrong anon? Don't you like parents that teach their children real values instead of allowing them to be indoctrinated at libacrit training camps also known as public schools? You must be a teacher.

The TEA PARTIES ARE having the desired effect, the background NOISE from the left is getting louder! The pigs are squealing! Aren't you anon!?

Barry's disrespect for the common man was apparent back when he attacked "Joe The Plumber". To a smart person that would have told him not to vote for him. To one of the SHEEP it didn't matter.

Tea party leaders would welcome meeting Obama

BRING IT ON BARRY IF YOU HAVE THE GUTS - I THINK NOT!

YEAH TED!!! How dare Barry disrespect me even though I was practicing plumbing without a license and was only making 40K as opposed to the 250K that I claimed! Liars trying to take down a candidate through unscrupulous means deserve respect too!

Only "squealing" I hear in this forum is the sound of gas escaping sour grapes as they ferment.

Oh Ted, that's just great:

"The national leadership team of the Nationwide Tea Party coalition confirmed members were responding to Obama's invitation "to have a serious conversation about how we are going to cut our health care costs down over the long term, how we are going to stabilize Social Security."

So meanwhile, these little piggies are squealing about socialism, and they want to meet about STABILIZING one of our successfully implemented SOCIALIST programs, social security?

Neeeeeeext!

"Yes, you folks aren't indoctrinated at all! What place do children have at a protest? What real opinion can a five year-old have on politics except what's handed to them painted on a sign?"
Loony liberal protestors wrote the book on using children in their protests (And their protests are much less family- friendly than the Tea Parties), they've been doing it for years.
Really young children (12 and younger) they use to hold up signs for the sake of getting photo ops, since those kids have pretty much no grasp of the situation.
Middle school and high school kids that they can recruit for their bigger and more lawless protests(Especially in big groups, such as by organizing a school walkout like they did for the Berkeley Marines recruiting office protest on February 12, 2008) they like using as foot soldiers to act as their first attack waves, for two reasons:
1. Those kids, while also having very little grasp of the real issues at hand beyond T- Shirt slogans and talking points, are highly emotional, self- righteous, easily manipulated, highly susceptible to peer pressure, and posessing enough testosterone and enough of a desire to show their buddies how cool they are that they are willing and eager to take stupid risks and put themselves on the front lines of the protests.
2. By using them as their first attack wave (In other words, cannon fodder) against the police, when the teenagers inevitably push the police into overreacting, the liberal protestors can then howl "BRUTALITY! BRUTALITY! THOSE HORRIBLE PIGS ARE BULLYING CHILDREN! WAAAAAAH!"

I hadn't heard Obama commenting on the Tea Parties, Karin. What exactly did he say?

Unfortunately, I don't think I'll be able to attend the July 4 Tea Party, since I'll be vacationing in Canada then. So, everybody who's going, chant and cheer a little louder for me!

"How dare Barry disrespect me even though I was practicing plumbing without a license..."
The liberal dimwits who bleat about that conveniently forget to mention one important fact: While the real Joe the Plumber (Not the twit here pretending to be him) indeed didn't have his own personal plumbing license, he was covered by his plumbing company's group license that they give to all its employees, so a personal license would have been unnecessary.

So meanwhile, these little piggies are squealing about socialism, and they want to meet about STABILIZING one of our successfully implemented SOCIALIST programs, social security?

Oh boy, too rich. Calling Social Security "one of our successfully implemented socialist programs." Phew!

Look up the definition of "success." I do not think that word means what you think it means.

E-dog,
Obama is proposing the most massive expansion of government in our history. If unchecked, he will amass more deficit spending than all of his predecessors COMBINED.

And Clinton's "surplus" was thanks to the Republicans taking over Congress in '94.

You're the one that needs to wake up, idiot.

LIBERALS started bringing children to protests in the sixtys to use as HUMAN SHIELDS for when the peofessional agitators started trouble. This was an attempt to keep the police at bay when the riots started. Even REVREND King had a few kids in his marches. These days it's called "creating martyrs for the cause".

Ok Cowlust, Social Security has hit some bumps in the road along the way (to put it mildly). My point is, why are the teabaggers complaining about socialism but they want to talk about "how we are going to stabilize social security"? If you're against socialism, talk about getting rid of it hypocrites. And while you're at it, talk about getting rid of Medicare, another "socialist program" (sorry grandma, you're going to have to fend for yourself, Medicare is an evil socialist program!). And hell, while you're at it, talk to all your big money republican compadres that have ocean front property that are getting "National Flood Insurance" which is essentially welfare for millionaires.

And Adam, Joe came up with some hypothetical bullshit story about how he was going to buy a plumbing business and didn't want his taxes to be raised. Meanwhile, he was making 40K and obviously had no intention of buying a plumbing business. But hey, it's so nice of all of you to be out there protesting for the people that make over 250K, I'm sure they really appreciate your support. Way to pick a cause to rally behind.

Because really, how many people making 250K+ were at those tea party rallies? Think about it, you're their obedient little bitches, keep up the good work!

Karin:
"The best way to make an enemy is to tell a man he doesn't count."
Is this yours? I would like to quote it. If it's your's, you are one perceptive woman.

Karin:
Sent it off before I finished typing.
Add "If it's not, you are better read than me."

No, seriously Joe, those things need to go. They're all abject failures, which is about par for the course for any socialist program. One of the first questions any doctor's office will ask you these days is, "Do you use Medicare," and "If so, do you have supplement insurance?" Social Security has "hit a few bumps in the road???" You're a buffoon, unless you consider bankruptcy of the greatest Ponzi scheme ever created to be just "a little bump in the road." Given you're demonstrated wit and intelligence, that could very well be the case.

But keep it up, seriously. "Little bitches," "piggies," "teabagging." Your insults are like sweet, sweet nectar for my soul. Why would you waste such vitriol on meaningless little demonstrations, unless they shook you to your core? Please accept my sincere thanks for your encouragement.

whoops, you're = your.

Pet peeve of mine.

Does anyone ON this thread even know what the nearly mythical Boston Tea Party was ABOUT? It was about REAL transgressions by our once mother country, not some social programs getting some way overdue attention by a... giggle... "Christian" nation.

I love the way you lemmings line up to be told how to respond to spending on social programs for the less fortunate. "Tea parties." Ha ha ha. What blasphemy. God forbid the richest country world BEGIN to start taking care of it's own versus just lining the pockets of big business. And I would venture an educated guess that virtually no one on this absurd site was one of W's chosen 1%er's, nor will you be impacted by the President's tax increases for those of us raking in 200k or more annually.

Dance puppets dance... have your "creative" tea party parodies. The MAJORITY of the country has spoken and kicked some SERIOUS ass. Welcome to the ever-shrinking minority xenophobes!

Joe, no, I don't make $250k a year, and it is indeed a safe bet that the vast majority of the people in the Tea Parties don't, either. However, we do realize three things:
1. Contrary to Obama's campaign promises, we know that he won't be able to finance all the massive spending his Adminsitration's been doing without also having to eventually raise taxes on the middle class.
2. Tax increases on the wealthy ultimately cause the workers to suffer. The wealthy business owners want to make money and profit from their businesses, that's natural. If the government starts jacking up their taxes, as Obama plans to do, they (The wealthy business owners) will make cuts wherever they can to lessen how much money they'll be losing as a result. Inevitably, among the first to suffer from this will be their workers, as the business owners conserve money by cutting their hours, their wages, and ultimately their jobs. Last summer, I lost my job at a small hardware store chain for that very reason. At least one of my coworkers also had to be let go due to the budget cuts, and the remaining employees all had their hours reduced.
3. Another important consideration we at the Tea Parties have is that the tax dollars we do pay are being used irresponsibly by the Obama administration, such as for corporate bailouts.

btw, as cowlove pointed out, slinging such crude, juvenile insults at us isn't exactly a good way to make us to your arguments (Or you, for that matter) seriously.

Posted by: cowlove at April 30, 2009 1:07 PM

And Clinton's "surplus" was thanks to the Republicans taking over Congress in '94.

(I love it when the 'rules' are one way for the 'enemy' and another for your party... the hypocrisy is thick cowpoker. Dude... whomever's in the big chair gets the credit AND the blame... you can't pick and choose... pull your head out of Newt's rectum)

You're the one that needs to wake up, idiot.

(No, YOU'RE stupid... infinity. HA HA HA HA HA. Sucks to LOSE doesn't it inbred?)

Posted by: Anonymous at April 30, 2009 3:33 PM

Hmmm...I didn't mention Clinton or any surplus. The signatures go at the bottom of the posts. Ironic, isn't it? To do something so wildly idiotic while calling someone stupid for something they didn't write, while presenting no argument of your own.

Good one, keep on chuggin'.

Yes, that's right... everyone on this site is more suitable to work on the country's AND administration's budget plans... stop regurgitating FAUX News nonsense... Yes, I'm sure no one in Obama's cabinet did ANY math on his proposed programs/budgets. Ha ha ha. Brilliant rebuttal.

Tax increases on the wealthy wreak havoc on the workers. Ha ha ha. Oh no... the reappearance of the mythical Ronny "the God" Reagan's "trickle-down" fantasy. Ha ha ha. Wow... I didn't know anyone WITHOUT adult-onset dementia still BELIEVED in THAT fairy tail.

Have you not been WATCHING the cuts/layoffs etc? This all began on W's watch.

The corporate bailouts began on WHOSE watch again? Hmm... let's see if I can recall... HA HA HA HA.

What a bunch of sore losers... but I'd have to say I prefer this to the bravado and baseless cockiness over the last 8 years as W rearranged chairs on the Titanic to use an overused cliche. Worst approval rating in history. Nice job boys! Have fun on your sad little website... I need to go back to the real world... you know... the one that beat the GOP senseless? HA HA HA HA HA HA.

Posted by: E-Dogg at April 30, 2009 3:27 PM

How do you feel about Obama's expansion of TARP funding, which was opposed on the order of 300:1 the first time around, his expansion of the war in Afghanistan, and his expansion of wire-tapping by the NSA. Sitting well? All that change you voted for? Or, is this your way of saying, "I really hate conservatives, even if I agree with their premise, because that's what I've been told to do." Anything clicking up there?

"Tax increases on the wealthy wreak havoc on the workers. Ha ha ha. Oh no... the reappearance of the mythical Ronny "the God" Reagan's "trickle-down" fantasy. Ha ha ha. Wow... I didn't know anyone WITHOUT adult-onset dementia still BELIEVED in THAT fairy tail."
Okay, did you not pay any attention to my last post? It is no fairy tale, I know it to be true because I experienced it firsthand, it's the reason I lost my job! Our economic crisis (Which was caused largely by Obama and the other Senate Democrats as I've indicated several times on this site) caused the store I worked for to lose a lot of money, as a result my boss needed to make some budget cuts, so I and another worker got laid off, and the others all had their hours reduced.
"What a bunch of sore losers."
Oh, please. Again, as I've pointed out numerous times on this site, liberals spent the last eight years revealing themselves to be the EPITOME of sore losers when it comes to elections!

The tea parties are not over yet mose are being planned and NO ACORN ALLOWED

And besides what happened to the hardware store where Adam worked, is the John Galt effect. It's already happening. It's happening in my own household.
Surely E-dogg, even you can understand this: Why the hell should I work over half of the year for Obama, a man I loathe? Why not just go fishing and drink beer in the warm sunshine instead? Hang up a sign: "Gone fishin." There is no such thing as a free lunch, E-Dogg and Anonymouses. Especially not from me to the likes of you. I don't even like you, why should I turn my $$ over to YOU so you can drink beer in the sunshine?

That's right Karin, there is no such thing as the free lunch dubya was spending on. We're gonna pay for it now. So if you hang up your gone fishing sign, you won't have much to eat, unless you actually catch something besides one of your many beers on your trip.

I'm with you, Karin. Anonymous, if you didn't like Bush's spending you must be absolutely jumping up and down with anger over Obama's spending.

Spending in our own country on our own people for our own issues, with a price tag we can all see. That kind of spending I can maybe live with.

Secret spending on an illegitimate war in another country where we don't have any business being. That's the kind of spending that gets me jumping up and down.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 2, 2009 12:21 PM

Yes, totally. Fighting Saddam, ending the rape rooms, stopping the genocide. All horrible things.

Frisbee golf courses, marsh mice, subways between L.A. and Vegas. All much better things.

Secret spending on an illegitimate war in another country where we don't have any business being. That's the kind of spending that gets me jumping up and down.

So I suppose you're quite literally, hopping mad about Obama's drastic increase in military hostilities in Afghanistan? Yeah, I thought not.

You were talking about "free lunch" spending, troll.

That's right Karin, there is no such thing as the free lunch dubya was spending on. We're gonna pay for it now.

There was no "illegitimate war," troll.

Oh that's right, hunting around in the desert of a country with a barely existent army, with no WMDs, and a terrorist leader that couldn't be found (and who was barely connected to the country we were waging the war on)

You're right, what could be more legitimate than that?