moonbattery.gif


« Sara Jane Olson Presents Staffing Opportunity for Obama Administration | Main | A Domino Falls in Central America »


March 16, 2009

Unions Offer Bribe to Specter on Card Check

No doubt Arlen Specter was well rewarded for selling out his party and his country by supporting the obscene Porkulus package. The 30 pieces of silver he will get for voting to abolish secret ballots for unionization are already on the table.

Angling for a critical Senate swing vote to pass the "card check" bill that would make it easier to form unions, Pennsylvania labor leaders promised Sen. Arlen Specter that they will switch union members from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party to help him win a tough 2010 primary election, The Washington Times has learned.
Pennsylvania AFL-CIO President William M. George said he pledged Mr. Specter "all kinds of help from the union" in a series of meetings to woo the Republican senator's support for the bill, which would ease rules favoring secret-ballot elections to unionize workplaces.
"We are pushing to give him help in the primary, including changing Democrats to Republicans for the primary," Mr. George told The Times. "It's hard to do because of other races in the state … but we'll do it for 'card check.' "

Democrats have tampered in Republican primaries before. They got Obama into the White House by saddling the GOP with an awful candidate who likely would have lost to Romney if not for Dems voting in its primaries. But if Spectacle thinks unions are going to save his seat, he's as dumb as he is treacherous — though probably still not dumb enough not the realize the damage the Orwellian Employee Free Choice Act would do to our economy by allowing unions to use bribery and coercion to expand their power, which is the point of doing away with secret ballots.

On a tip from The MaryHunter.

Posted by Van Helsing at March 16, 2009 11:10 AM

Comments

Not surprising since many labor unions are connected with organized crime and the mafia and especialy the infamous AFL/CIO and the TAMSTERS who have used strong armed tactics agisnt those who oppose them

Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at March 16, 2009 11:17 AM

Romney had his own issues. Like the ROMNEY CARE health plan. Not to mention that being a Mormon would have had him raked over the coals for all the weird stuff they do - like (not so) secret rituals where they baptize the dead and "holy underwear" and the part about when you die you become a God of your own planet with a harem of women. Actually that sounds pretty cool, being a guy and all.


Posted by: Anonymous at March 16, 2009 11:20 AM

Lets make him an offer he can't refuse

Posted by: JamesJ at March 16, 2009 11:34 AM

Bribes, aren't they illegal?

Posted by: bill-tb at March 16, 2009 11:37 AM

I'll be happy to chair the Maryland chapter of Just Say NO to Specter in 2010. They're our neighbors, so I'm just being a neighborly Marylander.

Anonymous: interesting thoughts, I hate to agree with you. People compared the Romney situation to that of JFK being Roman Catholic (fears that he'd take orders from the Pope, etc.) Romney would have been skewered, and primarily -- especially -- because he's a religious Conservative.

Still, it never ceases to blow me away that he was the Gov. of wackjob liberal Taxachusetts. In a parallel universe, perhaps he's the Pres now (w/Jindal or Palin as VEEP) and battling like hell with Congress to cut taxes across the board esp. at the corporate level... I see him vetoing that omnibus bill, I see him encouraging anti-Congressional Tea Parties from coast to coast... I see him maintaining human embryonic stem cell funding restrictions... I see him expanding Guantanamo... I see him setting stealth bombers on high alert targeting Iran's nuclear facilities... I see him getting the Justice Dept to investigate Barney Frank and Chris Dodd over Fannie/Freddie collusion...

One can dream, can't one.

Posted by: The MaryHunter at March 16, 2009 11:44 AM

This along with his $500 million earmark for NIH facilities in Bethesda, MD was enough for him to turn traitor. The thing is the unions are going to dump him during the next election for the next Dem that comes along. It is so sad he doesn't see the Libs for who they are.

But, we see who he is, JUDAS.

http://franklinslocke.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Franklin's Locke at March 16, 2009 12:11 PM

Specter has to go down in 2010. Every conservative should donate to his primary opponent. I know the CFG will be gunning for him.

Posted by: Matt at March 16, 2009 12:16 PM

Go CFG Go! They rock and had a decent success record in 2008, given the givens.

Posted by: The MaryHunter at March 16, 2009 12:43 PM

And can these union bosses really "promise" this? You know some of these guys would never, ever vote Republican, just because D has always run in the family. And, they might be discounting the union members who hate their unions. My husband was one of those.

A very risky proposition for Sphincter, indeed.

Posted by: Karin at March 16, 2009 1:24 PM

It's just for the primary, anyway. After that, all the union people go back to their 'rat candidate anyway. Not just a traitor, a weak fool.

Posted by: Mr Evilwrench at March 16, 2009 1:46 PM

I've linked to your post from Blogwatch Voter Intimidation

Posted by: Wayne at March 16, 2009 2:00 PM

Bill em George and Spector make clear what they think of the little guy and the sense of fair play. It is all about them, the union to rake in more bucks and Spector to keep his job... all at the expense of the 'working man', or more accurately 'funding fodder'.

This Orweillian propagandist writes: "ease rules favoring secret-ballot elections to unionize workplaces." making it seem a yes vote gives the workers more freedom. It doesn't. How would unionists and entrenched politicians like 'Guido and Marcellos' looking over their shoulders as they make their choices or cast votes?

This is just another action to embed union socialism into our society. Nobody is entitled to a job. It is a contract between an individual and a company. Labor is simply a commodity that should have price set by availability and quality of product in the marketplace instead of having these labor cartels establish an inflated artificial price. Unionization and federal regulation is what makes the domestic auto industry uncompetitive.

Having someone watch you vote allows intimidaton later. Some worker votes no but keeps the job. The workplace will not be so pleasant for that person.

Posted by: IOpian at March 16, 2009 2:15 PM

Who cares about AS? The REAL issue here is the legalized thuggery and intimidation that is the "Free Choice Act": it confounds me, even in the through-the-looking glass world of the United States of Obama, that semi-sentient people don't see this bill as what it really is, the "No-Choice Act."

Posted by: Ruddie at March 16, 2009 4:04 PM

Arlene is the quintessential girlyman. I heard him on the radio trying to explain why he sold out on the stimulus bill.

All I really heard was that he's been bought and paid for by his DemocRat cronies, who appear to be his new best friends.

Arlene will sell our country down the river on this union scam, you watch [and I say this as a twice elected statewide union officer].

Posted by: Smokey at March 17, 2009 6:07 AM