« Moonbats March in Adoration of Cop Killer | Main | White People With Blue Eyes Caused the Financial Crisis »
March 27, 2009
Now I Get It: Obama Is a Joke
Remember when a teleprompter glitch caused the hapless Moonbat Messiah to thank himself? It has been revealed by his nutroots acolytes that this was no slip-up at all, but a clever joke that went over the heads of all but the liberal elite.
Next, this same excuse will be applied to Chairman Zero's economic and foreign policies.

On a tip from Viking04.
Posted by Van Helsing at March 27, 2009 7:01 AM
Comments
Rush said it best: If it was a joke why suppress the video? Show us!
AC
Posted by: AC at March 27, 2009 8:14 AM
Posted by: TED at March 27, 2009 9:02 AM
Oh, I get it now, the Peewee Herman bike crash gag... "I meant to do that".
Posted by: IOpian at March 27, 2009 9:30 AM
What about this guy ISN'T a joke?
Posted by: Parley at March 27, 2009 9:30 AM
In fairness to the Messiah, it apparently was a joke, according to non-moonbat sources in the British press (Times or Telegraph, I've forgotten). The Irish PM had begun reading his speech off the teleprompter when he realized that it was Obama's speech being displayed. So when Obama got up to give his speech, he pretended to be reading the Irish PM's speech. There was no video taken.
I find this eminently plausible, because otherwise one would have to postulate two slipups - one each by the Irish PM and Obama - and the former is beyond dispute. Moreover, having had one teleprompter screwup occur, Obama would doubtless have been wary of another one when he arose to speak. (He's not a stupid man.)
So I give him a pass on this one. Actually, I give him props, first for actually having a sense of humor, and second for trying to help the Irish PM out of an embarrassment.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at March 27, 2009 9:32 AM
NOW I GET IT!!!
He is a comic genius!
I love how he straightfaced it for 10 minutes saying Ore -EEE-un
3x.
What a friggin genius.
Andy Kaufman would have been proud.
Posted by: Anonymous at March 27, 2009 10:29 AM
There should be a shark fallowing him real close
Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at March 27, 2009 8:32 PM
I find this eminently plausible, because otherwise one would have to postulate two slipups - one each by the Irish PM and Obama - and the former is beyond dispute. Moreover, having had one teleprompter screwup occur, Obama would doubtless have been wary of another one when he arose toPosted by: Jay Guevara at March 27, 2009 9:32 AM speak. (He's not a stupid man.)
He's not?
Posted by: Anonymous at March 28, 2009 11:24 PM
Didn't all of you read the sign?
It said:
" Lovelle stood up AGANIST
Police terror "
I'm puzzled. I searched all over the internet and cannot find the definition of the word:
AGANIST
Maybe it was misspelled.
( I doubt that could be possible from that ilk. )
So I took the liberty to 'vocalize' what they spelled out and came up with this:
AGONIST
1: one that is engaged in a struggle
2 [from antagonist]
a: a muscle that is controlled by the action of an antagonist with which it is paired.
b: a chemical substance capable of combining with a specific receptor on a cell and initiating the same reaction or activity typically produced by the binding endogenous substance
I think that says alot don't you?
Or maybe it was " AGAINST " Its so hard when these clever idiot savants try to communicate with us dumb mainstream (work for a living) people.
Posted by: Jules V. at March 29, 2009 7:24 AM
Didn't all of you read the sign?
It said:
" Lovelle stood up AGANIST
Police terror "
I'm puzzled. I searched all over the internet and cannot find the definition of the word:
AGANIST
Maybe it was misspelled.
( I doubt that could be possible from that ilk. )
So I took the liberty to 'vocalize' what they spelled out and came up with this:
AGONIST
1: one that is engaged in a struggle
2 [from antagonist]
a: a muscle that is controlled by the action of an antagonist with which it is paired.
b: a chemical substance capable of combining with a specific receptor on a cell and initiating the same reaction or activity typically produced by the binding endogenous substance
I think that says alot don't you?
Or maybe it was " AGAINST " Its so hard when these clever idiot savants try to communicate with us dumb mainstream (work for a living) people.
Posted by: Jules V. at March 29, 2009 7:27 AM

