« Government Food | Main | Open Thread »
February 27, 2009
31% of Dems Approve of Occupying Homes
It would be nice to think that Democrats voted for Obama by some terrible mistake, having been duped by the hardcore leftists running the media into thinking he was the kind of guy who might uphold the liberties on which this country was founded. But according to a recent Rasmussen poll, an alarming 31% of them favor the ACORN policy of encouraging people to occupy foreclosed homes, in direct violation of the property rights without which non-totalitarian civilization cannot function. Only 35% of Dems are opposed, with the rest too clueless to make up their minds.
Once again media radicals have skewed the numbers by casting as put-upon saints those who take out mortgages they can't afford and then expect to stay in other people's houses for free, while the rest of us work hard and play by the rules. But the number of liberals who are in effect actual communists may be high enough to prevent them from turning on the new administration, even as its true nature becomes obvious.
Hat tip: Teh Resistance Blog, on a tip from V the K.
Posted by Van Helsing at February 27, 2009 10:30 AM
Comments
They're just FOR anything that doesn't make sense because they're REBEL'S and they're COOL!!! Cough Cough Gag!
Posted by: TED at February 27, 2009 10:56 AM
Posted by: Kathleen at February 27, 2009 11:27 AM
Well, that's 35 percent of Dems against, a lot of "undecideds" and (I'm guessing) the overwhelming majority of Republicans. Add that together and it's most people in the country who see this for what it is.
I don't think I'd want to be the squatters after folks realize what they're doing. They sure wouldn't want to let ME catch them. To bring up a bit of that Thomas Paine quote again:
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property."
The invader and the plunderer. They need to be very afraid. 'Nuff said.
Posted by: Montag (matt) at February 27, 2009 11:28 AM
Well, of course, they do. Liberals do not beleive in private property rights nor sound business principles.
So what that they signed a contract. It does not matter. So, what that they stopped paying their house payments and violated the contract. This does not matter to them.
http://franklinslocke.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Franklins Locke at February 27, 2009 11:45 AM
HA thats nothing
100% of liberals believe they should censor rush and fine you for not recycling
Posted by: BillytheKid at February 27, 2009 11:54 AM
Nothing new here.
Those familiar with Dims and liberalism know that fascist authoritarianism forms the weight of their shallow and indecent doctrine.
Seizing foreclosed homes, seizing property ostensibly for purposes of community interest (i.e., eminent domain) or seizing homeowners guns (as in New Orlean's mayor Ray Nagin- post-katrina) are all crimes against individuals. Seizing tax dollars for the purpose of the enrichment of others is similarly a crime of theft enforcible through violence and perpetuated by liberalism.
Liberals are inevitably motivated by crimes of opportunity: they will take anything that isn't nailed down.
If they can't take it, they'll wreck it.
If they can't wreck it, they'll copulate with it.
Facist authoritarianism comes about in a free society when infected individuals without character, ability or the capacity for truth come together like sediment in a urinal.
Posted by: Fiberal at February 27, 2009 12:36 PM
And to think hollyweird star JULIA ROBERTS once said SHE LOOKED UP DEMACRAT IN THE DICTIONARY AND IT SAID BY THE PEOPLE TO THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE and that comes from some silly hollywood dim-bulb spaced out on too many drugs and tooo much booze HE SHE LITERATE OR A BRAINLESS DING-BAT?
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at February 27, 2009 2:37 PM
Is anyone surprised that liberals think this is ok? I saw the tagline and thought to myself "well no shit". Moonbats are nothing if not thieves and bums. Why do you think they think it's justifiable to steal from their neighbors to pay for the healthcare they should provide for themselves?
Posted by: Right0fReagan at February 27, 2009 3:13 PM
The funny thing is to see the libs get all aggitated when a contract that's favorable for THEM gets stepped on. OHHH BOY! Here come the lawyers.
I think the thing I hate worst about liberals is that they're not honest...in the sense that they can't just admit "Yeah, I'm looking out for ME and screw YOU". OK, I can accept that. But NO, they're ALWAYS going off about how FAIR and TOLERANT and INCLUSIVE they are. It's THAT dishonesty that drives me nuts.
In that sense (only), I almost admire Bill Ayers more than Barack Obama. At least he admits (and in fact is proud of) what he is. None of this "sheeps clothing" stuff.
Posted by: Montag (matt) at February 27, 2009 4:32 PM
Adolph Hitler and Joe Stalin were liberals
Posted by: Flu-Bird at February 27, 2009 10:09 PM
