January 26, 2009
Pork Package to Include "Family Planning"
Russia, China, Cambodia — the story was the same. Where you have communism, you generally have genocide. This makes it particularly alarming that as America lurches left, our next "stimulus package" (i.e., liberal pork bonanza) is to include funding for "family planning" — an Orwellian euphemism that means preventing children from being born.
Nancy Pelosi is taking a key role in dragging America down the path blazed by Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. Here she is on ABC's This Week (via Drudge), explaining why the government will be blowing hundreds of $millions of our money on antifamily services in the name of stimulating the economy:
Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children's health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those — one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.
Asked if she had no apologies for her antihuman ideology, Nancy the Nazi replied:
No apologies. No. We have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy.
If government excess continues to leave the economy in ruins even after we've aborted our kids, next we can turn to the elderly and infirm.
Here we see why the government doesn't make any effort to improve the economic situation by lightening the tax burden and laying off the extravagant pork. The worse they make the situation, the more extreme the measures they can exploit it to justify.
On tips from Oiao, mega, and John R.
Posted by Van Helsing at January 26, 2009 6:52 AM
Apparently, the professional voter fraud organization ACORN could get up to $4 Billion in stimulus spending.
Posted by: V the K at January 26, 2009 7:05 AM
Let's take a low-income white woman that was knocked up and then abandoned by her black husband - back in the 60's - when this was considered taboo.... had abortion been "easy" and used as contraception back then, would BHO be our president today?
Posted by: Pauly at January 26, 2009 7:16 AM
Besides that, less pregnancies (that result in full-term births) means less people working, less people contributing to Social Security -
Less people contributing their collective intelligence for the common good of our country.
What are liberals thinking, anyway? It means less of them too...
Posted by: Pauly at January 26, 2009 7:23 AM
The change the commie donkeys want drag us down the path into communism and emporer palpatine obama is going to lead us there
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at January 26, 2009 7:30 AM
Magaret Sanger's original vision was that birth control would reduce the number of undesirable poor whites and blacks, especially blacks. An in fact half the fetuses Planned Parenthood aborts are black. Is that what Pelosi is proposing? Perhaps a program of forced sterilization is in order. Then there is Peter Singer's (Princeton bioethicist) proposal that people with damaged brains (Down's, Huntington's, Alzheimer's, etc) are not human and should be killed. Perhaps we could add people with IQs less than, say, 85.
Brave New World
Posted by: Bob Sykes at January 26, 2009 7:30 AM
meanwhile, 15,000 jobs to be lost in the next hour according to fox, but by all means fork over the b.c.
Posted by: nancz at January 26, 2009 7:32 AM
Pelosi is a wicked and immoral woman, who is only a symptom of a larger sickness in our country. If you can think straight, you'd better stand up and speak out for truth, because we're losing America right in front of our noses.
Posted by: Anonymous at January 26, 2009 8:19 AM
"They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children's health, education..."
So how will preventing babies being born this year help states reduce their education costs? I don't recall many infants attending elementary school.
Posted by: dpt at January 26, 2009 8:31 AM
All these consequences have been expertly covered by Mark Steyn in his America Alone. Now the only question remaining concerns the title: by the time The One is done with bringing Hope'n'Change to America, will America really be alone, or will it be in the same mire as the rest of 'em? Steyn made the radical proposition that Europe join America in raising babies and killing taxes; instead, what we got is America decided to join Europe in doing the converse.
Posted by: Conservigilant at January 26, 2009 8:43 AM
Welcome to the Fourth Reich!
Posted by: Judith M. at January 26, 2009 8:56 AM
Uh, doesn't Pelosi have five kids? So she's already dropped a giant deuce in the gene pool.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 26, 2009 9:26 AM
What are liberals thinking, anyway? It means less of them too...
Conservatives are born in hospitals. Liberals are born in the public school system.
Posted by: Alan at January 26, 2009 11:11 AM
It didn't take them long to come right out and start talking end game. Babies are "cost". Of course, nobody asked who will pay back all the money they are borrowing if we abort the next generation.
I thought it was immoral to run up debts on kids that haven't even been born yet, but not to fear, we'll kill them and they won't have to worry about it.
Posted by: forest at January 26, 2009 11:47 AM
And guess who will be considered "a cost" once socialized medicine is in place?
Posted by: forest at January 26, 2009 12:11 PM
Nancy is third in line to be president. I think they would have to have Abrams tanks stationed in front of the white House and she would travel around town in a Stryker Light Armored Vehicle with longbow cobra gunships overhead. How about a select group of secret service guys in full battle armor--maybe about 150 to escort her?
Posted by: SnowSnake at January 26, 2009 12:19 PM
Is that her "O" face?
Posted by: Cheesecake at January 26, 2009 12:22 PM
Charlie Sykes had an interesting take on this on his radio show (in Milwaukee) this morning. Japan has been in a recession for something like 15 years now. Their answer? Encourage families to have more kids! They are encouraging companies to let their workers leave early two days a week and encouraging them to use that time to, well, go forth and multiply. The upshot of this is to fix an economic problem (companies that participate can cut down their overtime costs two days a week - 12 hour workdays are the norm in Japan - and provided more consumers in the future) and a social problem (Japan's birthrate is one of the lowest in the developed world (1.3 children per family, way below the 2.0 they need to maintain their population). Their population is also aging faster than any other developed nation.
This is interesting. On one hand you have Japan, mired in a huge prolonged recession, telling people to get busy. On the other hand, you have Nancy the Moonbat telling us we need to have fewer kids to keep costs down for the state in tough economic times - and that we should shell out tax dollars to help make that happen. You could argue that the state has no business caring for children in any capacity, but that's another topic. On this topic, one wonders how saved costs many years into the future count as an economic "stimulus" now. Only if one is an idiot or a moonbat (same thing, really) does that make sense on any level.
Posted by: CoderInCrisis at January 26, 2009 12:39 PM
Cheesecake, I did not need that image in my mind.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at January 26, 2009 1:29 PM
Imagine how bad the economy would be if we hadn't already aborted 50 million of those economy-sucking vermin. If only more of the last two generations appreciated the virtues of abortion, we certainly wouldn't be facing this dire financial crisis.
Family Planning = Abortion. I'll need a few more years in college to understand that fewer people will help to turn around our struggling economy. This is senseless (economically), warped (morally), and dangerous (unless you like that whole totalitarianism thing).
The financial meltdown, like AGW, is just another ginned up, manufactured crisis to impose more of the socialist agenda. It got them into office (September surprise?) and now they're praising the advantages of abortion for society.
From the mind of the American Left (you know, the children now running the government):
Abortion is something we need and deserve. It's good for women. It's good for unwanted 'children'. It's good for society. It's good for America. It's a constitutional right. It's highly intellectual and shows true compassion. When are you ignorant, superstitious, religious nuts gonna to get it?? Some people just can't understand real progress.
Get educated. Enter modernity.
The argument is over.
Posted by: lvb-rocks at January 26, 2009 2:37 PM
My God, i never thought she'd actually say it. Nancy Pelosi is nothing but a monster. I knew this would come with socialized health care. Under government care, eventually you will be euthanized as soon as keeping you alive is deemed "not cost effective".
Posted by: Archduke of Funk at January 26, 2009 2:51 PM
"Let's take a low-income white woman that was knocked up and then abandoned by her black husband - back in the 60's - when this was considered taboo.... had abortion been "easy" and used as contraception back then, would BHO be our president today?"
It would be some other worthless liberal POS the left would have made into a rock star with no credentials, no abilities (reading off a teleprompter is not an ability) and no IQ...
Posted by: TED at January 26, 2009 10:01 PM
"My God, i never thought she'd actually say it. Nancy Pelosi is nothing but a monster. I knew this would come with socialized health care. Under government care, eventually you will be euthanized as soon as keeping you alive is deemed "not cost effective"."
You don't know her maiden name? Nancy Mingala, ever wonder why she's the only feminist that doesn't hyphenate her name!
Posted by: TED at January 26, 2009 10:09 PM
Compaired to THE WICKED WITCH OF THE WEST all those female villinas in those disney films would pale in comparason
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at January 27, 2009 8:03 AM