« NBC Cancels Coulter | Main | Moonbats Attack Gravel Mine »
January 6, 2009
If Hamas Were in Mexico
Moonbats bleat that we should see things from the point of view of Palestinians, who find Jews living in their part of the world intolerable. It would be more appropriate to see from the point of view of Israel. What if instead of shooting rockets from Gaza into Israel, Hamas were shooting them from Mexico into the USA? Via The Razor, here's a map of their relative range:

Too bad houses in Phoenix don't come with basements; they make good places to hide when rockets come raining down on your neighborhood, provided you have enough warning. Los Angeles, Houston, San Diego, Las Vegas, Albuquerque, Tucson, and San Antonio would all be within range too. Rockets falling by the thousands on these cities might be enough to get even W to acknowledge a problem at the border. Even a few liberals might stop puling about "dialog" and "restraint."
Considering that extremist groups like MEChA — an alumnus of which is now Mayor of Los Angeles — want to "reconquer" this region and rid it of non-Hispanics, the scenario may not be all that implausible. We know whose side the UN would take.
Hat tip: Lone Star Times, on a tip from Byron.
Posted by Van Helsing at January 6, 2009 8:44 AM
Comments
Between Harry Reid in Nevada, John McCain in Arizona, all-Democrat New Mexico, and the modern Hell that is California... why not let Mexico take it all back?
Posted by: V the K at January 6, 2009 9:04 AM
"The so called states of CA, AZ, NM and TX constitute and illegal occupation of the Mexican Homeland! I demand the right to return! The apartheid border fence is a war crime! The genocide in North Mexico of must stop! Yargghh!" - A. Moonbat
Posted by: forest at January 6, 2009 9:07 AM
A wise intellectual asks...
Why do you think Israel would attack Gaza? Is it for their national treasure? Is it because Israel wants all of the scientific discoveries that are being made by Hamas intellectuals? Is it because Israel wants that sand pit of territory? Israel was more than happy to give it away, so why the hell attack? What’s there that you want? You want the oil deposits? There aren’t any. Do you want the golf courses? There aren’t any. Do you want the major economic infrastructure? There isn’t any. Do you want the sanitation plants? There isn’t any. Why attack?
Why indeed? Could it perhaps be something the Palestinians did?
Posted by: V the K at January 6, 2009 9:51 AM
That map is a bit of an exaggeration, the range of rockets used by Hamas is more like 15 miles but the map shows 350-400 miles.
Now if SCUDs missiles were used the map would be correct - but Hamas doesnt have those (yet).
Never the less, if any rockets were hitting US soil from Mexico, Im sure the US wouldnt be sitting back taking it - they would just send in some B-52's and A-10s along with some attack helicopters to mop up.
Posted by: Name at January 6, 2009 10:11 AM
well, give it time...
since putin agreed with chavez to build and start making rpgs, ak107s, and dragunov sniper rifles. the idea was to replace iran as the bridge from them to their destabilizatini business. (heck they are now starting to station their ships in ports of freindlies all over. they may not have missiles in silos that can reach, but they sure do have them in their ships, and there is no much different between a silo launch from cuba, and a ship launch from a port in cuba.
once that is built and the stuff starts leeking out all over, such WILL happen..
after all, do a search and you will find out that the mexican military and others have come across borders to do operations on behalf of the drug cartels, who get assistance from where?
Posted by: Artfldgr at January 6, 2009 10:13 AM
Heres the offical IDF map which indicates maximum range of 70km or 43 miles. Though most rockets are the smaller ones.
http://lonestartimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/map.jpg
Posted by: Name at January 6, 2009 10:14 AM
It's not absolute miles, it's a matter of proportion. The land area shaded in the USA is proportional to the land area of Israel that is under rocket attack.
Posted by: V the K at January 6, 2009 10:25 AM
Thanks V the K. That's what's meant by "relative range."
Posted by: Van Helsing at January 6, 2009 10:53 AM
What do you mean buy if?
Posted by: JimH at January 6, 2009 11:32 AM
Yup, I researched it properly. I think the Brits have basically not forgiven the Israelis for the period between the 1920s and the end of WW2, when Israel was declared. Basically they encouraged Immigration of Jews to Israel, but then some hardline factions turned on the Brits, when they figured it was as good as theirs. The Jews basically did a little fighting once well established, but the cold and real truth of the formation of Israel is that it was literally bought and I'm afraid all too many Palestinians were all too willing to sell. If this short period in world history is the reason for Britain and the BBC (and other Channels and so on are about the same), being generally so blatantly anti-Israel and pro-Palestine then they ought to get ovewr it. It was a long time ago. We get on with Germans, French, Italians and a whole host of others that we did far more fighting with in history and there seems far more forgiveness for them than the jewish people, who have far more and far more frequently been victims. I think it is weird, very vvery weird to say the least for a Country that takes so much monumental pride in havaing defeated the Nazis and in no way supporting the likes of the Russian Pogorms. Wierd, wierd, wierd this anti-Israel and anti-Jew thing that still spouts out of Britain, despite the fact that it is not jews constantly berating, threatening and attacking us, but Muslims. I am truly amazed that Britain on the whole and its voicepieces like the BBC, still seem to have such underlying dislike of Israel and the Jews.
With Germany and those who supported her and the Russians in their times of Jew Persecution, dislike and even hatred of Israel is more obvious. Mossad has hunted down many and old Nazi and got assets away from their families and they have probably gone after and got pro-Nazi French and so on too and they have probably even got revenge on Russian and other Persecutors of Jews from the last Century. Regular and sometimes aggressive anti-Jew sentiments from much of Europe are there and far more logical than those from Britain.
However, Britain always had its Nazi sympathisers didn't it. Perhaps the likes Aryans like Tony Benn, George Galloway and Annie Lennox (with her striking blond hair and blue eyes) are not do-gooders at all but raving Nazis. I mean look at then marching on the streets of the democratic world with hordes of authoritarian totalitarian following jew hating Palestinians and other Muslims.
If I ever get the chance, I will merrily say to one of these Celebrity Jew haters, 'You're nowt but a fucking Nazi'. Chew on that Annie you useless Cunt. I shan't be buying any of your tracks.
Israel is one Country the size of Wales. The Muslims have the 22 directly surrounding Countries, both Sunni and Shi'a (While they agree on little constructive with each other, the one thing they do argee with is Jew hating). Supporting the Palestinians who are part of the Muslim league to eradicate Israel (They would tomorrow if they could), can only mean you are one thing. I think it is high time our Government and others rooted out these Nazi Jew hating Celebrities and their supporters and gave them years of hard labour.
For those who have their doubts about who the troublemakers in this world are, I suggest they take a little time to study a webpage. www.thereligionofpeace.com You won't find any Jewish terrorism going on daily around the world. Who the hell is the BBC and so on, on the side of here. It isn't only the Jewish State forever getting bashed and threatened by Muslims, whether they are palestinians of something else. It is us too. Excuse me but that suggests that we ought to be on the same side and that includes our propaganda machines.
To think the Palestinians need our help, support and understanding, when their brother Muslims sit on vaults of trillions in Saudi and the Gulf States? The question is; why are the 22 Muslim Countries not sorting this out and making space and opportunities for their Muslim brothers?
Perhaps I'm wrong and the period 1920s to 1948 is not the reason and annie Lennox is not a Nazi. If I am wrong, I'd appreciate some explanation?!
And, fuck 'em, I hope they do monitor my emails at GCHQ. What the fuck?! P.
Posted by: Patrick at January 6, 2009 12:22 PM
If they ever push Israel into the sea, just at the end some hunchbacked little old guy is going to totter over to some biohazard refrigerator in some level 5 biocontaminant room and take out a flask. He will wander out to the front of the building, throw a few handfuls of bread and bird seed on the steps and pour the contents of the flask out on the steps. It will be some kind of bioengineered e coli that has the genetics for some kind of human transmitted, 100% lethal virus and bacteria--maybe two or three antibiotic resistant types. He will probably mutter something like, "Never again."
This really will lead to the glorious future moonbats want and work for--no living humans on the planet.
Posted by: SnowSnake at January 6, 2009 2:39 PM
Well done Patrick. BRAVO!!!!!
Posted by: Watching at January 6, 2009 3:27 PM
I love the map of the South West - it does point out a picture of what is being hit by Hamas.
I wonder how much further the red line would extend in the South West, on the map, if the porportion of land mass to include Alaska was used in ratio instead of relative range? I think the red area would be a bit larger.
Posted by: Oiao at January 6, 2009 7:53 PM
How many terrorists are sneaking accross the border with the illegal aliens?
Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at January 6, 2009 10:37 PM
What if Mexico lobbed rockets into San Diego? What would the USA do?
Well… if Mexico lobbed rockets into San Diego… and IF Mexico were to build walls winding through the streets of the United States designed to separate us from them... and IF Mexico cut off our supply lines to food and medical aid… and IF Mexico controlled our air space… and IF Mexico periodically assassinated our appointed representatives… and IF Mexico cut off our access to our own shores…
… we would do nothing. Because IF Mexico COULD do all of that we would be to weak to do anything about it. In fact we would probably be content with the fact that only a few rockets were lobbed our way.
But Mexico CAN’T do all of that.
Soooo… in response to them lobbing rockets we would be forced to defend ourselves. The most certain way to do that would be to slaughter those who were doing the lobbing. Now if that means innocent women and children die so be it. Wars will be fought.
But lest we never forget this – for every innocent woman and child slaughtered we would surely create ten times more of those who lob rockets.
Peace is the only soil where change can grow…
APGTG
Posted by: Nick Peace at January 7, 2009 11:37 AM
So NICK, you are saying that Israel should just sit there and TAKE IT?
That's called "peace at any cost" and the COST is TOO DAMN HIGH.
Posted by: KHarn at January 8, 2009 5:41 PM
This comparison between Gaza and Mexico is unfair. As far as I know the U.S is not occupying any Mexican territories. Is that the case with Israel?! I think eveybody knows that it is NOT. Israel is occupying more than 75% of Palestine since decades. Hamas is the leading force and the most effective one in the Palesinian liberation process which has begun since 1988 in what is known as Intifada. It is a matter of one decade or hopefully less when Hamas will be able to liberate the Holy Muslim Land of Palestine. This is the only reason why the leaders of the occupation forces are dreaming to put an end to this liberation process lead by Hamas. A dream that will never come true.
Posted by: Maher Almutawa at January 15, 2009 1:23 AM

