moonbattery.gif


« Starbucks Climbs Aboard Obamania Bandwagon | Main | Carbon Credits: A Dam Swindle »


January 24, 2009

Greg Gutfeld Steps on a Cockroach

In case you missed the Red Eye crew laying into Keith Olbermann, the loony left's most obnoxiously sanctimonious propagandist:

Via Olbermann Watch, on a tip from Johnny Dollar.

Posted by Van Helsing at January 24, 2009 1:01 PM

Comments

I think Keith Olbermann is just doing it for ratings, that's all he knows, his show is nothing if he can't bash Bush, he'll be doing it until MSNBC gets wise to his idiocy.

Posted by: me at January 24, 2009 1:30 PM

I actually did see this segment (TiVo) and am glad someone sent it in.

Olbubblermann is a first class Ass Hat.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 24, 2009 2:46 PM

More people probably saw the Olbermann tirade shown here on Red Eye, which airs at 3 AM, than the original on MSNBC

Posted by: James McEnanly at January 24, 2009 4:02 PM

I'm on the fence. Olbermann is obviously being outrageous for ratings, but my sense is he also personally believes his schtick.

Will we hear word one from Olbie when Obama shuts down free speech (talk radio) or nationalizes most businesses or gives away American sovereignty to the U.N. or botches the response to a domestic terrorist attack or refuses to allow us to become truly energy independent?

Nope.

Posted by: matt at January 24, 2009 4:20 PM

Sore losers in 2001. Sore losers in 2004. Sore winners in 2009.

Posted by: scaramouche at January 24, 2009 4:34 PM

VH is an angry right wing extremist and obstructionist.

Maybe VH wishes that he had had President Obama's fortitude to go to Harvard Law and earn the grades [anonymous grading] to get on the Law Review and become its editor.

VH - get a life - [hint - being an angry right wing radical does not qualify].

Posted by: Anonymous at January 24, 2009 5:06 PM

Anony: easy to snipe behind the anonymous title.

Anony wishes he had invisible funders pay for him to go to Harvard.

Posted by: Cheesecake at January 24, 2009 5:34 PM

Anony wishes he had invisible funders pay for him to go to Harvard.

Posted by: Cheesecake at January 24, 2009 5:34 PM


And make invisible grades and have an invisible transcript with invisible professors and invisible classmates.

Posted by: Jimbo at January 24, 2009 5:40 PM

Because Liberals have selective memories, I have to remind them that last year they had a hearing on weather or not to try President Bush. The result was that several Liberals threw accusations, insults and demands, and did not offer ONE SHRED of evidence to back up their claims.

Liberals don't believe in our justice, only in lynch mobs.

Posted by: KHarn at January 24, 2009 5:50 PM

Actually it's Cheney who should be on trial for a lifetime of mixing money making and war making, but everyone seemed to fear him, as though he had the power make threats behind the scene ...oh thats right, he did have the power... that may change however, "if you will", now.

Posted by: Debushificator at January 24, 2009 8:02 PM

Do you think maybe a swift kick in the head would jump start his nonworking brain. Where was this jackass when BILL CLINTON was selling out our militaries top secrets to the chi-coms WHAT MAKE HIM SO DARN STUPID AND REDICULOUS?

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at January 24, 2009 8:17 PM

"Debushificator"

Huh? What kind of 'name' is that? Sounds like the name of a guy who gleefully "pulled the lever" to a Nazi gas chamber full of Jewish women and babies - which obviously makes it a liberal's 'handle'.

The only time a thinking person would "fear Cheney" is if they were quail hunting with him.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 24, 2009 8:54 PM

Matt:
Olbermann has nothing to fear from the Unfairness Doctrine; he and his kind will have free reign, because these new "fair" speech laws will only be enforced against Conservatives. "Liberals", as always, will be above the law.

Posted by: Toa at January 24, 2009 9:22 PM

...also, I second your statement that Olbermann is dead serious about the bile he launches. The M.S.M. is not JUST about ratings; they are, first and foremost, about moving Leftism foreward.

Posted by: Toa at January 24, 2009 9:30 PM

Fine Olby. Let's accept the historical references cited. We must then by obligation include Jimmy Carter's signing a treaty with a Panamanian dictator, and Bill Clinton's BJ from an intern as likewise reprehensible acts that deserve encarceration. We can continue on and on with this crap Olbermann. Let's just imprison everyone?

Posted by: Pete at January 24, 2009 9:33 PM

WORST "JOURNALIST" TOADY IN THE WORRRRRRRRRRLD

Posted by: David Waldman at January 25, 2009 1:11 AM

>>Liberals don't believe in our justice, only in lynch mobs.

Well....it is an historical fact that the KKK was founded 100% by Democrats.

------------------

If your dog acted as confused as Olbermann, wouldn't you take the poor thing to the vet and have him euthanized?

Just asking.

Posted by: Authentic Connecticut Republican at January 25, 2009 1:50 AM

I work security for Fox studios and found out that Keith Olbermann is banned from Fox property. Don't know why, but I heard he had been accused of stalking someone.

Posted by: Joe at January 25, 2009 2:06 AM

Thanks for the video - I had to post that one on my own blog LMAO

That Sharrod guy seems pretty sharp. The chick? Not so much. I remember the Iraqis joyously tearing down the Saddam statue - it WAS good for morale. And his sons? With their rape camps and their terrorism of their own people? Yeah, it WAS good when he was hung. Very very good.

Posted by: Anniee451 at January 25, 2009 7:10 AM

"Debushificator at January 24, 2009 8:02 PM"

OK, give us EVIDENCE!

"Authentic Connecticut Republican at January 25, 2009"

Yeah, you're a Yankee, alright. Since Southerners were/are so EEEVIL, your ancestors should have let us go and be rid of us. But if they had, the north would not have benefited from the SEVENTY PERCENT of the federal taxes Southerns were paying at the time.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 25, 2009 8:34 AM

"Debushificator at January 24, 2009 8:02 PM"

OK, give us EVIDENCE!

I Just feel it in my gut... you know like W... you don't need to read or watch the news if you have a gutbrain and Jesus sending messages in there.

Hey folks Rush hates America and wants the country to go down because he hates the 70% that now have some sort of hope for Obamas plans. I find that quite cold hearted, wishing another serious depression on the country... remember that if it happens. Rush helped. He encourages us to become a nation of bitchers, which is the same as whining, but with irritable bowel syndrom.

DeBushification... like Debaathification in Iraq only we will do it over over here to repress the Bushits, I mean Bushists.

Posted by: Debushificator at January 25, 2009 10:03 AM

Debushiflicator, Rush said, I support President Obama but I don't support his socialist policies. I don't want his socialist policies to succeed. If he succeeds with socialism it will destroy the country.

That's a lot different than your version. But then you are out to "repress." Looks like the very first order of business for the Left is to completely misrepresent what detractors of Dear Leader Obama say.

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: This morning, CNN, they have a beat reporter on me. Her name is Carol Costello. I'm her beat. Coanchor Kiran Chetry, introduction to... Wait a minute. This is not about Green Bay. This is about the Last Man Standing. This is about I want Obama to fail. I don't want Obama to fail; I want the country to succeed! I want Obama's policies to fail. But Obama's failure to implement his policies is good news, the best news possible for this country. That's all I'm saying. Okay, you want to hear one of the CNN bites? Okay, here's Kiran Chetry introducing the correspondent Carol Costello, the Limbaugh beat reporter, the pool reporter at CNN, on me.

CHETRY: Barack Obama has inspired millions to "hope," including Rush Limbaugh, only Rush Limbaugh hopes something very different. Let's listen.

RUSH ARCHIVE: Look, what he's talking about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the US government as possible, from the banking business, to the mortgage industry, the automobile business, to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don't want this to work. So I'm thinking of replying to the guy, "Okay, I'll send you a response, but I don't need 400 words, I need four: 'I hope he fails.'"

CHETRY: All right, so is the Obama honeymoon already over for some die-hard Republicans?

COSTELLO: (snickering) Well, if you listen to Rush Limbaugh (haughty laugh), it certainly is! Let me ask you a question, though, Kiran. How long did your honeymoon period last after you got married? (cackling)

ROBERTS: It's still going, right? How many years has it been?

CHETRY: It's been eight, eight and still, you know, every day --

COSTELLO: Yeah, but that's not the honeymoon period. Some -- some people say their honeymoon period lasted as long as it took to walk down the aisle. Barack Obama, of course, is asking for a lot longer than that from Americans. The question is: Will he get it?

RUSH: Now, the question here is... By the way, this report was then used by another CNN reporter, Rick Sanchez who I even know and who I thought was professional. But Rick Sanchez obviously is not a professional journalist. I just explained in that bite everything I mean about why I want him to fail. There's no way to misunderstand this, but they get to those four words, "I hope he fails," and they ignore everything else I said in front of it. They actually put this in context. It is impossible for anybody at CNN to not understand what I was saying, yet they purposely took it out of context, and then Rick Sanchez, who... I wouldn't trust anything you see this guy do, if you even watch CNN, because he knows full well what was said and what was meant. He might have been assigned this by some editor, I don't know, but they don't care obviously at CNN to get it right. And it's all of course redounded to my benefit.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_012209/content/01125117.guest.html

Posted by: Kevin R at January 25, 2009 12:54 PM

I like that: Debushificator gripes about "cold-hearted" people who oppose Obama's ideas, then declares that he's eager to "repress Bushists"...

Oops, I forgot- repression is only patriotic if "Liberals" carry it out...must be quite a cathartic experience, being a chesspiece in the hands of Jihadis, Communists, etc....

Posted by: Toa at January 25, 2009 2:48 PM

Now Kevin, you know the truth don't matter here in Moonbatteryville.

Plus I wouldn't believe anything coming from that cystbutt's own site...

I'm just here to join the hatefest... if you want a serious blog, you'll have to look elsewhere ...Moonbatteryville is a place where we can hate each other and not get along... and have fun all the while.

I can't wait for the next Posting!

Posted by: Debushificator at January 25, 2009 3:00 PM

"I can't wait for the next Posting!
"Posted by: Debushificator at January 25, 2009 3:00 PM"

Here it is:

You're a smug little elitist fool who can't understand that Liberalism is just communism lite. And if you do understand that, you are in complete agreement with it.

A KGB agent who defected told an interviewer (It's on video) that he had seen the KGB list of names for exicution when the communist revolution came to America. On the list were such shining communist lights as Jane Fonda and Bill Ayres.

Posted by: KHarn at January 25, 2009 3:11 PM

KGB's a-coming to get us now? What happened to the Islamofacists? Wow... somebodys got some loose screws...

Like I said, this is the wrong place to have rational discussions, assuming there actually is a occasional rational comment. I mean, really, you don't start out naming the site Moonbattery.com and proclaiming everyone left of the hard right is a moonbat on pretty much every thread ... then expect us proud moonbats to play nice do you??? Not the way it works.

OK. Next stupid/paranoid/hate filled/ and or just plain pathetic comment please.

Posted by: Debushificator at January 25, 2009 4:34 PM

I see one of Olberfrau's sniveling little parents-basement dwelling fanboys has chosen to grace us with his presence.

By the way, Rush is right. The point of this "stimulus" has nothing to do with stimulating the economy. Most of the spending doesn't even come on line until 2011. Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi has larded up with, among other things, hundreds of millions of dollars to be spent on "family planning." How does family planning stimulate the economy?

It doesn't. The "stimulus" is a sham. Rush is right.

Posted by: V the K at January 25, 2009 5:30 PM

Debushificator is obviously a gay male, based on his screen name, and is very upset over the fact that Democratic Party Voters, who voted for Obama smack in Fla and CA voted against gays like him.

No gay marriage for you Debushificator! Your black, white, asian and hispanic Democratic Party Voters don't like your kind. Oh so sad.

You know, with a screen name like yours, people might just figure out that you beat women. You are't a gay muzzie are you? That profile would fit with your screen name.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 25, 2009 7:07 PM

Oh, just for the libbatard troll - that was me on that above post.

Posted by: Oiao at January 25, 2009 7:08 PM

The reason O'Reilly gets higher ratings than Olberman is both those on the right and left watch him. While only Moonbat lefties watch Olberman and his wild eyed hatred of anyone not dedicated to Socialism.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 25, 2009 8:08 PM

My God Obermann is such a moron! It's a real shame there are people like him on this earth let alone America! A product of liberalism.

Another reason O'Reilly gets higher ratings is NO ONE in their right mind COULD watch Olbermann!

Posted by: TED at January 25, 2009 9:55 PM

"OK. Next stupid/paranoid/hate filled/ and or just plain pathetic comment please"


Debushificator


Fits ALL of the criteria!

Posted by: TED at January 25, 2009 9:59 PM

Posted by: nancz at January 25, 2009 11:19 PM

Debush, your 70% is hyperbole. The latest Rasmussen poll is showing a trend...The percent strongly approving is going down to 42%, while the percentage strongly disapproving is going up to 20%, for an index of 22. Down, down down each day since inauguration.

I watch the polls everyday, the libs love to throw around 75-80 numbers, but it's not accurate.

Posted by: Karin at January 26, 2009 6:59 AM