moonbattery.gif


« The Binghamton Soda Party | Main | Tax Cheat Geithner Hires Lobbyist as Chief of Staff »


January 29, 2009

Children Taken From Grandparents for Homosexual Adoption

Britain is always a good place to look if you want to see what it will mean for our society that liberal government is becoming alarmingly more powerful. The latest outrage — children denied to their grandparents are turned over by the State to a pair of homosexuals to be raised in an atmosphere of depravity:

The devastated grandparents were told they would never see the youngsters again unless they dropped their opposition.
The couple, who cannot be named, wanted to give the five-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister a loving home themselves. But they were ruled to be too old — at 46 and 59.

The relatively young grandparents have fought for years for the right to raise the kids, but finally knuckled under to the Leviathan "after they faced being financially crippled by legal bills." The government doesn't have a problem with legal bills; it just passes them on to the taxpayers it rapes.

There were several other heterosexual couples who wanted to raise the children, but bureaucrats didn't want to pass up this opportunity to engage in social engineering by having the kids raised in a grotesque parody of a family. Meanwhile, mom is too busy shooting heroin to worry about it. There was no mention of a dad. This is society on moonbattery.

On a tip from Jay Guevara.

Posted by Van Helsing at January 29, 2009 6:59 AM

Comments

I'm a single adoptive parent. Yes, the kids I have adopted are better off with me than they would be in foster care. (Not every state, especially states in the south, see it that way.)

But, realistically speaking, the best place to raise children is with a traditional married heterosexual mother and father. I can't model the dynamics of marriage on my own, and kids need to see that. Also, to grow up balanced and healthy, a kid needs both a mother to kiss his skinned knee and "make it better," and a father to say, "stop whining, it doesn't hurt, that bad."

Whenever there is a good married couple willing to take a child, that should *always* be the preferred option.

Posted by: V the K at January 29, 2009 7:11 AM

Its goverment blackmail from a bunch of socialists scumballs in englands parlament of whores Every memeber of englands parlament should get beheaded

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at January 29, 2009 7:42 AM

Wow that is shocking, especially since the grandparents are so young. In the US there are no real age limits for adoption. My husband and I adopted a US newborn when I was 48 and he was 57. How sad that England had become such a dreadful place.

Posted by: puffdaddy at January 29, 2009 8:02 AM

I just adopted my fourth and I am 56 years old AND a single mom having never been married. My two eldest are in college, the twelve year old and the 2 year old which I have had in my foster home since birth are both at home of course. I have a full time job and own my own home, have a fairly new car, have also a dog, and two cats. None of it is fancy but it is full of love and I am always getting called to take another child to foster.

Shame on these liars who are willing to destroy the lives of two innocent children and devestate their loving grandparents. I would grab those kids and run for our lives before I would subject my babies to such a filthy and deadly lifestyle.

Posted by: Barb at January 29, 2009 8:45 AM

That's just about the saddest thing I've read. My 16 year old daughter came home from a dance extremely upset. We got it out of her that it was about a boy laughing at her. Because both my husband and I were there and interested in raising her right, he was able to tell her that even boys that like her will laugh at her, and I was able to give her that understanding that only a mother (who has been through it) can. Tantrum and blues averted. How can two men or two women give the same kind of counseling to their children?

Posted by: 2keyboards at January 29, 2009 8:49 AM

Britian has sunk to new lows...what has happened to these people!!?

Posted by: TED at January 29, 2009 9:02 AM

Those poor children and grandparents. It particularly ticks me off because I gave birth to my youngest child when I was 41! Too old, my butt!

Posted by: Judith M. at January 29, 2009 10:11 AM

Wow. Just when I think I've heard possibly the worst out of Great Britain, they go ahead and top it. How absolutely disgusting, immoral, unethical, and outright cruel!

They may as well start those kids off in therapy right now, so by the time they're old enough to understand what is really going on, they'll be able to correctly place the blame, instead of on themselves or their heartbroken grandparents.

Posted by: Seamus at January 29, 2009 10:44 AM

As I said before, I'd be more disgusted if I didn't know for a fact that generally there aren't enough married heterosexual couples who volunteer for adoption. Not even close. There are hundreds of thousands of kids living in group homes who would appreciate even a homosexual couple over that.

I know a lot of conservatives do adopt. However, I did outreach on behalf of an regional government for adoption and foster care. I met far too many couples who said it was immoral to put kids with single parents or gay couples who in the next breath scoffed at the notion of ever doing it themselves. Hypocrisy always annoys me.

Posted by: Anonymous at January 29, 2009 11:00 AM

Brits are, sadly, a bellwether for the future of America since we decades ago also lost our moral base.
American kids will soon be turned over to homosexual adopters, if they aren't already, since our various governing entities are either leaning towards "the gay side" or are homosexuals themselves.
Instead of just moaning about this state of affairs, why not DO something about it?
We can start by becoming much more pro-active and end by voting out the pervs!
(http://genelalor.com/)

Posted by: Berlet98 at January 30, 2009 1:21 AM

I'm a social worker in a liberal big city, and even here good social work practice dictates that a child should be placed with family members FIRST. If there are no available family members, then the child is placed in a foster home. And we have grandparents in their sixties raising children. Many do quite well.

So what the heck is wrong with these people??

Posted by: MST at January 30, 2009 8:33 AM

e n g a l i n d swings like a pendulum do
we'll raise grandkids but not by you
westminster abbey stinks like a pig pen
the horror in the faces of the little children

Appologies to Roger Miller

Posted by: czuch at January 30, 2009 8:38 AM