« TSA Puts Moonbattery Before Security | Main | Open Thread »
January 3, 2009
Another Moonbat Goes Off the Rails
Evidence continues to accrue that moonbattery and mental health do not go hand in hand. From a note written by Jim Blanning, before he shut down Aspen by delivering gasoline bombs to local banks and then blew out whatever served him as brains:
DO NOT F*CK WITH US OR THERE WILL BE MASS DEATH LIKE WE HAVE ALL BEEN PART OF OVER IN THAT F*CKING QUICKSAND TRAP THAT ROVE'S AND CHANEY'S MONKEY BUSH PUT US INTO WHERE SO MANY OF OUR SOUL MATES AND BROTHERS DIED VERY HORRIBLE DEATHS. …
THIS IS AS MUCH A SUICIDE MISSION AS A BANK ROBBERY, SO, IF IT GETS F*CKED UP, OUR SOULS HAVE ALREADY BEEN DESTROYED AND WE WILL ALL DIE LIKE THE RAG-HEAD MARTYRS THAT WE WERE KILLING OVER THERE. THEY TRAINED US GOOD FOR THIS SORT OF THING. …
WE LEARNED SOME NASTY CHEMISTRY FROM THE MARTYRS, ETC.
Looks like he also learned some nasty moonbattery from MSNBC, etc.
What comes first, psychosis or moonbattery? This question would make a fascinating subject for a dissertation in psychopathology.

Hat tip: Michelle Malkin; on a tip from V the K.
Posted by Van Helsing at January 3, 2009 10:23 AM
Comments
What comes first, psychosis or moonbattery?
Moonbattery is a symptom of psychosis, or at least that's what they'll argue when it suits them. Sufferers can blame their nefarious ways on their health and get free rehab treatment to boot. The US Taxpayer will have yet another way to to pay the price for moonbattery.
Imagine what said rehab would include under Obamacare: Doublespeak 101, kumbya self affirmation and Gaia worship. Ergo, the treatment would perpetuate the disease.
Posted by: The MaryHunter at January 3, 2009 10:45 AM
(THE DEAD ARE JUDGED)
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
YES RECORDS ARE BEING KEPT IN HEAVEN ON EVERYONE.
THERE IS STILL A CHANCE FOR THOSE THAT ARE LIVING BY ACCEPTING JESUS CHRIST AS LORD AND SAVIOR. JESUS WILL WIPE AWAY ONES SINS IF THEY REPENT TURN FROM THEIR WICKED WAYS AND SERVE THE LORD. GOD SAID: IF ONE TRUELY REPENTS HE WILL NOT REMEMBER THEIR SIN.
STUDY THE BIBLE AT (BIBLE.COM) ARE (BLUE LETTER BIBLE.COM) DUE THE RESEARCH FOR YOUR SELF.
ON JUDGEMENT DAY THE BIBLE SAYS THAT THERE WANT BE ANY EXCUSE FOR ANYONE. BECAUSE HE HAD GIVEN EVERYONE TIME TO REPENT BUT THEY REPENTED NOT. JESUS SAID: I HAVE COME INTO THE WORLD TO NOT TO JUDGE THE WORLD BUT I HAVE COME INTO THE WORLD THAT THROUGH ME ONE MAY BE SAVED WHO EVER BELIEVE ON ME WILL PERISH BUT WILL INHERIT ETERNAL LIFE. IT IS MY FATHER WHO WILL CONDEM, BECAUSE THEY BELIVE NOT THE SON WHO IS THE SAVIOR OF THE WORLD.
JESUS IS THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE, ANYONE BELIEVES ON ME WILL NOT DIE BUT WILL LIVE. (JESUS IS SPEAKING OF ETERNAL LIVE IN HEAVEN)
THE BIBLE SPEAKS OF A PLACE WHERE THEIR IS NO MORE DYEING , NO MORE CYRING, NO MORE SUFFERING,
A PLACE WERRE THERE IS PEACE, YOU DON'T HAVE WORRY ABOUT FINDING A JOB, ARE HOW YOU ARE GOING TO TAKE CARE OF YOURSELF AND YOUR FAMILY.
BUT PLACE FULL OF JOY FOR EVER AND EVER.
START READING THE BIBLE THIS PLEASES THE FATHER
STOP TRYING TO PLEASE MAN, PUT GOD FIRST.
MAY GOD BLESS THE READER THAT READS AND UNDERSTANDS. STAY AWAY FROM CULTS,AND FALSE RELIGION. IF YOU STAY WITH THE BIBLE YOU WILL NEVER BE CONFUSE, AND NO ONE CAN EVER DECEIVE. YOU,
Posted by: Tonya at January 3, 2009 11:02 AM
Well, at least he won't be posting anonymous comments on this blog any more.
Posted by: V the K at January 3, 2009 11:07 AM
Just one question.... who's "Chaney"????
Posted by: ToddonCapeCod at January 3, 2009 11:08 AM
Wasn't Jim Blanning up for two different appointments by Obama and there was internal disagreement in Obama's inner circle over which appointment was the more appropriate. I think the stress of waiting is what got to Mr. Blanning and now this happened--one more problem that Obama's indecision caused.
Posted by: SnowSnake at January 3, 2009 12:14 PM
Is it me or does every moonbat rant sounds like it comes came out of an automatic random speech generator?
Posted by: Arthur at January 3, 2009 1:01 PM
I hate it when people type in all caps. It makes it hard to follow.
Posted by: conservativeteen at January 3, 2009 2:42 PM
"V the K at January 3, 2009 11:07 AM"
Ha ha ha - good one. Although I suspect that another troll will raise itself up to replace this one.
Posted by: PabloD at January 3, 2009 2:53 PM
The media has lit the fuse. You cannot spend years spewing out the "Bush, Cheney, hate hate hate" rhetoric without it having some material consequences.
The irrational hate-frenzy that the TV and press have unleashed is only just starting to emerge. There are two whole generations that hate without even knowing WHY. Just say "Sarah Palin". Hate. "Why?" Well...umph, uh...she KILLS MOOSE...and uh...SHE'S a right wing Christian nut and...uhhh...
These morons have no clue. It's almost GENETIC at this point that they have hate for anything that isn't left of Stalin.
We are in deep trouble.
Posted by: matt at January 3, 2009 4:27 PM
I wonder where that leftie who argued on and on with me in that post about the woman who faked the "B" in her cheek is today?
I remember him saying something about all that right-wing hate speech having consequences. Couldn't prove it, of course,.. dum, de, da, da dumm,..
I'm sure you're here somewhere,..
**crickets**
Posted by: The Him at January 3, 2009 4:53 PM
If he hates mass wealth in his home town, then why in hell does he hate Bush so much? After all, it is Obama's Hollyweird buddies and supporters that dot the Aspen landscape with their big money.
Posted by: William at January 3, 2009 6:01 PM
One less crzy rediculous moonbat to mess up america noew lets have him creamated and his ashes showered over SAN FRANFREAKSHOW
Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at January 3, 2009 7:43 PM
Everyone I need your help on understanding the scriptures on divorce. Here are some scriptures when Jesus is explaining about divorce. Many minister cannot explain them, so they avoid certain topics.
Mathew chapter 5 verse 32 Reads: But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unaithfulness, causes her to become and adulterres, and anyone who marries the divorce women committs adultery.
Luke Chapter 16 verse 18 Reads: anyone who divorces his wife and marries another women commits adultery, and the man who marries a diborced women commits adultery.
1Corinthians chapter 7 verse 11 Read: A wife must not separate from her husband. But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not diborce his wife.
1Corinthians chapter 7 verse39 Reads: A woman is bound to her huysbans as long as he lives, But if her husband dies, she is gree to marry anone she wishes, but must belong to the Lord. In my judgement (Paul is speaking) she is happier if she says as she is.
1Corinthains chapter 7 verse 28 Reads: But married people will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this (this is Paul speaking). Then he further explains that "What he means is that brothers is that the time is short.
I understand that If I get married God must help me and direct me to the right person. And we must not divorce. But if he sleeps with someone than I am free to divorce him. But If we just cannot get along than I can separtate but not divorce and I must remain unmarried. This is my understanding I might be wrong.
(Bible.com) or (Blue Letter bible) I will check back for your answers.
Posted by: Tonya at January 3, 2009 10:03 PM
Anyone care to explain to me what the hell that guy's message is about?
Posted by: cerulean1 at January 3, 2009 10:05 PM
But Jim Blanning looks so "normal" in this photo.
Oops, switching back to the right side of my brain. Yup, too many drugs in the 60s. I can see it clearly now.
Posted by: Oiao at January 3, 2009 10:14 PM
How come the media doesnt talk about this?
Posted by: Anonymous at January 4, 2009 12:01 AM
Anonymous
"How come the media doesn't talk about this?"
We don't have any mainstream media--this blog is a media and we are talking about it.
The mainstream media died last year! If you search the mainstream media all day, you will find more truth and unbiased information about the economy, politics, and world affairs in a colored ad they insert in those fishwrappers--like the ones from K-mart or Wal-mart. (Check the prices, where the goods are from, and the ethnicity of the models as well as the nature of the goods being sold--especially the toys.)
Posted by: SnowSnake at January 4, 2009 8:35 AM
Im sure some liberal collumists for some ultra liberal left-wing news paper will blame conservative talk radio the same way some jerk liberal collumist for the NYTs tried to blame conservative talk radio for the OKLAHOMA CITY bombings just like stupid liberal scribblers are always doing
Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER at January 4, 2009 1:15 PM
He was just mad because everyone was harshing his mellow.
Posted by: Anonymous at January 4, 2009 7:03 PM
Is it me or does every moonbat rant sounds like it comes came out of an automatic random speech generator?
Posted by: Arthur at January 3, 2009 1:01 PM
Pretty much. For all that moonbats constantly talk, they really have only a very few topics.
When was the last time you heard a moonbat talk about something besides race, gay rights, the environment, or war?
Posted by: mandible claw at January 5, 2009 11:59 PM

