moonbattery.gif


« Blackbird: The Browser for Black People | Main | Open Thread »


December 12, 2008

Moonbats Protest Chicago Cops' Guns

It isn't only civilians whose guns moonbats would like to take away; they even want to disarm the police:

A parade of 150 protesters, many of them Chicago teens, slowly made their way into a public meeting at Chicago Police headquarters Thursday night, voicing in unison their displeasure with the police department's increased firepower: "1, 2, 3, 4, No more M4s!"
The group, whose members are part of the Live in Peace Campaign, was referring to the powerful M4 carbines that police brass said earlier this year would be given to officers to match the powerful weapons now in the hands of criminals.
Jose Juarez, 16, who lives in the Marquette Park neighborhood and attends Gage Park High School, was among the protesters attending the monthly Chicago Police Board meeting at 35th and Michigan. He wanted to voice fears that if police increase their firepower, the criminals will follow suit.

I'd never thought of it like that before. Maybe if we arm the police with limp flowers, criminals won't use weapons at all.

Jose is off to a great start. The sky is the limit for budding young community activists in the Windy City — so long as they play ball with the Chicago Machine.

MP4.jpg
An MP4: What it takes to defend public order in a place like Chicago.

On tips from MP and Burning Hot.

Posted by Van Helsing at December 12, 2008 8:42 AM

Comments

I hope they change their minds in Chicago and provide the police with some 10 gauge magnum automatics for long shells. Some special ammo would go along: explosive shells, high velocity sabots, flechettes, teflon covered tungsten pellets, fragmented spring-wire wrapped explosive slugs, etc. When people shoot at cops, they should stand a good chance of having large portions of their heads and bodies converted into a red mist that drifts with the wind.

Posted by: SnowSnake at December 12, 2008 10:13 AM

Moonbats: Citing teenagers as the voice of reason since 1968.

Posted by: Jaeson at December 12, 2008 10:14 AM

Well they're bound the win. The creative genius of rhyming "4" with "4" will just bowl their opposition over. Truly these are the leaders of the future.

Posted by: Archonix at December 12, 2008 10:22 AM

I like the idea. Maybe they should push for the cops to have to follow all the gun laws and restrictions the little folks have to.
Maybe then the cops would not be so fast to disarm the populus. . .

Posted by: JD at December 12, 2008 10:33 AM

Equip law-enforcement, especially in Chi-town, with those portable (albeit heavy) .50 cal. rifles -- talk about "red mist" -- Lord! Hit the tip of the little finger, off comes the whole arm, shoulder and half the chest. Think the bad guys might run like hell when they see one of those bad boys?

The end of crime as we know it.

Posted by: jc14 at December 12, 2008 10:50 AM

I wonder if whoever programmed those fears into Jose went on to speculate just what the criminals would increase their firepower TO. What's the upgrade path?

Posted by: Mr Evilwrench at December 12, 2008 11:14 AM

Police should have to follow the same gun laws as innocent law abiding citizens. Why are they allowed to carry guns and people are not allowed to defend themselves?

Posted by: Frank White at December 12, 2008 12:32 PM

That's a good looking weapon; where's the M203?

Posted by: Henry at December 12, 2008 12:46 PM

I'm sure the criminals in Chicago (even the ones not in elected office) would love it if the cops were unarmed or poorly armed compared to them.

Posted by: CoderInCrisis at December 12, 2008 1:07 PM

I prefer a well tuned smiper rifle to a blow-em-away gun.
"He's got on body armor he's got on body armor. Well he dosen't have it on his head shoot him there." ~Ron White.

Posted by: Big_Daddy at December 12, 2008 1:27 PM

The M4 will punch through kevlar, unless they're wearing SAPI plates. You pick your weapon in context. It's hard to engage multiple hostiles in close quarters with a sniper rifle, especially a bolt. I'd have my M4 strapped on even if I was out sniping.

Posted by: Mr Evilwrench at December 12, 2008 2:29 PM

You mean only a puny 150 mindless moonbats chanting this stupid mindless poppycock? I,ll bet they wanted more teenage munant ninny zombies but couldnt get enough STILL A BUNCH OF MINDLESS LIBERAL MOONBAT IDIOTS

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at December 12, 2008 3:26 PM

The "powerful" M4? HAHAHAHA
It's a .22 sportsfans. A poodleshooter.

Posted by: single stack at December 12, 2008 3:43 PM

single stack I can assure you the M4 isn't a .22. It's likely the police are using the .223 caliber, although some reputable companies make a fantastic .308 caliber. Problem is, that .308 will go through a lot of different materials, cinder block and drywall being a few examples. That's why I prefer it, personally, but it's also a consideration when you're analyzing a gun for use by a police force. I doubt they'd want errant shots going through walls and killing civilians. The 5.56 definitely comes in armor-piercing rounds, which is the main factor in using AR's by police forces. That's what I've read at least. The bad guys are getting sophisticated, so the police have to step it up. Some would have you think it was the other way around, but some people are stupid.

Posted by: cowlove at December 12, 2008 4:20 PM

cowlove

You have it right. Heavy weapons in an urban environment would not always be optimum. That's why I suggest shotguns with a wide variety of ammo. (And the proper training). If a cop has the choice of ammo that can cut down highline poles and penetrate engine blocks and then switch to something like dove shot or plastic/rubber slugs, he has a chance of doing his job without killing everybody around or getting killed himself.

An auto 10 gauge magnum with a drum of double ought buck is an awesome weapon. When you multiply the number of 32 cal pellets per shot and then consider the number of shots you can let loose, it is more terrifying than a machine gun.

As far as rights go, anybody who shoots at a cop has only one right--an immediate violent death.

Posted by: SnowSnake at December 12, 2008 5:50 PM

A pistol is an appropriate weapon to carry for a person who is NOT expecting a life-threatening encounter. You carry a pistol "just in case." Every cop should have an M-4 or similar firepower within arm's reach, precisely because they are expected to deal with life-threatening situations.

Posted by: PabloD at December 12, 2008 6:42 PM

As far as rights go, anybody who shoots at a cop has only one right--an immediate violent death.

Remember this piece of crap?

Take him out back, shoot him, leave him in a shallow ditch.

Can't imagine what stopped anyone from voting for the death penalty in this case. If anyone "deserves" it, he does.

Posted by: cowlove at December 12, 2008 7:16 PM

(And the proper training)

You've really hit the nail on the head here. You can give police forces all the M4's you want. Hell, give them some .50's. It doesn't make much difference if they aren't experts with their weapons. I'd trust a trained sniper who only had an air rifle before I'd trust a pretender with a M-16 clicked to full auto.

Do you remember when Glock came out with their compensated models? They were supposed to generate a downward recoil to help officers avoid the unfortunately common problem of firing into crowds after getting the first two rounds off. Gun recoils, aim gets higher and higher, innocent people die. Now, there are a lot of problems with compensated pistols (blindness when firing at night, powder burns and residue, etc.) but it's the fundamental theory that really stinks. Don't make weapons that correct human error. Eliminate the human error through proper training. Get that double-tap down. Understand proper firing opportunities and methods.

So, give these police departments all the firepower they need, with a caveat. Make sure these tools are used to best of their ability and only to the best of their ability.

Posted by: cowlove at December 12, 2008 7:33 PM

You've really hit the nail on the head here. You can give police forces all the M4's you want. Hell, give them some .50's. It doesn't make much difference if they aren't experts with their weapons.
Posted by: cowlove at December 12, 2008 7:33 PM

cowlove - You got that right on. Especially in the PC world of affirmative action hiring. Consider the number of people on the Chicago force who were hired solely because they were the PC race/gender. Many because of Obama’s “community organizing”.

Kinda gives you shivers, huh?

Posted by: Jimbo at December 12, 2008 8:38 PM

Bah, you want a gun for urban warfare? Look no further:
The AA-12
Wait 'til you reach the 2 minute mark of the movie. This gun will make any criminal think twice.

Archonix, I too noticed the "clever" rhyme they came up with. Moonbats=morons

Posted by: conservativeteen at December 12, 2008 10:03 PM

Just like the so called MILLION MOM MARCH it wasnt even close to being a million moms becuase they had more important things to do then listen to the mindless clucking of DOAANA DEES THMASES and ROSIE O,DONNELL but since it was in the WINDY CITY run by a demacrtaic windbag RICHARD DALEY the CHICAGO TRASHBIN probibly made big time hay outta this

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at December 12, 2008 10:14 PM

single stack I can assure you the M4 isn't a .22. It's likely the police are using the .223 caliber


Um, yes it is a .22. A .223 is a centerfire .22.
Anyone who complains that it is "powerful" doesn't know anything about guns.
That's what I was laughing at.
I'm very familiar with the AR platform and variants like the M4. I've been shooting them for years.
My club shoots at the local police range and the cops use M4s chambered for 5.56 NATO, which is NOT the same as .223 Rem.

Posted by: single stack at December 12, 2008 11:17 PM

Here's a video of a couple of guys trying out a Russian Saiga 12. I guess you can get these with a 20 round clip. They take just about any shotgun shell in 12 gauge.

You never know when an Epson printer or something will annoy you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJRFqcukWCo&eurl=http://smf.rantradio.com/rantvideo-general/300-round-per-minute-automatic-military-shotgun-(video)/0/&feature=player_embedded

Posted by: SnowSnake at December 12, 2008 11:44 PM

Why shouldn't the police have powerful weapons? The Left is so incredibly naive, it just kills me.

I was a police officer for 8 years in Bangor, Maine. My department ended up getting some M-4s after a guy went nuts and sprayed about 80 rounds of 7.62 from his crappy second-story apartment. He was using a Chinese made SKS. The patrol officers had nothing to respond with, so they had to wait until SWAT rolled up, which takes quite a while--Bangor doesn't have full-time SWAT, so guys had to respond from their homes or come in off the street to gear up.

These people are stupid and they get good people killed. They also ruin entire cultures, in my opinion, because they poison the thinking of others. Good only wins if good tries, and evil doesn't just go away. March away Moonbats, and don't stop until you get to France...

Posted by: Douglas at December 13, 2008 2:41 AM

Liberals feel that the only reason these poor people like Jose, are shooting at the police is that no one understands them. Give them more Free stuff they'll be happy and become church going upstanding citizens.

Take away from the people who have (Including guns)and Chicago will become paradise.

So folks Obamessiah has the right Idea.......

Posted by: davidfxs at December 13, 2008 7:05 AM

Can I interest anyone in Illinois in some Beach front property in Arizona?

Posted by: davidfxs at December 13, 2008 7:08 AM

"Every cop should have an M-4 or similar firepower within arm's reach"

I know it's not the same as an M4, but I wish Ruger was still making the PC9 and PC4.

Posted by: Henry at December 13, 2008 8:38 AM

These idiots want gun control but their still shooting off their mouths

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at December 13, 2008 9:33 AM

Rem .223 is not QUITE the same as 5.56x45 (lower pressure and slightly shorter neck) but to even compare it to .22LR is absurd. 5.56x45 is not "powerful" in comparison to some much bigger rounds, but an SS109 5.56 is specified to penetrate 1/2" steel plate at 100m. Your .22 wouldn't even dent it.

You can get AR-15/M4 upper receivers in 7.62x39, and the latest is the 6.8SPC, which as I understand compares favorably to 7.62x51 in terminal ballistics and thumping power. The lower receiver won't allow for .308/7.62x51.

Police (and bystanders) would definitely most often be best off with one of the 12ga options in a populous urban environment, especially inside. I would be offended to have police bullets whizzing through my wall just because my neighbor was acting up.

Posted by: Mr Evilwrench at December 13, 2008 9:42 AM

5.56x45, 7.62x39, 6.8spc, 50 BMG... that's why I like this website: we know how to celebrate diversity, and we have tolerance for fans of all calibers, large and small.

Posted by: PabloD at December 13, 2008 10:42 AM

I never compared the .223 to the .22LR. If you will reread my posts you'll see that I never mentioned it. And the .223 IS a .22, hence the nomenclature. It's also a pipsqueak. The only cartridges less powerful are the rimfires.
You seem to have missed the point of my first post. I was laughing at the ignoramus who was complaining that the M4 is too powerful.
I'm very familiar with the ballistics of the .223 and the 5.56 NATO. They will penetrate house walls in an urban environment so if the cops go after a bad guy in your neighborhood it might be a good idea to be prepared to be offended.

Posted by: single stack at December 13, 2008 1:06 PM

If law abiding citizens were allowed to openly carry assault rifles there would be a lot less crime to begin with.

Posted by: Frank White at December 13, 2008 1:10 PM

I was watching Weaponology and saw a shotgun type gun that fired 40mm mortar rounds. Can anyone tell me the name and how about that for fighting scumbags? ;)

Posted by: Farmer Ted at December 13, 2008 2:30 PM

Farmer Ted,
If it was a single shot, break open type weapon it was probably a M79, nicknamed the "bloop tube" from the Vietnam era.
It is a Class III destructive device and falls under the National Firearms Act of 1934, meaning it is legally treated the same as a machine gun.

Posted by: single stack at December 13, 2008 4:17 PM

Now you know what the old 70s peace symbol was the sign of the AMERICAN CHICKENS And i bet that chicagos jerk mayor RICHARD DAILY was fully behand these 150 mindless moonbat zombies

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at December 13, 2008 10:30 PM

Singlestack,
It was a semi-auto with a round magazine in the middle of the weapon. I can't remember the name but the host of the show Mack former SEAL siad it has been deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq. Thanks for the info.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at December 14, 2008 10:50 AM

Farmer Ted

I think you might mean the M-32 Multiple Shot Grenade Launcher. It can throw 6 40mm rounds in about 3 seconds. I don't think this is a tactical police weapon. It would be possible to wipe out whole neighborhoods with this thing. (Maybe all the police who watch some of the marches in San Francisco should be required to carry these with extra drums of ammo.)

http://www.blackfive.net/main/2006/03/marines_fight_w.html

Posted by: SnowSnake at December 14, 2008 1:55 PM

Snowsnake,
Thanks for the info. It's quite an impressive weapon.

Posted by: Farmer Ted at December 14, 2008 2:10 PM

150 people?

ok.

Posted by: young whippersnapper at December 14, 2008 2:37 PM

WARNING I ACCELARATE FOR MOONBATS

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at December 14, 2008 7:22 PM

There is a weapon similar to the M32 that is available to law enforcement that shoots beanbags.
There is also a revolving cylinder shotgun that is similar to the M32 called the Street Sweeper that makes moonbats wet their pants faster than almost anything else.
I don't know if the 3 weapons share a common pedigree or not.
If they would replace the Mack guy that show would be ok. I think he's a dingleberry.

Posted by: single stack at December 14, 2008 7:32 PM

PHASERS ON STUN

Posted by: Spurwing Plover at December 14, 2008 10:14 PM

Well I definitely learned something single stack.

I'm still not sure I'd call the .223 a poodleshooter, but it's amazing what a little more load will do... ;)

Posted by: cowlove at December 15, 2008 12:04 PM