« Even Breathalyzers Are Racist | Main | Curtailing Public Drunkenness Is Racist »

That's not all they swallow, I hear.

This is so asinine -- emphasis on "as," with an extended "s" sound.

Man, the puns and double entendre's just keep coming, huh -- hey, there's another one!

I'm going to completely rip off a one-liner I saw over at AOSHQ:

Did you expect the homos to just bend over and take it?

Thanks, VH. I was just reading through the thread on the subject on Michelle Malkin, and boy did I find a rich prize: a moonbat troll posted a complete manifesto (post #164) to show us in a clear and unambiguous way how these people think:

If you have to be forced to be tolerant, you're an a-hole. I'm glad you're angry. Go cry somewhere. Or maybe get out your big gun! You're clinging to it right now! LOL.

You're losing. We took a giant step on 11/4, and we're not stopping until we drag all your asses out of the darknesss and into the light. If we can't have you, we'll get your kids. We'll teach them to be politically correct, because it's CORRECT.

We'll teach them to love everyone, including those that hate them.

We'll teach them that people are not illegal - they are all the same no matter where they are born and should be able to live where they want. We'll teach them to respect everyone regardless of language, culture, or religion.

We'll teach them to share, that in the words of FDR, "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics." We will teach them that we are all in this together, and we need to have economic justice, and those that oppose that are selfish a-holes who should be scorned and defeated.

We'll teach them that the only kind of intolerance that will be tolerated (and encouraged) is intolerance of intolerance. The rest will be mercilessly crushed by any means necessary, because people like that are evil and selfish and need to be punished. They need to have it shoved in their faces.

You can't stop progress and progressives. We have always been right, and we will always be right.

Fabulous. Simply amazing in its honesty. And horrifying in its revelations. Truly the Obama victory has felled all the masks from the faces of those who would plunge us into darkness.

Viacom should now be forced to have a Christian tv station since their other stations are the disgusting LOGO, MTV, AND VH1.

Is this the first act of the unfairness doctrine?

The nutroot nation is in full swing.

Is a 2nd Civil War coming? Hope not, but if the country keeps heading in the direction it is, who knows.

The only good thing about Bush (except for tax cuts) is that he kept the leftists crazies in check. Now that one of their own will soon be in the Whitehouse - expect stories like this to be seen daily.

Under what law does E-harmony have to comply with these outrageous demands? As a privte company as long as they are upholding the proper disability and equal oppotunity laws, are they doing this simply to avoid a lawsuit?

You notice, teh gheys didn't go after singlemuslim.com

Hey if your intolerent about intolerence, then your being intolerent.

vtk - there are no gay muslims...

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!

heard out of ahmadinnywhackjob's mouth last summer!

Click on (BLUE LETTER BIBLE) On the website and read the bible,type in any topic of scripture, example homosexual, fornication, hell, sin, heaven, holy spirit, and so on. Study the bible for your self right on the computer right at your finger tips, pray ask Jesus to give you the understanding of his word, do this everday and I garrantee you will experience the power of God. The most important thing is salvation, do you want to live in heaven? there is no crying, dieing, murder, hate, no more abandonment, no more worring, will have a job, our pay rent. Just complete happiness, where there is a place and the christians knows this, also the devil know this and he's not going and does not want anyone else to go, is job on earth is kill, steal, and destroy. Wake up love, the bible say choose life rather then death. May God bless you

Outsource eHarmony to another country. Escape from moonbatlandia. I plan on doing this with my business once I am done programming my first video game. Not worth opening up in the US since I'd be regulated to death right out of the starting gate.

not just outsource but move the business out of the US. It isn't worth it to have this happen at all. :(

At our family get-togethers we have it all; Christians, Mormons, atheists, whites, Mexicans(sorry, no Obots). If these liberal freaks ever heard our banter, they'd sue us for sure.

Our family holidays have gotten very United Colors of Benneton over the last few years, too.

We've never considered ourselves to be 'tolerating' each other; have you? But we do have zero-tolerance for stupidity, which probably explains the lack of Oworshippers.

Tolerance is the virtue of a man without conviction.

Tolerance is certainly conducive to a functional society. For example, I tolerate my neighbor when he works on his motorcycle until late into the night. I tolerate my secretary when she spends 15 minutes telling me about her dog's intestinal worms.

Moonbats would be well-advised to realize there are limits to tolerance.

I will not tolerate giving gays more rights than non-gays simply because of who we choose to have sex with.

I will not tolerate threats to my children under the guise of political correctness.

I will not tolerate threats to my inalienable rights under the guise of gun control.

I will not tolerate theft and slavery under the guise of social justice and equality.

You simply cannot force someone to be tolerant of anything. You can reason with them and try to show them your logic.

Or, you can be like fezdogdinoshanaeveryothertroll and attempt to shout people down and insult them, thus entrenching them even more firmly than before in their belief that liberals are generally morons with no knowledge of reality.

Too much is never enough for the homo-left. Case in point: The AIDS racketeers. They could be handed the keys to the National Treasury and they'd STILL bitch about it not being enough. Sorry LGBT freaks, I REFUSE to play along and pretend your perversions are normal.

If they are unhappy about eHarmony's services, let them start their own website, on their own dime.

cowlove:

Please alert your fellow commenters as to the identification of the author of your quote:

Tolerance is the virtue of a man without conviction.

It is, of course, G.K. Chesterton.

http://chesterton.org/

Professor of Philosophy Alfred Freddoso introduced me to the works of Chesterton at Notre Dame. It is a bit of a struggle to sum up Chesterton's works, so I'll crib from the introduction on the American Chesterton Society website:

Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936) cannot be summed up in one sentence. Nor in one paragraph. In fact, in spite of the fine biographies that have been written of him, he has never been captured between the covers of one book. But rather than waiting to separate the goats from the sheep, let’s just come right out and say it: G.K. Chesterton was the best writer of the 20th century. He said something about everything and he said it better than anybody else. But he was no mere wordsmith. He was very good at expressing himself, but more importantly, he had something very good to express. The reason he was the greatest writer of the 20th century was because he was also the greatest thinker of the 20th century.

Perhaps the literary figure who was affected most profoundly by Chesterton was C.S. Lewis. Although Lewis was already an admirer of Chesterton when The Everlasting Man was published in 1925, he could not accept Chesterton's Christianity. "Chesterton had more sense than all the other moderns put together," Lewis wrote, "bating, of course, his Christianity . . . Then I read Chesterton's Everlasting Man and for the first time saw the whole Christian outline of history set out in a form that seemed to me to make sense."

He influenced the conversion of Evelyn Waugh and inspired, at least in part, the original conception of Brideshead Revisited. He indirectly influenced the conversion of Graham Greene following discussions with his future wife who had previously converted through the avid reading of Chesterton's books. He had nurtured to full recovery the ailing faith of both Ronald Knox and Dorothy L. Sayers during periods of adolescent doubt. And to top it all off, an Irishman named Michael Collins was inspired enough by Chesterton's The Napoleon of Notting Hill to lead a movement for Irish independence.

A few of his quotations:

"The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice."

"There are arguments for atheism, and they do not depend, and never did depend, upon science. They are arguable enough, as far as they go, upon a general survey of life; only it happens to be a superficial survey of life."

"Alone of all creeds, Christianity has added courage to the virtues of the Creator. For the only courage worth calling courage must necessarily mean that the soul passes a breaking point and does not break."

"Latter-day skepticism is fond of calling itself progressive; but skepticism is really reactionary. Skepticism goes back; it attempts to unsettle what has already been settled. Instead of trying to break up new fields with its plough, it simply tries to break up the plough."

"To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it."

"He is a sane man who can have tragedy in his heart and comedy in his head."

If you haven't yet had the pleasure of reading Orthodoxy or The Everlasting Man, get thee to a bookstore at once.

VH,

Comparable to a church setting up a brothel? Is that what you think of people born with an homosexual sexual orientation?

Ever seen "girls gone wild", mardi gras, Spring break etc..etc..etc?

Tonya,

You might want to move to Iran were religious fanatics run things.

I am not religious. You have no right to use your religious beliefs to force laws on me or anyone else.

Thanks for the tip GR. I didn't know who to attribute that quote to except the bumper sticker I saw it on.

I have seen outrageous heterosexual sexual behavior. In fact it has been a problem for centuries - rape, molestation, infidelity, 3 somes, wild las vegas weekends, child prostitution, etc., etc.

Stop scapegoating people born with an homosexual sexual orientation.

Oh - and welcome to the 21st century. You can't shame people born with an homosexual sexual orientation anymore. Sucks right [oops - poor choice of words]?

"To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it."

Succinct and profound.

I fully intend on picking up a copy of both those titles you recommended.

Anyone who influenced C.S. Lewis clearly has something to say.

"I have seen outrageous heterosexual sexual behavior. In fact it has been a problem for centuries - rape, molestation, infidelity, 3 somes, wild las vegas weekends, child prostitution, etc., etc."

~Without even bothering to address the substance of those behaviors, why are you using moral equivalency as justification for anything? Your argument amounts to, "I believe heterosexuals have done bad things, so it's ok when these homosexuals do bad things." Is that really how you want to start out?

"Stop scapegoating people born with an homosexual sexual orientation."

~"Scapegoating" implies that I think there is some problem for which homosexuals are responsible. In this case, you're right. The behavior of these homosexuals is the problem, and I hold them fully responsible for it.

"Oh - and welcome to the 21st century. You can't shame people born with an homosexual sexual orientation anymore. Sucks right [oops - poor choice of words]? "

~I have no intention of shaming anyone. They should be ashamed of themselves.

Hey Anon, go back to BlueBoy.com or wherever you came from.

Enough is enough. You don't want tolerance, you liar. You want to break down society. You want social engineering. YOU WANT LITTLE BOYS.

cowlove has it right. You people want the abnormal to be celebrated and promoted as "choice". This new liberal wave of muscle flexing is going to backfire big time. You ain't even SEEN intolerance yet...and intolerance of that which is unhealthy is NOT A BAD THING.

All I can say is I hope somehow I get to see the video tape (or whatever it is) of these fags when they get to the gates of heaven and Jesus turns them away saying "I know you not". As for what they do here, it is their problem, not mine, I know it isn't my duty to judge them. It is rather funny though that if I teach my children it is an abomination in the eyes of God, they understand and avoid it, no matter what they may have heard about it. (meaning I still say being homosexual is a choice of free will, not a genetic implant)

I think the important thing to remember here is that conservatives have been handed yet another defeat.

Seems to be a lot of those lately.

Hey Eric...I think it can be either a choice or "genetic" or some sort of mental pre-disposition.

The point is that it's getting so that YOUR OPINION IS NOW A MATTER OF LAW. When the church can no longer teach that something is a sin, we're in trouble. This marriage thing is exactly that...once it's the "law", churches will be forbidden to teach that it's a sin. That will be considered "hate speech"...which is the other point: no one, not even churches, are stopping homosexuals from doing what they want. They're potentially stopping youngsters from entering that life, and THAT pisses off the gay community. THEY WANT TO RECRUIT, AND HAVING PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT HOMOSEXUALS ARE SINNERS GETS IN THEIR WAY. C'mon, gayboys...you KNOW that's true!

So as far as I'm concerned, gay can certainly do what they want with each other, but not to the point of SOCIALLY ENGINEERING GAY-NESS AS NORMAL.

Hey Yoo-hoo...so far, the liberal victory has sent the stock market down 7,000 points. With victory like that, I'll stay on the side of the vanquished.

Oh...and California STILL rejects gay "marriage". You must count on the courts to once again thwart the will of the people. And you were worried about the Patriot Act!

If McCain had won we'd all be immediately rich, huh?

The markets are responding to the failure of republican leadership. But you already knew that. If not, you have bigger problems than the market.

I think the important thing to remember here is that conservatives have been handed yet another defeat.

So THAT'S all this is to you? It sounds like you don't give a DAMN sbout gays, it sounds like you are USING THEM to further your socialist attacks on private enterprize.

WAKE UP GAYS! Liberals are not your friends, they use you like they use EVERYONE!

I'll parrot VtheK here and ask, why are conservatives "blamed" for Prop 8 passing? Of course conservatives voted overwhelmingly for it. However, the reason it passed is because minorities, specifically blacks (the same blacks that voted as a 97% majority for Obama) voted for it as well. Go preach to them you silly homosexuals. Be forewarned that your recent militant and disgusting behavior is doing nothing but hurting your cause.

"The markets are responding to the failure of republican leadership. But you already knew that. If not, you have bigger problems than the market."

~You're right. The Republicans should have fought harder to regulate the mortgage industry, specifically Fannie and Freddie. Instead, they let the Democrats (see: Barney Frank) insist underqualified minorities with poor credit had an absolute right to own homes, regardless of their ability to pay their loans. And here we are, with a struggling economy desperatly trying to correct for the past 10-12 years of over-inflated housing and credit markets. And there the Republicans lost another key battle. Instead of opposing the bailout and insisting the markets be allowed to correct, they've keeled over and played dead, insisting some corporations and banks were "too big to fail," a decidedly NON-conservative principle.

And honestly, that is among the reasons Republicans lost. They deserved to in that regard. Republicans as a whole have been fiscally irresponsible and soft on social issues recently, and they've paid dearly for it. And now, we're ALL paying dearly for it.

But don't think for a second that raising taxes, punishing the rich, and giving even more handouts to undeserving deadbeats (including irresponsible corporations and lenders) is the solution. Following true conservative principles is the only way out of this mess.

What our dimwitted trolls don't realize is that markets look forward, not backward. The 2000 pt drop since Chairman Zero's ascension is not because of what happened in the past, but because of what investors expect to happen next year.

Which is nothing but loss based on what we can tell from the market so far.

Oh and we have to stay on topic or risk waking our troll.

Um, excuse me, YooHoo, but you apparently know nothing about the stock market.

Investors aren't reacting to things happening now or yesterday or 3 weeks ago; they're reacting to what they think will be happening next year. So why are they pulling - and why have they been pulling - their money out of the market for the last couple of months?

Well, let's see. The steady erosion of the market began about mid-September. That's when Obama took the lead in the polls. Investors already about knew his specific plans for hiking taxes (capital gains most of all). That was worrisome. Then Obama started the insane talk about the govt. taking over 401k’s. That was unnerving. Then came the 'redistribute' comment. That got the brokerage house phone lines lit up. Then Obama was elected. Investors started sheltering their capital, and are continuing to do so. We just elected a president with distinctly Marxist leanings and we're acting surprised that capitalists are bolting for the hills? If investors were at all confident about the value of their investments under Obama, they would not be pulling their money out the way they are.

He has said he'll hold off on his tax hikes, but frankly, few believe he won't bring the hammer down rather decisively at some point in the next couple of years. He could name a Secretary of the Treasury who doesn’t scare the bejesus out of investors, and that might slow the stream of money out of the market. That said, I doubt a substantial population of investors will be placated. They will be looking for ways to move their capital offshore, which is what I think is happening.

Geez...Dino, YooHoo, various Anonymous folks....This board needs a better class of troll. Someone who knows something about the market, the difference between an amendment and a revision, someone with any theological training whatsoever.......hell, how about just someone who includes in their news sources a few outlets right of The Nation?

That the crisis was caused by F and F has been disproven time and time again. Do yourself a favor and look it up.

VK, if you truly believe that we are sinking in anticipation of Obama there is a serious problem with your thought processes. This rout and the events leading up to it have seeds that were sown long before today. And I would ask again- the 87 crash; was it anticipating Clinton or perhaps a delayed reaction to Carter?

The first step in coming to terms with this is recognizing that bad economic policy and leadership by republicans is the cause.

That is how the electorate and history will see it.

I've gotta see this proof that Fannie and Freddie weren't part of the cause of this collapse. Really. Telling me to research it myself is telling me to do your job. Reputable links only please.

V the K:

Beat me to "because of what investors expect to happen next year." Damn your quick typing fingers!

I reiterate what I said at the end of my post about the board needing a better class of troll. I guess these poor souls need something to do with their lives now that the election is over, so we should just pity them.

California just approved a class action lawsuit against e-Harmony on behalf of homosexuals. Someone should sue every gay dating site, gay porn site, and gay organization in California for discrimination. And if the case is thrown out, sue the state.

Why doesn't eHarmony open a subsidiary, say "eFisting" or "eSodomy?"

I know. It's a gift.

Even if I posted links about F&F you won't believe or even read them. Krugman, NPR, Slate and several others have written extensively about this with data to back it up. Just this week the OC Register published a story disproving your contention.

I would post links but I am blocked and it is hard to post from this Blackberry. Yes this is DINO!

You people don't really want proof that your people are the cause. You will go down with the ship believing what you will.

Get that asshole to unblock me and you'll get your links. But if you wanted the truth you could find it but you don't.

Thankfully your numbers are dwindling as the last election showed us.

"Even if I posted links about F&F you won't believe or even read them. Krugman, NPR, Slate and several others have written extensively about this with data to back it up."

Silly me for wanting you to substantiate your position.

Whining about being blocked isn't an excuse as you brought it on yourself.

Republicans should be killed and/or sterilized? Christians should be fed to lions? We should all be disarmed, have our children taken away, and be gassed? You can't hurl such invective and then pretend to be a reasonable person with knowledge of, well, anything really. Of course, the reason you won't provide evidence to support your assertions is because you can't. You're not here for debate; you're here to release your rage over your sad lot in life.

With every comment you make, I pity you more. I know you're going more for a provocation of anger, but I can no more be angry at you than the stray dog who bites me when I try to pet it. It knows nothing but fear and pain, and I suspect you both have similar experiences.

YooHoo:

You wrote:

"...that bad economic policy and leadership by republicans is the cause [of the stock market free-fall].

That is how the electorate and history will see it."

Only if they are as colossally stupid as you are. If you don't realize that a majority of investors

a) could not give a great goddamn about whatever Bush's policies were, as he will be out of office in 60 days, and

b) are faced with tax hikes in the near future (capital gains most of all), AND the prospect of the govt. taking over 401k accounts, AND a pledge from the President to "redistribute wealth", i.e. take capital from those have enough to invest in the stock market (no one invests with their food and gas money) and give to those who do not

and want to blame Bush for them pulling their money out of the market as soon as they could find a suitable shelter for it, then you, sir (or madam) are either

a) a child, or

b) someone who has never had a course on economics or how the engine of capitalism - the market - actually works, or

c) a goddamned idiot

You also know absolutely nothing about the '87 crash, or you wouldn't try to marshall it in support of your argument. That crash was triggered by anticipation of the enactment of a conficatory government financial policy. I can honestly say that I did not catch earlier that you were this stupid: to haughtily cite for support a historical event that invalidates your own claim.

Because you don't know shit, I'll help you out: From Oct. 15-19, 1987, the major indexes of the stock market plunged in value by 30% or more. Initial blame for the '87 crash centered on the interplay between stock markets and futures markets. However, the main culprit was legislation that passed the House Ways & Means Committee on October 15 eliminating the deductibility of interest on debt used for corporate takeovers. Those stocks that led the market downward were precisely those most affected by the legislation. Investors had all the weekend of Oct. 17-18 to fret, then on Monday Oct. 19, they ran for cover. Congressional scuttlebutt was that the bill in its present form would be clobbered in a floor vote of either of the House or later the Senate - information that, thankfully, traveled quickly to Wall Street. (Ultimately, the legislation was stripped of the provisions that concerned the stock market before being enacted into law.) The market rallied immediately, posting a record gain of 102.27 on 10/20, a record broken (186.24!) the next day as the news sunk in. The lesson: The stock market pays attention to what is going on in the legislature.

So I ask you, YooHoo, if this two month downturn in the stock market is traceable to Bush's policies, why haven't they been falling since his policies were passed? Or why haven't they been falling since his policies were inacted? Why have they only been falling since Obama took the lead in the post-convention national election campaign? Why have they accelerated as he is elected and begins to name his cabinet?

Christ, can we find a troll who actually knows anything about how the market works? When a troll actually cites an event to buttress his case that actually undercuts it, and doesn't have the slightest idea that he is providing the rope with which I can hang him, it is clear that he is not merely an unworthy opponent, but a fool.

YooHoo, please replace yourself with a troll with an education. You have a lot of reading to do.

Don't worry GR. It'll just wait until Van Helsing posts again, and then it will populate that comment section with the exact same rhetoric.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

Jay - as sick as those URLs are, they are already taken (checked URL registery - did not try to go to them = yuckie)

Yes, you have a 'Gift'

Speaking of dimwitted characters who are oblivious to the fact that everyone thinks they're an idiot... it's time for 'The Office.'

" You can't hurl such invective and then pretend to be a reasonable person with knowledge of, well, anything really."
For that matter, he can't hurl such invective and then act so surprised and affronted that his venomous, hate- mongering comments got banned.
We have no problem with dissenting views here. What we do have a problem with is sociopathic trolls who not only promote hatred of people who disagree with them, but actually advocate genocide against fellow American citizens who disagree with them.
Hopefully he'll lose interest in us sooner rather than later. Some trolls can be funny, but he's just sad and nauseating.

Oh, and Gays still can not marry in CA.

"Speaking of dimwitted characters who are oblivious to the fact that everyone thinks they're an idiot... it's time for 'The Office.'"

~I was surprised to see Toby came back.

And yes, Michael is an idiot. $500 bucks for "two pounds" of caprese salad. Fantastic.

So, can I sue McDonalds because I don't like hamburgers and they're discriminating against those of us who don't eat hamburgers? Can I force them to serve pizza?

[Of course conservatives voted overwhelmingly for it. However, the reason it passed is because minorities, specifically blacks (the same blacks that voted as a 97% majority for Obama) voted for it as well. Go preach to them you silly homosexuals.]

The homosexuals won't because they are petulant, disease-ridden cowards who can only pick on frail, elderly Christian women with crosses.

Other minorities won't have any compunctions about, as they say, 'laying the smack down' on these deviants. You won't see these perverts acting like this in Compton or East LA.

At least, you wouldn't see them acting that way for very long.