« Elderly Woman Threatened With Jail for Not Converting Bedroom Into Unwanted Garage | Main | Giant Squirrel Attempts to Save Our Democracy »
October 20, 2008
Jon Stewart Wins Pea Brain Award
Congratulations go out to smirking jackass Jon Stewart, who has earned himself a Pea Brain Award with this contribution to the despicable campaign to defile Sarah Palin:
I like the woods…I just don't know if I would pull my vice president out of the woods randomly.
She came out again today. She was talking to a small town, she said that small towns, that's the part of the country she really likes going to because that's the pro-America part of the country.
You know, I just want to say to her, just very quickly…[expletive] you.
That will teach her for daring to bring decency into the cesspool of politics. Stewart's core audience of elitist liberal degenerates lapped this up, grateful for confirmation that they owe Sarah Palin and her reviled ilk no respect whatsoever.
Here's Stewart spewing his purulent moonbattery:
…and here's his well-earned award, compliments of Hugh:

Posted by Van Helsing at October 20, 2008 6:08 PM
Comments
If Stewart thinks that Palin is wrong about places being more pro-American than others, he has likely never been to Berkley, San Francisco, or 'Trinity United.' You won't hear many patriotic rumblings in those cesspools.
Posted by: Smoke TNT at October 20, 2008 6:56 PM
Jon Stewart must have had somthing happen with his brain HE DONT HAVE ANY it must have fell out his ear one day when he sneezed
Posted by: Anonymous at October 20, 2008 7:07 PM
With appologies to disney and pinnocio a song for JON STEWAT done to I GOT NO STRINGS a I GOT NO BRAIN TO MAKE ME THINK,TO MAKE ME REASON TO MAKE ME FINK,I HAD BRAIN BUT NOW IVE GOT NONE,ALL I DO IS SHUN
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at October 20, 2008 7:11 PM
Seriously...does anyone REALLY care what these elitist morons think? Other than their elitist moron friends, that is.
Posted by: matt at October 20, 2008 8:00 PM
he gets the peabrain award only because they've yet to come up with a neutronbrain award. peabrain is stretching it a little, don't'cha think?
Posted by: nanc at October 20, 2008 8:32 PM
Like mentalities seem to attract each other and judging from the filth they spew online, I would imagine that some 99% of BO supporters get their political information exclusively from television comedy and restroom walls.
That's not hard to figure out since liberals prefer an Al Frankin, threat-style kind of violence throughout almost all their humor (not to mention their music...although I have to admit, Silverperson's "I'm f'n Matt Damon" had a couple of pretty good hooks)
But give them a pass: Humor is difficult for liberals when reference to violent themes, obscenities, harsh emotions, deep reflection on the correct pronunciation of foreign words, impressions of 1 or 2 colors, and aromas substitute for thought.
Posted by: Fiberal at October 20, 2008 9:32 PM
Oh my god, get over yourselves. He's pointing out that Palin's archaic line about having to come from a small-town to be a 'real American' is ridiculous. You don't have to be an 'elitist' to think that she's full of crap!
Posted by: dani at October 21, 2008 3:02 AM
Oh my god, get over yourselves. He's just pointing out that Palin's archaic line about having to come from a small town to be a 'real American' is ridiculous. You don't have to be an 'elitist' or even a liberal to see that she's full of crap! Frankly, you'd be hard pressed as a conservative to support this argument, and I haven't yet seen anyone do so without resorting to empty rhetoric.
Posted by: dani at October 21, 2008 3:05 AM
Oh my god, get over yourselves. He's just pointing out that Palin's archaic line about having to come from a small town to be a 'real American' is ridiculous. You don't have to be an 'elitist' or even a liberal to see that she's full of crap! Frankly, you'd be hard pressed even as a conservative to support this argument, and I haven't yet seen anyone do so without resorting to empty rhetoric.
Posted by: dani at October 21, 2008 3:06 AM
And I apologise for the multiple posts, my laptop appeared to have posted every time I editted.
Posted by: dani at October 21, 2008 3:10 AM
And I apologise for the multiple posts, my laptop appears to have posted each time I editted.
Posted by: dani at October 21, 2008 3:13 AM
Fiberal at October 20, 2008 9:32 PM,
That is because they are throwbacks from the stoneage who think "direct action" aka violence is a form of rational debate.
Buy a few guns and lots of ammo.
Posted by: bwahahahahah` at October 21, 2008 3:30 AM
It's okay, dani. You're an elitist who looks down on people who don't share your background and political beliefs, and judging by your poor spelling and punctuation, in addition to your multiple posts, you're not nearly so clever as you think you are.
I'll take Sarah Palin... a woman who's gotten where she is on her own merits, fighting against a corrupt party establishment ... over Obama who used his corrupt party establishment to get where he is and paid them back handsomely in return ... any day of the week.
Small town values versus big city corruption? Easy choice.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 3:31 AM
Just wondering dani, can you please show me where Palin said you have to come from a small town to be a real American?
Posted by: gaffers at October 21, 2008 3:32 AM
Furthermore, even Joe Biden admits, Obama is not ready to handle a major crisis.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 3:32 AM
By the way, look Stewart's info up. He was a fan of socialist presidential candidate Eugene Debbs. Went to the highly prestigious William & Mary, where he quit Pi Kappa Alpha after 6 months due to "hazing." He earns $15 million a year. Now how, I wonder, can you consider yourself socialist when you have attended a very highly selective and upper class school such as W&M and make $15 million a year? I guess when you're a liberal elitist you can call yourself whatever the hell you like.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2008 3:45 AM
I joined Tau Kappa Epsilon in college and never left because of any "hazing".
And that was back when I was younger and more liberal-minded, too.
Posted by: Murff at October 21, 2008 3:58 AM
I've never liked Jon Stewart. He's an unfunny, talentless jackass whose fanbase consists mainly of twentysomethings too stoned to put their sandals on the right feet. He was also the worst Oscar host I've ever seen. If they wanted to get a late- night host to host the Oscars, they should have gone with Conan O'Brien. He's twenty times funnier than Stewart, and has thirty times better range as a comedian.
As I recall, a couple years ago, MAD Magazine did a really funny segment in which they went through an episode of the Daily Show and just made fun of how stupid it is in so many different ways (One of my favorite parts was when it compares the even more obnoxious and talentless Lewis Black on the show to "a belligerent Mr. Potato Head").
Posted by: Adam at October 21, 2008 4:08 AM
The reason a wealthy elitist like Jon Stewart likes socialism is because it tends to lock everybody into their social class. He and the other wealthy who got theirs don't have to worry about up-and-coming rabble taking their place. The people that will be hardest hit by Obama's tax increases aren't the super-rich, but the people making between 250-500K, mostly small businessmen and entrepreneurs, who will find it much tougher to advance to the next level. Of course, you can argue that the people laid off by small business so that Obama's taxes can be paid will also be hard hit.
And that's if you really believe Obama can come up with the trillions of dollars he needs to put 47M people on Medicare, provide universal daycare, make hundreds of billions in 'Big Dig' quality infrastructure improvements, and make college tuition an entitlement... by "only" taxing the top five per cent of taxpayers.
Obama is lucky the American education system has dumbed down mathematics as much as it has. No one with even basic math skills could believe his tax and spending plans add up.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 4:14 AM
dani, you need to apologize for lots of things, dear.
Posted by: Tanda at October 21, 2008 5:10 AM
Elitist??? NO! We are angry Angry ANGRY!
Why are small towns pro-American? Wassila? It's the meth capital of Alaska. That's pro-America???
Not paying taxes [or not wanting to] is pro-America? Why the red states are worried about paying taxes is beyond me. You get more money from the government than you pay in.
We send our sons and daughters to war as well AND we pay for it.
Shame on Sarah Palin for accusing parts of the country of not being pro-American. Shame on you for believing her.
Joe Six-pack can kiss my ass!
You are the small minded pea-brains.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 6:37 AM
Another "classy" and "eloquent" leftist speaks her "mind."
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 6:44 AM
Beware this is your brain on liberalism it like those vegan diets cuase your brains to shrink AND A CHICKEN IS MORE INTELLEGENT
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at October 21, 2008 6:46 AM
I'm not sure why Stewart is even upset. He knows he's not pro-American. And he can't honestly believe that others think he is.
Posted by: NudeGayWhalesForJesus at October 21, 2008 6:54 AM
BTW, there are areas of the country that are anti-American: San Francisco, Berkeley, Madision WI, Ann Arbor MI, Takoma Park MD, the entire state of Vermont, Hollywood.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 6:57 AM
And as far as Sarah Palin goes, what he complains about is actually the main reason the elitist left doesn't like her. She's not one of them.
She made it on her own merits without the help of the leftist-feminist establishment. Leftist-feminism is like affirmative action for women. And if you don't toe that line, they do NOT like you to succeed. Sarah Palin makes leftist feminism seem pointless, unnecessary.
They're afraid more women might realize that they can get ahead and succeed in this world without
signing on to the abortion mentality. I'm not sure why, but abortion is the single defining characteristic of modern leftist feminism.
If she had killed Trig, they would be praising everything about her that they currently denigrate.
Posted by: NudeGayWhalesForJesus at October 21, 2008 7:00 AM
The attacks on Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber just shows how the elite class hates real Americans. I come from a working class background and I take those attacks personally.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 7:06 AM
Hey mef, before you go calling us "Pea brains," you might want to learn the correct way to spell "Wasilla."
Posted by: Adam at October 21, 2008 7:46 AM
Jon Stewart...5'4" and getting smaller
Posted by: JamesJ at October 21, 2008 8:17 AM
"We believe that the best of America is in these small towns that we get to visit, and in these wonderful little pockets of what I call the real America, being here with all of you hard working very patriotic, um, very pro-American areas of this great nation." — Sarah Palin in North Carolina.
Jon Stewart was 100% right to criticise Palin for her despicable assertion that some parts of the USA are more "real" or "Pro-America" than others.
Stewart also made the point that this is an insult to those New Yorkers who enlisted after 9-11 to fight the War on Terror, yet they are not "Pro-America" according to Palin.
This was, at the very least, a poor choice of words by Palin. She needs to apologise.
Those who defend it are not patriots.
If you don't like America then leave.
Posted by: Rob at October 21, 2008 9:31 AM
Somebody tell Bin Laden that he bombed the wrong America! The real-America is the small towns.
Gee, he is going to feel pretty silly.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 9:48 AM
By the way, the "Posted by" is wrong on all of my posts. What's up with that?
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 9:50 AM
Why is Berkley not pro-America?
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 9:56 AM
Why do aliens always land their saucers in pro-America territory?
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 9:59 AM
Liberal elitist Hollywood? Don't tell Arnold or Gary Sinese, Kelsey Grammar, Angie Harmon, Jon Voight, Dennis Hopper, and David Zucker.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 10:06 AM
Speaking of bombing New York can I ask why we are in Afghanistan fighting El Qaeda if they bombed the liberal elitist anti-American city of New York? Shouldn't you wing-nuts be happy?
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 10:13 AM
Hey mef, before you go calling us "Pea brains," you might want to learn the correct way to spell "Wasilla."
Also, Berkeley, Sinise, Al Qaeda, and Grammer,
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 10:24 AM
If Obamunists really love America, why do they say everything in it needs to be 'changed?' America's fine. It's Washington that needs change.
If someone claimed he loved his wife, but bitched constantly that she was "too dumb, too fat, too greedy and why can't she be like one of those European women?" and never talked about all the good she did for other people, I think one would rightfully suspect that he didn't love her that much.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 10:29 AM
Great - you are a better speller than I am. But how about answering the substance of the question.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 10:31 AM
Why the hell are we in Afghanistan if all we are talking about is a meaningless piece of anti American city like New York?
Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2008 10:33 AM
You had the White House for 8 years! You had the Congress for 10 out of 12. YOU are the problem.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2008 10:35 AM
Oh, the old "we do so much good" argument. You can't kill civilians in Iraq - including children - and then say "But we did it for their own good".
If you kill people you aren't forgiven because you give the survivors food.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 10:39 AM
And Wasilla is still the meth capital of Alaska.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2008 10:41 AM
I'm neither a Bush supporter nor a Republican. Bush is a moderate who has governed like a blue-dog Democrat, vastly increasing the size and cost of the government, expanding entitlements, and neglecting the border. If the country had really been run by conservatives we wouldn't be in the mess we're in; conservatives know better than to give out mortgages to people who can't pay them back.
The reason we're fighting in Afghanistan is because real Americans are more charitable toward coastal elitists than coastal elitists are toward real Americans.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 10:43 AM
Real Americans pay their taxes not ask for government handouts.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 10:45 AM
Real Americans are more charitable? In what way? You don't even want to pay taxes. You take more from the government than you pay. So don't tell me coastal elitists are not charitable.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 10:48 AM
Good! So start paying and stop asking for handouts.
Posted by: dmef at October 21, 2008 10:50 AM
OK, if you are to dumb to understand the meaning of the word 'charitable,' --- which does not strictly refer to money, but also means more willing to tolerate and forgive --- I can see why you're dumb enough to support Obama.
There is nothing charitable about taxes. Taxation is money taken away under threat of incarceration. Worse... liberals are notorious for being generous with other people's money, as anyone who has looked over Joe Biden's tax returns well knows.
Also, studies have shown that red states donate higher percentages of income to charity than blue states.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 10:57 AM
And if you want people to stop asking for handouts, start with ACORN. And then go on to La Raza, Planned Parenthood, and all the other left-wing groups funded by tax dollars.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 11:04 AM
First of all, ACORN is not a partisan group, neither is Planned Parenthood or La Raza. They are, however, groups to help the poor register to vote, get health care and reduce poverty. So, I'm guessing the poor are not on the conservative agenda. Not a surprise. But how do you justify calling them left wing groups?
Second, charitable is defined as "showing or motivated by sympathy and understanding and generosity" and I believe that giving to the poor and disenfranchised [and offering them programs to help them acheive the American dream] is charitable. I do not pay my taxes for fear of incarceration. I believe every American should have the opportunites that I've had - people from the mid west, south, north and people from the coastal states. I don't hear this in the Republican rhetoric. Instead the Republican theme is "them against us". Again, not a surprise.
I also believe that pre-emptive war is an extremely bad foreign policy, supporting corporate welfare while bemoaning welfare for the poor in America is unconscionable, taxing the middle class at a higher rate than the wealthy is wrong, wire tapping private citizens without a court order is eroding our civil liberties, torture does not garner information and that the Geneva Convention is not something that should be so easily dismissed. I also believe that if you are going to send our kids over to fight in Iraq you need to provide them with the right equipment and when they get home you provide them with proper medical care.
And lastly, I saw the Kerry/Fonda photo on this site - still circulating. It was photoshopped. It's not real. It's fake. If you still cannot understand that then there isn't any hope that you will ever be able to tell the difference between what IS true and what PASSES as truth.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 11:55 AM
I'm already giving at least 50% of my income to the government at the point of a gun, and I'm squarely in the middle class. How much more do you frigging liberals need? 100%?
Posted by: ent at October 21, 2008 11:59 AM
You can't run a $400 million dollar/day war without paying for it. How does the government raise money to pay for it? Taxes. Don't want to pay more taxes? End the war. It's very simple.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 12:05 PM
If it weren't deathly serious it would be funny how much you believe the stuff you spout. I'd love to see some info about the times ACORN has perpetrated voter fraud that caused Republicans to benefit.
Posted by: Thulsa Doom at October 21, 2008 12:09 PM
You need to learn to distinguish voter fraud from voter registration fraud. Registering as Mickey Mouse is voter registration fraud. Showing up and voting as Mickey Mouse is voter fraud. Huge differences.
ACORN was a victim of work theft. They didn't delibrately register Mickey Mouse. Please.
Why don't you worry about voter suppression. Google it if you don't know what it is.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 12:17 PM
ACORN is non-partisan. Now, it may be that the Democrats benefit from their work but that's only because they register the poor. And the poor usually vote for the Democrat. So ACORN tries to get the poor to register to vote and then the GOP tries to stop them from voting by using voter suppression tactics. (Again, google it in NEWS.)
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 12:22 PM
Okay, my ideas are funny to you. Argue the points then. Don't just say they are funny. What is funny? Torture works? Iraq is a success? We shouldn't give opportunities to all Americans? We shouldn't give returning soldiers good healthcare?
Which of these do you disagree with and why?
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 12:26 PM
Oh, please. Like Obama paid ACORN $800K because he thought they would be non-partisan in their GOTV effort. Like ACORN made any effort at all to flag the questionable registrations before they turned them in. Like Democrats haven't opposed every single measure that's been proposed to stop voter fraud... like requiring photo ID.
Maybe lefties are dumb enough to believe that BS, but we're not.
BTW, how about this smear campaign against Joe Wurzelbacher? This idea that any citizen who asks a question that embarrasses the Dear Leader must be destroyed. How pro-American is that?
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 12:35 PM
Another "Pro-American" Obamunist?
Make no mistake: It is Barack Obama’s destiny to be President of the United States. Justice demands it. The Truth demands it. The World demands it.
Oppressed peoples throughout the world are looking to Obama for hope. For Justice. For an to war. For America to stop attacking the world and for it to start being a just and peaceful member of the community of nations.
If for some reason he is not elected then there will be a cry of outrage so great that America and all its racist institutions will shake and collapse. It will be the end of America and God will damn it for its final and most terrible sin.
Posted by: V the K at October 21, 2008 12:47 PM
ACORN indeed flagged the questionable registrations. How do you think the state found them? Yeah it looks silly that Mickey Mouse registered and ACORN knows that. But they are not allowed to simply discard them - it's against the law - so they flag them.
Obama paid the money to a group called
Citizens' Services who then contracted out to ACORN.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 12:55 PM
Please V the K! You want to talk about extremists? How about the wing-nuts yelling "Kill him!" at Palin rallies?
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 12:59 PM
ACORN is non-partisan. Now, it may be that the Democrats benefit from their work but that's only because they register the poor.
Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees. And the reason that ACORN concentrates on the poor is...? Do you think there are any conservatives working for ACORN? Do you see any Republicans funneling millions to ACORN?
Regarding registration fraud not implying voting fraud, bullcrap. One of their methods is to round up homeless people, drive them to the courthouse, have them register, then have them VOTE ABSENTEE right then and there ... then drive them to the next county and repeat. There have already been hundreds of thousands of fraudulently placed votes,
Posted by: ent at October 21, 2008 1:03 PM
No, voter registration fraud is not voter fraud. Sorry, it isn't.
Hundreds of thousands of fraudently placed votes? Where are the news reports on this? Just give me one.
I would doubt that Republicans would work for a group like ACORN. Helping the poor goes against their grain.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 1:09 PM
I see no one has taken me up on telling me why, for example, torture is good. Someone tell me why torture is good.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 1:30 PM
I can respect the fact that people have different opinions but if you can't defend them, if you can't back them up by facts, then you are just parroting what you've heard. And that makes you ripe for con men.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 1:49 PM
mef,
Noone said "kill him" at a rally where Palin had not even appeared yet.What's that you were saying about passing as truth and what is truth? SUCKER!
Posted by: Farmer Ted at October 21, 2008 1:53 PM
The next time you get an email saying that Obama trained as a terrorist, chek it out before you spread it around. Use snopes.com, politifact.com and factcheck.org.
How you can back a woman who, after a panel files a report saying she was guilty of an ethics violation as governor of Alaska, says straight faced to the camera that she is glad that she wasn't found guilty of any ethics violations is really beyond me. But hey, that's just my opinion.
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 1:57 PM
"Wasilla is still the meth capital of Alaska."
So what? Even if that were true, I could just as easily point out that Obama's from Chicago, the city which wrote the book on political corruption.
"Someone tell me why torture is good."
Not saying I agree with all forms of torture, and the concepts of what defines "Torture" vary, but okay.
A reason why some forms of torture can be seen as good (If properly implemented) is it can cause terrorists being being put through it to reveal vital information about their organizations' plans which can save countless lives.
Posted by: Adam at October 21, 2008 3:03 PM
My point about Wasilla is that how is the meth capital of Alaska pro-American and New York isn't?
I don't believe physical torture works. I can't find any reports that back it up. Do you have any?
Posted by: mef at October 21, 2008 3:14 PM
I don't know about the other fact checking websites, but I took a look at snopes.com recently and they clearly have it in the bag for Obama. In their article debunking the "50 lies" e-mails about him, they couldn't admit to even a single case of him ever being even a wee bit misleading. It was quite an impressive exercise in bend-over-backwards rationalizing.
Posted by: ent at October 21, 2008 3:43 PM
Personally, I find being confronted with patchouli-stinkin' hippie Obamunists not merely offensive, but TORTUROUS. Who can I sue?
Posted by: hiram13pm at October 21, 2008 8:05 PM
It's pretty obvious that mef is following the "get in their faces and yell" tactic that the Obama camp officially sanctioned. It's also pretty obvious that trying to debate him is out of the question as well.
What I don't understand is: why even come here? None of us formed the opinions we have overnight. Chances are you're not going to convince any of us that we're wrong by jumping down our throats from your high horse. We appreciate being talked down to about as much as we appreciate being lied to by a candidate who clearly wants to "spread the wealth around."
Split hairs all you want about difference between voter registration fraud and voter fraud, but the fact is that in several cases over the last few decades Democratic candidates have received votes from the deceased like crazy. Obama's followers pretty much strongarmed the nomination away from Hillary Clinton. Multiple cases of VOTER FRAUD were reported in the primaries-- not that you'll ever see them on any mainstream media outlets. We have a video on the front page today that pretty much points out that the media has a huge bias toward Obama and is willing to look the other way in regards to stories that might cast him in a bad light.
Now... you might believe that the end justifies the means to that end, but we here do not share that belief. Frankly, we don't really care to hear it.
Posted by: Thulsa Doom at October 21, 2008 11:12 PM
Mef, you keep throwing out these "statistics" and "facts" without any references or evidence. I find the attacks on Palin laughable. I have never seen a vice presidential candidate receive so much more flak than the presidential candidate they are running with. Why is that?
Posted by: gaffers at October 22, 2008 1:32 AM
Split hairs over voter fraud vs. voter registration fraud? There's a big difference.
Telling the truth about Palin is not an attack. The report said she was guilty of ethics violations. Sorry, it's true. And she did say she was glad she wasn't accused of any ethics violations. Again, true. Not an attack, just the facts. She doesn't have a clue what the job of the Vice President is. That is the facts as well. I don't have to make stuff up.
And you can find this out for yourself. There's a wide world out there. Try Google News. Search for ethics violation Palin. Then try voter suppression.
Posted by: mef at October 22, 2008 5:55 AM
Split hairs over voter fraud vs. voter registration fraud? There's a big difference.
Telling the truth about Palin is not an attack. The report said she was guilty of ethics violations. Sorry, it's true. And she did say she was glad she wasn't accused of any ethics violations. Again, true. Not an attack, just the facts. She doesn't have a clue what the job of the Vice President is. That is the facts as well. I don't have to make stuff up.
And you can find this out for yourself. There's a wide world out there. Try Google News. Search for ethics violation Palin. Then try voter suppression.
Goodbye and good luck.
Posted by: mef at October 22, 2008 5:57 AM
Just send him to the CELSTIAL DEPT STORE and maybe some aliens that like dorky earthlings will order him
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at October 22, 2008 7:01 AM
Kthankguhbye. Don't let the doorknob hit you on the rump on the way out.
Posted by: Thulsa Doom at October 22, 2008 9:10 AM
And you think Obama has any clue on what the job of President is? You can attack Palin on her experience all you want but here are two interesting facts. Obama has been in the U.S. Senate for 4 years. Palin is the only one among the four that has any true executive experience.
Posted by: gaffers at October 22, 2008 11:27 AM
By the way I googled what you said. The first page has websites such as guntotingliberal.com and womenagainstsarahpalin.blogspot. Not really reliable sources.
Posted by: gaffers at October 22, 2008 11:31 AM
HA! HA! HA! So if it doesn't fit your world view it's liberal. You guys crack me up!
Posted by: mef at October 22, 2008 12:44 PM
HA!HA!HA!
You guys crack me up.
If it doesn't fit into your world view it's liberal.
HA!
Posted by: Anonymous at October 22, 2008 12:46 PM
What the...
The report from the panel looking into troopergate said that Palin had violated the ethics clause. How is that liberal??? This is from the panel she appointed.
You guys have some screws lose.
Oh, and those aliens who might want to buy Stewart are those the same ones that land thier saucers in the "real" America?
Posted by: Anonymous at October 22, 2008 12:53 PM
What the...
The report from the panel looking into troopergate said that Palin had violated the ethics clause. How is that liberal? This is from the panel she appointed.
You guys are funny.
Posted by: Anonymous at October 22, 2008 12:53 PM
Go Jon you rock. You should have said FU** you like a 100 times to her.
Posted by: tricklyboy at October 22, 2008 8:18 PM

