« An Abortion Survivor Takes on the Obamessiah | Main | Lindsay Lohan: Another Dimwitted Degenerate for Obama »

Ugh.
I can't decide which is more repulsive: Their blasphemies against God, or saying that having Trig Palin sucked out of the womb and chopped to bits because he had a disability would be a "Rational and even humane thing." They have no right to talk about religion or the Lord because they are atheists whose supposed knowledge of God and the Christian faith is based entirely off of slanderous stereotypes, and they have no right to talk about morality, because they have no morals, or at least massively misguided morals (Respecting the sanctity of trees' lives, yet having no problem with aborting babies that will be disabled).
I have a couple mild learning disabilities. If my mom had known in advance that I would be born with those conditions, think the Slog jackals would have advised her to abort me?

Is it irony? These people claim to be "pro-choice" and not "pro-abortion" but when a woman makes the choice NOT to have an abortion they get extremely bent out of shape. No. It's not irony, it's revealing. It shines a big fat spotlight on the fact that the left is an evolutionary mistake and without doubt will eventually abort itself out of existence.

It's one of those damned if you do and damned if you don't things. They would be piling on either way. They'll call her inhumane for not doing it, but what really pisses them off is she denied them the opportunity to smear her as a hypocrite, not that they've needed any legitimate issues to smear her.

They really, really, really don't get the whole religion thing.

Religion doesn't have a monopoly on mercy or morality.

I've long held that pro-life advocates would do well to argue against abortion on its own principles and leave religion out of it. It's wrong to have an abortion because abortion is an affront to decency and humanity, not because God says it's wrong. Bringing one's faith into the argument, even if it is relevant, distracts from the point and gives one's enemies ammunition.

Given the "pro-choice" contempt towards disabled children, I'm surprised the disabled community isn't more up in arms against them.

V the K-

They really don't "get" anything. You have to remember these are people who don't innately understand the world. They have to try to grasp it by doing social studies because at a basic human level they're unsocialised. They're the kind of people who talk about society and diversity but are completely incapable of handling social situations with anyone not like themselves. They want to recast the whole world in their image because they can't handle the variety it actually contains.

Arthur, it's not just the pro- choice community, it seems to be liberals as a whole who have little compassion for the disabled. As I mentioned in a post a few weeks ago, I was once in a political debate on Youtube with an ultra- liberal jerk (ultra as in, he bragged about how he's helping to start a Communist revolution in the US, and is recruiting urban gang members as his foot soldiers). He at one point made the comment that all conservatives are "Retards." I told him I took offense at that statement because I have a couple mild disabilities, and he responded by calling me a "Genetic mistake" for that reason. Also, the movie 'Tropic Thunder,' directed by and starring outspoken Obama fan Ben Stiller, had several scenes that were really insulting towards the mentally disabled, so much so that several disabled advocacy groups organized boycotts of the movie.

Just look at the "logic" in this statement -

"return to nothing that which was still a no-thing"

If something is NOTHING, why would it have to be "returned" to nothing. It's OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING.

It's really truly sad that these people have such DISDAIN for anyone with a real sense of morality and decency, religious or not. I suspect the OP would likely be right at home, and not the least bit concerned by the lack of morality and basic decency on display at the Folsom Street Fair, the multitude of GP Parades and other such depravities of the "Pride" community.

But God Gaia forbid that someone would actually see some sort of value in any person born without "PERFECT" (in their judgment) attributes. Quetion I have is: WHO made THEIR judgment the standard? If SOCIETY is not the standard-bearer, what makes them think THEY are qualified to hold it?

God help the poor soul that gets stuck in an elevator with moonbats like that joker from Slog.

I would comment, but anything I have to say used to be called "unprintable".

No, SpideyTerry...

God help the moonbat from 'slog' that get's stuck in an elevator with *me*.