« Access Problems | Main | A Crack in the Muslim–Moonbat Alliance »
August 2, 2008
Report from Gomorrah
It's hardly surprising that Nancy Pelosi would back the Obamessiah's plan to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, in light of the constituency she represents. Ralph Peters compares San Francisco to Calcutta. More apt comparisons would be to Sodom and Gomorrah.
To get an idea of just how degenerate the city that elected our Speaker of the House has become, check out Zombie's photographic report on the Up Your Alley street fair held on July 27, sponsored in part by the ever-moonbatty Miller beer. This festive celebration of the sacrosanct gay community and lifestyle drew massive crowds out onto the streets, where they walked around naked and indulged in disgusting acts of perversion in broad daylight.
Zombie thoughtfully provides both a blurred and an uncensored version of her report. I would provide a representative sample picture, but even the blurred version is too over the top. Basically, Up Your Alley was a hardcore gay porno movie enacted with a cast of tens of thousands all day long on public streets.
Meanwhile, San Francisco is showing what it thinks of the rest of America by naming a sewage treatment plant after the President.
It's no coincidence that Obama was in San Francisco when he denounced normal Americans as bitter people who cling to guns and religion. This is the cultural capital of the liberal elite.
If moonbattery prevails, San Francisco is what we will have instead of America.
On tips from Jay Guevara, V the K, and joegosox.
Posted by Van Helsing at August 2, 2008 9:48 AM
Comments
I saw those pictures last night and let's just say I'm still fuming that something as revolting as this is allowed to happen on city streets.
And this morning, I woke up to this headline: Over 56,000 new AIDS infections each year in U.S.. GEE, I WONDER WHY!
Posted by: Anonymous at August 2, 2008 11:04 AM
The Zombietime report is unbelievable. It really makes you wonder - is there ANY limit to perversion and public depravity today, or will it go on and on and on until lesbian cannibals eat human flesh while the crowds cheer?
When I hit the picture of the guy masturbating from his apartment onto the cheering crowd below who egged him on as he ejaculated on them, I thought "that is the jumping-the-shark" moment; and then I realized I was less than half way through the set. And it kept getting worse.
Welcome to Obama's America.
Posted by: mega at August 2, 2008 11:05 AM
Maybe, if we get lucky, San FranSicko with go the way of Sodom and Gomorrah. God did it then, who's to say he won't do it now. What a lack of moral decency the degenerates have!
Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at August 2, 2008 11:06 AM
Notice how the mainstream media isn't reporting this? They want us to believe that gays are just like your average American: falls in love, wants to get married, stays faithful, and has children. Anything that runs contradictory to their agenda isn't aired on tv.
I also noticed how there were cops standing by who were doing nothing. I bet they were there just to keep out Christian protesters. And speaking of Christian protesters, where were they? Has the Church - or heck, just normal Americans with a sense of decency - completely fallen asleep?
Posted by: Anonymous at August 2, 2008 11:13 AM
Depraved and degenerate hardly describe this event. A public spectacle like this requires new words for the lexicon. San Fransodomites have crossed the line into the twisted world of Hieronymus Bosch. I don't know that divine retribution is necessary because these people are already living in hell. And the gay lobby wants us to accept this as "normal?" God save the republic!
Posted by: ~Paules at August 2, 2008 11:44 AM
Wow, the bitterness just doesn't end with you people, does it?
Have fun being angry all the time in your unimaginative, boring dead-end jobs.
Posted by: Worg at August 2, 2008 11:59 AM
Ahhhh, Worg...another provocateur visits Moonbattery. Yeah, we're just angery, narrow minded bigot homophobes who just can't see the joy and beauty of the gay lifestyle.
It's hysterical that these folks behave in the most outrageous, purposely offensive manner possible, then play the "you're intolerant" card.
The media is complicit by not showing the public the true, ugly nature of this "culture".
Posted by: matt at August 2, 2008 12:27 PM
Worg;
We are not angry nor bitter. Just disgusted at what is going on in public in an American city. There is nothing biologically sustainable nor regenerative in such behaviors.
Again, it is the public in-your-face (not meaning to make any puns) aspects of these behaviors that we have a problem with. We would not be thrilled with men and women behaving in such a manner in public, either.
Do what you wish behind closed doors, but be willing to take responsibility for the results. And don't demand our tax money to try to fix the biological damage you have done to yourselves.
Posted by: on-the-rocks at August 2, 2008 12:28 PM
Bitter? You're damn right I'm bitter. I'm watching my country degenerate into utter depravity because these disgusting behaviors are constantly being pushed down our throats (no pun intended). I see a city that trashes the Marines yet celebrates homosexual perversion. What kind of nation is this that bans the Ten Commandments in federal buildings but allows men to walk around naked and perform sex acts on public streets? The rest of my fellow conservatives may not be bitter but I do admit I am quite bitter right now.
And what does jobs have to do with anything? Do you know what each of us do for a living?
Posted by: Anonymous at August 2, 2008 12:36 PM
Worg,
Do you think that behavior is appropriate on a city street?
I don't. They are free to give all the BJs they want in the privacy of their own bedrooms or in the stalls at gay bars.
But having the right to do that clearly isn't enough. For some reason these guys have the need to be exhibitionists in the middle of the street in the middle of the day. I'll guess it's because just having the right to be gay was never the end game - they want to force the "lifestyle" into everyone's face.
Posted by: forest at August 2, 2008 12:38 PM
Worg
Is it so wrong to point out that these people act like RETARDS in public? To fools like yourself, it's all about "shock value" and "sticking it to THE MAN", but it's really just retarded.
As MEGA (And others) have asked, what will they do after we get used to THIS behavior? What will be the next level of obcenity? Remember; when you engage in "pushing the envelope", you will just make "the envelope" BIGGER and will have to top what was done before.
Posted by: KHarn at August 2, 2008 12:56 PM
No use trying to reason with Worg, folks. If he can't grasp the concept of people beimg revolted by queers' perversions, never mind them being done on a public street, he is a spiritually/morally sick individual.
Posted by: Toa at August 2, 2008 12:59 PM
Yes, I am displaying my bitterness when I condemn sodomy in public. Gee, where have I heard that word "bitter" previously applied to ordinary Americans? And by what leap of logic does my opinion lead a reader to assume that I have an unimaginative, boring, dead-end job?
Worg, take a guess; what do I do for a living? I can make an analogy to a renaissance artist to illustrate my point. The nature of virtue and the direction of public morality concern me deeply. I refer to our nation as a republic. Okay, three hints should be sufficient. What sort of boring, dead-end job keeps me occupied? C'mon, Worg, I'm calling you out.
Posted by: ~Paules at August 2, 2008 1:00 PM
Worg,
I'm a professional classical musician and I love my job and there is opportunity for growth both monetarily and in terms of professional and personal fulfillment.
I think these people are spiritually and morally depraved and are so immature and juvenile as to throw caution to the wind and not see how this tears at the fabric of society.
Could it be that YOU are merely projecting? YOU are the bitter and angry one with the dead-end job? Sounds like most of my liberal friends to a tee.
Posted by: Doug at August 2, 2008 1:27 PM
These are the same people who whine for more money to find a cure for AIDS. They can't understand why AIDS keeps spreading, After all they ARE practising safe sex, they ARE being careful. Right?
Posted by: Rick A at August 2, 2008 1:50 PM
Could it be that YOU are merely projecting? YOU are the bitter and angry one with the dead-end job?.
I agree. Major projection on display. Moonbats love to project all kinds of things.
But it's refreshing that Worg is at least honest. Most of the left-libs I have known first deny that anything like Folsom Street Fair ever happens, and when shown the pictures they insist it's a small, unrepresentative part of the gay community. But if you check the numbers, 400,000 people attend FSF every year.
Now, back in my hometown, we have a county fair that attracts a similar number of people. The people who go there may not provide a flattering picture of that community, but it is an accurate and representative one.
Posted by: V the K at August 2, 2008 2:01 PM
Did any of you NOT know that San Francisco has a large, open and flamboyant gay community? Did we really need a pornographic post on a supposedly conservative, decent and moral Website to prove it? Are any of you NOT aware that Mardi Gras festivals in New Orleans and lots of other places world wide are just as openly sexual - just not limited to homosexuals? Are San Francisco homosexuals somehow worse? Why?
Are white supremicists and other haters any more moral or any less destructive than a bunch of homosexual men indulging themselves?
Hedonists and haters would tear down what civilization has built up. But they cannot do it if decent people (a) ignore them and give them no power over our lives, and (b) are active in our churches and communities to provide a countervaiing ( indeed far more powerful) force.
Posted by: metatron at August 2, 2008 2:30 PM
Are any of you NOT aware that Mardi Gras festivals in New Orleans and lots of other places world wide are just as openly sexual
I call BS. Straight people who expose themselves at Mardi Gras get arrested. (Ever seen that episode of "Cops?") Whereas San Freakshow does not dare arrest teh Gheys at FSF for what they do in public because teh Ghey community would rally to the support of those who were arrested.
Which is what makes teh San Freakshhow Ghey Community worse... they insist that depraved behavior be allowed in public, be celebrated, and be subsidized.
And isn't teh Ghey community constantly insisting that being ghey "isn't about sex," and they want to be treated just like other people? OK, so stop having depraved sex in public and insisting that everybody else celebrate it.
If you want to be a sexual deviant, fine, just keep it private.
Posted by: V the K at August 2, 2008 2:42 PM
Moonbats somehow defend both homosexuality and Islam. I wonder what would happen to these guys if they practiced their perversions in the streets of Tehran. Oh but you see, it's their "culture" to stone gays to death! Christians in America are the REAL enemy! Christians are the intolerant ones!
Posted by: Anonymous at August 2, 2008 3:15 PM
"...teh Gheys..."
LOL- a new term is born!!! Good shot, V!
If we post this term at every opportunity, I wonder how long it will take to become mainstreamed on the other Conservative blogs...?
Posted by: Toa at August 2, 2008 3:17 PM
I find it odd that people like these, being fixated at an infantile stage of developmental growth, like to call themselves progressives when, in fact, they are little more than a life support unit for their genitals.
Posted by: IOpian at August 2, 2008 3:28 PM
metatron,
C'mon now, It's not a tradition to have semen raining down from the balconies at Mardi Gras, and I wouldn't compare the flashing of breasts to group BJs in the street either. I can deal with a little "flamboyance", but not semen showers. The moral relativism falls flat, as it always does.
And it isn't a pornographic post. You have to click to Zombies site and then go through several warnings to get to the photos, and even then you can choose the blurred out version, which I did, and I'm glad for it.
Posted by: forest at August 2, 2008 3:39 PM
Does any one wonder why, after 18 years in SF, I fled? I don’t need to go to the website and look at anything – and don’t think for a second it is exclusive to “planned events”. San Francisco is truly the cesspool of the world. That is no exaggeration, no hype, no lie, no kidding. Anyone who spends a tourist dollar there is a fool.
And to the ‘parker-type worg troll’ (or person who thought they would ‘play troll’ just to stir things up and drive up the post count); my “unimaginative, boring dead-end job” is far from boring, is anything BUT dead-end – and my imagination is what I’m paid for; and paid quite well, thank you. As compared to your utopian life of having feces on you erection, I’d say I have it made. You’re exactly why liberalism is a despised disease. You are the epitome of my favorite adjective for liberals – you are a ‘dipshit’. (And you are obviously VERY proud of it.)
Posted by: Jimbo at August 2, 2008 4:00 PM
Don't despair. They'll still all have their day in court, in the clouds.
Posted by: Corona at August 2, 2008 5:46 PM
Have fun being angry all the time in your unimaginative, boring dead-end jobs.
Worg, if you are an example of the "other side" of my career choice... I don't want any part of it. Good for you though, as I pay plenty of taxes so depraved people like you can get your gooberment handout checks! And for the record, I would be equally offended if heterosexual couples conducted themselves that way in public! It is just sickening!
...in fact, they are little more than a life support unit for their genitals.
Posted by: IOpian at August 2, 2008 3:28 PM
Oh so awesomely stated, per norm!!!
Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at August 2, 2008 6:13 PM
Oh my.
This is the same problem I have with transsexuals.
They say that they want to be looked at just as people and not for their sex or sexual preferences yet, when you talk to them, (or listen to them speak to others) it’s all about cock.
I predict this story is going to get viral. It has to. And, once the Islamo-facists get a hold of it, bad things are going to start happening in San Fran-feakshow. They have been very heads-down about their hatred of gays (at least the Muslims here in the U.S. have) so as not to jeopardize the unwavering support they get from the left but, this will drive them over the top.
It’s not to hard to imagine human bombs exploding at these gay events in the future and, while there is no excuse for the actions of murderous terrorists, who is the militant gay community going to turn to for support? The military (who they hate and mock), the police (who they hate and mock), the Republicans (who they hate and mock)? They left is not capable of helping them, just as they will not be capable of helping themselves. They only know how to make things worse.
Posted by: The Him at August 2, 2008 7:20 PM
The Him, you are completely right. On all accounts. Supporting both Muslim and homosexual agendas is like spraying a flamethrower in a room full of gunpowder. And in a fight, I think the muslim extremist will win.
Posted by: conservativeteen at August 2, 2008 9:26 PM
Are San Francisco homosexuals somehow worse? Why?
Ooh, ooh, I know. Because they're perverts? Because they're spreading disease (syphilis, gonorrohea, hepatitis B, MRSA, and, of course, AIDS)?
And because Mardi Gras celebrations are prayer meetings compared to this.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at August 2, 2008 10:13 PM
metatron, I'm not going to "ignore" this type of open behavior that's tolerated on a public City Street, in daylight, in a Major United States City, and that requires a police presence at tax payers expense.
Posted by: NH Dad at August 3, 2008 5:59 AM
"And because Mardi Gras celebrations are prayer meetings compared to this."
Posted by: Jay Guevara at August 2, 2008 10:13 PM
Well said Jay. And the "wilder participants in Mardi Gras do not try to push thier lifestyle on the rest of the country either. They exercise their freedom to be immoral, but they don't have a lobby in Congress to try to make their indecent behavior accepted as a norm for the rest of the country.
Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at August 3, 2008 6:42 AM
Somehow I have the feeling that an employment comparison between moonbats and conservative blog readers would not yield the huge windfall of superiority that moonbats keep appropriating to themselves.
Posted by: mega at August 3, 2008 7:05 AM
Supporting both Muslim and homosexual agendas is like spraying a flamethrower in a room full of gunpowder. And in a fight, I think the muslim extremist will win.
Again, I suggest simply surrendering to the Muslims. They at least still have a semblance of standards and a culture and a faith they find worth defending. What are we conservatives fighting to conserve, anyway? San Francisco? Not much left worth conserving if you ask me.
Posted by: Rob Banks at August 3, 2008 8:08 AM
Mild global warming skepticism, or at least we've-taken-this-too-far-ism, has made it to the first page of WaPo's Outlook (weekend editorials) section. Interesting. Global Warming Did It! Well, Maybe Not.
Posted by: mega at August 3, 2008 8:14 AM
OT – Very interesting read on the Black Republicans and their leader.
There are a number of great ‘one liners’ in this article, for your amusement.
Possibly, Frances Rice should get an honorable mention in the category of counter-MoonBattery?
Posted by: Oiao at August 3, 2008 10:39 AM
OT - 'nother toung-n-cheek article for a laugh.
Posted by: Oiao at August 3, 2008 10:46 AM
OT – in the category of ‘you can’t make this sh** up’ or ‘be careful what you ask for’? You decide.
Atheist Richard Dawkins blames Muslims for 'importing creationism' into classrooms
Posted by: Oiao at August 3, 2008 11:40 AM
Oiao, you are absolutely "ate up"!!! LOL!!!
Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at August 3, 2008 2:38 PM
A RELATED POST:
In days of old when knights were bold/ And “gay” was not invented,/ They went along their hidden way/ And seemed to be contented.
That bit of doggerel is simplistic, of course, but it did seem that forty years ago homosexuals seemed happier in the closet. That may not have been altogether true but prior to co-opting and misusing the word “gay,” they definitely seemed gayer than they seem today.
Perhaps gays were seething underneath, and it’s true that some may have been bullied and ridiculed, but they didn’t seem violent before the mass outings that began with the Stonewall riots in 1969. (See Parts One to Five of this continuing series.) That’s all changed today, ironically, as they push for acceptance and assimilation into general society and as they succeed more and more in that quest. Perhaps, too, since we unfortunately live in a violent world, they feel violence is the path to travel and they have moved on down that road.
(Another disclaimer is in order here. In no way do I imply that every homosexual is violent any more than I suggest all violence is gay-inspired, although it has mushroomed of late.)
Paul Cameron, Ph.D., of the Family Research Institute documents the violent behaviors that have occurred in the last few decades in his article, “Homosexuals and Violence,” http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet4.html, and on his website. Squeamish readers should be cautioned that what Cameron reports is graphic and unsettling. (Oddly, it has also been accorded little media attention.)
Incidents he relates include the case of two teen lesbians murdering a 12 year old girl, statistics on male serial killers,...
(For the rest of this article and for Parts 1-5 of this series, please see http://genelalor.com/)
Posted by: Gene Lalor at August 3, 2008 2:59 PM
Gays just want the same rights as everyone else. Right. The right to have unprotected anonymous sex on public streets, with police protection and corporate sponsorship.
Posted by: mandible claw at August 3, 2008 8:55 PM
Posted by: metatron at August 2, 2008 2:30 PM
Oh lookee, it's a lib-troll!
Did any of you NOT know that San Francisco has a large, open and flamboyant gay community?
You're dissembling. You know perfectly well that neither "large," "open" or "flamboyant" are remotely adequate to describe the events depicted in the report. You are being completely dishonest by trying to imply that conservatives have an issue with the number, openness or style of the gay community in SF. It's not like these are a bunch of sissy drag queens flouncing down main street, these are several thousand hardcore, militant homosexuals attending an organized event specifically designed to demonstrate some of the most extreme sexual behaviour around, in broad daylight and on public streets. Not to mention zombie's point that the event is sponsored by anti-AIDS groups yet not a single condom is in evidence, or to mention the risks inherent in drinking cupfuls of anonymous urine and exchanging other bodily fluids - the entire thing is a complete violation of every law concerning public decency yet it is being allowed and even supported by the authorities. Implying that anything other than those are the reasons conservatives are opposed to this kind of thing, is an outright lie.
Did we really need a pornographic post on a supposedly conservative, decent and moral Website to prove it?
Do you really think that people would become aware of the actual nature of the gay community's activities without the information being disseminated at outlets we frequent? Hell, if conservatives relied on mainstream media coverage of these type of events, we'd end up believing it was just a bunch of "open, flamboyant" gay men hanging out and swapping makeup tips. You know, exactly the type of thing you are attempting to claim this is. It's necessary for us to view the information ourselves because liberals like you are such outright liars that we'd never know what was actually going on if we didn't see it firsthand.
Are any of you NOT aware that Mardi Gras festivals in New Orleans and lots of other places world wide are just as openly sexual - just not limited to homosexuals?
Ah, no. But nice try at some more dissembling. Involvement of gay sexuality at Mardi Gras is first and foremost a celebration of gay style and gay rights - the right to dress flamboyantly in public, the right to express themselves, etc. It's about style, decoration, expression - not hardcore sex acts in public. Okay, those things happen - of course they do. They're extracurricular in nature and punished by law enforcement when they impinge on laws on public decency. That's completely different to an entire event that basically amounts to police protection for participants in a hardcore porn video made on public streets.
Are San Francisco homosexuals somehow worse? Why?
Apparently so, as evidenced by their own behaviour. You apparently don't see a difference between a festival dedicated to hardcore f*cking on the street and a style, fashion and music festival where some participants flaunt the law by engaging in sexual acts, maybe you need to re-assess.
Are white supremicists and other haters any more moral or any less destructive than a bunch of homosexual men indulging themselves?
Ahhh.. Yes, yes they are. Since first and foremost white supremacy as a concept is an issue of freedom of speech, unfortunately it's legal, unless it impinges on hate speech or other laws.
That aside, if you'd like to make an accurate, realistic comparison between the two, you'd first have to locate a white supremacy festival that's allowed to take place on public streets, and given police protection, despite countless violations of public law. Then, you might have a point when attempting to compare the two. As it is, you're simply dissembling once more, and attempting to shift the focus away from what's actually going on, onto some imaginary straw-many bogeyman that you're creating out of thin air.
Hedonists and haters would tear down what civilization has built up.
Yes, which is why we care a fig what they do in the first place, hence the attention on the festival.
But they cannot do it if decent people (a) ignore them and give them no power over our lives, and (b) are active in our churches and communities to provide a countervaiing ( indeed far more powerful) force.
Ah.. Wrong. Wrong, wrong and super-wrong. They absolutely can, and will, do it if we ignore them. Do you somehow attribute the gay rights movement to the fact that people care what gays do? Do you think that less attention would prevent hardcore gay sex festivals in public streets?
Posted by: mandible claw at August 3, 2008 9:30 PM
Is Zombie a she? I always thought he, seeing as there are often lots of 'this protestor looked hot/this protestor was not' comparisons around the photo reports.
Posted by: BURNING HOT at August 3, 2008 9:42 PM
The pictorial was enough to make me nauseous, and I was only brave enough to view the blurred version (while squinting). Nothing like wanting to puke before 7AM.
Any public display of behavior like that can simply NOT BE TOLERATED. Sorry San Franners, but it's just over the line. Seriously. I work in the TV/Radio industry and I have had several gay co-workers in the past few years. Most of them would have been appalled at this behavior. This event goes so far beyond the issue of trying to achieve acceptance of homosexuality. It delves straight into depravity, indecency, and exhibitionism. Disgusting by all accounts. No display such as that will ever get anyone any respect, no matter what the issue.
And to top it all off, the "Toilet Pig" probably didn't even have the decency to ask for a quarter in exchange for his services. Sheesh.
Posted by: Murff at August 4, 2008 5:04 AM
worg lost his dream job at the sperm bank for drinking on the job
Posted by: JamesJ at August 4, 2008 9:41 AM
My family has been living in SF since its founding. I live in the burbs just 20 min south of SF and wouldn't dare to move back. It saddens me so deeply that this is the state that SF has lowered itself to. I love the city and mourn its descent.
Posted by: Nathaniel M at August 4, 2008 11:49 AM
"worg lost his dream job at the sperm bank for drinking on the job"
I just spit my drink all over my monitor... thanks!
Posted by: Thulsa Doom at August 4, 2008 12:18 PM
That was a good one!
Have met two types of gay (and whatever else category they call themselves) types; 1) Militant San FranFreako perverts and 2) hard working low key people who are just really confused about their sexuality because of some reason (que the apologist lefty socialist to explain....).
The second group absolutely despises the minority of the first group and are generally of the opinion that the first group does Gay acceptance much more harm than it helps.
The first group absolutely despises the majority of the second group and are generally of the opinion that the second group does Gay acceptance much more harm because they are not militant about being 'special' and fighting for 'special little laws' to prove that their perversions are a legitimate rational lifestyle.
The Militant Fags use the law to convince themselves that they are normal, which everyone knows they are not.
Bring on the Fag Trolls.
Posted by: Oiao at August 4, 2008 12:41 PM
It will be interesting to see what happens when the ass munchers and the sand niggers start to butt heads.
Posted by: meh at August 5, 2008 1:33 PM
Posted by: mandible claw at August 3, 2008 9:30 PM
That is the best comment response I ever read. Fabulous! Thank you for taking the time to address each non-point metatron failed to make.
Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at August 5, 2008 6:14 PM

