« CNN Compares Palestinian Terrorists to Dalai Lama | Main | The Physical Ravages of Lifelong Moonbattery »
August 4, 2008
Norwegian Muslims Mull Death Penalty for Homosexuality
The marriage of convenience between Muslims and moonbats will soon make for a very messy divorce, as Eurabians are already starting to learn. From hyper-liberal Norway:
The Norwegian Islamic Council is still waiting for a reply from the European Fatwa Council before it decides whether or not it is in favor of the death penalty for homosexuality.
Gripes Sara Azmeh Rasmussen, "the only openly lesbian Muslim in Norway":
It's wrong of the Islamic Council to wait for the "verdict" from the fatwa council in such an important case. By not saying "no" to death penalties for gays, it shows attitudes that conflict with both democratic and humanitarian values.
They also conflict with moonbat "values," which will be a dim memory when Europe becomes Islamized, an irreversible process made possible by the same sort of liberal fools who consider "homophobia" the ultimate crime.
On the positive side, at least we won't be seeing any Up Your Alley festivals in the Norway of the future. It's a little cold for them up there anyway.
On a tip from Oiao.
Posted by Van Helsing at August 4, 2008 8:35 PM
Comments
To my fellow Christian-minded conservatives interested in the topic of Islam and its takeover of the West, I heartily recommend the book AntiChrist: Islam's Awaited Messiah. I just finished it and it was quite sobering.
Posted by: Anonymous at August 4, 2008 8:52 PM
The whole issue is sobering. In a world where liberal "progressives" won't even allow a reasonable debate on (for example) whether lesbians or homosexuals can be Boy and Girl Scout leaders, it's perfectly acceptable for Moslems to consider capitol punishment for being gay (and I have a feeling it wouldn't be by humane "leathal injection" either).
Moslem culture hates the west, hates infidels, is just biding it's time and when they have the numbers, all those "civil rights" that they throw in our faces (here in the U.S.) will be thrown out the window and sharia law will take over.
Charlemagne had the right idea...drive 'em back to Africa at the point of a sword. Unfortunately, there is no Charlemagne today. They may, in fact, win this time, thanks in no small part to liberal "progressives" and the "tolerance" crowd.
Posted by: matt at August 4, 2008 10:06 PM
Its finally reaching the boiling point. Next gay pride parade, the muslims might try to make a point. An explosive, deadly point.
Posted by: conservativeteen at August 4, 2008 11:20 PM
Good point on the Up Your Smelly public fornication fest - did any Muslim groups complain about the decadence happening at their doorsteps?
Posted by: BURNING HOT at August 4, 2008 11:50 PM
Nah, they'll wait until they have larger numbers in the U.S. before they start publicly denouncing and protesting the gay events. Gotta keep the liberals on their side.
According to Wikipedia, 1.8% of Norway is Muslim. America isn't far behind with 1%. France is between 6.9-10% and the country that experience the ridiculous cartoon protests, the Netherlands, is between 5.5-6%. Apparently once a country nears 2% and beyond, the Muslims get rather vocal.
Posted by: Anonymous at August 5, 2008 12:35 AM
http://heretical.com/ofarrell/index.html
Posted by: Anonymous at August 5, 2008 1:02 AM
Anon 1:02am: We're not into your Nazi crap. Take it somewhere else.
Posted by: Anonymous at August 5, 2008 1:46 AM
Speaking of lesbians, Why do liberal Hollywood actors all look like old lesbians?. Al Franken. Tim Robbins. Warren Beatty. Roger Ebert.
Posted by: V the K at August 5, 2008 4:04 AM
Eventually, gay/metrosexual/pussified liberals will, of course, seek refuge and protection from sharia-imposing Moslem killers. Who will they go to for that protection? We who are armed and still capable of putting up a fight. And we will gladly provide the protection, as we always have. We will sacrifice everything so that the frieks can have oral sex with each other on the streets in public. They will thank us by writing editorials about how there's too much violence and how we need to understand the root causes of our enemies' anger.
Posted by: mega at August 5, 2008 5:24 AM
>>By not saying "no" to death penalties for gays, it shows attitudes that conflict with both democratic and humanitarian values.>>
No! REALLY?
I hope you have your bags packed, honey. Don't wait for the decision, just start running!
Posted by: KHarn at August 5, 2008 6:35 AM
Speaking of Moslems imposing sharia law, Tyson Foods has just dumped the Labor Day vacation and replaced it with Eid al-Fitr. Yeah it's as mind-bogglingly sickening as it sounds. Right here in the US, no need to go to Norway.
Posted by: mega at August 5, 2008 6:42 AM
If you read the article, the change in holidays wasn't because some lily livered librul was demanding it.
"Tyson company spokeswoman Libby Lawson said by phone that, "This isn't a religious accommodation, this is a contractual agreement. The majority asked for it.""
700 of the 1200 workers were Muslims. They asked for it in their contract. Are you suggesting the minority should have had their way, or are you suggesting that the government or judiciary should get involved to put a stop to it? Either way, those seem like the kind of solutions "libruls" would be asking for.
Posted by: bt at August 5, 2008 7:05 AM
bt, I'm saying that the U.S. better take the stand...and fast...that Islam isn't a legitimate religion. It's a terror/death cult ("We love death more than you love life") and has no place in civilized society.
Oh, there will be some yelling from our "Allies" like France and Germany. Big deal. In less than 10 years, they will cease to exist as the countries we know...and we could be next if we let the Moslems set their agenda. "Civil rights" only works one way with The Religion Of Peace: for them. YOUR civil rights will consist of having the chance to convert to Islam or die as an infidel.
Allah'u Akbar, baby.
Posted by: matt at August 5, 2008 10:46 AM
How do you propose we defeat 1 billion people? If they are, in fact, our enemy simply by being muslim, not radical muslim, but muslim, how are going to stop them from "setting their agenda"?
Posted by: bt at August 5, 2008 2:03 PM
bt, I think Charlemagne had the right idea, for starters. Forget this radical BS, it is MOSLEMS period that have it in for us..."us" being non-Moslems, and the west in particular.
No, not every Moslem will strap a bomb to his chest or drive a plane into a building. But there will be no outcry, no "let's all stand up and condemn this WITHOUT qualification". Never. Not ever.
I have a very ugly saying "You don't negotiate with cancer." (Well, you can have one lung and some lymph glands. Will you promise not to attack any other organs? Promise?)
I wish it were otherwise, I wish we could "all just get along"...but the reality is, this "religion" is a politically driven Terror Cult, and even the "non-terrorist" among them still want Islam to be the one and only religion, lifestyle and theocratic political movement on the planet. Now what do YOU think we should do? YOU DON'T NEGOTIATE WITH CANCER.
If people realize their lives, religion, country and freedom are truly at stake...really TRULY in danger of extinction...they'll know what to do. With the will of the people behind you, one can marginalize even a billion people. It won't be pretty. The consequences of not doing anything will be a lot worse.
Posted by: matt at August 5, 2008 4:54 PM
I just remembered this exchange from a movie called "The Stranger" with Orson Welles:
"I can't imagine you advocating a Carthaginian peace!"
"Well, as a historian, I must remind you that the world hasn't heard much from Carthage in the last two thousand years."
Posted by: matt at August 5, 2008 5:07 PM
Hey Matt,
Posted by: Oiao at August 5, 2008 5:35 PM
Matt, assuming I agree with your premise that all Muslims are the enemy (I don't), I still am unsure as to what the solution would be. Oiao's post of the "Mitchum Solution" seems, well... impossible, as the extermination of a sixth of the world's population would seem to have rather dire ramifications.
I wonder, too, if we had used the "Mitchum Solution" on say Germany in WW2, wiped them from the face of the earth, how would the world look right now? I know if we had used it on Japan, my Cubs would be without a right fielder right now.
I may eventually be convinced that the entire Muslim world is out to get me (for now, none of my Muslim friends have threatened to cut my head off), but even if that is the case, I'm not sure how dealing with them would be different than we have dealt with the USSR in the past or China currently.
Posted by: bt at August 6, 2008 8:18 AM

