« BHO Complains That New Yorker Cover Is Offensive to Muslims | Main | AP Films Snuff Video for Taliban »

Someone should tell the Saudis that violence is incompatible with Islam:

They assert that unbelievers, such as Christians, Jews, and Muslims who do not share Wahhabi beliefs and practices, are hated "enemies." Global jihad as an "effort to wage war against the unbelievers" is also promoted in the Ministry's textbooks.

Hey v. that's just what Martin Luther said abou the Jews!

So, i guess the Archbishop of Cnterbury isn't a real Christian either. He's not nearly hateful enough.

He's right that the concept of the Holy Trinity offends Islam. Associating anyone or anything with Allah is considered to be shirk, the very worst sin in Islam.

So obviously he knows Islam is utterly incompatible with Christianity. The only thing that will suffice is unconditional surrender. Maybe that's what he has in mind.

When will you people stop fighting about your silly Gods????? You are all wrong.

Anony, tell that to the muslims. See how far you get.

This might be a good time to just ignore the troll for a while. Obviously, he's got some sort of ax to grind against religion, and is incapable of being reasonable on the topic. So, any attempt to engage him would be a waste of time.

Wouldn't you think that someone appointed to a religion's highest office would, I don't know, FOLLOW THE RELIGION HE LEADS? Actually adhere to scriptural teachings and church doctrine? It's one thing to "modernize" church practices, like allowing services to be conducted in the local dialect instead of Latin, or things of that nature. It's quite another to go completely against the core beliefs of the church.

If you don't like the doctrine of a particular religion, that's fine. The correct action in that case is to leave that church and join one that is more in line with your own beliefs. Rowan Williams has no business leading the Church of England, and if he is at all a man of faith he should resign, on the grounds that his own beliefs are incompatible with the teachings of the church he is charged with leading.

"If you don't like the doctrine of a particular religion, that's fine. The correct action in that case is to leave that church and join one that is more in line with your own beliefs."

Unless you're Muslim, in which case this might get you killed.

The Anglican Communion may be on the verge of a split. The Anglicans who are fed up with Williams dhimmitude are on the verge of walking out.

I don't think the church is really "splitting," so much as I think real Christians want a real church --- and not a dhimmified PC daycare centre and gay dating service.

The church is grasping at straws, because it's on it's way out...

No, V, Anony has an ax to grind against Christianity specifically. Though, yes, he is completely incapable of being reasonable, tolerant, or even remotely polite on the subject, so engaging him is indeed a complete waste of time. That's why I stopped debating him on it several days ago.

The left doesn't debate. They "feel." And they "feel" much more strongly than you do which makes them right and you wrong.

End of subject.

Note: Any attempted continuation of the subject will cause the lefty to sling ad hominem attacks until you give up. That's one thing in which they don't believe in surrender.

He needs an eyebrow wax and probably has the same ugly hairs growing out of his nose and ears..

Once again it is illustrated that Moslems have "long eyes". They have patience, and if it takes 500 years, so be it. Attrition is a powerful weapon for them.

The "moderate" Moslems in our society today are simply less proactive about their methods as their more radical brethren. But don't doubt for a minute their desire for an all-Islamic world.

And you know what? That's fair enough. Christians want the same thing. Big difference is, Christians are putting their trust in God to do it in his own time. Yes, they proselytize and spread the word, but they don't slaughter anyone specifically because that person isn't a believer. The worst you'll get from a Christian is "...and when you die, you'll end up in Hell." Again, fair enough...it's between you and God. Big difference between that and "Jihad", no? (Not asking Anon, since we KNOW what he would say.)

Freedom to belong to a religion in this country does not mean we have to adopt the "values" of other religions, or in this case a Bronze Age terror cult. We're firmly based on Jewish and Christian fundamentals. It must stay that way or we will descend into chaos. Look at Beirut if you don't believe me.

Once again, Islam is not a religion but a Terror Cult. No one in the U.S. had anything against Moslems until they started trying to destroy us simply because of what we are. That they cannot exist within any civil society is now very obvious. We can't afford to keep "embracing" them for "diversity" and end up like Belgium or France.

This type of dilemma for moonbats has been detailed here before. They cannot push depravity AND kiss the collective behinds of Islamo-Fascists indefinitely.

To paraphrase Capt. Renault:

"I am shocked, SHOCKED, to learn that Christianity is offensive to Islam!"

It's official. The entirety of England has lost it's fucking collective mind. How in the 9 hells can the people of England stand for this anymore. Where are in world are the true men of England. Oh, I know they are wasting away in pubs and being cuckold by their nanny-state. It was good knowing you big brothers. RIP England.

You beat me to it, Asmodeus. Are we (collectively, since I don't live in G.B.) EVER going to be rid of this moronic Moonbat? Like Henry II, perhaps my off-the-cuff remark will send a trio of knights to slay the offensive Thomas a Becket (believe me, I'm not comparing this idiot Williams with Becket!).

Best way this could happen, of course, is for the Archbishop's best buds, the Islamonazis, to tire of his rants on their behalf (to them, he may actually be a little too "in your face") and behead him, at Canterbury (where else?). Only problem is, would his successor be even worse?