« The Amendment That Separates Citizens from Subjects | Main | Anorexic Sues Cooking Show »
July 3, 2008
Alleged "Man" Thomas Beatie Gives Birth
Transsexual freakazoid Thomas Beatie has given birth.
Despite the name and the media's obsequious use of masculine pronouns, Beatie is like every other mother in the history of mammals in that she is a female. Nonetheless, Roto-Reuters reports that she "became a man 10 years ago." From the MSM's point of view, the birth must constitute a miracle — possibly even moonbattery's depraved answer to the Virgin Birth.
The proud parent won't be breast-feeding her bundle of joy because, "He [sic] has had his [sic] breasts surgically removed."
Beatie is described as "thinly bearded" due to having deformed herself chemically as well as surgically, with assistance from an alarmingly amoral medical profession. In Oregon she is legally recognized as being married to another woman.
Moonbattery is turning our culture into an obscene cross between a freak show and a horror movie.
On a tip from PabloD.
Posted by Van Helsing at July 3, 2008 8:32 PM
Comments
why is it still referred to as a male, its a female with an awful paint job and some panels replaced.
it wasn't changed at the genetic level.
Posted by: furballz at July 3, 2008 9:25 PM
Which one is the man?
Posted by: Kristy at July 3, 2008 9:28 PM
I always thought this kind of stuff was just a bit too "Jerry Springer-esque" for Oprah. I'm sure she is in full support of her...errr....his...it's pregnancy, and is probably going to donate a house or something.
The thought of this person giving birth makes me almost as queasy as Oprah does.
Posted by: mikey777 at July 3, 2008 9:39 PM
That poor kid is gonna have a lot of issues
Posted by: conservativeteen at July 3, 2008 10:41 PM
"Deformed herself?" Is a hermaphrodite a "her?"
Posted by: Gene Lalor at July 3, 2008 10:57 PM
I'm sorry, but since a "he" doesn't menstruate, carry, or deliver babies, it is more of a "she" than a "he", no matter what anyone says...... And that kid WILL be screwed up.
Posted by: cwchute at July 4, 2008 3:05 AM
Which one's Oprah?
Posted by: Archonix at July 4, 2008 7:39 AM
If IT is such a paragon of progressyve ideals, then why doesn't ORpah employ IT as a surrogate for her own child? She could prove to the world that she is more than just empty hypocritical rhetoric. Oh wait...
Posted by: Doug at July 4, 2008 8:12 AM
"Which one's Oprah"?
Posted by: Archonix at July 4, 2008 7:39 AM
The one projecting the "Hope and Change Aura"???
This is more proof that moonbats only have "values" if they have shock potential.
Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at July 4, 2008 9:11 AM
Seems perfectly normal and OK to me.
Had you going there for a minute, didn't I?
Posted by: Jay Guevara at July 4, 2008 10:03 AM
Which one's the freak?
Posted by: Arcticman Speaks! at July 4, 2008 10:18 AM
I would say something, but I don't want to get locked into a huge back-and-forth like I did over my views on "Jazz", the kind who's parents twisted his "gender identity".
This article speaks for itself. God help that kid.
Posted by: matt at July 4, 2008 11:37 AM
Is the freak's head tiny, or is Oprah's huge?
Posted by: Gaffers at July 4, 2008 5:33 PM
Jeez, Gaffers...now that you mention it...
Posted by: matt at July 5, 2008 12:59 AM
Gaffers, I think you're right on both counts...
And, when Oprah's in a picture with someone else, denoting one of them as "the freak" only adds to the confusion.
Posted by: PabloD at July 5, 2008 9:08 AM
Ah, finally...a Caucasion "father" "Liberals" can respect and hold up as an example...
Posted by: Toa at July 7, 2008 12:42 PM
