moonbattery.gif


« Baltimore Bureauweenie Compares Plastic Bags with Holocaust | Main | Profiles in Countermoonbattery: Gina Elise »


May 1, 2008

Hollyweird Spits Up Yet Another Anti-War Movie

Failure after failure after failure is no reason for Tinseltown to stop cranking out one anti-war movie after another. By now it's obvious the glitterpigs aren't even trying to make money. They just want to demoralize our troops and bask in the approval they lavish on each other for being obnoxious and seditious.

The latest is War, Inc., featuring the squishy, damp little mollusk John Cusack, who shares his political wisdom:

(The movie) was just a reaction to the war and all the insanity behind using the 9/11 attacks to make an imperial land grab in the Middle East. We really wanted to channel our outrage a little bit into something creative.

Journalists, college professors, and Arab terrorists will love War, Inc.. Normal Americans will ignore it, just like they ignored Stop Loss, Redacted, Rendition, Lions for Lambs, In the Valley of Elah, Badland, and Cusack's previous anti-American flop, Grace Is Gone.

Grace is gone, all right. So are patriotism, decency, and a post–junior high understanding of what's going on in the world — from Tinseltown, anyway. Unfortunately the money isn't gone, and until it is they will keep right on rubbing their diminishing audience's faces in enemy propaganda.

john-cusack.jpg
Outraged by America.

Hat tip: NewsBusters; on a tip from Cheetah.

Posted by Van Helsing at May 1, 2008 8:12 PM

Comments

No doubt people like John Cusack want Obama to win so their horrendous flops will be subsidized by the government.

Posted by: conservativeteen at May 1, 2008 8:30 PM

No, Patriotism isn't gone. It's only gone from Hollyweird. Us real Americans still know right from wrong. Check out this site...

http://www.pinupsforvets.com/index.html

All the cash goes to help wounded veterans...

Plus, she's hot, and it'd be a great calendar on yer wall :)

Posted by: Hiram at May 1, 2008 8:47 PM

Well, some of us have traveled the world to protect the USA, and I've lost many friends in that goal. None of them would have had it any other way, regardless of the outcome.

I will not resort to the gutteral words that come to mind over the worthless opinions of hollywierd creations..........

I'm proud to serve and am sworn to defend the constitution of the United States of America.

What these idiots constantly forget is, I and every other defender of thier freedom(s), are sworn to the constituion, not bush, or Hillibeast (if elected), or Osama Obama (if elected) or McLame (if elected)!

If I see John on the street during my next visit to his neck of CA, I will (in the words of Hank Williams JR) spit some Beech Nut in his eye.

Posted by: Oiao at May 1, 2008 8:48 PM

It makes you wonder, doesn't it?

Islamoterrorists attacked (or attempted to attack) symbols of American economic (WTC), political (White House) and military power (Pentagon).

So what's left? How about cultural power? The symbol for which would be...Hollywood, right?

Plus the fact that Hollywood is chock-a-block with Jews and homosexuals, not two of the Muslims' favorite groups.

If I were in Hollywood (!), I'd think twice about attending the Academy Awards. What better target to a) hit at a symbol of American cultural hegemony, b) kill a bunch of Jews and homosexuals, and c) make an enormous splash, all at the same time.

But apparently Hollywood's denizens haven't figured this out.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 1, 2008 9:07 PM

Well, at least Ian from EUSSR has some reasons to celebrate tonight - in his country, the Moonbat party is taking a hell of a shellacking.

Cheers Ian!

Posted by: Rob Banks at May 1, 2008 10:35 PM

Who cares? There's Iron Man to watch!

Minor spoiler: Tony Stark gets blasted by his own company's weapons used by mujahideen (actual, uncensored Afghan and imported terrorists!).

Tony Stark escapes by building a robot suit and killing said mujahideen.

Tony Stark has an epiphany and wants to turn his company away from making weapons of war.

Anti-war hippie film? Not quite.

Tony Stark puts on new robot suit and kill more mujahideen.

Now that's what people wanna see!

Posted by: BURNING HOT at May 2, 2008 1:10 AM

I can't wait for that movie to flop. Hopefully, enough flops will cause them to learn their lesson eventually and make films the people want to see.
Jay Guevara, I heard somewhere that many terrorist groups actually use footage from American films and the Oscars' Red Carpet to promote hatred of America, by using them to show how decadent, materialistic, and immoral America has become. Doing this reinforces their belief that America is in need of either forced conversion to Islam or complete annihilation.
Burning Hot, good point. I can't wait to see Iron Man tomorrow night, to watch him lay the smack- down on some Jihadi scumbags. I loved the scene in the trailer where he comes out of the cave wearing his clunky original Iron Man suit, the terrorists are all spraying their assault rifles at him, but the bullets just bounce right off him while the legendary Black Sabbath song is playing in the background. The movie's already getting some really good reviews.
btw, for anyone else planning on seeing it, after it's over, stay through the closing credits, I've heard there's a secret ending at the end of them that's pretty cool.

Posted by: Adam at May 2, 2008 4:35 AM

Iron Man will score huge bucks, while War Inc. will flop badly - not as bad as REDACTED, but close enough. Of course, once its released in enemy territory it will likely make some money. The HOLLYWOOD sign should be replace with "MUZZIE-WOOD". Since it produces movies that give muzzies a woody.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 2, 2008 5:42 AM

Saw Iron Man at the midnight showing. It rocked, and I wasn't even a fan of the comic series. And yes, stay afterwards to the very end (post credits) as its got a nice surprise (essentially, a spoiler for another Marvel-based movie involving several of their heroes to be produced sometime soon).

Posted by: Brooklyn Red Leg at May 2, 2008 5:51 AM

How about replacing HOLLYWOOD sign with HOLLYWEIRD using sheet with replacement letters. If the envirowackos can manage things like that Im sure someone else could do it. Keep it up at least long enough for photos to be taken of it.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 2, 2008 5:53 AM

Results for STOP-LOSS aka BIG LOSSES !! Losses arent stopping!

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=stoploss.htm

Its losing $15 million right now.

Posted by: Anonymous at May 2, 2008 7:02 AM

Hate John Cusack or Love him,
Better off Dead was pretty damn funny.
16 candles wasn't too bad either.
The only thing is I can't tell the difference between him and his sister Joan. Kinda like MJ and his sister.
One thing is for certain, John Cusack is no John Wayne. They always play the same character in every movie the are in, only polar opposites.
Cusack the big pussy, and Wayne the big bad ass.

Posted by: UCA at May 2, 2008 7:52 AM

"TWO DOLLARS!!! I WANT MY TWO DOLLARS!"

Posted by: ttevolla at May 2, 2008 8:07 AM

Great line,
I especially like the 68' Camaro and the guy that snorts snow.

Posted by: UCA at May 2, 2008 9:31 AM

I have an old Laserdisc version of Better Off Dead. The $2 paperboy kid was comic genious. And the homemade space shuttle made from vacuum cleaner parts going thru the roof at the end! And he dream at the diner about Franken-burger coming to life. LOL!

Posted by: Anonymous at May 2, 2008 9:32 AM

We got involved in WWI by sending a passenger ship, loaded with ammunition, into a war zone. We entered WWII after we aided Japan's enemies and then let them kill all our men in Pearl Harbour; you can't stage a surprise attack with an entire fleet. We entered Vietnam after a killing the South Vietnamese president and then staging a PT incident. I'll leave it up to you to figure out how we got into the I war. It's not just about.money. It's about power.

Posted by: t at May 2, 2008 12:37 PM

Prove it, t.

Oh wait, I forgot that Liberals NEVER provide proof. Stuff like "burden of proof" and other CONSTITUTIONNAL RIGHTS are beyond their comprehention.
So sorry to bother you with the burdens of a FREE SOCIETY.

Posted by: KHarn at May 2, 2008 1:35 PM

"No doubt people like John Cusack want Obama to win so their horrendous flops will be subsidized by the government."

Not to mentioned required viewing in public schools.

Posted by: NudeGayWhalesForJesus at May 2, 2008 1:39 PM

And as always, just ignore the troll libs. Every time they cough of a hairball of made up info, they, for some reason, expect people to believe them. They learn this trick from their college profs.

Posted by: NudeGayWhalesForJesus at May 2, 2008 1:41 PM

No wait, on second thought, there are some things that bother me. Since you seem to "know the REAL history", maybe you can answer this:

FACT: The RMS Lusitania was sunk in 1915.
FACT: The United State Congress declaired war on the Central Powers in 1917.
QUESTION: Why did they wait TWO YEARS if there was a conspiracy?

FACT: A foreign military force needs only to fire on soverign territory to constitute an "act of war". (Look it up)
FACT: You do not need a military disaster to declair war. There does not even have to be any casualtys or damage for it to be an "act of aggression". (Look it up)
FACT: You don't WANT a military disaster at the start of a war.
FACT: Several US Navy and civilian ships had been sunk by Germany BEFORE December, 1941.
FACT: There were several other targets that US intelligence officers said MIGHT be hit, Pearl Harbor was one.
FACT: The Japanese hit more than HALF of those targets.
FACT: The intercepted messages to the Japanes embasy DID NOT tell which base was to be attacked (As many people like you belive) or when. It did not even include a declaration of war! It contained only more accusations, demands and the cutting off of diplomatic relations.
QUESTION: If the Japanese were "tricked" into attacking, wouldn't it have been better to be on the alert to hurt the enemy and save as many men and material as possible, rather than letting them come in unopposed? This would have been easy to do, since there had been SEVERAL alerts and drills months before the attack and the effect of an unprovoked attack would have been the same.

Now ask yourself this: if they lied to you about those conspiracy theorys, what OTHER conspiracy theories have you been lied to about?

To paraphrase you own words, "It's not about TRUTH, it's about power".

Posted by: KHarn at May 2, 2008 1:59 PM

Pardon me NudeGayWhalesForJesus, my last post was directed at "t". I like to dump a lot of facts on trolls (When I have them), it's funny to watch steam come out of their ears.

Posted by: KHarn at May 2, 2008 2:02 PM

I'm just reading "A Conservative History of the American Left," by Daniel J. Flynn.

A very illuminating read.

Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 2, 2008 5:21 PM

He's an ASS. Deport him. I've been saying that alot today.

Posted by: Oiao at May 2, 2008 6:11 PM

Outstanding work Kharn.
t definitely needs a history lesson. Not to mention the Lusitania wasn't even an American ship. There were only about 150 Americans on it.

Posted by: UCA at May 3, 2008 12:32 PM

I am not a liberal troll. I visit this site daily and agree with all but it's support of American imperialism. I will review the points mentioned above.

Posted by: t at May 4, 2008 11:51 AM